Clinical Trial Results:
Phase II, open, one-site, pilot Clinical trial for assessing the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety and tolerability after conversion of the immuno-suppressive regimen with Advagraf® to Envarsus® in patients with stable pulmonary transplant.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2015-005519-34 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
09 May 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Dec 2021
|
First version publication date |
26 Dec 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ENVARUS
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
VHIR
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, Spain, 08035
|
||
Public contact |
Joaquin Lopez Soriano, Fundació Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron - Institut de Recerca (VHIR), 0034 934894779, joaquin.lopez.soriano@vhir.org
|
||
Scientific contact |
Antonio Román - Servicio de Neumología, Fundació Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron - Institut de Recerca (VHIR), 0034 934893000, aroman@vhebron.net
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
09 May 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
09 May 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Determinate and compare the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profile in stable pulmonary transplant patients after the conversion 1:0.7 from Advagraf® to Envarsus®
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients had been in postoperative follow-up for more than 6 months. On day 16 after enrollment, patients were admitted to the hospital for determination of their 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile. Patients with chronic allograft dysfunction and those with an episode of acute cellular rejection in the previous 3 months were excluded from the study.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jan 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 20
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
20
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
20
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
16
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
4
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
At recruitment, patients remained under ODT for 30 days per protocol. On day 16 after enrollment, patients were admitted to the hospital for determination of their 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile. On day 31, patients were switched from ODT to LCPTin a 1:0.7 (mg/mg) conversion ratio, according to manufacturer's recommendations. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
- | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
20 | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
20 | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
ODT
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
ODT treatment | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
ODT: Oral Daily Treatment per 30 days
LCPT: Oral once-daily extended-release formulation, in ratio 0.7:1 (mg:mg) compared to ODT.
The dose of tacrolimus had to remain stable with an individualized target level of Cmin between 5 and 15 ng/mL in 2 determinations performed before enrollment,with a minimum interval of 6 days between them.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
LCPT
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
LCTP switch | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
ODT: Oral Daily Tretament per 30 days
LCPT: Oral once-daily extended-release formulation, in ratio 0.7:1 (mg:mg) compared to ODT.
The dose of tacrolimus had to remain stable with an individualized target level of Cmin between 5 and 15 ng/mL in 2 determinations performed before enrollment,with a minimum interval of 6 days between them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
ODT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
ODT to LCTP conversion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Afert recruitment, patients remained under ODT for 30 days per protocol. On day 16 after enrollment, patients were admitted to the hospital for determination of their 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile. On day 31, patients were switched from ODT to LCPTin a 1:0.7 (mg/mg) conversion ratio, according to manufacturer's recommendations in Europe as well as previous data in renal transplant
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
ODT treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
LCTP switch
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
ODT to LCTP conversion
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Afert recruitment, patients remained under ODT for 30 days per protocol. On day 16 after enrollment, patients were admitted to the hospital for determination of their 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile. On day 31, patients were switched from ODT to LCPTin a 1:0.7 (mg/mg) conversion ratio, according to manufacturer's recommendations in Europe as well as previous data in renal transplant
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
AUC 0-24 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
All study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
AUC 0-24 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ODT treatment v LCTP switch
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1762 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Cmin 0-24 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
All the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
C min at 0-24 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ODT treatment v LCTP switch
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1552 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Cmax 0-24 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
All the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Cmax 0-24 h | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
LCTP switch v ODT treatment
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.849 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Tmax 0-24 h | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
All the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Tmax 0-24 hour | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ODT treatment v LCTP switch
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
All the study
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
14.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Total adverse events
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
A potential limitation of the study design is the short follow-up period, which prevents efficacy and safety from being assessed in the long term. The study population (mainly white) may not be representative of other ethnicities. | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29965950 |