Clinical Trial Results:
Allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cell therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and heart failure
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-001560-19 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
31 Dec 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
19 May 2023
|
First version publication date |
19 May 2023
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
ASC_HF II |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CSCC-ASC2
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02387723 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Rigshospitalet
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
|
||
Public contact |
Jens Kastrup, Department of Cardiology, 2014, Rigshospitalet, 0045 35452819, jens.kastrup@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Jens Kastrup, Department of Cardiology, 2014, Rigshospitalet, 0045 35452819, jens.kastrup@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Apr 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 Dec 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 Dec 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To perform at clinical double-blind placebo-controlled CSCC_ASC multicentre study in heart failure patients to investigate the regenerative capacity of the CSCC_ASC treatment.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients are hospitalized 24 hours after treatment
|
||
Background therapy |
Maximal tolerable heart failure medical therapy | ||
Evidence for comparator |
No | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Sep 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 81
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
81
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
81
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
39
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
42
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The planned 81 patients were enrolled in the study. 54 patients were treated with cell product and 27 with placebo. Mean age was 67.0 ± 9.0 years and 66.6 ± 8.1 years in the ASC and placebo groups, respectively. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients had to meet the predefined in- and exclusion criteria. 139 patients were screeened. 49 did not meet the inclusion criteria. 1 had severe kidney disease, 2 had infection, 2 had severe claudicatio, 1 had mural thrombus and 3 withdrew consent | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
81 | |||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
81 | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Randomisation (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Assessor, Data analyst, Subject | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
All image data was stored on a central server and analysed blinded by two independent observers not aware of the treatment allocation. Moreover, they did not have access to each other’s analysed images.
The study nurses, physicians and patients were not aware of the treatment allocation.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ASC treatment | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Injections of 0.3 mL CSCC_ASC (total cell dose 100 x 106 ASCs) (n=54) performed into the viable myocardium in the border zone of infarcted tissue using the NOGA Myostar® catheter (Biological Delivery System, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, US). | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. (CSCC_ASC)
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
CSCC_ASC constituted 110 million ASCs/5 mL CryoStor CS10 (BioLife Solutions).
The CSCC_ASCs were injected into the myocardium by 12-15 injections of 0.3 mL solution except the first injection, which consisted of 0.4 mL. Point by point measurement generates an electromechanical 3D LV map. The system distinguishes between viable (unipolar voltage > 12 mV, bipolar voltage > 2.5 mV, local linear shortening-LLS > 6 %), non-viable-myocardium (unipolar voltage < 6 mV, bipolar voltage < 1.5 mV, LLS < 4%) and border zone (unipolar voltage 6-12 mV, bipolar voltage 1.5-2.5 mV, LLS 4-6 %) around myocardial scar tissue. To ensure appropriate injection into the ventricle wall, the injection catheter tip was located perpendicular to the ventricle wall and a ventricular extrasystole was elicited when extending the needle into the wall before any injection. The injections were performed into the viable myocardium judged by the 3D map in the border zone of infarcted tissue tissue with a unipo
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Injections of 0.3 mL isotonic saline (n=27) were performed into the viable myocardium in the border zone of infarcted tissue using the NOGA Myostar® catheter (Biological Delivery System, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, US). | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Saline
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The placebo was injected into the myocardium by 12-15 injections of 0.3 mL solution except the first injection, which consisted of 0.4 mL. Point by point measurement generates an electromechanical 3D LV map. The system distinguishes between viable (unipolar voltage > 12 mV, bipolar voltage > 2.5 mV, local linear shortening-LLS > 6 %), non-viable-myocardium (unipolar voltage < 6 mV, bipolar voltage < 1.5 mV, LLS < 4%) and border zone (unipolar voltage 6-12 mV, bipolar voltage 1.5-2.5 mV, LLS 4-6 %) around myocardial scar tissue. To ensure appropriate injection into the ventricle wall, the injection catheter tip was located perpendicular to the ventricle wall and a ventricular extrasystole was elicited when extending the needle into the wall before any injection. The injections were performed into the viable myocardium judged by the 3D map in the border zone of infarcted tissue tissue with a unipolar voltage > 6 mV.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Randomisation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
ASC treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
Injections of 0.3 mL CSCC_ASC (total cell dose 100 x 106 ASCs) (n=54) performed into the viable myocardium in the border zone of infarcted tissue using the NOGA Myostar® catheter (Biological Delivery System, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, US). | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Injections of 0.3 mL isotonic saline (n=27) were performed into the viable myocardium in the border zone of infarcted tissue using the NOGA Myostar® catheter (Biological Delivery System, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, US). |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
LVESV (left ventricular end systolic volume) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Difference between the two groups
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months after ASC/placebo injections
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
T-test | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Paired t-test was used for normal distributed continuous data comparison within groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison between groups
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ASC treatment v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
79
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-9.1 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
9 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Between the two grops |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
1 years followup
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
Adverse events | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
ASC and placebo group
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36638837 |