Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2015-002125-19
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:9494
    National Competent Authority:France - ANSM
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2019-06-18
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedFrance - ANSM
    A.2EudraCT number2015-002125-19
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A phase IIb, prospective, multicentre, double-blind, triple-arm, randomized versus placebo trial, to assess the efficacy of a single injection of either 2 or 10 x 106 autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASC) in the treatment of mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, active and unresponsive to conservative therapy for at least 12 months.
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A phase 2b Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Single Injection Autologous Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in
    Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    ADIPOA 2
    ADIPOA 2
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number9494
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorCHU Montpellier
    B.1.3.4CountryFrance
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportH2020-PHC-2014-single-stage
    B.4.2CountryEuropean Union
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationCHU Montpellier
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointChristian JORGENSEN
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressHôpital Lapeyronie, 191, avenue du Doyen gaston Giraud
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityMontpellier cedex 5
    B.5.3.3Post code34295
    B.5.3.4CountryFrance
    B.5.4Telephone number330467337796
    B.5.5Fax number330467337227
    B.5.6E-mailc-jorgensen@chu-montpellier.fr
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameAutologous adipose derived stromal
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Suspension for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntraarticular use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Yes
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameAutologous adipose derived stromal
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Suspension for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntraarticular use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Yes
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSuspension for injection
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntraarticular use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Active knee Osteoarthritis (mild to moderate)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Osteoarthritis
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy of ASC in mild to moderate knee OA based on increase in the rate of “strict” responders at 6 month, compared to placebo (vehicle: 0.5% glucose in saline with 4,5% human albumin).
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    - The rate of “strict” responders and responders will be assessed at month 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in each group.
    - Assessment of the potential structural benefit with evaluation of the Kellgren-Lawrence score on X-rays and progression of affected knee joints by quantitative MRI. Every patient will have these evaluations (X-rays and MRI) three times: first before the start of the treatment, to define the initial state, then at 12 and 24 months after the treatment to quantify the long term benefits/effects of the therapy.
    - Assessment of the disability and the quality of life at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with the following patient report outcomes: WOMAC questionnaire, KOOS questionnaire, SAS questionnaire, VAS pain and Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaire.
    - Assessment of antalgic (paracetamol) medication during all the follow up (24 months). A reduction in dose or frequency of administration of paracetamol is an indirect marker of the benefits of ASC.
    - Assessment of the safety.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Symptomatic mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the index knee as defined by the American college of Rheumatology (ACR):
    - History of pain in the index knee ≥ 6 months, AND
    - Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) Grade 2 or 3 only, on plain radiographs of the index knee (including fixed flexion), AND
    - Swelling of the index knee evaluated by the investigator
    2. Must meet the following pain criteria at the time of screening/baseline visit since at least half of the days in the previous month:
    - Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscores ≥ 40 mm on the 0-100 normalised scale
    - Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) pain rating of at least 40 on a 100-mm scale
    -Subject’s global assessment of the contralateral knee <20 mm by 100-mm using Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
    3. NSAID washout of at least 2 days before screening/baseline
    4. BMI between 20-35 kg/m2
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1) Previous treatments acting on cartilage or bone metabolism (eg, oral or intravenous bisphosphonates <1 year previously, denosumab < 6 months, strontium ranelate or teriparatide or raloxifene <7 days prior to selection, and oral glucosamine ≥1500 mg/day or chondroitin sulphate ≥1000 mg/day <3 months previously)
    2) Has had any trauma of the index knee in the previous 12 months prior to the screening visit
    3) Has OA of the index knee that meets K-L classification criteria of grade 1 or 4
    4) Osteoarthritis causing significant pain in any joint other than the identified knee as confirmed by a separate VAS at baseline for any other painful joint concerned (≥ 20 mm pain)
    5) Significant trauma or surgery to the index knee within the last year or arthroscopy of the index knee within 12 months of screening (Not applicable in Germany and Netherland)
    6) Prior to the screening visit, has received:
    -Oral corticosteroid therapy within the previous 3 month, OR
    -Intramuscular, intravenous or epidural corticosteroid therapy within the previous 6 months, OR
    -Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the index within the previous 6 months, OR
    -Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in the index knee within the 6 months. OR
    -Intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma in the index knee within the 6 months.
    7) Inflammatory or other rheumatic diseases defined by clinical examination and previous serum markers (such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disorder, seronegative spondyloarthritis, gout or pseudogout (defined as acute episodic attacks of swollen, painful joint in a patient with X-ray chondrocalcinosis or CPPD crystals)), History or evidence of infectious arthritis, Paget’s disease, Ochronosis, Wilson’s Disease, Primary osteochondromatosis
    8) History of articular fracture of the target knee joint
    9) History of heritable disorders (e.g. hypermobility) and collagen gene mutations
    10) Immunodeficiency diseases
    11) Alcoholics not in treatment and still drinking (14+ drinks/week)
    12) Subjects with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (HbA1C > 8%) or known concomitant vascular problems
    13) Planned longer stay outside the region that prevents compliance with the scheduled visit
    14) Severe misalignment of the knee (excessive varus or valgus ≥ 8°) at physical examination, as confirmed by standard radiograph
    15) Severe osteoporosis with previous symptomatic vertebral or hip fractures
    16) History of joint replacement of the knee or hip within the previous 12 months
    17) Serious systemic diseases or infectious/inflammatory skin diseases in the area of the affected knee
    18) Positive serology for HIV, hepatitis B, C and syphilis
    19) History of cancer or blood dyscrasias, or previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy
    20) Contraindication to MRI, including MRI-incompatible internal devices (pacemaker, neurostimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign bodies, foreign bodies close to neurovascular structures)
    21) Intolerance or allergy to local anaesthesia
    22) Anticoagulant treatment
    23) Overweight with body mass index (mass in Kg/size in m2) greater than 35 (obesity grade II).
    24) Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.
    25) Abnormal blood tests:
    -Hepatic (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and/or aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 2 × upper limit of normal [ULN]),
    -Renal (clearance < 30 ml/min/1,73 m2),
    pancreatic or biliary disease, except asymtomatic bile stones
    -Blood coagulation disorders, Anaemia (≤ 10 g/dL) or platelet count of ≤ 100 × 109/L
    26) Significant medical problems, such as uncontrolled hypertension, symptomatic heart failure, or any other clinically relevant condition or current medication that in the opinion of the investigator contra-indicates the use of any of the study or rescue medications
    27) Pregnant or lactating women, or premenopausal women not using an acceptable form of birth control. For example : Intrauterine device, Hormonal based contraception, Double barrier contraception (condom and occlusive cap), Abstinence (no sexual activity).
    28) Known allergies to protein products (horse or bovine serum, or porcine trypsin) used in the ex vivo cell production process
    29) Known hypersensitivity to study drug or additives: albumin, sodium caprylate, sodium chlorid, potassium chlorid, ciprofloxacin, cefazoline, heparin (if used in the participating country)
    30) Known hypersensitivity to antibiotics :
    • beta-lactam antibiotics (cefazoline) and lincosamides (clindamycin) (if used in the participating country)
    • penicillin antibiotics and aminoglycosides for Germany only
    31) Known hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine or other components or contraindications of Hibiscrub and iodine or other components or contraindications of Betadine Scrub (if used in the participating country)
    32) Cancer or immunodeficiency disease
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    - The primary endpoint is the rate of “strict” responders defined by the OMERACT OARSI (Pham et al, 2003) as improvements from baseline in WOMAC pain or physical function subscores ≥ 50% and absolute changes ≥ 20 mm at 6 month, compared to placebo (vehicle: 0.5% glucose in saline with 4,5% human albumin).
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Month 6
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    - Kellgren-Lawrence scores will be assessed on the basis of X-rays (conventional standing antero-posterior radiograph with fixed location JSW). Joint space width will be measured at baseline, one-year and 2-years post-injection as previously described (Kothari M, Guermazi A, von Ingersleben G, et al. Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1568–73). Joint space narrowing less than 0.5 mm will be considered as significant.
    - Progression of affected knee joints by quantitative MRI will include volumetric measurement (cartilage volume, thickness, surface area, 3D shape) from a 3D T1 spoiled gradient echo MRI sequence with fat saturation and 1.5 mm slice thickness performed at baseline, months 12 and 24 MOAKS semi-quantitative knee scoring will use PDFS sequences in axial, coronal and sagittal planes and a T1-weighted coronal acquisition, all with 3.0 mm slice thickness. Every patient will be scanned three times: first before the start of the treatment, to define the initial state of joint, then at 12 and 24 months after the treatment to quantify the long term benefits/effects of the therapy, in particular absence of progression at 24 months post-treatment. Additional MRI scans can be performed.
    - Disability and life quality (WOMAC, KOOS questionnaire, SAS questionnaire and Short Form (SF)-36 scores) measures will be assessed at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The secondary clinical outcomes will include: SAS score, WOMAC total score, and WOMAC stiffness subscores; patient and physician global assessments of disease activity; quality of life assessment (KOOS questionnaire and SF-36 scores).
    - OARSI response will be assessed at month 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24. Patients will be classified as responders defined by improvements from baseline in at least 2 of the 3 next values (WOMAC pain, WOMAC function and VAS pain), as follows of at least 20%, together with an absolute change of 10 mm on a 0-100 scale
    - Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) medication: the drug consumption will be assessed throughout the study at each visit. A reduction in dose or frequency of administration of paracetamol is an indirect marker of the benefits of ASC therapy.
    - SAS score
    - VAS pain in the affected knee
    - SF-36 score
    - patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (VAS)
    - Adverse events will be evaluated at each visit.


    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response Yes
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial3
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned5
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA12
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months1
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 45
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 70
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 153
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 153
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    G.4.1Name of Organisation ECRIN European Correspondent for France
    G.4.3.4Network Country France
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2016-04-19
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2015-09-08
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 11:05:57 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA