Clinical Trials Register

Summary
EudraCT Number:	2015-002125-19
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:	9494
National Competent Authority:	Netherlands - Competent Authority
Clinical Trial Type:	EEA CTA
Trial Status:	Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:	2016-05-23
Trial results

Index
A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
P. END OF TRIAL

Expand All Collapse All

A. Protocol Information

A.1

Member State Concerned

Netherlands - Competent Authority

A.2

EudraCT number

2015-002125-19

A.3

Full title of the trial

A phase IIb, prospective, multicentre, double-blind, triple-arm, randomized versus placebo trial, to assess the efficacy of a single injection of either 2 or 10 x 106 autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASC) in the treatment of mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, active and unresponsive to conservative therapy for at least 12 months.

A.3.1

Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language

A phase 2b Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Single Injection Autologous Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in
Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

A.3.2

Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available

ADIPOA 2

A.4.1

Sponsor's protocol code number

9494

A.7

Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan

A.8

EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan

B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1	Name of Sponsor	CHU Montpellier
B.1.3.4	Country	France
B.3.1 and B.3.2	Status of the sponsor	Non-Commercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1	Name of organisation providing support	H2020-PHC-2014-single-stage
B.4.2	Country	European Union
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1	Name of organisation	CHU Montpellier
B.5.2	Functional name of contact point	Christian JORGENSEN
B.5.3	Address:
B.5.3.1	Street Address	Hôpital Lepyronie, 191, avenue du Doyen gaston Giraud
B.5.3.2	Town/ city	Montpellier cedex 5
B.5.3.3	Post code	34295
B.5.3.4	Country	France
B.5.4	Telephone number	330467337796
B.5.5	Fax number	330467337227
B.5.6	E-mail	c-jorgensen@chu-montpellier.fr

D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3	IMP Role	Test
D.2	Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1	IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation	No
D.2.5	The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community	No
D.2.5.1	Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1	Product name	Autologous adipose derived stromal
D.3.4	Pharmaceutical form	Suspension for injection
D.3.4.1	Specific paediatric formulation	No
D.3.7	Routes of administration for this IMP	Intraarticular use
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1	Active substance of chemical origin	No
D.3.11.2	Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP)	No
	The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3	Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP)	Yes
D.3.11.3.1	Somatic cell therapy medicinal product	Yes
D.3.11.3.2	Gene therapy medical product	No
D.3.11.3.3	Tissue Engineered Product	Yes
D.3.11.3.4	Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device)	No
D.3.11.3.5	Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product	No
D.3.11.4	Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy	No
D.3.11.5	Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product	No
D.3.11.6	Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum)	No
D.3.11.7	Plasma derived medicinal product	No
D.3.11.8	Extractive medicinal product	No
D.3.11.9	Recombinant medicinal product	No
D.3.11.10	Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms	No
D.3.11.11	Herbal medicinal product	No
D.3.11.12	Homeopathic medicinal product	No
D.3.11.13	Another type of medicinal product	No
D.IMP: 2
D.1.2 and D.1.3	IMP Role	Test
D.2	Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1	IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation	No
D.2.5	The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community	No
D.2.5.1	Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1	Product name	Autologous adipose derived stromal
D.3.4	Pharmaceutical form	Suspension for injection
D.3.4.1	Specific paediatric formulation	No
D.3.7	Routes of administration for this IMP	Intraarticular use
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1	Active substance of chemical origin	No
D.3.11.2	Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP)	No
	The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3	Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP)	Yes
D.3.11.3.1	Somatic cell therapy medicinal product	Yes
D.3.11.3.2	Gene therapy medical product	No
D.3.11.3.3	Tissue Engineered Product	Yes
D.3.11.3.4	Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device)	No
D.3.11.3.5	Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product	No
D.3.11.4	Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy	No
D.3.11.5	Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product	No
D.3.11.6	Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum)	No
D.3.11.7	Plasma derived medicinal product	No
D.3.11.8	Extractive medicinal product	No
D.3.11.9	Recombinant medicinal product	No
D.3.11.10	Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms	No
D.3.11.11	Herbal medicinal product	No
D.3.11.12	Homeopathic medicinal product	No
D.3.11.13	Another type of medicinal product	No

D.8 Information on Placebo
D.8 Placebo: 1
D.8.1	Is a Placebo used in this Trial?	Yes
D.8.3	Pharmaceutical form of the placebo	Suspension for injection
D.8.4	Route of administration of the placebo	Intraarticular use

E. General Information on the Trial

E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation

E.1.1

Medical condition(s) being investigated

Active knee Osteoarthritis (mild to moderate)

E.1.1.1

Medical condition in easily understood language

Osteoarthritis

E.1.1.2

Therapeutic area

Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]

MedDRA Classification

E.1.3

Condition being studied is a rare disease

E.2 Objective of the trial

E.2.1

Main objective of the trial

Evaluate the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of ASC in mild to moderate knee OA (KL 2-3) based on improvement of WOMAC pain and function subscore at 6 month, compared to placebo (vehic: 0.5% glucose in saline with 4% alb)

E.2.2

Secondary objectives of the trial

- Kellgren-Lawrence scores assessment on the basis of X-rays
- Progression of affected knee joints by quantitative MRI
- Disability and life quality assessment
- OARSI response assessment
- Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) medication assessment

E.2.3

Trial contains a sub-study

E.3

Principal inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the index knee as defined by the American college of Rheumatology (ACR):
- History of pain in the index knee ≥ 6 months, AND
- Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) Grade 2 or 3 only, on plain radiographs of the index knee (including fixed flexion), AND
- Swelling of the index knee evaluated by the investigator
2. Must meet the following pain criteria at the time of screening/baseline visit since at least half of the days in the previous month:
- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscores ≥ 40 mm on the 0-100 normalised scale
- Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) pain rating of at least 40 on a 100-mm scale
- Subject’s global assessment of arthritis status must be fair, poor, or very poor
-Subject’s global assessment of the contralateral knee <20 mm by 100-mm using Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)
3. NSAID washout of at least 2 days before screening/baseline
4. BMI between 20-35 kg/m2

E.4

Principal exclusion criteria

1. Previous treatments acting on cartilage or bone metabolism (eg, oral or intravenous bisphosphonates <1 year previously, strontium ranelate or teriparatide or raloxifene <7 days prior to selection, and oral glucosamine ≥1500 mg/day and chondroitin sulphate <3 months previously)
2. Prior to the screening visit, has received intra-articular injection of corticosteroids, platelet rich plasma or hyaluronic acid within the previous 6 months,
3. Significant trauma or surgery to the index knee within the last year or arthroscopy of the index knee within 12 months of screening.
4. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1 or 4 in the index knee.
5. Osteoarthritis causing significant pain in any joint other than the identified knee, i.e., pain in hip, back, or contralateral knee (≥ 20 mm pain) as confirmed by a separate VAS at baseline for any other painful joint concerned
6. History of joint replacement of the knee or hip within the  previous 12 month
7. Diagnosis of one or more of the following:
- Inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disorder, seronegative spondyloarthritis, gout or pseudogout (defined as acute episodic attacks of swollen, painful joint in a patient with X-Ray chondrocalcinosis or CPPD crystals);
- Severe misalignment of the knee (excessive varus or valgus ≥ 8°) at physical examination, as confirmed by standard radiograph
- Severe osteoporosis with previous fractures

E.5 End points

E.5.1

Primary end point(s)

Primary Efficacy Analysis:
- Improvement from baseline to month 6 in WOMAC pain score of the index knee.
-Improvement from baseline to month 6 in WOMAC physical function score of the index knee.

E.5.1.1

Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point

Month 6

E.5.2

Secondary end point(s)

- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in OARSI scores of the index knee.
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in VAS pain scores of the index knee.
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in WOMAC stiffness scores of the index knee
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in WOMAC global scores of the index knee
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 12 and 24 in WOMAC pain and function scores of the index knee
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in KOOS scores of the index knee
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in SAS scores of the index knee
- Changes from baseline to months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 in SF-36
- Changes from baseline to months 12 and 24 in cartilage volume/thickness of the index knee MRI (MOAKS score).
- Changes from baseline to months 12 and 24 in femorotibial joint space of the index knee on X-ray

E.5.2.1

Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point

Months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24

E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial

E.6

Scope of the trial

E.6.1

Diagnosis

E.6.2

Prophylaxis

E.6.3

Therapy

Yes

E.6.4

Safety

Yes

E.6.5

Efficacy

Yes

E.6.6

Pharmacokinetic

E.6.7

Pharmacodynamic

E.6.8

Bioequivalence

E.6.9

Dose response

Yes

E.6.10

Pharmacogenetic

E.6.11

Pharmacogenomic

E.6.12

Pharmacoeconomic

E.6.13

Others

E.7

Trial type and phase

E.7.1

Human pharmacology (Phase I)

E.7.1.1

First administration to humans

E.7.1.2

Bioequivalence study

E.7.1.3

Other

E.7.1.3.1

Other trial type description

E.7.2

Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II)

Yes

E.7.3

Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III)

E.7.4

Therapeutic use (Phase IV)

E.8 Design of the trial

E.8.1

Controlled

Yes

E.8.1.1

Randomised

Yes

E.8.1.2

Open

E.8.1.3

Single blind

E.8.1.4

Double blind

Yes

E.8.1.5

Parallel group

Yes

E.8.1.6

Cross over

E.8.1.7

Other

E.8.2

Comparator of controlled trial

E.8.2.1

Other medicinal product(s)

E.8.2.2

Placebo

Yes

E.8.2.3

Other

E.8.2.4

Number of treatment arms in the trial

E.8.3

The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned

E.8.4

The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned

Yes

E.8.4.1

Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned

E.8.5

The trial involves multiple Member States

Yes

E.8.5.1

Number of sites anticipated in the EEA

E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA

E.8.6.1

Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA

E.8.6.2

Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA

E.8.7

Trial has a data monitoring committee

E.8.8

Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial

LVLP

E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial

E.8.9.1

In the Member State concerned years

E.8.9.1

In the Member State concerned months

E.8.9.1

In the Member State concerned days

E.8.9.2

In all countries concerned by the trial years

F. Population of Trial Subjects

F.1 Age Range

F.1.1

Trial has subjects under 18

F.1.1.1

In Utero

F.1.1.2

Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks)

F.1.1.3

Newborns (0-27 days)

F.1.1.4

Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)

F.1.1.5

Children (2-11years)

F.1.1.6

Adolescents (12-17 years)

F.1.2

Adults (18-64 years)

Yes

F.1.2.1

Number of subjects for this age range:

F.1.3

Elderly (>=65 years)

Yes

F.1.3.1

Number of subjects for this age range:

F.2 Gender

F.2.1

Female

Yes

F.2.2

Male

Yes

F.3 Group of trial subjects

F.3.1

Healthy volunteers

F.3.2

Patients

Yes

F.3.3

Specific vulnerable populations

F.3.3.1

Women of childbearing potential not using contraception

F.3.3.2

Women of child-bearing potential using contraception

F.3.3.3

Pregnant women

F.3.3.4

Nursing women

F.3.3.5

Emergency situation

F.3.3.6

Subjects incapable of giving consent personally

F.3.3.7

Others

F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included

F.4.1

In the member state

F.4.2

For a multinational trial

F.4.2.1

In the EEA

150

F.4.2.2

In the whole clinical trial

150

F.5

Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)

None

G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
G.4.1	Name of Organisation	ECRIN European Correspondent for France
G.4.3.4	Network Country	France

N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned

Competent Authority Decision

Authorised

Date of Competent Authority Decision

2016-05-13

Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial application

Favourable

Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion

Date of Ethics Committee Opinion

2016-11-29

P. End of Trial
P.	End of Trial Status	Completed

Select Country:	Select Age Range:
Select Trial Status:	Select Trial Phase:
Select Gender:
Select Date Range: to
Select Rare Disease:
IMP with orphan designation in the indication
Orphan Designation Number:
Results Status:
Clear advanced search filters

Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Outside EU/EEA

Clinical trials