Clinical Trial Results:
A Multicenter, Open-label, Follow-up Study to Assess the Long-term Use of Lacosamide (Flexible Dose From 200 to 600 mg/Day) Used as Monotherapy in Subjects Who Completed SP0994 and Received Lacosamide Monotherapy Treatment
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-001549-96 |
Trial protocol |
FI SE DE LV BG PL FR RO |
Global end of trial date |
06 Jan 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Dec 2020
|
First version publication date |
26 Dec 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
SP1042
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02582866 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
UCB BioPharma SPRL
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Allée de la Recherche 60, Brussels, Belgium, B-1070
|
||
Public contact |
Clin Trial Reg & Results Disclosure, UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH, clinicaltrials@ucb.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clin Trial Reg & Results Disclosure, UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH, clinicaltrials@ucb.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Feb 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
06 Jan 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Jan 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of lacosamide dosed at 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day when used as monotherapy in subjects, with partial-onset seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin), who completed SP0994
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
During the conduct of the study all participants were closely monitored.
|
||
Background therapy |
Not Applicable | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Not Applicable | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
18 Jan 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bulgaria: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Finland: 6
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 14
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Japan: 6
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Latvia: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Mexico: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Philippines: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Romania: 19
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Russian Federation: 11
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Korea, Republic of: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Sweden: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Switzerland: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Ukraine: 7
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
106
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
64
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
92
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
13
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The study started to enroll study participants in January 2016 and concluded in January 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Participant Flow refers to the Safety Set. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Lacosamide | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally, twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day, in 2 divided doses at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening. The investigator may have maintained the subject’s LCM dose, decreased the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increased the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day. Participants stopping LCM should have been tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper was permitted but the duration of tapering should not have exceeded 6 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lacosamide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
LCM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Vimpat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day (at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening) in 2 divided doses.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lacosamide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally, twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day, in 2 divided doses at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening. The investigator may have maintained the subject’s LCM dose, decreased the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increased the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day. Participants stopping LCM should have been tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper was permitted but the duration of tapering should not have exceeded 6 weeks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Lacosamide
|
||
Reporting group description |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally, twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day, in 2 divided doses at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening. The investigator may have maintained the subject’s LCM dose, decreased the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increased the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day. Participants stopping LCM should have been tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper was permitted but the duration of tapering should not have exceeded 6 weeks. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Lacosamide (SS)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally, twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day, in 2 divided doses at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening. The investigator may have maintained the subject’s LCM dose, decreased
the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increased the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day.
Participants stopping LCM should have been tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper was permitted but the duration of tapering should not have exceeded 6 weeks.
Participants formed the Safety Set (SS).
|
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants experiencing any Adverse Events (AEs) reported spontaneously by the subject and/or caregiver or observed by Investigator [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.
The SS consisted of all study participants in the ES who received at least 1 dose of study medication in SP1042.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned for this study. Results were summarized in tables as descriptive statistics only. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants experiencing any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) reported spontaneously by the subject and/or caregiver or observed by Investigator [2] | ||||||||
End point description |
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:
- Results in death
- Is life-threatening
- Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect
- Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics
- Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the study participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
The SS consisted of all study participants in the ES who received at least 1 dose of study medication in SP1042.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
|
||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned for this study. Results were summarized in tables as descriptive statistics only. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants that withdrew due to Adverse Events (AEs) [3] | ||||||||
End point description |
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.
The SS consisted of all study participants in the ES who received at least 1 dose of study medication in SP1042.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
|
||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned for this study. Results were summarized in tables as descriptive statistics only. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events were collected from Visit 1 (Week 0) to Final Visit (up to Week 158)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
16.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lacosamide (SS)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Lacosamide (LCM) was administered orally, twice daily from 200 mg/day to 600 mg/day, in 2 divided doses at approximately 12 hour intervals in the morning and in the evening. The investigator may have maintained the subject’s LCM dose, decreased the dose in decrements of 100 mg/day per week to a minimum dose of LCM 200 mg/day, or increased the dose in increments of 100 mg/day per week up to a maximum dose of LCM 600 mg/day. Participants stopping LCM should have been tapered off LCM at recommended decreasing steps of 200 mg/day/week. A slower taper (eg, 100 mg/day/week) or faster taper was permitted but the duration of tapering should not have exceeded 6 weeks. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |