Clinical Trial Results:
A PHASE II PILOT STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, EFFICACY, PHARMACODYNAMICS AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF IDES IN ASYMPTOMATIC ANTIBODY-MEDIATED THROMBOTIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA (TTP) PATIENTS WITH LOW ADAMTS13 ACTIVITY
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-000249-30 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
25 Jan 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
04 May 2019
|
First version publication date |
04 May 2019
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
15-HMedIdeS-08
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02854059 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Hansa Biopharma AB (former name Hansa Medical AB)
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Scheelevägen 22, Lund, Sweden, 223 63
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trials Information, Hansa Biopharma AB (former name Hansa Medical AB), clinicalstudyinfo@hansabiopharma.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trials Information, Hansa Biopharma AB (former name Hansa Medical AB), clinicalstudyinfo@hansabiopharma.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
02 Mar 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
25 Jan 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
25 Jan 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess safety and tolerability of single intravenous doses of IdeS in patients diagnosed with asymptomatic antibody-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) with low ADAMTS13 activity
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was performed in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with ICH/Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements.
An internal monitoring committee (IMC) at Hansa Biopharma AB (former name Hansa Medical AB) was established to review safety and tolerability data after the first 3 patients had been dosed and before potential dose escalation. Additionally, if at any time during the study, 2 or more patients had experienced a grade 3 (according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events [CTCAE] v 4.0) related adverse event (AE), the IMC had to be convened. Safety data (clinical chemistry, haematology, coagulation and AEs) collected up to and including day 14 was to be evaluated. Furthermore, efficacy data (ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13 antibodies and CD19) were also planned to be evaluated by the IMC.
|
||
Background therapy |
Patients received premedication with paracetamol, hydrocortisone and antihistamine before study drug infusions as well as a 2-week regimen of prophylactic antibiotics (penicillin V or alternatively ciprofloxacin in case of allergy to penicillin), starting pre-dose. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
N/A | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
23 Sep 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 2
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
2
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
2
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
2
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
The study was a single centre study. 6 patients were planned: 3 patients to recieve 0.25 mg/kg of IdeS and a potential dose escalation to 0.5 mg/kg for additional 3 patients. Two patients were recruited between 25-Sep-2016 and 11-Nov-2016. The study ended prematurely 25-Jan-2017. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
The study included adult patients diagnosed with acquired TTP with ADAMTS13 levels of ≤10% in clinical remission and with measurable or previously confirmed ADAMTS13 antibodies. 2 patients were included and completed the study. The study was discontinued prematurely as an non-favourable risk-benefit profile was observed in the first 2 patients. | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
2 | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
2 | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Group 1 (overall trial) | ||||||
Arm description |
Single i.v. infusion of IdeS ( 0.25 mg/kg). After review of the initial results from the study that demonstrated a non-favourable risk-benefit profile in the first 2 patients who received single i.v. infusion of IdeS (0.25 mg/kg), the study was prematurely discontinued. The potential dose escalation to i.v. infusion of IdeS (0.5 mg/kg) did not occur. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
IdeS
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
IdeS
|
||||||
Other name |
HMed-IdeS, IgG endopeptidase
|
||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Single 30-minute i.v. infusion of IdeS (0.25 mg/kg).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Group 1 (overall trial)
|
||
Reporting group description |
Single i.v. infusion of IdeS ( 0.25 mg/kg). After review of the initial results from the study that demonstrated a non-favourable risk-benefit profile in the first 2 patients who received single i.v. infusion of IdeS (0.25 mg/kg), the study was prematurely discontinued. The potential dose escalation to i.v. infusion of IdeS (0.5 mg/kg) did not occur. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Safety assessed as Adverse Events [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Data on AEs were obtained if spontaneously reported by the patient, if reported in response to an open question from the study personnel or if revealed by observation.
A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE occurring after administration of the IMP and within the time of the residual drug effect period (i.e. 30 days after IMP administration).
Severity was graded based on CTCAE version 4.0.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
AEs were collected from subject signing the ICF until end of study visit, incl the follow-up period (=Day 64).
AEs reported in EudraCT include TEAEs and post-treatment AEs, i.e. all AEs occurring after admin of the IMP until end of study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Because of the premature termination of the study and since the sponsor will no longer pursue the indication, the analyses as described in the protocol were not performed. Instead, data collected for the 2 enrolled subjects were listed and presented graphically. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in ADAMTS13 activity | ||||||||
End point description |
ADAMTS13 is an enzyme which is inhibited in patients with TTP. The efficacy of IdeS on ADAMTS13 activity was measured througout the study as change from baseline.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From day of dosing until end of follow up on day 64.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in ADAMTS13 Antibody Levels (IgG and F(ab’)2) | ||||||||
End point description |
The efficacy of IdeS on ADAMTS13 antibody cleaving was measured througout the study as change from baseline in ADAMTS13 antibody concentration.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From day of dosing until end of follow up on day 64
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Time for ADAMTS13 Activity to Return to Normal Levels | ||||||||
End point description |
The ADAMTS13 activity in TTP patients is decreased. The efficacy of IdeS on ADAMTS13 activity was assessed throughout the study to identify the time-point of return to normal levels.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From day of dosing until end of follow up on day 64
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Pharmacodynamics as Measured by Level of IgG | ||||||||||||
End point description |
IdeS cleaves IgG molecules. The concentration of uncleaved IgG in the patient's serum was measured throughout the study to determine change from baseline following IdeS administration.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From day of dosing until end of follow up on day 64
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Immunogenicity of IdeS by Measuring Anti-drug Antibodies | ||||||||||
End point description |
Most humans have been infected with S. pyogenes which is the origin of IdeS. It was therefore expected that patients in this study might have antibodies against IdeS before being exposed to IdeS in the study. The concentration of ant-IdeS antibodies was measured before dosing and throughout the study.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From day of dosing until end of follow up on day 64
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
AEs were collected from subject signing the ICF until end of study visit, incl the follow-up period (=Day 64).
AEs reported in EudraCT include TEAEs and post-treatment AEs, i.e. all AEs occurring after admin of the IMP until end of study
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Data on AEs were obtained if spontaneously reported by the patient, if reported in response to an open question from the study personnel or if revealed by observation.
A treatment emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE occurring after administration of the IMP and within the time of the residual drug effect period (i.e. 30 days after IMP adminis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
19
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Group 1 (overall trial)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Single i.v. infusion of 0.25 mg IdeS/kg body weight. Initially 3 patients receiving a dose of 0.25 mg/kg body weight of IdeS and after safety evaluation, a potential dose escalation to 0.5 mg/kg for the remaining 3 patients. The study was terminated early by the sponsor following a review of the initial results from the study that demonstrated a non-favourable risk-benefit profile in the first 2 patients. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
Because of premature study termination and since the sponsor will no longer pursue the indication, the analyses as described in the protocol were not performed. Instead, data collected for the 2 enrolled subjects were listed and presented graphically |