Clinical Trial Results:
"AnAnkle Trial": Peripheral nerve block vs. spinal anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery – implications on pain profile and quality of recovery
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-001108-76 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
31 May 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
25 Jun 2022
|
First version publication date |
25 Jun 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2015-735
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Herlev Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
|
||
Public contact |
Department of Anaesthesiology I65N9, Herlev Hospital, rune.sort.03@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Department of Anaesthesiology I65N9, Herlev Hospital, rune.sort.03@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
31 May 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 May 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 May 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To study difference in combined short term postoperative pain and opioid use following peripheral nerve block (PNB) anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia (SA) for ankle fracture surgery.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The interventions (peripheral nerve block anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia) were already part of standard clinical practice and performed with attention to minimising any pain, distress or discomfort, i.e. by providing thorough information, local anaesthesia and on-demand light sedation.
|
||
Background therapy |
Both arms received peroperative light sedation on demand and a postoperative pain treatment regimen of paracetamol 1 g every 6 hours, ibuprofene 400 mg every 8 hours and PCA on-demand i.v. morphine 2,5 mg pr. dose with a 6 min lock-out interval and no background infusion. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jun 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 150
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
150
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
150
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
106
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
44
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Eligible subjects were Danish speaking adults scheduled for acute internal fixation of an ankle fracture in two university hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. Treating physicians consecutively identify eligible subjects according to the listed criteria. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
PNB anaesthesia | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ropivacaine
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ultrasound guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml, 20 ml
Ultrasound guided saphenous nerve block: Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml, 8 ml
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Spinal anasthesia | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
hyperbaric bupivacaine
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in vial
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intrathecal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Spinal anaesthesia: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/ml, 2 ml.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PNB anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Spinal anasthesia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
PNB anaesthesia
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Spinal anasthesia
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
PIOC (pain intensity and opioid consumption) score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-27 hours post-anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
PIOC analysis | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
PIOC is calculated by ranking both the NRS area under the curve (AUC) pain score and total morphine consumption 0-27 hours across both groups. PIOC is the summation of the deviations from the mean ranks for both parameters and equals -200% to +200% for each patient.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PNB anaesthesia v Spinal anasthesia
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
150
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Morphine consumption | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-27 hours post-anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Morphine consumption comparison | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Comparison of 0-27 hours morphine consumption.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PNB anaesthesia v Spinal anasthesia
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
150
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
NRS-AUC pain score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0-27 hours post-anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pain score comparison | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Numeric rating scale (NRS) area under the curve (AUC) 0-27 hours comparison.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
PNB anaesthesia v Spinal anasthesia
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
150
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
20 hours post-anaesthesia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
PNB anaesthesia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Spinal anaesthesia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546844 |