Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43861   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Xenon as an adjuvant to sevoflurane anaesthesia in children younger than four, undergoing interventional or diagnostic cardiac catheterization: a pilot study.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2015-002329-20
    Trial protocol
    BE  
    Global end of trial date
    01 Apr 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    18 Dec 2019
    First version publication date
    18 Dec 2019
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    SR052015
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University Hospitals Leuven
    Sponsor organisation address
    Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
    Public contact
    Anesthesia Research, University Hospitals Leuven, +32 16344620, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
    Scientific contact
    Anesthesia Research, University Hospitals Leuven, +32 16344620, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    23 Feb 2017
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    01 Apr 2016
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    01 Apr 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    We hypothesized that the administration of 50-65 % xenon as an adjuvant to general anaesthesia with sevoflurane would result in superior hemodynamic stability when compared to sevoflurane anesthesia alone.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The interventional treatment was administered to patients with standard haemodynamic monitoring in the setting of a fully equipped cardiac catheterization room. This enabled immediate detection and treatment of adverse events. Xenon inhalation was to be immediately stopped in case that the study patient showed a life-threatening deterioration. Also after leaving the operation room, all patients were closely monitored by the study team for the occurrence of eventual (S)AE’s, first on the PACU, later on the normal ward. Moreover, the inclusion of each individual patient into the study was indicated in the electronic hospital information system and hence visible to all physicians and nurses involved in the care of this patient. This facilitates reporting of (S)AE’s to the principal investigator.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Sep 2015
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 40
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    40
    EEA total number of subjects
    40
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    1
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    26
    Children (2-11 years)
    13
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    From September 2015 to April 2016, 69 children scheduled for elective heart catheterization were screened. A total of 40 were included and randomized to receive general anesthesia either with xenon plus sevoflurane or sevoflurane alone.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A screening failure occurred in 29 patients (16 met exclusion criteria, 7 declined to participate, and 6 had other reasons that excluded them from the participation in the trial).

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject
    Blinding implementation details
    Two investigator types conducted the trial. Investigator I accomplished the enrollment (day prior to intervention) and all postoperative visits and was, similar to the patient and his parents, blinded to treatment allocation. Investigator II performed randomization and the GA and could not be blinded to the treatment due to the kind of intervention (adminis- tration and monitoring of either one or two inhalational anesthetics).

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Xenon
    Arm description
    General anesthesia was maintained with 50%-65% xenon (LENOXeTM; AirLiquide Santé International, Paris, France) in oxygen (FiO2 = 0.25-0.4) as an adjuvant to sevoflurane
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Xenon
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation vapour
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    EEG titrated administration via inhalation via endotrecheal tube

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Sevoflurane
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation vapour
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    EEG-titrated administration via inhalation via endotracheal tube

    Arm title
    Sevoflurane
    Arm description
    General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Sevorane; AbbVie, Wavre, Belgium) (FiO2 = 0.25- 0.4).
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Sevoflurane
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation vapour
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    EEG-titrated administration via inhalation via endotracheal tube

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Started
    20
    20
    Blinded dample size re-estimation
    20
    20
    Completed
    20
    20

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Xenon
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with 50%-65% xenon (LENOXeTM; AirLiquide Santé International, Paris, France) in oxygen (FiO2 = 0.25-0.4) as an adjuvant to sevoflurane

    Reporting group title
    Sevoflurane
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Sevorane; AbbVie, Wavre, Belgium) (FiO2 = 0.25- 0.4).

    Reporting group values
    Xenon Sevoflurane Total
    Number of subjects
    20 20 40
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 1 1
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    12 14 26
        Children (2-11 years)
    8 5 13
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: months
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    18 (2 to 39) 8 (3 to 26) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    11 8 19
        Male
    9 12 21

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Xenon
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with 50%-65% xenon (LENOXeTM; AirLiquide Santé International, Paris, France) in oxygen (FiO2 = 0.25-0.4) as an adjuvant to sevoflurane

    Reporting group title
    Sevoflurane
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Sevorane; AbbVie, Wavre, Belgium) (FiO2 = 0.25- 0.4).

    Primary: Intraprocedural hemodynamic instability

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Intraprocedural hemodynamic instability
    End point description
    intrapro- cedural hemodynamic instability, defined by the occurrence of one of following events: (i) a heart rate (HR) change >20% from baseline (not caused by interventional manipulation); (ii) a change in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) >20% change from baseline (this change has been recently demonstrated to be associated with cerebral desaturations in infants and is frequently used as intervention trigger in pediatric studies); or (iii) the requirement for an hemodynamic intervention performed by investigator II to treat hemodynamic instability as defined above (assessed as the composite of using either vasopressors, inotropes, chronotropes, or fluid boluses). Isolated blood pressure drops >20% from baseline were treated with phenylephrine (2-3 mikrog/kg) and/or a fluid bolus (crystalloid 10 mL/kg), isolated bradycardia with atropine (10-20 mikrog/kg), and the combination of bradycardia with hypotension with ephedrine (50-100 mikrog/kg).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    During the administration of IMP/comparator
    End point values
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    20
    Units: Number
    20
    20
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint
    Comparison groups
    Xenon v Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 1
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Phenylephrine requirements

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Phenylephrine requirements
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    During administration of IMP/active comparator
    End point values
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    20
    Units: mikrogram/kg
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    0 (0 to 2.49)
    4.93 (0 to 15.37)
    Statistical analysis title
    Phenylephrine
    Comparison groups
    Xenon v Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.01
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Incidence of cerebral desaturation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Incidence of cerebral desaturation
    End point description
    Incidence of cerebral desaturation, defined as a decrease in rScO2 of >20% from baseline.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    During administration of IMP/active comparator
    End point values
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    20
    Units: Numbers
    2
    10
    Statistical analysis title
    Cerebral desaturation left side
    Comparison groups
    Xenon v Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.03
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Cerebral desaturation right side
    Comparison groups
    Xenon v Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.04
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Recovery index

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Recovery index
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    During administration of IMP/active comparator
    End point values
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    20
    Units: /min
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    0.44 (0.39 to 0.69)
    0.27 (0.19 to 0.40)
    Statistical analysis title
    Recovery index
    Comparison groups
    Xenon v Sevoflurane
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From enrollment until the first postinterventional day
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Xenon
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with 50%-65% xenon (LENOXeTM; AirLiquide Santé International, Paris, France) in oxygen (FiO2 = 0.25-0.4) as an adjuvant to sevoflurane

    Reporting group title
    Sevoflurane
    Reporting group description
    General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (Sevorane; AbbVie, Wavre, Belgium) (FiO2 = 0.25- 0.4).

    Serious adverse events
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Vascular disorders
    Thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Xenon Sevoflurane
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 20 (45.00%)
    14 / 20 (70.00%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Emergence agitation
    Additional description: assessed by four-point agitation scale
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    8 / 20 (40.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    8
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Postoperative vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 20 (20.00%)
    2 / 20 (10.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28872734
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri Apr 26 07:45:34 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA