Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Repeat-dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of Olipudase Alfa in Patients with Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-000371-26 |
Trial protocol |
DE GB NL FR PT ES IT BE |
Global end of trial date |
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
First version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
DFI12712
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02004691 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
U1111-1142-5963 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Sanofi Genzyme
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
450 Water Street, Cambridge, MA, United States, 02141
|
||
Public contact |
Trial Transparency Team, Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement, Contact-US@sanofi.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Trial Transparency Team, Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement, Contact-US@sanofi.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Interim
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
15 Mar 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
15 Mar 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this Phase 2/3 study was to evaluate the efficacy of olipudase alfa (recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase) administered intravenously once every 2 weeks for 52 weeks in adult subjects with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) by assessing changes in: 1) spleen volume as measured by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); for the United States (US) only, the primary objective was spleen volume in association with subject perception related to spleen volume as measured by splenomegaly-related score (SRS), and 2) infiltrative lung disease as measured by the pulmonary function test diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Subjects were fully informed of all pertinent aspects of the clinical trial as well as the possibility to discontinue at any time in language and terms appropriate for the subject and considering the local culture. During the course of the trial, subjects were provided with individual subject cards indicating the nature of the trial the subject is participating, contact details and any information needed in the event of a medical emergency. Collected personal data and human biological samples were processed in compliance with the Sanofi-Aventis Group Personal Data Protection Charter ensuring that the Group abides by the laws governing personal data protection in force in all countries in which it operates.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
18 Dec 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Australia: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Argentina: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Chile: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Turkey: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Japan: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Brazil: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
36
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
14
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
35
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
1
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The study was conducted at 23 active centers in 17 countries. A total of 62 subjects were screened between 18 December 2015 and 1 October 2018, out of which 36 subjects were randomised. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 18 subjects each were randomised to the placebo and the olipudase alfa groups, respectively. Data reported based on date, 15 March 2021. Primary Analysis Period (PAP) is complete. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
PAP: Up to 52 Weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received intravenous (IV) infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of primary analysis period (PAP). Subjects who completed PAP entered in extension treatment period (ETP) and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) after dose escalation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) IV infusion once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GZ402665
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. The dose was escalated to a target dose of 3.0 mg/kg of olipudase alfa.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
ETP: Ongoing From Week 52
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
No
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo/Olipudase alfa: PAP/ETP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received IV infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 mg/kg after dose escalation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GZ402665
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. The dose was escalated to a target dose of 3.0 mg/kg of olipudase alfa.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Olipudase alfa/Olipudase alfa: PAP/ETP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GZ402665
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. The dose was escalated to a target dose of 3.0 mg/kg of olipudase alfa.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received intravenous (IV) infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of primary analysis period (PAP). Subjects who completed PAP entered in extension treatment period (ETP) and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) after dose escalation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received intravenous (IV) infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of primary analysis period (PAP). Subjects who completed PAP entered in extension treatment period (ETP) and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) after dose escalation. | ||
Reporting group title |
Olipudase alfa
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo/Olipudase alfa: PAP/ETP
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 mg/kg after dose escalation. | ||
Reporting group title |
Olipudase alfa/Olipudase alfa: PAP/ETP
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Predicted (% Predicted) Hemoglobin (Hb) and Altitude-Adjusted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Baseline [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Percent predicted Hb and Altitude-adjusted DLco was calculated as: 100*Adjusted DLco/Predicted DLco in unit of mL CO/min/mmHg where, adjusted DLco = Observed DLco (in mL CO/min/mmHg) times Hemoglobin-adjusted factor times Altitude-adjustment factor. Analysis was performed on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population which included all randomised subjects who had received at least 1 infusion (partial or total) and were analysed according to the treatment arm allocated by randomisation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Day 1)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: As the Baseline endpoint was descriptive in nature, no statistical analysis was performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change from Baseline in Percent Predicted (% Predicted) Hemoglobin (Hb) and Altitude-Adjusted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Percent predicted Hb and Altitude-adjusted DLco was calculated as: 100*Adjusted DLco/Predicted DLco in unit of mL CO/min/mmHg where, adjusted DLco = Observed DLco (in mL CO/min/mmHg) times Hemoglobin-adjusted factor times Altitude-adjustment factor. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Placebo, Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Olipudase alfa v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0004 [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed model for repeated measures | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least Squares Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
19.008
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
9.319 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
28.696 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
4.7576
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and p-values were based on mixed model for repeated measures approach with Baseline Derived % Predicted DLco adjusted for Hb and pressure, age, treatment group, visit, and study visit by treatment group as covariates. [3] - Threshold for significance was 0.05. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Spleen Volume (in MN) at Baseline [4] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Spleen volume was assessed by abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantitate the degree of splenomegaly in multiples of normal (MN). Analysis was performed on mITT population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Day 1)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: As the Baseline endpoint was descriptive in nature, no statistical analysis was performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change from Baseline in Spleen Volume (in MN) at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Spleen volume was assessed by abdominal MRI to quantitate the degree of splenomegaly in MN. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Placebo, Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
35
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [5] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed model for repeated measures | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least Squares Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-39.927
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-47.051 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-32.803 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
3.4957
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The 95% CI and p-values were based on a mixed model for repeated measures approach with Baseline Spleen Volume (MN), Baseline age, treatment group, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction as covariates. [6] - Threshold for significance was 0.05. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change from Baseline in Liver Volume (in MN) at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Liver volume was assessed by abdominal MRI in MN. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Placebo, Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in an order the endpoint were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
35
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [7] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [8] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed model for repeated measures | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least Squares Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-26.596
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-33.911 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-19.281 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
3.5862
|
||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The 95% CI and p-values are based on a mixed model for repeated measures approach with Baseline Liver Volume (MN), Baseline age, treatment group, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction as covariates. [8] - Threshold for significance was 0.05. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change from Baseline in Platelet Counts at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Placebo, Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in an order the outcome measure were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [9] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0185 [10] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed model for repeated measures | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least Squares Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
14.332
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
2.564 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
26.099 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
5.7822
|
||||||||||||
Notes [9] - The 95% CI and p-values are based on a mixed model for repeated measures approach with Baseline Platelets, Baseline age, treatment group, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction as covariates. [10] - Threshold for significance was 0.05. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Fatigue Severity as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)-Item 3 Scale Score at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The BFI is a 9-item, validated, self-administered questionnaire that was originally developed to assess fatigue severity. The 9-items were measured on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being ‘does not interfere’ and 10 being ‘completely interferes.’ BFI - Item 3 asks subjects to “Please rate your fatigue (weariness, tiredness) by circling the one number that best describes your worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. Numerical rating scale ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst imaginable fatigue). Higher global scores were associated with more severe fatigue. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Placebo, Olipudase alfa | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the overall type I error. Testing was then performed sequentially in an order the endpoint were reported and continued when previous endpoint was statistically significant at two-sided 0.05.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Olipudase alfa
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [11] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.94 [12] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed model for repeated measures | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least Squares Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.056
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-1.566 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.454 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.7384
|
||||||||||||
Notes [11] - The 95% CI and p-values are based on a mixed model for repeated measures approach with Baseline BFI item 3 (Worst Fatigue), Baseline age, treatment group, study visit, and study visit by treatment group interaction as covariates. [12] - Threshold for significance was 0.05. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Pain Severity as Measured by Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)-Item 3 Scale Score at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The BPI-SF is a validated, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure a subject’s perceived level of pain. The BPI-SF consisted of 15 items that use a numeric rating scale to assess pain severity and pain interference in the past 24 hours and the past week. For BPI-SF Item 3 asks subjects to “Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the past 24 hours.” The numeric rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), where higher scores indicate greater intensity of pain. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Dyspnea Severity as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Dyspnea Scale at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
FACIT-Dyspnea: 20 Item assessment split into two 10-item sections. First 10-item section asks subjects about severity of their shortness of breath during various activities. Second 10-item section asks subjects to rate difficulty due to shortness of breath associated with same activities that were referenced in first section. For dyspnea severity items, score range from 0=no shortness of breath; 1=mildly short of breath; 2=moderately short of breath; 3=severely short of breath. For functional limitation items, score range from no difficult=0, A little difficult=1, some difficult=2, and much difficulty=3. Raw score was calculated as: sum of individual item scores*10/number of items answered. Raw scores were then converted to scale scores using table included in FACIT Dyspnea Scale Short Form Scoring Guideline. FACIT dyspnea scale score range: 27.7 to 75.9. Higher score represented high levels of dyspnea. mITT population. Number of subjects analysed=subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Splenomegaly-Related Score (SRS) at Week 52 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The SRS rates 5 items: abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, early satiety, dissatisfaction with abdominal body image, and difficulty to bend down using a numerical rating scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The total score of SRS ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores (50) indicated worst imaginable rating. Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of subjects analysed = subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 52
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from time from first infusion of investigational medicinal product (IMP) to time just prior to first infusion in extension treatment period i.e. up to 52 weeks of PAP regardless of seriousness or relationship to IMP
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) i.e AEs that developed/worsened during treatment epoch for PAP (time from first infusion of IMP to time just prior to first infusion in ETP if subject had an infusion in ETP or to last date data are available if subject had no infusion in ETP i.e. up to Week 52). Safety population.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
23.1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of placebo (matched to olipudase alfa) once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and crossed over to olipudase alfa with a target maintenance dose of 3 mg/kg after dose escalation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Olipudase alfa
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects received IV infusion of olipudase alfa once every 2 weeks during the 52 weeks of PAP. Each subject underwent a dose escalation according to the following paradigm: 0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.0 mg/kg. Three (3) mg/kg was the target maintenance dose, which was maintained for the remaining duration of 52 weeks of PAP. Subjects who completed PAP entered in ETP and continued the same treatment in ETP. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
05 Sep 2014 |
Following changes were made: modification of study title, study organisation, study design, study objectives, changes to
assessments. |
||
05 Dec 2014 |
Following changes were made: changed rhASM nomenclature; the primary endpoint was modified to include change from baseline to week 52 in infiltrative lung disease as measured by the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco); removed key secondary endpoint and reorganized the secondary endpoints; added a PK sampling timepoint; increased the number of enrolled subjects from approximately 24 to approximately 35; removed requirement to stratify subjects based on baseline spleen volume; subjects assigned to the placebo arm in the PAP were rerandomised 1:1 in the ETP to 1.0 mg/kg or 3.0 mg/kg olipudase alfa; added an interim analysis of the primary endpoint after approximately 20 subjects completed 52 weeks of treatment with study drug. |
||
28 Jan 2015 |
New EudraCT number updated. |
||
08 May 2015 |
Following changes were made: added splenomegaly-related symptom efficacy endpoint; changes in the tools used to collect information for the composite secondary efficacy endpoint and included use of an eDiary; clarified that abdominal MRIs and pulmonary imaging by HRCT will be evaluated by readers blinded to subject, treatment arm, and timepoint; demoted to tertiary the secondary efficacy endpoint percentage change in liver function tests ALT and total bilirubin; removed requirement that inpatient hospitalisation was necessary during quarterly visits of years 3 through 5; added a provision for future use of samples; corrected reporting requirements for pregnancy; clarified the “Not applicable” taken regarding action to study drug for an AE; changed the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test to the ANCOVA method for primary and secondary efficacy endpoint analyses. |
||
01 Feb 2016 |
Following changes were made: removed 1.0 mg arm from the PAP; removed 1.0 mg arm from the ETP; removed “dose comparison”; changed randomisation ratio from 2:1:2 to 1:1 during the PAP; added inclusion criterion for mean splenomegaly-related symptoms score; added contraception requirements following the last olipudase alfa infusion; clarified that the longest study duration per subject will be for at least 3 years and up to 5 years and 3 months dependent upon continued regulatory approval of the protocol; changed interim analysis wording from “interim analysis may be conducted” to “no interim analysis is planned”; clarified subject stopping criteria. |
||
08 Feb 2017 |
Following changes were made: changes in objectives and endpoints; addition of Patient Global Impression of Symptom Severity (PGIS) of ASMD and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); changes in statistical analysis; clarification of time points at which vital signs should be taken; addition of rules on how to resume study drug administration in subjects who have missed infusion; change in some of the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) conditions; change in assessments to be done before rescue treatment was applied; addition of recommendation on usage of cationic amphiphilic antihistamines in rules on concomitant medications; added tobacco use monitoring. |
||
24 Aug 2017 |
Following changes were made: change in 7.2 Exclusion Criteria to include subjects with non-melanoma skin cancer and simplify
language; added Lab Values that already were part of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) to the relevant sections and table; corrected discrepancy of PK Collection; replaced all instances of “after infusion” text with “after the end of infusion” where applicable. |
||
26 Jan 2018 |
Following changes were made: change in subject selection criteria to remove cirrhosis from Exclusion criteria; removed liver biopsy from assessments beyond Week 104; changed the secondary endpoints hierarchical order; clarified language of exclusion criteria. |
||
18 Sep 2018 |
This amendment was made to clarify that portal hypertension would be detected for all subjects using already existing liver ultrasound echo parameters and also to clarify language in statistical analysis and pharmacokinetic assessments. |
||
05 Dec 2018 |
This amendment was made to include the immunogenicity schedule of analysis to be followed in case of drug product from an updated manufacturing process is administered. Also, the language of dose reescalation was clarified. |
||
12 Aug 2019 |
This amendment was made to indicate the different assessments that will be done after manufacturing process update as per regulatory authorities requirements. Previous omissions and errors were corrected. Clarified the plans for interim Clinical Study Report(s). |
||
15 Apr 2020 |
This amendment was made to provide option of home infusion during the COVID-19 pandemic for eligible subjects during the ETP in compliance with applicable country specific regulations and in case of multiple missing infusions, to clarify the process of dose reintroduction, and change the reintroduction starting dose. Previous omissions and errors were corrected. To allow safer reintroduction at a lower level in case of missing >=3 infusions; updated hospitalisation requirements to be more flexible at PI discretion
regarding quarterly and yearly visits in ETP. |
||
02 Feb 2021 |
Following changes were made: during a regional or national emergency declared by a governmental agency such as the COVID-
19 pandemic, to allow more flexibility with regard to additional options for monitoring techniques in compliance with applicable country-specific regulations; during a regional or national emergency declared by a governmental agency such as the COVID-
19 pandemic that can lead to site closure or extenuating circumstances that prevent an in-person site visit, for the switch from Process C(48) IMP to the updated manufacturing Process C(32) IMP, adding the possibility to perform the first infusion at home for eligible subjects in agreement between the Sponsor and the Investigator and in compliance with applicable country-specific regulations; liver function test (LFT) monitoring post infusion was already included in this protocol. However, review of the interim data from the clinical development program has identified "Transient elevation in transaminases associated with ceramide release during the dose escalation phase with olipudase alfa" as an important identified risk. Therefore, additional recommendations for the management of transaminase elevation during dose escalation have been added to the protocol; conduct of treatment experience interviews to understand subject’s experience living with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) and participating in this study was added; assessments have been streamlined to reduce subject burden in the extension phase of this trial. Assessments to ensure subject safety have been preserved. This change was implemented after the cutoff date for a planned second database lock of the study for purpose of regulatory submissions in 2021 (the first cutoff on 17 October 2019 was at the end of the PAP); other changes, omissions and corrections were addressed. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |