Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomised Controlled Trial for People with Established Type 2 Diabetes during Ramadan: Canagliflozin (Invokana™) vs. standard dual therapy regimen: The ‘Can Do Ramadan’ Study

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2015-002104-91
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    13 Sep 2018

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    31 Jan 2020
    First version publication date
    31 Jan 2020
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    UNOLE0527
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    ISRCTN14964201
    US NCT number
    NCT02694263
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Leicester
    Sponsor organisation address
    Research & Enterprise Division, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester , United Kingdom, LE5 4PW
    Public contact
    Natasha Wileman , University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, +44 01162588929, natasha.wileman@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
    Scientific contact
    Professor Melanie Davies, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, +44 01162586481, melanie.davies@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    13 Sep 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    13 Sep 2018
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    13 Sep 2018
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective is to achieve the double composite endpoint of a reduction in HbA1c (≥ 0.3%) and weight loss (≥1kg) 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    Protection of trial subjects
    All study participants were required to read a patient Information Sheet (PIS) about the trial (including trial treatments and any known side-effects) and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF). Patients were monitored regularly throughout the trial duration.
    Background therapy
    Patients taking monotherapy (Metformin) or standard second line therapy (Metformin plus other glucose lowering therapy (comparator)) were recruited into the trial.
    Evidence for comparator
    There have been significant advances in glucose lowering therapies in T2DM and their availability, thus offering a greater choice of therapies to people with diabetes with the potential for supporting safer fasting. Three new classes of therapy have been licensed for the treatment of T2DM in the UK in the past 10 years. The most recent class that has been introduced are the Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors). Canagliflozin (Invokana™) is one of a number of SGLT2 inhibitors that have been licensed within the UK. Phase III trials of this novel agent have reported reductions in HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure reduction. Canagliflozin has a low intrinsic propensity to cause hypoglycaemia. Importantly this drug is reported to be well-tolerated and has a good safety profile in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM, as monotherapy or in combination with other glucose lowering therapy including sulphonylureas and metformin. Exploration in advent of novel therapies such as Canagliflozin which could potentially provide positive health outcomes to those who wish to participate in Ramadan is required. The aim in the present study was to determine if the addition of Canagliflozin therapy to monotherapy of metformin was more effective at achieving the double composite endpoint of a reduction in HbA1c (≥ 0.3%) and weight loss (≥1kg) 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan. Patients currently on dual therapy (specifically metformin plus a sulphonylurea or pioglitazone or repaglinide or DPP-4 inhibitor) were included to determine whether switching to metformin plus Canagliflozin is more effective at achieving the composite endpoint compared to those remaining on previous dual therapy.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Aug 2016
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 25
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    25
    EEA total number of subjects
    25
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    22
    From 65 to 84 years
    3
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Sponsor Greenlight was issued on 11/07/2016. The First Patient First Visit (FPFV) date was 15/08/2016 and the Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV) date was 13/09/2018. Participants took part in the study at one of two sites in the UK (Leicester and Birmingham).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus planning to fast during Ramadan were enrolled. Participants on monotherapy at entry were randomised 1:1 to metformin + Canagliflozin or metformin + other glucose lowering therapy. Participants on dual therapy at entry were randomised 1:1 to metformin + Canagliflozin or to existing dual therapy combination

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    N/A

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Study Drug (IMP)
    Arm description
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) 100mg or 300mg, orally, once daily.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    There was a lead-in period for this study of 4 weeks to ensure that the correct dose was achieved for each participant. Titration of study treatment Canagliflozin (Invokana™) oral hyperglycaemic agent began with a starting dose of 100mg once daily. Those participants that tolerated this dose well for 14 days +/- 3 days had this increased to 300mg once daily by telephone consultation. The best tolerated dose was then maintained until the participant’s final study visit. Conversely, if participants experienced tolerability issues such as recurrent hypoglycaemia or postural hypotension or they exceeded the HbA1c target, they did not have the study treatment titrated.

    Arm title
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Arm description
    Standard second-line therapy (a sulphonylurea or pioglitazone or repaglinide or DPP-4 inhibitor) in line with NICE guidelines as the preferred second-line therapy after metformin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Sulphonylurea
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Gliclazide and glimepiride
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Gliclazide and glimepiride were the sulphonylureas chosen to be prescribed to participants in this study. Gliclazide dose was started at 40-80 mg once daily, up to maximum dose of 160mg twice daily. Glimepiride was initially administered as 1mg once daily, up to a maximum dose of 4mg once daily.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Repaglinide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    An initial dose of 0.5mg once daily where no prior treatment has been given was prescribed. However, where prior treatment was in place, an initial dose of 1-2mg once daily was started and this was titrated up to a maximum dose of 4mg daily.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Pioglitazone
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    An initial dose of 15mg or 30mg once daily was prescribed. If the response was inadequate, the maximum daily dosage was increased to 45mg once daily.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    DPP4 inhibitor
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Sitagliptin, Vildagliptin, Saxagliptin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The study clinicians did not actively prescribe DPP-4 inhibitors. If participants were taking metformin and a DPP-4 inhibitor at baseline and were randomised to continuation of their current prescribed second line therapy (control arm), they remained on a DPP-4 inhibitor. If they were randomised to the intervention arm, they were prescribed metformin and Canagliflozin (Invokana™).

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Started
    12
    13
    Completed
    8
    8
    Not completed
    4
    5
         Physician decision
    1
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    1
         Voluntary withdrawal
    1
    2
         Protocol deviation
    1
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Study Drug (IMP)
    Reporting group description
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) 100mg or 300mg, orally, once daily.

    Reporting group title
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Reporting group description
    Standard second-line therapy (a sulphonylurea or pioglitazone or repaglinide or DPP-4 inhibitor) in line with NICE guidelines as the preferred second-line therapy after metformin.

    Reporting group values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy) Total
    Number of subjects
    12 13 25
    Age categorical
    25 participants, with type 2 diabetes, above 25 years of age were enrolled into the main study across two sites. 21 were included in the physical activity (PA) sub-study.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    10 12 22
        From 65-84 years
    2 1 3
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Age continuous
    In the main study of 25 participants, the mean age was 53.6 years.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.6 ± 9.4 52.7 ± 9.7 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    1 3 4
        Male
    11 10 21
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        South Asian
    10 12 22
        Other
    2 1 3
    Smoking Status
    Units: Subjects
        Current smoker
    3 0 3
        Ex-smoker
    3 4 7
        Never smoked
    6 9 15
    Systolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean systolic blood pressure of 125.8mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    122.5 ± 13.7 128.8 ± 11.6 -
    Diastolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 79.1 mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    74.8 ± 10.5 83.0 ± 9.3 -
    Heart Rate
    The combined main study population had a mean heart rate of 78.6 (bpm).
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    72.8 ± 9.1 83.8 ± 13.2 -
    Standing Systolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean standing systolic blood pressure of 129.6mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    127.4 ± 16.4 131.7 ± 11.8 -
    Standing Diastolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean standing diastolic blood pressure of 83.2mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    79.0 ± 9.1 87.1 ± 10.7 -
    Standing heart rate
    The combined main study population had a mean standing heart rate of 84.5 bpm.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    78.8 ± 8.6 89.7 ± 14.0 -
    Weight
    The combined main study population had an average weight of 75.9kg.
    Units: Kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    68.7 ± 8.0 82.4 ± 23.4 -
    BMI
    The combined main study population had a mean BMI of 27.3kg/m^2
    Units: kg/m^2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    25.6 ± 2.7 28.9 ± 5.8 -
    Body fat
    The combined main study population had a mean body fat of 25.6%.
    Units: percentage
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    20.3 ± 6.1 30.5 ± 6.5 -
    Muscle Mass
    The combined main study population had a mean muscle mass of 53.2kg.
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    52.0 ± 7.8 54.3 ± 13.2 -
    Fat free mass
    The combined main study population had a mean fat free mass of 55.9 kg.
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.7 ± 8.2 56.9 ± 13.9 -
    Waist Circumference
    The combined main study population had a mean waist circumference of 96.8cm.
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    90.9 ± 4.3 102.3 ± 14.4 -
    Hip Circumference
    The combined main study population had a mean hip circumference of 100.6cm.
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    96.3 ± 6.6 104.7 ± 10.2 -
    Visceral rating
    Visceral fat rating on a scale from 1 to 59 (This is for an age range between 18 years to 99 years). 1-12 is healthy, 13-59 is an excess level of visceral fat.
    Units: Visceral fat rating scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    9.2 ± 1.5 11.8 ± 6.1 -
    Height
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    Valid days
    Number of days with valid accelerometer data.
    Units: number
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    Overall activity level
    Units: mg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    Total MVPA
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    MVPA in 1-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    MVPA in 5-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    MVPA in 10-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: minute/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ± ± -
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients who had a valid GeneActiv recording as part of the GeneActiv sub-study.

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Pre-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    During-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study.

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Post-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study.

    Subject analysis sets values
    PA sub-study PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects
    21
    21
    11
    9
    Age categorical
    25 participants, with type 2 diabetes, above 25 years of age were enrolled into the main study across two sites. 21 were included in the physical activity (PA) sub-study.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
        Newborns (0-27 days)
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
        Children (2-11 years)
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
        Adults (18-64 years)
        From 65-84 years
        85 years and over
    Age continuous
    In the main study of 25 participants, the mean age was 53.6 years.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    52.4 ± 8.6
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    3
        Male
    18
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        South Asian
        Other
    Smoking Status
    Units: Subjects
        Current smoker
    3
        Ex-smoker
    7
        Never smoked
    11
    Systolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean systolic blood pressure of 125.8mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    126.4 ± 11.6
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Diastolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 79.1 mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    80.9 ± 9.9
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Heart Rate
    The combined main study population had a mean heart rate of 78.6 (bpm).
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    78.1 ± 11.1
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Standing Systolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean standing systolic blood pressure of 129.6mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    129.8 ± 14.0
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Standing Diastolic blood pressure
    The combined main study population had a mean standing diastolic blood pressure of 83.2mmHg.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    84.4 ± 10.8
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Standing heart rate
    The combined main study population had a mean standing heart rate of 84.5 bpm.
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    84.7 ± 10.9
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Weight
    The combined main study population had an average weight of 75.9kg.
    Units: Kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    76.8 ± 19.6
    ±
    ±
    ±
    BMI
    The combined main study population had a mean BMI of 27.3kg/m^2
    Units: kg/m^2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.6 ± 4.9
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Body fat
    The combined main study population had a mean body fat of 25.6%.
    Units: percentage
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    25.8 ± 7.7
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Muscle Mass
    The combined main study population had a mean muscle mass of 53.2kg.
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    52.6 ± 10.9
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Fat free mass
    The combined main study population had a mean fat free mass of 55.9 kg.
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    56.4 ± 11.4
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Waist Circumference
    The combined main study population had a mean waist circumference of 96.8cm.
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    96.9 ± 12.7
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Hip Circumference
    The combined main study population had a mean hip circumference of 100.6cm.
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    100.6 ± 9.5
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Visceral rating
    Visceral fat rating on a scale from 1 to 59 (This is for an age range between 18 years to 99 years). 1-12 is healthy, 13-59 is an excess level of visceral fat.
    Units: Visceral fat rating scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    10.9 ± 4.7
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Height
    Units: cm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    166.1 ± 10.8
    ±
    ±
    ±
    Valid days
    Number of days with valid accelerometer data.
    Units: number
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    6.7 ± 0.8
    ±
    ±
    Overall activity level
    Units: mg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    29.0 ± 8.0
    ±
    ±
    Total MVPA
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    110.5 ± 53.6
    ±
    ±
    MVPA in 1-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    39.6 ± 27.4
    ±
    ±
    MVPA in 5-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    18.3 ± 20.0
    ±
    ±
    MVPA in 10-min bouts
    MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity
    Units: minute/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    ±
    8.8 ± 11.5
    ±
    ±

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Study Drug (IMP)
    Reporting group description
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) 100mg or 300mg, orally, once daily.

    Reporting group title
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Reporting group description
    Standard second-line therapy (a sulphonylurea or pioglitazone or repaglinide or DPP-4 inhibitor) in line with NICE guidelines as the preferred second-line therapy after metformin.

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients who had a valid GeneActiv recording as part of the GeneActiv sub-study.

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Pre-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    During-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study.

    Subject analysis set title
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Post-Ramadan period for patients in the PA GeneActiv sub-study.

    Primary: Reduction in HbA1c and weight 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Reduction in HbA1c and weight 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan [1]
    End point description
    The primary outcome is the achievement of the double composite endpoint of a reduction in HbA1c (at least 0.3%) and weight loss (of at least 1kg) 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    3-4 weeks post Ramadan.
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: 50% of participants on Canagliflozin (IMP) achieved planned primary outcome compared to 12.5% on standard second line therapy (control). Underpowered to test statistical significance of this trend.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8 [2]
    8 [3]
    Units: Number of patients achieving outcome
        Achieved
    4
    1
        Not achieved
    4
    7
    Notes
    [2] - 8 patients had valid HbA1c and weight values pre- and post-Ramadan.
    [3] - 8 patients had valid HbA1c and weight values pre- and post-Ramadan.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 3.1 mmol/L)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 3.1 mmol/L)
    End point description
    Triple composite endpoint of a reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight (at least 1kg) and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (capillary blood glucose of 3.1 mmol/L or lower) between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [4]
    0 [5]
    Units: Number of patients achieving outcome
        Achieved
        Not achieved
    Notes
    [4] - Only 4 patients had results at more than one time point - therefore not feasible to include results.
    [5] - Only 4 patients had results at more than one time point - therefore not feasible to include results.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 3.9 mmol/L)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 3.9 mmol/L)
    End point description
    Triple composite outcome of a reduction or maintenance of HbA1c, reduction in weight (≥1kg) and no self-reported hypoglycaemic events (capillary blood glucose ≤ 3.9mmol/L).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [6]
    0 [7]
    Units: Number of patients achieving outcome
        Achieved
        Not achieved
    Notes
    [6] - Only 4 patients had results at more than one time point - therefore not feasible to include results.
    [7] - Only 4 patients had results at more than one time point - therefore not feasible to include results.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change in weight from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in weight from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in weight between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -3.2 ± 3.2
    0.9 ± 2.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -4.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -7.1
         upper limit
    -1.1

    Secondary: Change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in HbA1c from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: Percent %
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.6 ± 0.6
    -0.4 ± 0.7
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1
         upper limit
    0.6

    Secondary: Change in fructosamine from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in fructosamine from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in fructosamine level from baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: µmol/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.7 ± 29.4
    15.4 ± 42.7
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy) v Study Drug (IMP)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -18.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -87.3
         upper limit
    51.2

    Secondary: Change in SBP from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in SBP from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -10.23 ± 10.4
    -4.3 ± 9.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy) v Study Drug (IMP)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -16.5
         upper limit
    4.5

    Secondary: Change in DBP from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in DBP from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -6.8 ± 5.6
    -6.5 ± 6.6
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy) v Study Drug (IMP)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.8
         upper limit
    6.3

    Secondary: Change in total cholesterol from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in total cholesterol from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in total cholesterol from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmol/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.03 ± 0.4
    -0.3 ± 0.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2
         upper limit
    0.8

    Secondary: Change in HDL-C from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in HDL-C from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmol/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.02 ± 0.1
    -0.03 ± 0.1
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.1
         upper limit
    0.1

    Secondary: Change in LDL-C from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in LDL-C from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in LDL cholesterol from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmol/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.1 ± 0.3
    -0.2 ± 0.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2
         upper limit
    0.8

    Secondary: Change in triglycerides from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in triglycerides from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in triglycerides level from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: mmol/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.2 ± 0.5
    -0.2 ± 0.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.6
         upper limit
    0.5

    Secondary: Change in treatment satisfaction from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in treatment satisfaction from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in DTSQ score for treatment satisfaction from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: DTSQ score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    3.3 ± 4.4
    3.9 ± 6.6
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.7
         upper limit
    5.4

    Secondary: Change in disease burden from baseline to follow-up

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in disease burden from baseline to follow-up
    End point description
    Change in DTSQ score for disease burden from baseline to 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Between baseline and 3-4 weeks post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    Study Drug (IMP) Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    8
    Units: DTSQ score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.4 ± 4.2
    -0.8 ± 4.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (Study drug - Comparator)
    Comparison groups
    Study Drug (IMP) v Comparator (other glucose lowering therapy)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.3
         upper limit
    4.1

    Secondary: Overall activity level

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Overall activity level
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan, from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan, and from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    11
    9
    Units: mg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    29.0 ± 8.0
    26.9 ± 6.3
    31.4 ± 8.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in overall activity (pre-during Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=32) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=10 people in this analysis (10 people with data both pre- and during-Ramadan), assessing the change in overall activity level from pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    32
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.14
         upper limit
    1.77
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in overall activity (pre-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=30) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=8 people in this analysis (8 people with data both pre- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in overall activity level from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.5
         upper limit
    3.79
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in overall activity (during-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=20) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=7 people in this analysis (7 people with data both during- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in overall activity level from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.11
         upper limit
    4.18

    Secondary: Total MVPA

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Total MVPA
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan, from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan, and from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    11
    9
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    110.5 ± 53.6
    103.4 ± 40.0
    123.2 ± 47.9
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in total MVPA (pre-during Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=32) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=10 people in this analysis (10 people with data both pre- and during-Ramadan), assessing the change in total MVPA from pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    32
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -3.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -20.44
         upper limit
    14.26
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in total MVPA (pre-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=30) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=8 people in this analysis (8 people with data both pre- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in total MVPA from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -19.38
         upper limit
    13.94
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in total MVPA (during-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=20) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=7 people in this analysis (7 people with data both during- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in total MVPA from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study during Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -18.01
         upper limit
    21.57

    Secondary: MVPA in 1-min bouts

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA in 1-min bouts
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan, from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan, and from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    11
    9
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    39.6 ± 27.4
    42.3 ± 31.5
    48.3 ± 34.1
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 1-min bouts (pre-during Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=32) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=10 people in this analysis (10 people with data both pre- and during-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 1-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    32
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    4.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -8.93
         upper limit
    18.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 1-min bouts (pre-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=30) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=8 people in this analysis (8 people with data both pre- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 1-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -13.27
         upper limit
    12.25
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 1min bouts (during-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=20) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=7 people in this analysis (7 people with data both during- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 1-min bouts from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -10.21
         upper limit
    10.64

    Secondary: MVPA in 5-min bouts

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA in 5-min bouts
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan, from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan, and from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    11
    9
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    18.3 ± 20.0
    24.2 ± 30.4
    22.6 ± 23.7
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 5-min bouts (pre-during Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=32) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=10 people in this analysis (10 people with data both pre- and during-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 5-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    32
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    6.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -8.49
         upper limit
    22.01
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 5-min bouts (pre-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=30) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=8 people in this analysis (8 people with data both pre- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 5-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -2.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -13.15
         upper limit
    8.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 5min bouts (during-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=20) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=7 people in this analysis (7 people with data both during- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 5-min bouts from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -9.82
         upper limit
    7.22

    Secondary: MVPA in 10-min bouts

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA in 10-min bouts
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan, from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan, and from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    End point values
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan PA sub-study during Ramadan PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    11
    9
    Units: min/day
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    8.8 ± 11.5
    13.4 ± 19.7
    11.5 ± 15.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 10min bouts (pre-during Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=32) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=10 people in this analysis (10 people with data both pre- and during-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 10-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to during-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    32
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.98
         upper limit
    17.98
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 10min bouts (pre-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=30) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=8 people in this analysis (8 people with data both pre- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 10-min bouts from pre-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study pre-Ramadan v PA sub-study post-Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.28
         upper limit
    9.1
    Statistical analysis title
    Change in MVPA in 10min bouts(during-post Ramadan)
    Statistical analysis description
    NOTE: the number below (N=20) is auto-generated and inaccurate. There were N=7 people in this analysis (7 people with data both during- and post-Ramadan), assessing the change in MVPA in 10-min bouts from during-Ramadan to post-Ramadan.
    Comparison groups
    PA sub-study post-Ramadan v PA sub-study during Ramadan
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.03
         upper limit
    2.27

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Consent to last dose of drug.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    At each visit, the investigator documented adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of relation to study treatment. All SAEs and non-serious AEs classified as severe or possibly/probably related were followed up until resolution.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    20.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™)
    Reporting group description
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) 100mg or 300mg, orally, once daily.

    Reporting group title
    Comparator (other glucose lowering agents)
    Reporting group description
    Standard second-line therapy (a sulphonylurea or pioglitazone or repaglinide or DPP-4 inhibitor) in line with NICE guidelines as the preferred second-line therapy after metformin.

    Serious adverse events
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) Comparator (other glucose lowering agents)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0.05%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Canagliflozin (Invokana™) Comparator (other glucose lowering agents)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 12 (83.33%)
    8 / 13 (61.54%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Localised inflammation
    Additional description: Localised inflammation to Flash Glucose Monitoring Sensor
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Muscular chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 12 (16.67%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    Scalp Cyst
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Thirst
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 12 (16.67%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Tiredness
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 12 (16.67%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Immune system disorders
    Hay fever
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Benign breast cyst
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Penile Itching
    Additional description: Itching at end of penis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Nose bleed
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Libido decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Cardiac disorders
    Lateral myocardial infarction
    Additional description: The participant had a routine ECG as part of his study visit. His ECG was abnormal and a previous lateral myocardial infarction was suspected. The participant was not unwell at the time of the ECG and was not hospitalized.
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    2 / 13 (15.38%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Pins and Needles in foot
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Shakiness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Eye disorders
    Gritty eyes
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Cracked Lips
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Dry mouth
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Heartburn
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Itchy skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Nocturia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Polyuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 12 (25.00%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Urge incontinence
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 12 (16.67%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Micturition urgency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Urinary frequency
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Ankle Swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Knee pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Subluxation left shoulder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Chest infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Cold
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Tinea
    Additional description: Left foot
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 12 (8.33%)
    0 / 13 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypoglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 12 (41.67%)
    3 / 13 (23.08%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    3
    Vitamin B12 deficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 12 (0.00%)
    1 / 13 (7.69%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    18 Apr 2016
    Following the receipt of a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication report (dated 21st March 2016) regarding the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during treatment with SGLT2-inhibitors including Canagliflozin, the study team updated the protocol to include additional exclusion criteria, revised the treatment management sub-section, and revised the expected serious adverse events/reactions sub-section. Further, the study team revised timelines throughout the protocol to indicate a study extension of 3-4 months (recruitment phase extended to April 2017 but follow-up period reduced from 12 months to 3 months) to enable the LPLV in September 2017.
    14 Nov 2016
    Exclusion criteria revised to include 1) Any contraindication to the IMP 2) individuals on loop diuretics. The study team added an ALT blood test at baseline to assess eligibility (12. Impaired liver function (ALT ≥ 2.5 times upper limit of normal)). Further, the study team included some treatment management information about lower limbs and AKI in the treatment section of the protocol (following the recent safety updates) and included AKI in the expected SAE/SAR section of the protocol (in line with updated SmPC).
    27 Jun 2017
    The study team extended the study timelines to enable an extended recruitment period (proposed recruitment end date: April 2018) to aid the study team to recruit participants to time and target. Further, the inclusion/exclusion criteria were revised to aid recruitment following a high screen failure rate in the previous recruitment phase. HbA1c ranges were widened, the requirement to fast for 10 consecutive days was removed, and participants taking DPP-4 inhibitors were included. The study team revised the wording within the protocol (randomisation & code breaking, study design and statistical methods) about stratification to include DPP-4 inhibitors. Specifically, randomisation was carried out using block design and stratified by site (Leicester and Birmingham) and entry therapy (monotherapy, dual therapy not including DPP-4 inhibitor, and dual therapy including DPP-4 inhibitor). Participants with monotherapy at entry were randomised 1:1 to metformin + Canagliflozin (Invokana™) or to metformin + a sulphonylurea or repaglinide or pioglitazone; whilst participants with dual therapy at entry were randomised 1:1 to metformin + Canagliflozin (Invokana™) or to existing dual therapy combination. Finally the study team included some additional information for Repaglinide under the treatment section of the protocol following the SmPC review. In an interaction study with healthy volunteers, co-administration of clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose), a CYP2C8 inhibitor, increased repaglinide exposure (AUC0–∞) 5.1-fold and continued administration (75 mg daily dose) increased repaglinide exposure (AUC0–∞) 3.9-fold. A small, significant decrease in blood glucose values was observed. Since the safety profile of the co-treatment had not been established in these patients, the concomitant use of clopidogrel and repaglinide were avoided.
    19 Feb 2018
    Notification to the MHRA from the Chief Investigator about the decision to terminate recruitment of participants into the trial. This decision was made solely due to practical issues/challenges with recruitment. All patients enrolled into the study at that time and receiving treatment were followed-up until September 2018.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    19 Feb 2018
    Despite the study team’s success with a previous Ramadan study and ongoing engagement with our local communities, the ‘Can Do Ramadan’ study team faced many challenges with recruitment (including changes to local prescribing practice) and the study did not achieve its recruitment target, culminating in its early closure having only recruited 21.5% of the recruitment target. After much deliberation, the Chief Investigator and Senior Management team took the decision to stop actively recruiting to the 'Can Do Ramadan' study but to continue to follow-up the actively participating participants (up until September 2018), resulting in descriptive analysis of the main study data.
    -

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Despite the study team’s success with a previous Ramadan study and engagement with local communities, the team faced many challenges with recruitment and the study did not achieve its recruitment target, culminating in its early closure.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 04 16:05:37 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA