| E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation | 
| E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated | 
| cervical artery  dissection |  
| Dissektion hirnversorgender Gefässe |  | 
| E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language | 
| patients with teared  brain supplying vessels |  
| Patienten mit Einrissen hirnversorgender Gefässe |  | 
| E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cardiovascular Diseases [C14] | 
| MedDRA Classification | 
| E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No | 
| E.2 Objective of the trial | 
| E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial | 
| To demonstrate the non-inferiority of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)  to anti- coagulant treatment (vitamin K antagonists) in patients with cervical artery  dissection (CAD) with regard to outcome and complication measures |  | 
| E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |  | 
| E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes | 
| E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives | 
| Transcranial doppler monitoring (TCD)-sub-study: All TREAT-CAD- participants will be asked to accept  a 6 hour TCD recording in between day 1 and day 4 of study treatment (aspirin or anticoagulation). Recording times can be split in up to 3 episodes if this will comfort the patient. In patients with internal carotid artery  dissection (ICAD), the ipislateral middle cerebral artery  will be investigated. In patients with vertebral artery  dissection (VAD),  the ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery  will be chosen. The presence of MES and their number will be compared with a) the presence of stroke/TIA (at 3 months) b) the presence of new ischemic lesion (DWI) or c) microbleeds (SWI) at the first follow-up-MRI (14 +/- 10 days after treatment onset), not present on the "baseline MRI" (by which diagnosis was established). Participation in this sub-study is optional. The target  sample size for this sub-study is 60 patients. The objectives of the TCD-sub-study are to (i) detect  the frequency of
 MES in CAD-patients, stratified to the type of treatment (aspirin
 versus) anticoagulation – in the setting of a randomized-controlled trial
 - and (ii) evaluate the meaning of MES by addressing the following questions:
 a) Is there an association of MES (presence or number) with the occurrence of clinical and/or surrogate MR outcome measures
 b) Is there an interaction between MES, type of treatment and outcome events
 The TCD-Substudy is mentioned in the TREAT-CAD protocol version 3.3 18.12.17.
 |  | 
| E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria | 
| 1.	Acute ischemic or non-ischemic symptoms within 2 weeks 2.	Verification of CAD-diagnosis (carotid and/or vertebral) by MR-techniques (at least one):
 •	mural hematoma or
 •	pseudo-aneurysm or
 •	long filiform stenosis or
 •	intimal flap or
 •	double lumen or
 •	occlusion situated more than 2 cm above the bifurcation of the carotid artery, revealing a pseudo aneurysm or a long filiform stenosis after recanalisation.
 3.	Written informed consent by patient or next-to-kin
 4.	24h latency period in case of thrombolysis
 5.	Age > 18 years by time of inclusion (no upper age limit)
 
 |  | 
| E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria | 
| 1. MR-contraindications (claustrophobia precluding MRI: patients agreeing to undergo MRI scanning with mild sedation may be entered into the study) 2. Contraindications to the use of ASA or vitamin K-antagonists (see below)
 3. Pregnancy
 4. Gegenanzeigen gegen eine der IMPs
 Aspirin protect 300 mg darf nicht
 angewendet werden:
 – bei Überempfindlichkeit gegen Acetylsalicylsäure,
 anderen Salicylaten oder einem
 der sonstigen Bestandteile von Aspirin
 protect 100 mg/-300 mg
 – bei Asthmaanfällen in der Vergangenheit,
 die durch die Verabreichung von Salicylaten
 oder Substanzen mit ähnlicher
 Wirkung, insbesondere nichtsteroidalen
 Antiphlogistika ausgelöst wurden
 – bei akuten gastrointestinalen Ulzera
 – bei hämorrhagischer Diathese
 – bei Leber- und Nierenversagen
 – bei schwerer, nicht eingestellter Herzinsuffizienz
 – in Kombination mit Methotrexat in einer
 Dosierung von 15 mg oder mehr pro Woche
 
 Marcumar darf nicht angewendet werden
 – bei Überempfindlichkeit gegen den Wirkstoff
 oder einen seiner sonstigen Bestandteile.
 – bei Erkrankungen, bei denen das Blutungsrisiko
 den möglichen therapeutischen Benefit überwiegt, z. B. hämorrhagische Diathesen, schweren Leberparenchymerkrankungen, manifeste Niereninsuffizienz, schwere Thrombozytopenie
 – bei Erkrankungen, bei denen der Verdacht
 auf eine Läsion des Gefäßsystems
 besteht, z. B.:
 – bei frischem apoplektischem Insult
 – bei Endocarditis
 – bei Perikarditis
 – bei Hirnarterienaneurysma
 – bei disseziierendem Aortenaneurysma
 – bei Ulzera im Magen-Darm-Trakt
 – bei einer Operation am Auge
 – bei Retinopathien mit Blutungsrisiko
 – bei Traumen oder chirurgischen Eingriffen
 am Zentralnervensystem
 – bei fortgeschrittener Arteriosklerose
 – bei fixierter und behandlungsrefraktärer
 Hypertonie (> 200/105 mmHg)
 – bei kavernöser Lungentuberkulose
 – nach urologischen Operationen solange
 Blutungsneigung (Makrohämaturie) besteht
 – bei ausgedehnten offenen Wunden (auch
 nach chirurgischen Eingriffen)
 
 
 
 |  | 
| E.5 End points | 
| E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) | 
| Primary composite outcome measure – labeled Cerebrovascular Ischemia, major Hemorrhagic events  or Death (CIHD) – includes the following efficacy and safety  outcome measures during the treatment period: (i) occurrence of any stroke,  new acute lesions on diffusion- weighted MRI (ii) any major extracranial hemorrhage, any symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and any asymptomatic micro-  or macrobleeds, (iii)  death. |  | 
| E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point | 
| 14 +/- 10 days after baseline 90 +/-  30 days after baseline
 
 |  | 
| E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) | 
| 1. New ischemic strokes; 2. new acute lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI
 3. any major extracranial hemorrhage
 4. any symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
 5. any asymptomatic micro-  or macrobleeds
 6. any death
 7. any increase in volume  of the vessel  wall hematoma at the follow- up cervical MRI as compared to the baseline MR-scan.
 8. independence in activity of daily living  (modified Rankin scale 0-2)
 at 3 months and at 6 months
 9. excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 0,1) at 3 month and at 6 months
 10. any TIA (classical Definition)
 11. recurrent cervical artery dissection
 
 
 |  | 
| E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point | 
| 14 +/- 10 days after baseline 90 +/-  30 days after baseline
 
 |  | 
| E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial | 
| E.6 | Scope of the trial | 
| E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No | 
| E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No | 
| E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes | 
| E.6.4 | Safety | Yes | 
| E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes | 
| E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No | 
| E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No | 
| E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No | 
| E.6.9 | Dose response | No | 
| E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No | 
| E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No | 
| E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No | 
| E.6.13 | Others | No | 
| E.7 | Trial type and phase | 
| E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No | 
| E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No | 
| E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No | 
| E.7.1.3 | Other | No | 
| E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description |  | 
| E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No | 
| E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No | 
| E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes | 
| E.8 Design of the trial | 
| E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes | 
| E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes | 
| E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes | 
| E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No | 
| E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No | 
| E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No | 
| E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No | 
| E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes | 
| E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description | 
| Rand. controlled, open labeled, non-inferiority trial with blinded assessment of outcomes |  | 
| E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial | 
| E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes | 
| E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No | 
| E.8.2.3 | Other | No | 
| E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 | 
| E.8.3 | The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned | No | 
| E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes | 
| E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 2 | 
| E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes | 
| E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 3 | 
| E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA | 
| E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes | 
| E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No | 
| E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |  | 
| E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes | 
| E.8.8 | Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
                        visit of the last subject undergoing the trial |  | 
| E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 6 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |