Clinical Trial Results:
Multicenter study to explore the impact of florbetaben (FBB) in change of diagnosis in patients who are evaluated for AD at the CMRR, and are eligible for analysis of CSF according to HAS recommendations, and in whom lumbar puncture is contraindicated or CSF results are ambiguous.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-002606-37 |
Trial protocol |
FR |
Global end of trial date |
29 Sep 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
24 Sep 2017
|
First version publication date |
24 Sep 2017
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
FBB-01-02-15
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02681172 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Piramal Imaging Limited
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Langstone Technology Park, Langstone Road, Havant, United Kingdom, P09 1SA
|
||
Public contact |
South West Europe Medical Affairs , Piramal Imaging Ltd, 49 30461124615, rossella.gismondi@piramal.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
South West Europe Medical Affairs , Piramal Imaging Ltd, 49 30461124615, rossella.gismondi@piramal.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
14 Dec 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
29 Sep 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
29 Sep 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To estimate the change in diagnosis comparing pre- and post-scan outcomes in the study population
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The trial was conducted in accordance with GCP Guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki and according to national law. The trial started only after regulatory and ethical approval. Recruitment only started after the protocol was signed by the investigator. Only patients with informed consent were included in the study. All necessary insurances to guarantee compensation of patients in the case of adverse reactions were in place.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
23 Nov 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 218
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
218
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
218
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
66
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
136
|
||
85 years and over |
16
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Eligible patients were evaluated for AD in tertiary memory centers and had a preliminary uncertain diagnosis after a prior comprehensive workup, according to recommendations from the French Health Authority. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
At total of 218 patients were enrolled in the study. 13 patients did not receive a florbetaben injection or did not have at least one PET/CT image available (e.g. consent withdrawn), therefore, 205 patients were included in the full analysis set and were evaluated. | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
218 | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
205 | ||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
|||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
No FBB scan available: 13 | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Full Analysis Set (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Full Analysis Set | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Florbetaben
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection/infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A single dose of 300 Megabecquerel (8.1 millicurie) Neuraceq was administered per subject. The applied FBB radioactive dose was ± 20%.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: At total of 218 patients were enrolled in the study. For 13 patients no amyloid PET scans were available, therefore, 205 patients were evaluated in the full analysis set. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Full Analysis Set
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Full Analysis Set
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Full Analysis Set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
To determine the impact of FBB Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging on clinical utility parameters in the study population.
|
|
|||||||
End point title |
Change of Diagnosis Comparing Pre- and Post-scan Outcomes [1] | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation) and Visit 3 (up to 6 months later)
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: For the full analysis set (n=205), 137 of the patients had a change in diagnosis post-FBB scan. Only frequency results are reported that correspond to a change of 66.8% (137/205) with a 95% confidence interval of 59.9% - 73.2%. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Improved Level of Physician Confidence in Diagnosis at Visit 3 | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation) and Visit 3 (up to 6 months later)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Change of Management Plan | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation) and Visit 3 (up to 3 months later)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Positive FBB PET Scan | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 3 (up to 6 months after baseline evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Number of Subjects With Negative FBB PET Scans | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 3 (up to 6 months after baseline evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Subjects With Contraindicated or Failed Lumbar Puncture | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Subjects With Available CSF Analysis But Results Considered as Non-contributory by the Clinician | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Lumbar Punctures Refused by the Patient | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 (baseline evaluation)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events were captured for up to 7 days after the PET scan procedure.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
18
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety Analysis Set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |