Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Proof of concept study to assess the differential effects of chronic beta-blockade (celiprolol versus bisoprolol) on cardiopulmonary outcomes at rest and during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2015-000207-13
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    30 Apr 2019

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    25 Jun 2021
    First version publication date
    25 Jun 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    2012RC22
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02380053
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Dundee - NHS Tayside
    Sponsor organisation address
    Residency Block, Level 3, Ninewells Hospital, George Pirie Way, Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
    Public contact
    General Enquiries, Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, +44 1382 383902, scrr@dundee.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    General Enquiries, Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, +44 1382 383902, scrr@dundee.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    30 Apr 2019
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    30 Apr 2019
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    30 Apr 2019
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the relative effects on heart and lung (airway) responses at rest and during exercise following beta-blocker treatment with bisoprolol versus celiprolol in COPD patients.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The Sponsor carried out a study risk assessment before issuing approval. The study was approved by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) (Ref: 15/ES/0102) and full informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants were checked against all inclusion and exclusion criteria and were only included if their COPD was stable; those with a low blood pressure or heart rate were not included. A medically-qualified person confirmed the participant’s suitability to receive the study drug according to the study protocol. Participants were given a paper diary card, PiKO device and pulse oximeter for daily a-home monitoring of their lung function, heart rate and oxygen saturation. The beta-blockers (IMP) were given by slowly escalating the dose during each treatment period. Initial beta-blocker dosing started at a low dose and was titrated up halfway through each treatment period. Participants were contacted when they were due to increase their beta-blocker dose and the following items assessed: symptoms attributable to beta-blocker therapy, FEV1, and heart rate. If these were satisfactory, participants progressed to the higher beta-blocker dose for the remainder of the treatment period. Participants were contacted again within 1 week of increasing their dose to repeat the checks. Participants intolerant of higher beta-blockers doses returned to their previous maximum tolerated dose for the remainder of the treatment period. Participants unable to tolerate the minimum beta-blocker dose were withdrawn. Participants were given an instruction leaflet with information on how to measure their lung function, heart rate and oxygen saturation, how to complete their diary cards, potential side effects of study drugs, and how to record adverse events and concomitant medications. Participants were given an out-of-hours mobile number carried by medical staff for advice if they encountered any adverse effects.
    Background therapy
    Subjects remained on their usual COPD medications. The IMP was given in addition to their standard treatments.
    Evidence for comparator
    Beta-blockers are underused in COPD despite evidence for reducing mortality from cardiovascular comorbidities. Beta-blockers are pharmacologically heterogeneous and the study was designed to assess the clinical consequences of different beta-blockers in COPD. Bisoprolol (BIS) is a beta-1 selective antagonist that may cause bronchoconstriction due to dose related beta-2 blockade. Celiprolol (CEL) is a beta-1 selective antagonist which also exhibits partial beta-2 agonist activity. The study assessed the relative effects of both BIS and CEL in COPD patients to establish whether the proposed benefits on survival with beta-blockers in COPD are reflected in improved cardiovascular and respiratory response to exercise and exercise tolerance.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    07 Jun 2016
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 20
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    20
    EEA total number of subjects
    20
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    5
    From 65 to 84 years
    15
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Subject recruitment began 7 June 2016 and the study completed on 30 April 2019. Of the 20 patients screened, 14 were randomised and 11 completed per protocol and were included in the final analysis.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Males and females, 40-80 years, stable COPD (GOLD stage 2/3), post-SABA FEV1 30-80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio <70%, no exacerbation in the last month, no hospitalisation for exacerbation in the last 3 months, ≥ 10 pack-years; O2 sats ≥ 92% on room air, sinus rhythm on ECG, average resting systolic BP ≥ 110 mmHg, average resting HR ≥ 55 bpm.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    20
    Number of subjects completed
    14 [1]

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Consent withdrawn by subject: 1
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Elective Intervention Scheduled: 1
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Did Not meet Inclusion Criteria: 4
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the pre-assignment period is not consistent with the number starting period 1. It is expected that the number completing the pre-assignment period are also present in the arms in period 1.
    Justification: 14 subjects completed run-in and attended a baseline visit. This is a cross-over study where subjects participate in both arms during the course of the study. Bisoprolol arm - 11 patients received at least 1 dose and are counted as participants in this arm. Celiprolol arm - 13 subjects received at least 1 dose and are counted as participants in this arm. 11 subjects completed both arms of this cross-over trial and were able to be analysed.
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bisoprolol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Bisoprolol 2.5 mg OD for 2 weeks, followed by 5 mg OD for 2 weeks.

    Arm title
    Celiprolol (CEL)
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Celiprolol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Celiprolol 200 mg OD for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg OD for 2 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Started
    11
    13
    Completed
    11
    11
    Not completed
    0
    2
         IMP Not Tolerated
    -
    2

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups [1]
    Reporting group title
    Overall Trial
    Reporting group description
    -

    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period is not equal to the worldwide number of subjects enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The worldwide number enrolled is the number of subjects screened into the study (20). The number of subjects in the baseline period is the number who were randomised into the study (14). Of these 14 subjects, 11 completed both arms of the cross-over trial and were able to be analysed.
    Reporting group values
    Overall Trial Total
    Number of subjects
    14 14
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    5 5
        From 65-84 years
    9 9
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    69.64 ( 7.14 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    5 5
        Male
    9 9

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Celiprolol (CEL)
    Reporting group description
    -

    Subject analysis set title
    Completed Subjects
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    11 subjects who completed both arms of the study per protocol

    Primary: Inspiratory Capacity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Inspiratory Capacity
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Inspiratory Capacity was measured at baseline (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    2.05 (1.72 to 2.38)
    1.77 (1.42 to 2.12)
    Statistical analysis title
    Inspiratory Capacity
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.42
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Primary: DH, dynamic hyperinflation; at exercise isotime 4min

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    DH, dynamic hyperinflation; at exercise isotime 4min
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    -0.42 (-0.61 to -0.23)
    -0.67 (-1.12 to -0.23)
    Statistical analysis title
    Dynamic Hyperinflation
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.52
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Borg Score (Breathing)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Borg Score (Breathing)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Borg Score (Breathing) was measured at baseline (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: units
        geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
    6.3 (4.8 to 8.1)
    6.6 (5.2 to 8.2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Borg Breathlessness
    Statistical analysis description
    Peak Borg score breathlessness*
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.72
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Heart Rate recovery over 3 min n=10

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Heart Rate recovery over 3 min n=10
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Heart Rate was measured at baseline (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: beats/min
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    6.7 (5.3 to 8.0)
    4.6 (3.5 to 5.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    Heart rate recovery
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.02
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Cardiac Output Peak heart rate

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Cardiac Output Peak heart rate
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Cardiac Output was measured at baseline (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: L/min
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    102 (96 to 109)
    104 (99 to 108)
    Statistical analysis title
    Heart rate
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak VO2, oxygen uptake

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak VO2, oxygen uptake
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1.21 (1.00 to 1.42)
    1.24 (1.02 to 1.45)
    Statistical analysis title
    Oxygen uptake
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.71
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak VE, minute ventilation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak VE, minute ventilation
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres/minute
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    48.2 (41.0 to 55.4)
    48.3 (41.0 to 55.6)
    Statistical analysis title
    Minute ventilation
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.31
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak RR, respiratory rate

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak RR, respiratory rate
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Breaths/min
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    34 (30 to 38)
    31 (28 to 34)
    Statistical analysis title
    Respiratory rate
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.053
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak O2 Sats*, oxygen saturations

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak O2 Sats*, oxygen saturations
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    97 (90 to 98)
    97 (91 to 99)
    Statistical analysis title
    Oxygen saturations
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.6
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: BR, breathing reserve at peak exercise

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    BR, breathing reserve at peak exercise
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1.1 (-7.8 to 10.0)
    -3.5 (-14.3 to 7.2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Breathing reserve
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.25
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Total exercise time (min)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Total exercise time (min)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    6.5 (4.5 to 8.5)
    7.2 (5.4 to 8.9)
    Statistical analysis title
    Total exercise time
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.83
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak Borg score leg discomfort*

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak Borg score leg discomfort*
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units
        geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
    17 (15.8 to 18.3)
    17.4 (16.1 to 18.8)
    Statistical analysis title
    Borg Leg Discomfort
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.16
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percentage of predicted
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    52 (45 to 59)
    52 (45 to 59)
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.9
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: FVC, forced vital capacity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FVC, forced vital capacity
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percentage of predicted
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    102 (87 to 117)
    100 (88 to 112)
    Statistical analysis title
    FVC
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.59
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Relaxed vital capacity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Relaxed vital capacity
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percentage of predicted
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    108 (93 to 124)
    109 (96 to 121)
    Statistical analysis title
    Relaxed VC
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.99
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity ratio

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity ratio
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    47.7 (43.3 to 52.0)
    49.6 (44.8 to 54.3)
    Statistical analysis title
    RV/TLC ratio
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.06
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: R5*, resistance at 5 Hertz

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    R5*, resistance at 5 Hertz
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
    144 (124 to 167)
    163 (149 to 179)
    Statistical analysis title
    R5
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.04
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Ax*, reactance at 5 Hertz

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Ax*, reactance at 5 Hertz
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Kilopascals/Litre
        geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1.98 (1.24 to 2.73)
    2.44 (1.74 to 3.13)
    Statistical analysis title
    Ax
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.004
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Oxygen pulse

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Oxygen pulse
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: millilitres per beat
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    11.7 (9.8 to 13.5)
    11.6 (10.0 to 13.3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Oxygen pulse
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Peak mean arterial blood pressure

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Peak mean arterial blood pressure
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: millimetres of mercury
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    106 (91 to 120)
    106 (93 to 120)
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean arterial blood pressure
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.03
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Cardiac Outcomes Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor -peak cardiac output

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Cardiac Outcomes Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor -peak cardiac output
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres/minute
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    11.2 (9.7 to 12.8)
    10.4 (9.4 to 11.4)
    Statistical analysis title
    Cardiac output
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.7
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Cardiac Outcomes Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor - Peak Stroke Volume, n=10

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Cardiac Outcomes Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor - Peak Stroke Volume, n=10
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: millilitres/beat
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    122 (102 to 142)
    105 (96 to 113)
    Statistical analysis title
    Stroke volume
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.003
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Oxygen saturations (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Oxygen saturations (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    95 (94 to 96)
    95 (94 to 96)
    Statistical analysis title
    Oxygen saturations
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.97
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes -oxygen saturations (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes -oxygen saturations (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Percent
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    94 (93 to 96)
    95 (94 to 96)
    Statistical analysis title
    Oxygen saturations
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.35
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Heart rate (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Heart rate (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Beats per minute
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    67 (62 to 72)
    73 (68 to 77)
    Statistical analysis title
    Heart rate
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Heart rate (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Heart rate (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Beats per minute
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    67 (63 to 70)
    74 (70 to 79)
    Statistical analysis title
    Heart rate
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1.24 (0.99 to 1.49)
    1.22 (0.95 to 1.49)
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.46
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1.21 (0.96 to 1.46)
    1.22 (0.92 to 1.52)
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.33
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 6 second (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 6 second (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    2.41 (2.01 to 2.81)
    2.41 (1.96 to 2.86)
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV6
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.91
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 6 second (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - FEV1 , forced expiratory volume in 6 second (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Mean of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Litres
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    2.35 (1.89 to 2.80)
    2.38 (1.91 to 2.85)
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV6
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.4
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Symptoms** (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Symptoms** (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Median of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units (0-3)
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    0 (0 to 1)
    0 (0 to 1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Daily symptoms
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.55
    Method
    Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Symptoms** (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Symptoms** (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Median of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units (0-3)
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    1 (0 to 1)
    1 (0 to 1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Daily symptoms
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.94
    Method
    Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Reliever use** (AM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Reliever use** (AM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Median of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Number of puffs
    0
    0
    Statistical analysis title
    Daily reliever use
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.65
    Method
    Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Domiciliary Outcomes - Reliever use** (PM)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Domiciliary Outcomes - Reliever use** (PM)
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Continuous diurnal measurement throughout the study. Median of last 3 days of each period.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Number of puffs
    0
    0
    Statistical analysis title
    Daily reliever use
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.54
    Method
    Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) GRQ Symptoms

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) GRQ Symptoms
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    45 (24 to 47)
    45 (30 to 60)
    Statistical analysis title
    SGRQ Symptoms
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.19
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) SGRQ Activity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) SGRQ Activity
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    60 (47 to 72)
    60 (47 to 73)
    Statistical analysis title
    SGRQ Activity
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.96
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)SGRQ Impacts

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)SGRQ Impacts
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    25 (17 to 33)
    25 (16 to 33)
    Statistical analysis title
    SGRQ Impacts
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.86
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)SGRQ Total score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Quality of Life Outcome - St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)SGRQ Total score
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    39 (30 to 49)
    37 (29 to 45)
    Statistical analysis title
    SGRQ Total score
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.6
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Biomarker (Venous Blood) Outcomes NT-pro-BNP*, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Biomarker (Venous Blood) Outcomes NT-pro-BNP*, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: picomoles/Litre
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    6.3 (3.2 to 11.6)
    3.97 (1.55 to 8.69)
    Statistical analysis title
    NT-pro-BNP
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.01
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Biomarker (Venous Blood) Outcomes Galectin-3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Biomarker (Venous Blood) Outcomes Galectin-3
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: nanograms/Litre
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    8.0 (6.3 to 9.7)
    8.5 (7.0 to 10.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Galectin-3
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.37
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity Creatinine kinase, n=10

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity Creatinine kinase, n=10
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Units/Litre
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    112 (78 to 147)
    131 (91 to 171)
    Statistical analysis title
    Creatinine kinase
    Comparison groups
    Celiprolol (CEL) v Bisoprolol (BIS)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.27
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Total Cholesterol

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Total Cholesterol
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: millimoles/litre
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    4.8 (4.2 to 5.4)
    4.7 (4.2 to 5.2)
    Statistical analysis title
    Total Cholesterol
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.35
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Cholestrol/High Density Lipoprotein ratio

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Cholestrol/High Density Lipoprotein ratio
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: no units
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    3.2 (2.8 to 3.6)
    3.0 (2.6 to 3.3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Chol/HDL ratio
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.015
    Method
    ANOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Potassium

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Beta-2 Adrenceptor activity - Potassium
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at baselines (pre-beta blocker) and post-beta blocker at 4 weeks.
    End point values
    Bisoprolol (BIS) Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: millimoles/litre
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    4.5 (4.3 to 4.6)
    4.4 (4.2 to 4.6)
    Statistical analysis title
    Potassium
    Comparison groups
    Bisoprolol (BIS) v Celiprolol (CEL)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.09
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time a participant consented to join the study until the last study visit.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    20.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Received IMP
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    Received IMP
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Received IMP
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 13 (92.31%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ligament sprain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Cardiac disorders
    Palpitations
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 13 (38.46%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Sciatica
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 13 (30.77%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Lethargy
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    Gait disturbance
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Lymphadenopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Irritable bowel syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Breast pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 13 (23.08%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    Rhinorrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Sputum increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nasal congestion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Catarrh
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Wheezing
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Productive cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle spasms
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Swelling in Left Hallux
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Neck pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Myalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu May 08 01:51:58 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA