E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Stroke (ischaemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage) |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Stroke (brain infarction or haemorrhage) |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 22.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10061256 |
E.1.2 | Term | Ischaemic stroke |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10022754 |
E.1.2 | Term | Intracerebral hemorrhage |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 22.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10042244 |
E.1.2 | Term | Stroke |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To assess whether prevention of aspiration, infections and fever with metoclopramide, ceftriaxone, paracetamol, or any combination of these, in the first four days after stroke onset improves functional outcomes at 90 days in elderly patients with acute stroke. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
- To assess the effect of prevention of infections and fever in the first days after stroke onset with metoclopramide, ceftriaxone, paracetamol, or any combination of these, on the following outcomes at 90 days: death, death or dependency, quality of life, cognition, costs
- To detect specific populations classified by age, sex, stroke severity, body temperature, co-morbidities, and geographic region, in which the proposed treatments are particularly effective or not effective.
- To assess the effects of prophylactic treatment with ceftriaxone on antimicrobial resistance and the occurrence of infections with Clostridium difficile.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Title: Detection of bacteria with 3rd generation cephalosporin resistance
Date: 06-2015 - 04-2020
Objective: To detect selection of bacteria with 3rd generation cephalosporin resistance caused by increased antibiotic pressure, a nested case-control substudy will be performed in 1000 patients in 30 centres in different participating countries. The presence of ESBL-producing bacteria will be assessed with PCR. With this purpose two rectal swabs will be collected in each patient, after specific informed consent, on admission and at day 7 (± 1 day, or at discharge, if earlier) and sent to the central laboratory at the AMC in Amsterdam, the Netherlands |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. A clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, confirmed with CT or MRI scan. A normal CT scan is considered compatible with ischaemic stroke;
2. A score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 6, indicating moderately severe to severe stroke;
3. Age 66 years or older;
4. The possibility to start treatment within 24 hours of symptom onset;
5. Written informed consent. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment, as judged by the treating physician;
2. Pre-stroke score on the mRS ≥4;
3. Death appearing imminent at the time of assessment.
In addition, patients will be excluded from participation in the trial treatment arms for any of the following reasons:
For the ceftriaxone arm:
1. Known hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics;
2. Clinical indication for antibiotic treatment; use of an antibiotic before screening is not an exclusion criterion.
For the paracetamol arm:
1. Known hypersensitivity to paracetamol or any of the excipients;
2. Known severe hepatic insufficiency;
3. Chronic alcoholism
4. Clinical indication for the use of paracetamol; incidental use of paracetamol before screening is not an exclusion criterion.
For the metoclopramide arm:
1. Hypersensitivity to the metoclopramide or to any of the excipients;
2. Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, mechanical obstruction or gastro-intestinal perforation for which the stimulation of gastrointestinal motility constitutes a risk;
3. Confirmed or suspected pheochromocytoma;
4. History of neuroleptic or metoclopramide-induced tardive dyskinesia;
5. Epilepsy;
6. Parkinson's disease;
7. Use of levodopa or dopaminergic agonists;
8. Known history of methaemoglobinaemia with metoclopramide or of NADH cytochrome-b5 deficiency.
9. Clinical indication for the use of metoclopramide; incidental use of metoclopramide before screening is not an exclusion criterion. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary outcome measure is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days (± 14 days). |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
The primary outcome will be evaluated on day 90 (± 14 days). |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
At 7 days (± 1 day) or at discharge, if earlier:
- Infections in the first 7 days (± 1 day; frequency, type, and C. difficile overgrowth syndrome). Infections will be categorised as diagnosed by the clinician, and as judged by an independent adjudication committee (masked to treatment allocation);
- 3rd generation cephalosporin resistance in the first 7 days (± 1 day), detected as part of routine clinical practice;
- Antimicrobial use during the first 7 days (± 1 day), converted to units of defined daily doses according to the classification of the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System with Defined Daily Doses Index;
- In a subgroup of patients: presence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria as detected by PCR in a rectal swab.
At 90 days (± 14 days):
- Death;
- Unfavourable functional outcome, defined as mRS 3 to 6;
- Disability assessed with the score on the Barthel Index (BI);
- Cognition assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- Quality of life assessed with the EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
- Home time: duration of stay in the patient’s own home or a relative’s home over the first 90 days;
- Patient location over first 90 days (± 14 days): hospital; rehabilitation service; chronic nursing facility; home
- SAEs in the first 7 days. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
As noted in E.5.2, the secondary outcomes will be on day 7(± 1 day) and day 90 (± 14 days). |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Yes |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
Blinded outcome assessment |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
standard care as defined by local protocols and national and/or international guidelines |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 8 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 10 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 80 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |