E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Critical Limb Ischemia in patients with Diabetes Mellitus |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Severe obstruction of the arteries in patients with Diabetes Mellitus |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cardiovascular Diseases [C14] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10077142 |
E.1.2 | Term | Limb ischemia |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004866 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 21.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10058069 |
E.1.2 | Term | Critical limb ischemia |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004866 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10012601 |
E.1.2 | Term | Diabetes mellitus |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Study Objective To confirm the efficacy and safety of a single intra-arterial administration of REX-001 to relief ischemic rest pain in subjects with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) Rutherford Category 4 and diabetes mellitus (DM).
|
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Study Endpoints Primary Efficacy Endpoint Change in Rutherford classification from CLI Category 4 to Category 3 or lower 12 months after administration of REX-001 or the placebo product (hereafter referred to as the Placebo). Success is defined as complete relief of ischaemic rest pain with the absence of the development of ischaemic lesions on the index leg. Secondary Endpoints The following secondary endpoints at 12 months after administration of REX-001 or Placebo are defined: • Change in Rutherford score (Categories 0-6). • Presence of ischaemic ulcers (yes/no). • Amputation free survival (AFS).
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
To be eligible for this trial subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria: 1. Aged ≥ 18 to ≤ 85 years. 2. Diagnosis of Type I or II DM, established more than one year ago. 3. Subjects with poor or no (surgical or endovascular) revascularization option classified as CLI Rutherford Category 4. The blood circulation in these subjects must be compromised at screening defined as: • Ankle systolic pressure < 50 mm Hg, or • Toe systolic pressure < 30 mm Hg, or • Transcutaneos oxygen pressure (tcpO2) < 30 mm Hg, and • Flat or barely pulsatile ankle or metatarsal pulse volume recording (PVR) The subject should have rest pain without tissue loss, and the rest pain must be persistent and require analgesics for at least two weeks for the subject to be eligibile. Subjects with non-compressible vessels must qualify on toe pressure or tcpO2. Poor or no revascularization option means that, in the opinion of the Investigator, revascularization using surgical or endovascular methods is not feasible due to unsuitable anatomy of existing vessels, existing comorbidity and/or previously failed surgical or endovascular revascularization. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Main Exclusion Criteria 1. Advanced CLI defined as presence of major tissue loss (i.e. significant ulceration and/or gangrene) proximal to the metatarsal heads (CLI Rutherford Category 6). Significant ulceration/gangrene means any ulceration that extends beyond the subcutaneous tissue layer, or any gangrene or tissue necrosis proximal to the metatarsal heads. 2. CLI Rutherford Category 5. 3. Uncontrolled or untreated proliferative retinopathy. 4. Failed surgical or endovascular revascularization on the index leg within 10 days prior to screening. 5. Subjects in whom arterial insufficiency in the lower extremity is the result of acute limb ischemia or an immunological or inflammatory or non-atherosclerotic disorder (e.g., thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger’s Disease), or systemic sclerosis (both limited and diffuse forms). 6. Clinical evidence of invasive infection on index leg defined as major tissue loss at the mid-foot or heel involving tendon and/or bone, and/or when according to the Investigator intravenous antibiotics are required to treat the infection. 7. At screening, the presence of only neuropathic ulcers on the index leg. 8. Amputation at or above the talus on the index leg. 9. Planned major amputation within the first month after randomization. 10. Subjects who may not be healthy enough to successfully complete all protocol requirements including BM collection, or who are not expected to survive more than 12 months, or in whom results may be particularly difficult to assess, as assessed by the Investigator. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Change in Rutherford classification from CLI Category 4 to Category 3 or lower 12 months after administration of REX-001 or Placebo. Success is defined as complete relief of ischemic rest pain with the absence of development of ischemic lesions on the index leg. The term "ischaemic rest pain" has been well characterized and indicates diffuse pedal ischaemia (Cranley 1969). It is a severe pain not readily controlled by analgesics that is in general localized to the forefoot and toes or, if more proximal, includes these distal parts. It may also be localized to the vicinity of focal ischaemic lesions. It is brought on or made worse by elevation and relieved by dependency and therefore is often only experienced at night or when lying down. The presence of ischaemic rest pain will be determined by the Investigator through a structured interview (for more details we refer to the Ischaemic Rest Pain Interview form). |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Change in Rutherford classification from CLI Category 4 to Category 3 or lower 12 months after administration of REX-001 or Placebo. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
The following secondary endpoints at 12 months after administration of REX-001 or Placebo will be used: • Change in Rutherford classification (Categories 0-6). The change in Rutherford classification from baseline will be determined at six and 12 months after administration of REX-001 or Placebo. The IAC will confirm the Rutherford category of PAD of each subject. • Presence of ischaemic ulcers (yes/no). The presence of ischaemic ulcers will be determined for each subject at the baseline visit (Visit 3) and at 12 months after the administration of REX-001 or Placebo. These assessments will be confirmed by the IAC using photographs taken of the lower limb and foot for each subject at the baseline visit (Visit 3) and of the ulcers (or the lower limb and foot if no ulcers are present) at 12 months (Visit 9). • AFS. AFS is a composite endpoint which incorporates mortality and major amputation. A major amputation is defined as any procedure that results in amputation at the level of the ankle or above, and is further divided based on its location in relation to the knee. Below the knee amputation is an amputation affecting the tibia at any point below the knee and above the ankle. Above the knee amputation is an amputation above the knee, affecting the femur at any level.
Additional Efficacy Endpoints
• Change in Rutherford classification at three, six, nine, 18, and 24 months. • Presence of ischaemic ulcers at three, six, nine, 18 and 24 months. The IAC will also confirm the presence of ischaemic ulcers using photographs taken of the ulcers, or of the lower limb and foot if no ulcers are present, for each subject at three, six, nine, 18 and 24 months when the primary endpoint is met. • Presence of ischaemic rest pain at 3, 6, 9, 18, and 24 months. • Six-Minute Walking Test at three, six, nine, 12, 18 and 24 months. • Ankle pressure, toe pressure, ABI and TBI at three, six, nine, 12, 18 and 24 months. • TcpO2 at one, two, three, six, nine, 12, 18 and 24 months. Measurements of tcpO2 reflect the metabolic state of lower limbs with CLI and diabetic feet. Small electrodes consisting of a circular silver - silver chloride anode surrounding a central platinum cathode are placed on the skin. Oxygen diffusing to the surface of the skin is reduced at the cathode to produce a current proportional to the partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) within the sensor. In patients with foot ulcers, tissue loss or rest pain, tcpO2 values can be used to assess the presence and severity of vascular disease, the need for revascularization, and to predict the success of healing with or without revascularization. This test is performed by placing probes with electrodes on the foot and the leg, using the chest as a reference site. Common locations for assessment are the dorsum of the foot, the anteromedial aspect of the calf 10 cm below the knee, and the thigh 10 cm above the knee (Cao, et al. 2011). • Revascularization confirmed by angiography at 12 months. An intra-arterial digital angiographic procedure will be performed using a contrast medium. • Disease-specific QoL as assessed by the VascuQol at three, six, nine, 12, 18 and 24 months. • EQ-5D-5L at three, six, nine, 12, 18 and 24 months. The EQ-5D is the most widely used generic preference based measure assessing health on five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) across three response levels generating 243 health states in total (Wisløff, et al. 2014). Value sets for use in cost utility analysis (anchored on a full health (1) and dead (0)) have been developed internationally (Szende, Oppe en Devlin 2007). A new version of the EQ-5D with five response levels (EQ-5D-5L; none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) has been developed (Herdman, et al. 2011). • Incidence of minor amputations. A minor amputation is defined as any procedure that results in amputation of a part of the foot distal to the transverse tarsal joint with preservation of the talus and calcaneus. • AFS at 24 months. • Cardiovascular morbidity. This includes cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke (adjudicated by the IAC, recommended as per CHMP note for guidance). |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
12 months post administration of REX-001 or Placebo
|
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 4 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 37 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
LVLS All subjects will be followed up until 24 months after the administration of REX-001 or Placebo. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 6 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |