E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Children aged 5 to 16 on entry to the RCT with the presence of two or more islet-related autoantibodies which confers a 40% risk of developing type 1 diabetes in five years. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Children at risk of developing diabetes. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Body processes [G] - Biological Phenomena [G16] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 18.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10036481 |
E.1.2 | Term | Pre-diabetes |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004861 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Can metformin, a drug known to reduce insulin demand in type 2 diabetes, reduce insulin demand in children at increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes (T1D)and prevent disease?
Stage 1 (pilot) - Study and Participant Outcome Measures Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial in children who are at high risk of T1D comparing metformin and placebo. Specific outcome measures will include (1) recruitment rate, (2) attrition rate, (3) standard deviation of proposed participant outcome measures which are: Biomarker outcomes for HOMAR-IR (measures of insulin resistance), beta cell demand (glucose and c-peptide) and immunological down regulation in T-cell response to islet related antigens. Stage 2 (proof of concept) will continue with these outcomes measures. Outcome Measures will inform sample size for the fully powered trial (Stage 2 & 3). Stage 3 (definitive trial) will focus on the efficacy of Metformin to reduce HOMA2-IR. For purposes of assessing effect size, the HOMA2-I |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Secondary exploratory outcomes will include: Response rate of families to screening Response of families to participate in the intervention stage when a second sibling in the same family is found to be at high risk of T1D. Compliance with liquid formula metformin. Serum vitamin B12 as a fall in vitamin B12 levels have been reported in adults, currently no data for children. With safety endpoints: Haemoglobin (Hb) and Full Blood Count (FBC) Renal function tests: urea and electrolytes Liver function tests
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
FOR SCREENING PHASE (approx. ~3500) -Children/Adolescents aged 5-16 years at time of screening who are siblings of people whose T1D developed before the age of 25 years -Children/Adolescents aged 5-16 years who are the offspring of parents who themselves developed T1D before the age of 25 years -Parent/Participant is willing and able to give informed consent/assent -Multiple family members meeting eligibility criteria. FOR RCT PHASE (~ n= 90-200) - Children/adolescents identified by screening to be sero-positive for at least two of the four islet-related antibodies (IAA, GAD, IA-2, ZnT8). |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
For Screening Phase:
-Parent /Participant is unwilling/unable to give informed consent/assent -Under 5y or over 16y at time of screening -Sibling or child of person who developed T1D after the age of 25y -Known to have physician diagnosed diabetes -Already taking metformin -Physically or psychologically unable to participate -Taking medication likely to increase insulin resistance (e.g. oral/systemic steroids or growth hormone) -Contraindication to metformin – anoxia, cardiovascular insufficiency, renal or hepatic disease, sepsis -Participating in another clinical trial (other than observational trials and registries) concurrently or within 30 days prior to screening for entry into this study
Additional exclusions for RCT Phase: -Development of diabetes during the screening phase -Identified by screening to be sero-negative (fewer than two of the four islet-related antibodies (IAA, GAD, IA-2, ZnT8) -Pregnant or lactating -Known allergies to milk and soya
For Randomisation: -fasting blood glucose (laboratory sample) greater than or equal to 7mmol/L
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The trial is designed to establish whether metformin, an oral hypoglycaemic agent that is known to reduce insulin demand in type 2 diabetes (T2D), can do the same in children at risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and thereby prevent disease.
Stage 1 (pilot) which will test 1. Study Outcome Measures: Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial in children who are at high risk of T1D comparing metformin and placebo. Specific outcome measures will include (1) recruitment rate, (2) attrition rate, (3) standard deviation of proposed participant outcome measures 2. Participant Outcome Measures: Biomarker outcomes for HOMAR-IR (measure of insulin resistance), beta cell demand (glucose and c-peptide) and immunological t-cell response to diabetes antigens.
Following 4 months treatment, for a minimum of 90 evaluable participants, Stage 1 evalutation will be undertaken. The design does not propose formally statistical testing for differences in outcomes between or within groups. Instead, for all groups, estimates of metformin and placebo group mean and standard deviation (or frequency) for all outcomes at each assessment point. Count data will be expressed both as a percentage of the total number of participants approached and in relation to the preceding step in recruitment. With regard to attrition, for both groups, the number of participants who withdrew, could not be contacted or did not provide four month follow up data for another reason will be quantified. In addition the total number of participants in each of the two groups will be presented. The primary analyses will be conducted according to the intention to treat (ITT) principle.
For purposes of assessing effect size, the HOMA2-IR levels obtained on metformin in adAPT will be compared with those modelled values for 1990, when the incidence of T1D was half that of today. A return to these IR levels would indicate a modest insulin resistance change, in response the study intervention.
Stages 2 and 3 are part of the adaptive design. Stage 1 data will be used to calculate participant numbers needed to ensure statistical reliability in Stages 2 & 3. It is planned that all participants receive 60 months of treatment (to end of Stage 3) irrespective at what juncture they join the study. Stopping rules are in place. Those participants already participating and entered into Stage 2 from Stage 1 will be invited and asked to consent to continue into Stage 3 (subsequently Stage 3 will require a substantial amendment).
|
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Stage 1 primary outcomes will be evaluated after a minimum of 90 sero-positive complete Stage 1. Maximum Stage 1 treatment will be 21 months while minimum treatment will be 6 months The time-frame allows for a 15 month recruitment period, 4 months minimum treatment and 2 month analysis period). Participants will continue treatment during the analysis period (with the aim of continuing to month 60, Stage 2 & 3.)
Participant outcomes measures: standard deviations of HOMA-IR and other indices of beta cell demand in pre-diabetic children (glucose, C-peptide) and immulogical down regulation in T-cell response to islet related antigens.
Stage 2 and 3, will review outcomes at 36 and 60 months (respectively) of intervention.
|
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Stage 1 Secondary exploratory objectives are screening response rates, response to participate in the treatment study when a second child in the same family is found to be at high risk of T1D (double-antibody positive) and are compliance of liquid metformin/placebo and review of Vitamin B12 serum levels.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Similarly secondary outcome of Stage 1 can only be known after all participants have completed 4 months treatment. We plan that by month 21, feasibility and efficacy secondary outcomes will be established.
Stages 2 and 3 will review outcomes at 36 and 60 months (respectively) of intervention. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Yes |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 15 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of the study is defined as the date of the last participant last visit(LPLV). This application is for entire study totaling 60 months/5 years however the RCT/CTIMP spans 3 distinct stages. Subsequent stage 2&3 amendments to the CTA, REC and R&D applications will be required/submitted Remote data-linkage monitoring will follow-up participants (with consent) for 10 years (to time of T1D diagnosis) - this will fall outwith the end of trial definition.
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 5 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 5 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 1 |