E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases [C17] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 18.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10074979 |
E.1.2 | Term | Vascular malformation |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10010331 - Congenital, familial and genetic disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To assess whether a treatment with mTOR inhibitor sirolimus induces a reduction in volume of voluminous slow-flow superficial vascular malformations of children evaluated on MRI, at the end of a treatment period ranging from 4 to 8 months, as compared to an observational period (also during between 4 to 8 months) |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
1. To evaluate the efficacy of study treatment by: -Qualitative assessment of efficacy on digital photographs -Patient self assessment or parents self assessements on o Global assessment o Reduction of cutaneous skin complications/symptoms (seepage, bleeding, skin tension, functional impairment) o Reduction of pain o Improvement of quality of life -Dermatologist’s global assessement of efficacy -Decrease of VEGF and TF plasma levels -Normalisation of platelet count, and fibrinogen, D-dimers, factor V levels 2. To evaluate safety of sirolimus treatment on children with a voluminous slow-flow VM 3. To carry out an organic collection of skin and blood samples, in order to perform current and further genetic analysis of several genes involved in vasculogenesis and involved in VMs, especially TIE2 and PIK3CA. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
* Patients aged from 6 years to 18 years (when submitting the intention letter, we aimed to include children from 12 months to 18 years. The minimal age was changed in the current protocol to children up to 6 years, because our protocol requires repeated MRI, which is non invasive imaging but requires sedation under the age of 5-6 years. We thus found too invasive to perform repeated sedations in toddlers) * With a slow-flow VM confirmed by MRI, included or not into a genetic disorder, among the following: - microcystic lymphatic malformation - mixed micro- and macrocystic malformation - venous malformation - combined lymphatic and venous malformation * Malformation voluminous (defined as ≥ 5 % of body surface) and complicated (pain, functional impairment, bleeding, seepage) * Extended to the underlying subcutaneous tissue, to the fascias, the muscles and/or the underlying bone * MRI of the VM performed within 8 months * Vaccination schedule updated * Informed, written consent of the subject’s parents or the 18 years old subject (see §9.3 Screening and baseline visits) * Cooperative parent or subject, aware of the necessity and duration of controls so that perfect adhesion to the protocol could be expected * Subjects or subject’s parents covered by or having the rights to social security |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Non Inclusion criteria linked to the condition Slow-flow VMs which are only macrocystic lymphatic malformations Visceral life-threatening involvement Non inclusion criteria linked to sirolimus Patients who received prior per os treatment with an mTOR inhibitor Immunosuppression (immunosuppressive disease or immunosuppressive treatment) Known chronic infectious disease History of cancer in the 2 previous years Brest feeding or pregnant women, or women on childbearing age without effective contraception, up to 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation Known allergy to mTOR inhibitor Concomitant treatment that inhibits or activates CYP3A4, and P-gp glycoprotein, cytotoxic drugs, antilymphocyte immunoglobulines and metoclopramide Intolerance to fructose, intolerance or malabsorption to glucose, galactose, metabolic insufficiency in sucrase-isomaltase, metabolic defect in lactase Known allergy to peanuts or soyabean Liver insufficiency (elevated transaminases > 2.5 N) Anemia with Hb < 9 g/dl Leukopenia < 1000/mm3 Thrombocytopenia < 80 000/mm3 Hypercholesterolemia (LDL-cholesterol ≥ 2g/l) Patients with risk of opportunistic infections Live attenuated vaccine up to 3 months after sirolimus discontinuation Other non inclusion criteria Contraindication of MRI Known allergy to lidocaïne (only for patients who accept genetic analysis1) Subject already participating to a therapeutic study
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Primary outcome will be based on the volume of the VMs on MRI. Three MRI will be performed: one at baseline (M0) for diagnosis of the VM (routine care), one at the date of switch from the observational period to the sirolimus period (MS) and one at the end of follow-up (M12). Relative change of volume, standardized by the duration period, will define the outcome. Thus, for the observational period, the primary outcome is defined as {(VMS – V0)/V0}/(MS-M0) where V0 and VMS are the volumes assessed at baseline and month S, respectively, and (MS-M0) corresponds to the duration of the observational period. For the sirolimus period, the outcome is defined in the same way as {(V12 – VMS)/VMS}/(M12-MS), where V12 is the volume assessed at month 12 and (M12-MS) corresponds to the duration of the sirolimus period. Interpretation of the MRI will be centralized and performed by a radiologist blinded from physical assessment and from treatment period. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
- Qualitative assessment of efficacy on digital photographs, by two blinded independent readers. For each patient, readers will be provided the baseline photograph. Then they will be provided the three other photographs (realized at visit v2, v3 and at the last visit) and will be asked to identify which photograph was performed at the end of the observational period, and which was performed at the end of the sirolimus period. Such a procedure comes down to a “Lady-tasting-tea” procedure (Falissard et al. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research 2013;2:88-93). - Patient self assessment or parents self assessements : o Global treatment efficacy on a visual analogic scale (0-10) o Skin complications/symptoms (seepage, bleeding, skin tension, functional impairment) o Pain on a visual analogic scale (0-10) o Quality of life by the dermatological quality of life scale (DLQI adapted to children) - Dermatologist’s global assessement of efficacy on a visual analogic scale (0-10) - VEGF and TF plasma levels - Platelet count, and fibrinogen, D-dimers, factor V levels supporting the presence and disappearance of an abnormal intravascular coagulation consumption For the latter outcomes, as for the primary outcome, relative change over the observational and sirolimus period will be considered, and standardized by the period durations. - Adverse events and safe adverse events - From the organic collection (including blood and skin samples) analysis of several genes involved in vasculogenesis (currently TIE2 and PIK3CA) will be performed. A genotype/phenotype study will be carried out.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
randomized observational-phase design |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
each patient will be his/her own control |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 12 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of the trial is the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |