E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma |
EXACERVACION DE ASMA AGUDO DE MODERADO A GRAVE |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma |
EXACERVACION DE ASMA AGUDO DE MODERADO A GRAVE |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Respiratory Tract Diseases [C08] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 19.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10064823 |
E.1.2 | Term | Asthmatic crisis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of heliox (He/O2 = 78%/22%) as a discontinuous nebulizer of rapid-acting beta2-agonists (salbutamol) compared to Air Synthetic Medicinal (O2 22%/N2 78%), in children and adolescents with acute severe asthma, attending to an Emergency Department.
The authors hypothesized that nebulization using heliox (because it reduces the turbulent flow and increases the deposition of aerosolized particles)could show greater clinical improvement than Air Synthetic nebulization, in children and adolescents with acute severe asthma, treated with salbutamol.
The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety of the treatment, especially in the hypoxia events (SaO2 < 90%) suffered by the patients. Patients with very severe crisis can present a desaturation, requiring higher O2 levels than air or heliox mix used.
|
El objetivo 1º consiste en la evaluación de la eficacia del uso de heliox(He/O2=78%/22%)para nebulizar en forma intermitente broncodilatadores agonistas beta de acción rápida (salbutamol)en comparación con el uso de aire sintético medicinal(O2 22%/N2 78%)en niños y adolescentes con asma aguda grave que consultan en un S.U.La hipótesis planteada en el estudio es que, en el caso de niños y adolescentes con asma aguda grave tratados con salbutamol, la nebulización con heliox(al reducir el flujo turbulento e incrementar el depósito de partículas aerosolizadas)puede traducirse en mejorías clínicas en comparación con la nebulización con aire sintético medicinal.Un 2º objetivo consiste en la evaluación de la seguridad del tratamiento,en especial de los episodios de hipoxia que puedan experimentar los pacientes.Algunos pacientes con crisis muy severas pueden presentar desaturación requiriendo niveles de O2 mayores a los que presenta el aire sintético medicinal o la mezcla de heliox utilizada. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
*Percentage of patients that suffered early termination of the study due to SaO2 < 90%.
*Percentage of patients that suffered early termination of the study due to PS = 0.
*Percentage of patients in which hospitalization is required at the end of the treatment.
*Percentage of patients that require ITU hospitalization, orotracheal intubation or exitus during the study.
*Pulmonary function [Change of PEF with respect to basal value, measured by flow meter in patients who can perform forced expiratory manoeuvre (the best of three measures)].*
*Number of hypoxia episodes [SaO2 < 90%] occurred during the treatment and that could require an increase in O2 administration or patient withdrawal.
|
Como variables secundarias serán consideradas:
• Porcentaje de pacientes con finalización anticipada del ensayo por (SaO2< 90%).
• Porcentaje de pacientes con finalización anticipada del ensayo por (EP = 0).
• Porcentaje de pacientes que requieran hospitalización al final del tratamiento.
• Porcentaje de pacientes que requieran ingreso a UTI, intubación oro-traqueal o que fallezcan durante el protocolo.
• Función pulmonar (cambio del FEM desde el valor basal, medido mediante un flujímetro en aquellos pacientes que puedan realizar la maniobra espiratoria forzada [se tomará la mejor de tres medidas]).*
• Número de episodios de hipoxia [SaO2 < 90%] que ocurran durante el tratamiento y que pueden requerir aumento del nivel de O2 administrado o la salida del paciente del protocolo).
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
All inclusion criteria are:
(1)All participants or their parents or guardians will give their informed written consent to participate.
(2) Age 6-16 years.
(3) Diagnosis of asthma according to the guidelines.
(4) Patients attending to an ED for an acute exacerbation.
(5) Pulmonary score of ≥ 4 |
Los criterios de inclusión para los participantes son:
(1) Todos los participantes o sus padres o tutores proporcionarán su consentimiento por escrito para participar.
(2) Edad entre 6 - 16 años.
(3) Diagnóstico de asma, de acuerdo con las directrices reconocidas internacionalmente.
(4) Pacientes que acudan a un servicio de urgencia (S.U.) por una exacerbación aguda.
(5) Puntuación del EP ≥ 4 (Tabla 1 [31]).
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
(1) Altered consciousness.
(2) Pulse oximetry reading of less than 90%
(3) Systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mm Hg,
(4) Patients requiring non-invasive ventilation, or intubation and/or mechanical ventilation.
(5) Other concomitant diseases than asthma.
(6) Be treated with corticosteroids until 6 hours before |
(1) Alteración de la consciencia.
(2) Una saturometría de pulso menor del 90 % al aire.
(3) Una presión arterial sistólica superior a 180 mm Hg.
(4) Requerir ventilación no invasiva, o intubación y/o ventilación mecánica.
(5) Presentar otras enfermedades concomitantes, aparte del asma.
(6) Haber recibido corticosteroides en las 6 horas previas.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of heliox (He/O2 = 78%/22%) as a discontinuous nebulizer of rapid-acting beta2-agonists (salbutamol) compared to Air Synthetic Medicinal (O2 22%/N2 78%), in children and adolescents with acute severe asthma, attending to an Emergency Department.
The authors hypothesized that nebulization using heliox (because it reduces the turbulent flow and increases the deposition of aerosolized particles) could show greater clinical improvement than Air Synthetic nebulization, in children and adolescents with acute severe asthma, treated with salbutamol.
The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety of the treatment, especially in the hypoxia events (SaO2 < 90%) suffered by the patients. Patients with very severe crisis can present a desaturation, requiring higher O2 levels than air or heliox mix used.
|
El objetivo principal de este estudio consiste en la evaluación de la eficacia del uso de heliox (He/O2 = 78%/22%) para nebulizar en forma intermitente broncodilatadores agonistas beta de acción rápida (salbutamol) en comparación con el uso de aire sintético medicinal (O2 22%/N2 78%) en niños y adolescentes con asma aguda grave que consultan en un servicio de urgencia. La hipótesis planteada en este estudio es que, en el caso de niños y adolescentes con asma aguda grave tratados con salbutamol, la nebulización con heliox (al reducir el flujo turbulento e incrementar el depósito de partículas aerosolizadas) puede traducirse en mejorías clínicas en comparación con la nebulización con aire sintético medicinal. Un segundo objetivo del estudio consiste en la evaluación de la seguridad del tratamiento, en especial de los episodios de hipoxia que puedan experimentar los pacientes. Algunos pacientes con crisis muy severas pueden presentar desaturación requiriendo niveles de O2 mayores a los que presenta el aire sintético medicinal o la mezcla de heliox utilizada. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
30, 60, and 90 min. |
30, 60, Y 90 min. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
*Percentage of patients that suffered early termination of the study due to SaO2 < 90%.
*Percentage of patients that suffered early termination of the study due to PS = 0.
*Percentage of patients in which hospitalization is required at the end of the treatment.
*Percentage of patients that require ITU hospitalization, orotracheal intubation or exitus during the study.
*Pulmonary function [Change of PEF with respect to basal value, measured by flow meter in patients who can perform forced expiratory manoeuvre (the best of three measures)].*
*Number of hypoxia episodes [SaO2 < 90%] occurred during the treatment and that could require an increase in O2 administration or patient withdrawal.
|
Como variables secundarias serán consideradas:
• Porcentaje de pacientes con finalización anticipada del ensayo por (SaO2< 90%).
• Porcentaje de pacientes con finalización anticipada del ensayo por (EP = 0).
• Porcentaje de pacientes que requieran hospitalización al final del tratamiento.
• Porcentaje de pacientes que requieran ingreso a UTI, intubación oro-traqueal o que fallezcan durante el protocolo.
• Función pulmonar (cambio del FEM desde el valor basal, medido mediante un flujímetro en aquellos pacientes que puedan realizar la maniobra espiratoria forzada [se tomará la mejor de tres medidas]).*
• Número de episodios de hipoxia [SaO2 < 90%] que ocurran durante el tratamiento y que pueden requerir aumento del nivel de O2 administrado o la salida del paciente del protocolo).
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
30, 60, and 90 min. |
30, 60, Y 90 min. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 9 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |