Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Fatigue in Sarcoidosis - A feasibility study investigating the treatment of fatigue in stable sarcoidosis patients using methylphenidate

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-000342-60
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    09 Jul 2018

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    09 Jun 2022
    First version publication date
    09 Jun 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    190280
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02643732
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    U1111-1180-0191
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
    Sponsor organisation address
    Colney Lane, Norwich, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
    Public contact
    Lisa Chalkley, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, +44 01603286611, lisa.chalkley@nnuh.nhs.uk
    Scientific contact
    Lisa Chalkley, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, +44 01603286611, lisa.chalkley@nnuh.nhs.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    10 May 2022
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    09 Jul 2018
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    09 Jul 2018
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objectives for this trial is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a suitably large randomised controlled trial investigating whether methylphenidate is a clinically effective treatment for fatigue in sarcoidosis, and how best to design this trial to successfully answer this question. As a result, the main research questions are: (1) What is the recruitment rate of participants/how quickly can we recruit people into the trial? (How many studies might need to be involved in a future trial?) (2) How many patients with sarcoidosis are excluded from the study and for what reason? (as above) (3) How many people who are included in the study manage to complete the study? (How many participants extra do we need to ensure statistical power is maintained allowing for drop-outs) (4) Why are potential participants excluded from the study, and why do participants withdraw/drop-out of the study? (as above, as well as generalisability of the results – is the population i
    Protection of trial subjects
    Monitoring of all high risks during the trial - blood pressure, liver function, ECG. These were done at all visits through the trial where participants were potentially receiving the IMP (weeks 2,4,6,12,18 and 24).
    Background therapy
    None
    Evidence for comparator
    Comparator is placebo - identical gel caps containing lactose powder only (compared with gel caps including the active methylphenidate pill, then packed with lactose powder.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    25 Apr 2016
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 22
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    22
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    18
    From 65 to 84 years
    4
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Participants were recruited from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (Norwich, Norfolk, UK) with patients referred from other centres for consideration of trial inclusion. Recruitment was open between 07/11/2016 and 02/03/2018.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants were screened via medical notes (all patients with sarcoidosis under the care of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital against eligibility criteria; A proven diagnosis of sarcoidosis, stable disease, able to give informed consent and a Fatigue Assessment Scale score >21 points.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Placebo and active treatments appeared identical. Trial pharmacists at NNUH were aware of the treatment group due to unequal arm size; they did not disclose the group allocation and medication labels did not reference the allocated group; this data was contained on a tear-off strip which was removed prior to dispensing to the study team. During study monitoring and auditing, pharmacy monitoring was performed by a member of staff from Norwich CRTU to maintain blinding of the study team.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Active treatment
    Arm description
    Methylphenidate, up to 20mg BD
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Methylphenidate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft + tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10mg BD for 2 weeks then increased to 20mg BD to the end of the trial. Participants could opt-out of the up titration if they felt they had adequate benefit at the lower dose. Down-titration to the lower dose could occur if certain side effects occurred; following this, it was not possible to uptitrate back to the higher dose.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Placebo medication - identical capsule to the active treatment arm
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Identical placebo to active treatment (methylphenidate) - this was a soft capsule containing lactose powder. Started at 1 tablet BD, increased to 2 tablets BD after 2 weeks if no side effects had occurred. Participants could opt out of the dose increase if adequate clinical improvement had already occurred. Down-titration from the higher dose could occur if side effects became apparent on the higher dose; once this occurred it was not possible to uptitrate back up to the higher dose.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Active treatment Placebo
    Started
    15
    7
    Completed
    15
    7

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Active treatment
    Reporting group description
    Methylphenidate, up to 20mg BD

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo medication - identical capsule to the active treatment arm

    Reporting group values
    Active treatment Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    15 7 22
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Age
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    55.5 ( 10.1 ) 55.4 ( 7.7 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Sex
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    5 4 9
        Male
    10 3 13
    Smoking status
    Smoking status
    Units: Subjects
        Current
    0 0 0
        Ex
    4 3 7
        Never
    11 4 15
    Disease duration
    Length of diagnosis of sarcoidosis
    Units: Subjects
        >3 years
    9 4 13
        1-3 years
    2 2 4
        <1 year
    4 1 5
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Caucasian
    15 7 22
    Current treatment
    Current immunosuppressive treatment for sarcoidosis
    Units: Subjects
        Prednisolone
    3 1 4
        Methotrexate
    1 2 3
        Azathioprine
    0 1 1
        No current treatment
    11 3 14
    Pulmonary disease present
    Number of patients with pulmonary disease present
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    15 7 22
        No
    0 0 0
    Extra-pulmonary disease present
    Number of patients with extra-pulmonary disease present
    Units: Subjects
        Yes
    9 3 12
        No
    6 4 10
    Fatigue assessment scale (stratified)
    Severity of fatigue by FAS score
    Units: Subjects
        Fatigued (Score 22-34)
    7 3 10
        Severe (35-50)
    8 4 12
    BMI
    Body mass index
    Units: kg/m^2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    30.3 ( 4.5 ) 33.8 ( 7.6 ) -
    Weight
    Weight
    Units: kg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    94.0 ( 16.8 ) 94.0 ( 21.3 ) -
    BP - systolic
    Systolic blood pressure
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    145.4 ( 16.3 ) 135.6 ( 24.7 ) -
    BP - diastolic
    Diastolic blood pressure
    Units: mmHg
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    88.7 ( 10.7 ) 85.9 ( 9.7 ) -
    Pulse
    Units: bpm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    73.5 ( 16.4 ) 75.9 ( 9.8 ) -
    Pack-year smoking history
    Number of pack-years smoking history
    Units: pack-years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    17.5 ( 14.2 ) 6.7 ( 4.9 ) -
    Alcohol intake
    Units of alcohol per week intake
    Units: units per week
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    5.3 ( 7.6 ) 4.7 ( 10.3 ) -
    Baseline FAS score
    Fatigue (FAS score)
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    35.9 ( 7.7 ) 35.9 ( 8.8 ) -
    Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue Score)
    Fatigue (scored by FACIT-Fatigue)
    Units: units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    19.9 ( 11.0 ) 20.0 ( 10.8 ) -
    Anxiety score
    HADS-A
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    7.8 ( 3.3 ) 8.0 ( 4.9 ) -
    Depression
    HADS-D
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    7.9 ( 2.9 ) 6.6 ( 4.5 ) -
    Health Utility (EQ5D)
    Health utility score by EQ5D utility score
    Units: units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.694 ( 0.271 ) 0.679 ( 0.244 ) -
    EQ-VAS
    VAS score from EQ5D utility
    Units: mm
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    62.5 ( 21.9 ) 68.0 ( 12.9 ) -
    Health Utility (SF6D)
    Health utility scored by SF6D
    Units: units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.613 ( 0.094 ) 0.559 ( 0.164 ) -
    KSQ General health status
    Kings Sarcoid questionnaire general health status
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    48.8 ( 12.8 ) 47.1 ( 11.8 ) -
    KSQ Lung
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire lung symptoms
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    58.8 ( 16.5 ) 43.7 ( 15.8 ) -
    KSQ Medications
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire medication related symptoms
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    86.0 ( 20.3 ) 85.6 ( 23.2 ) -
    KSQ Skin
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire skin symptoms
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    86.0 ( 21.4 ) 87.5 ( 17.3 ) -
    KSQ Eyes
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire eye symptoms
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    66.7 ( 21.5 ) 62.6 ( 22.5 ) -
    KSQ Composite
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire overall score
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    54.2 ( 7.7 ) 50.0 ( 6.7 ) -
    PSQI
    Pittsburgh sleep questionnaire inventory score
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    8.9 ( 4.1 ) 13.5 ( 3.4 ) -
    Sleep efficiency
    Overall sleep efficiency (% of night asleep)
    Units: percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    86.9 ( 27.7 ) 55.4 ( 15.9 ) -
    FEV1
    Forced expiratory volume in 1 seconds (percentage predicted)
    Units: percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    99.5 ( 24.1 ) 79.1 ( 19.0 ) -
    FVC % predicted
    Forced vital capacity (percentage predicted)
    Units: percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    104.3 ( 21.7 ) 88.6 ( 18.4 ) -
    MSWT
    Modified shuttle walk test distance
    Units: metres
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    522.7 ( 330.9 ) 438.6 ( 353.6 ) -
    Sedentary time
    Sedentary time per day
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    644.4 ( 152.8 ) 602.5 ( 118.7 ) -
    MVPA
    Moderate and vigorous physical activity per day
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    105.7 ( 68.3 ) 87.4 ( 43.9 ) -
    MVPA-10
    Moderate and vigorous activity per day (10 minute block time)
    Units: minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    19.0 ( 25.4 ) 4.6 ( 5.0 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Active treatment
    Reporting group description
    Methylphenidate, up to 20mg BD

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo medication - identical capsule to the active treatment arm

    Primary: Medication adherence

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Medication adherence [1]
    End point description
    Percentage of doses taken using pill counts at each visit to determine the number of doses that should have been taken, the number of pills expected to remain and the actual remaining pills. No participant took more than their expected number of doses. The overall count across the entire study period is reported.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    24 weeks total, though those recruited after December 2017 had a reduced follow-up period. (18 weeks if recruited between December and February 2018, 12 weeks if recruited after February 2018).
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Percentage of doses taken
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    98 (90 to 100)
    99 (97 to 100)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Questionnaire missing data

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Questionnaire missing data [2] [3]
    End point description
    A total of 1142 data points across 12 questionnaires. Data is for BOTH arms, not just active treatment arm. As this was a measure of feasibility it was not split by arm.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    8 visits across 30 weeks
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    Units: Missing data
    15
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Adverse event rate

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Adverse event rate [4]
    End point description
    Number of adverse events in any organ system reported during the 30 week trial.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    30 weeks
    Notes
    [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: Adverse events
    14
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Activity monitor wear periods

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Activity monitor wear periods [5] [6]
    End point description
    Feasibility end-point; number of wear periods for the accelerometer activity devices and number of devices with valid data. ASA. FEASIBILITY END-POINT THE DATA IS REPORTED FOR BOTH ARMS AND WAS NOT SPLIT.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    24 weeks - three wear periods per individual (fewer for individuals randomised from December 2017 onwards).
    Notes
    [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    [6] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    Units: Number of wear periods
        Devices returned
    59
        Any data on device
    55
        Minimum valid data
    54
        Complete 24h wear periods
    49
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Exit Questionnaire - Wished to continue study drug at end of trial

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Exit Questionnaire - Wished to continue study drug at end of trial [7]
    End point description
    Participants were asked their perception of study enrolment
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    7
    Units: Individuals
    11
    5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Exit questionnaire - was participation in the study useful?

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Exit questionnaire - was participation in the study useful? [8]
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    7
    Units: Individuals
    12
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Exit questionnaire - Given the chance again would you participate in the study?

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Exit questionnaire - Given the chance again would you participate in the study? [9]
    End point description
    Number of participants who would take part in the trial again if given the chance again
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    7
    Units: Individuals
    12
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Exit Questionnaire - Would you recommend future trials including methylphenidate?

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Exit Questionnaire - Would you recommend future trials including methylphenidate? [10]
    End point description
    Number of participants who would recommend future trials investigating methylphenidate
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    7
    Units: Individuals
    12
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Participants correctly predicting allocation (exit questionnaire)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Participants correctly predicting allocation (exit questionnaire) [11]
    End point description
    Participants were asked to predict their allocation at the end of the trial
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [11] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Individual
    14
    4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Investigator correctly predicting allocation at end of trial

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Investigator correctly predicting allocation at end of trial [12]
    End point description
    Number of participants where the investigator correctly predicted the allocation of the participant whilst still blinded.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 - Exit questionnaire
    Notes
    [12] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes and therefore do not relate to active vs placebo. It was pre-specified that no statistical analysis would take place on these primary feasibility outcomes and only exploratory statistical analysis would occur for the secondary clinical outcomes.
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Individuals
    11
    5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Fatigue (FAS score) - 12 weeks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fatigue (FAS score) - 12 weeks
    End point description
    Change in FAS score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: FAS score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    29.1 ( 9.4 )
    27.1 ( 12.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean difference between groups, adjusted for baseline scores
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [13]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    1.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.4
         upper limit
    8.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [13] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Fatigue (FAS) - Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fatigue (FAS) - Week 24
    End point description
    FAS score at week 24
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: FAS score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    28.2 ( 8.7 )
    22.0 ( 8.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean difference between arms adjusted for baseline values
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [14]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    6.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.4
         upper limit
    13.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [14] - Mean difference between groups, adjusted for baseline scores Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Fatigue (FAS) Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fatigue (FAS) Week 30
    End point description
    Final data, taken 6 weeks after completing medications
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks post completion of medications)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: FAS score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    32.7 ( 9.5 )
    27.6 ( 12.1 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean difference 0 week 30 fatigue (FAS) score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [15]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.3
         upper limit
    12.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [15] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: FACIT-Fatigue Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FACIT-Fatigue Week 12
    End point description
    FACIT-Fatigue score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: FACIT-Fatigue score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    28.6 ( 13.1 )
    29.3 ( 17.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean difference (adjusted)
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted mean difference (for baseline FAS scores) between arms
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [16]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -9.1
         upper limit
    8.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [16] - Planned analysis at week 12 of difference between arms 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: FACIT-Fatigue Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FACIT-Fatigue Week 24
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Final data point whilst receiving medication)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: FACIT-Fatigue score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    29.0 ( 10.7 )
    39.2 ( 11.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference (adjusted for baseline fatigue FAS scores)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [17]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -9.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -17.8
         upper limit
    -0.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [17] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: FACIT-Fatigue Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FACIT-Fatigue Week 30
    End point description
    FACIT-Fatigue score at week 30 (6 weeks after ceasing medications)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: FACIT-Fatigue score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    23.9 ( 11.8 )
    28.3 ( 18.1 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean difference between arms at week 30; difference adjusted for baseline fatigue (FAS) score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [18]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -14.7
         upper limit
    1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [18] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 12
    End point description
    HADS-A score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Units (HADS-A)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.8 ( 3.9 )
    4.3 ( 4.3 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean group difference (adjusted)
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted between-group difference (adjusted for baseline fatigue/FAS score)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [19]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    2.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4
         upper limit
    5
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [19] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 24
    End point description
    HADS-A Anxiety level score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: HADS-A score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    5.6 ( 1.8 )
    2.2 ( 2.7 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue (FAS) scores.
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [20]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    3.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.6
         upper limit
    5.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [20] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anxiety (HADS-A) Week 30
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks after completing medications)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: HADS-A score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.9 ( 3.7 )
    2.5 ( 2.5 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted between-group difference (adjusted for baseline fatigue (FAS) score)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [21]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    3.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.6
         upper limit
    6.5
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [21] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Depression (HADS-D) score week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Depression (HADS-D) score week 12
    End point description
    HADS-D (depression symptoms) score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 - depression score
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: HADS-D score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.9 ( 4.3 )
    7.6 ( 6.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [22]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -1.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.5
         upper limit
    3.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [22] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Depression (HADS-D) Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Depression (HADS-D) Week 24
    End point description
    Depressive symptoms on HADS-D score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 HADS-D score
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: HADS-D score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    6.4 ( 2.5 )
    3.2 ( 5.0 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score (by group)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [23]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    2.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.3
         upper limit
    6.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [23] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Depression symptoms (HADS-D) week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Depression symptoms (HADS-D) week 30
    End point description
    Depressive symptoms (measured by HADS-D) at week 30, 6 weeks after completing trial medications
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: HADS-D score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    8.1 ( 3.8 )
    3.8 ( 4.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [24]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    4.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.5
         upper limit
    7.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [24] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-GHS Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-GHS Week 12
    End point description
    Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire - General Health Status
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    55.8 ( 14.7 )
    64.0 ( 26.2 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group adjusted mean difference (adjusted for baseline fatigue severity)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [25]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -10.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -23.7
         upper limit
    -6.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [25] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-GHS Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-GHS Week 24
    End point description
    Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire - General health status questionnaire
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    59.0 ( 14.4 )
    71.2 ( 13.1 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean difference between groups adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [26]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -14.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -23.7
         upper limit
    -6.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [26] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-GHS Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-GHS Week 30
    End point description
    Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire General Health Score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    53.9 ( 13.1 )
    57.1 ( 28.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [27]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -8.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -20.6
         upper limit
    3.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [27] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Lung Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Lung Week 12
    End point description
    Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire - Lung symptoms score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    58.4 ( 18.0 )
    53.7 ( 30.5 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [28]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -11.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -26.7
         upper limit
    3.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [28] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Lung Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Lung Week 24
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - lung symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    64.5 ( 20.8 )
    70.8 ( 15.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [29]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -16.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -33.7
         upper limit
    0.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [29] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Lung Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Lung Week 30
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - lung symptoms week 30
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    64.0 ( 24.1 )
    61.8 ( 24.0 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Mean between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Active treatment
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [30]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -11.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -31.6
         upper limit
    7.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [30] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Skin Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Skin Week 12
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - skin symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    85.8 ( 17.1 )
    85.7 ( 17.2 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [31]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -15.9
         upper limit
    16.9
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [31] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Skin Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Skin Week 24
    End point description
    Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire - skin symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    94.6 ( 9.3 )
    100.0 ( 0.0 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group adjusted mean difference (adjusted for baseline fatigue)
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [32]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -4.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -12.4
         upper limit
    3.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [32] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Skin Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Skin Week 30
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - skin symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks after completing medications)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    90.3 ( 15.4 )
    81.8 ( 25.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue scores
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [33]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    7.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -9.2
         upper limit
    24.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [33] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Medications Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Medications Week 12
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - medications symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    88.5 ( 18.0 )
    77.3 ( 38.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted between-group mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference, adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [34]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    11.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -10.4
         upper limit
    32.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [34] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Medications Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Medications Week 24
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - medication score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    94.3 ( 9.2 )
    90.5 ( 10.5 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue score
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [35]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    4.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.3
         upper limit
    15.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [35] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Medications Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Medications Week 30
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - medication symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    81.4 ( 27.0 )
    78.3 ( 36.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [36]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -26.8
         upper limit
    26
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [36] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Eye Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Eye Week 12
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - eye symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    67.0 ( 13.5 )
    62.1 ( 33.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [37]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -16.4
         upper limit
    22.4
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [37] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Eye Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Eye Week 24
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - eye symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    68.4 ( 17.5 )
    73.3 ( 21.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [38]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -29.3
         upper limit
    16.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [38] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Eye Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Eye Week 30
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire eye symptoms
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    66.6 ( 14.7 )
    71.2 ( 23.3 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [39]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -19.4
         upper limit
    5.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [39] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Composite score Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Composite score Week 12
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire - Composite score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    55.8 ( 8.6 )
    61.0 ( 21.0 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [40]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -11.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -20
         upper limit
    -2.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [40] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Composite score Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Composite score Week 24
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire composite output
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    59.5 ( 11.9 )
    66.3 ( 10.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [41]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -12.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -20.6
         upper limit
    -4.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [41] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: KSQ-Composite score Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    KSQ-Composite score Week 30
    End point description
    Kings sarcoidosis questionnaire composite outcome
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    56.4 ( 10.5 )
    59.3 ( 19.1 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted by baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [42]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -9.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -18
         upper limit
    -1.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [42] - Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ5D Utility Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ5D Utility Week 12
    End point description
    EQ5D health utility score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.733 ( 0.249 )
    0.725 ( 0.378 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [43]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.005
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.121
         upper limit
    0.111
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [43] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ5D Utility Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ5D Utility Week 24
    End point description
    EQ5D-derived health utility value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.817 ( 0.133 )
    0.947 ( 0.066 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [44]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.139
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.214
         upper limit
    -0.065
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [44] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ5D Utility Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ5D Utility Week 30
    End point description
    EQ5D-derived health utility value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks after completing medications)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.817 ( 0.133 )
    0.947 ( 0.061 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [45]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.052
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.209
         upper limit
    0.104
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [45] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: SF6D Health Utility Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    SF6D Health Utility Week 12
    End point description
    SF6D-derived health utility score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.617 ( 0.120 )
    0.657 ( 0.204 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [46]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.097
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.173
         upper limit
    -0.021
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [46] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: SF6D Health Utility Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    SF6D Health Utility Week 24
    End point description
    SF6D-derived health utility score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.631 ( 0.085 )
    0.764 ( 0.153 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [47]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.161
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.266
         upper limit
    -0.056
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [47] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: SF6D Health Utility Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    SF6D Health Utility Week 30
    End point description
    SF6D-derived health utility value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks after medication completion)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0.597 ( 0.108 )
    0.677 ( 0.204 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [48]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.217
         upper limit
    -0.043
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [48] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 12
    End point description
    EQ-VAS derived health utility
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    7
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    62.1 ( 19.9 )
    66.0 ( 21.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [49]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -3.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -20.9
         upper limit
    13.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [49] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 24
    End point description
    EQ-VAS derived health utility score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    65.5 ( 24.4 )
    72.5 ( 22.9 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [50]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -7.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -32.4
         upper limit
    17.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [50] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    EQ-VAS Health Utility Week 30
    End point description
    Health utility score derived from EQ-VAS questionnaire
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 30 (6 weeks after completing medications)
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    7
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    64.3 ( 20.9 )
    57.6 ( 24.6 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [51]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    4.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -10.7
         upper limit
    19.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [51] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Sleep Quality - PSQI score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sleep Quality - PSQI score
    End point description
    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire sleep quality
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    4
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    8.4 ( 4.0 )
    10.5 ( 6.5 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    14
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [52]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    4.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.2
         upper limit
    11.9
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [52] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Sleep Quality - PSQI score (Week 24)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sleep Quality - PSQI score (Week 24)
    End point description
    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire score
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    6
    Units: Units
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    9.8 ( 2.5 )
    10.8 ( 5.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    14
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [53]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    0.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -23.3
         upper limit
    25.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [53] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Sleep efficiency

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sleep efficiency
    End point description
    Sleep efficiency, Higher values indicate better sleep efficiency (higher percentage of the time in bed spent asleep)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    4
    Units: Percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    81.4 ( 15.4 )
    67.0 ( 18.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group mean adjusted difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    14
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [54]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -12.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -40.3
         upper limit
    68
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [54] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Sleep efficiency - week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sleep efficiency - week 24
    End point description
    Sleep efficiency (time asleep as a percentage of time in bed)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    6
    Units: Percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    76.5 ( 12.4 )
    65.6 ( 22.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    14
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [55]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    1.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -64.7
         upper limit
    68
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [55] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: FEV1 percentage predicted - week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FEV1 percentage predicted - week 12
    End point description
    Forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    98.4 ( 14.6 )
    78.3 ( 20.7 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [56]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    8.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.2
         upper limit
    18.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [56] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: FEV1 percentage predicted - week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    FEV1 percentage predicted - week 24
    End point description
    Forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    94.5 ( 19.6 )
    80.0 ( 20.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [57]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    6.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.6
         upper limit
    19.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [57] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Forced vital capacity percentage predicted - week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Forced vital capacity percentage predicted - week 12
    End point description
    Forced vital capacity percentage predicted value
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: Percentage points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    106.1 ( 13.0 )
    88.0 ( 20.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [58]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    8.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.4
         upper limit
    23.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [58] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MSWT Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MSWT Week 12
    End point description
    Modified shuttle walk test distance (metres)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    10
    6
    Units: metres
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    658.0 ( 397.7 )
    515.0 ( 252.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    16
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [59]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    56.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -73.9
         upper limit
    186.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [59] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MSWT Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MSWT Week 24
    End point description
    Modified shuttle walk test distance (metres)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    7
    4
    Units: metres
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    624.3 ( 430.3 )
    432.5 ( 235.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between-group difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    11
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [60]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    43.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -216.3
         upper limit
    304.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [60] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MVPA minutes per day

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA minutes per day
    End point description
    Time in moderate or vigorous physical activity per day
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    4
    Units: minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    116.8 ( 76.6 )
    76.6 ( 47.7 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between-group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    19
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [61]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    14.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -29.1
         upper limit
    58.6
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [61] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MVPA minutes per day (week 24)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA minutes per day (week 24)
    End point description
    Time in moderate or vigorous activity per day (minutes)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    6
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    108.1 ( 62.9 )
    86.4 ( 48.7 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [62]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    24.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -16.8
         upper limit
    65.9
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [62] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MVPA10 Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA10 Week 12
    End point description
    Time in moderate or vigorous physical activity (10 minute bout criteria)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    4
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    19.4 ( 32.8 )
    3.8 ( 3.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    19
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [63]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -27.2
         upper limit
    13.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [63] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: MVPA10 - Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    MVPA10 - Week 24
    End point description
    Time in moderate or vigorous physical activity (ten minute bout criteria) in minutes per day.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    6
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    15.0 ( 20.3 )
    12.0 ( 15.4 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [64]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -6.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -27.2
         upper limit
    13.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [64] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: Sedentary time per day - week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sedentary time per day - week 12
    End point description
    Time in sedentary behaviours per day
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    4
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    565.9 ( 156.6 )
    700.2 ( 123.2 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    19
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [65]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -167.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -320.9
         upper limit
    -13.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [65] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Secondary: sedentary time per day - week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    sedentary time per day - week 24
    End point description
    Time spent in sedentary behaviours per day
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    End point values
    Active treatment Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    9
    6
    Units: Minutes
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    567.9 ( 96.7 )
    656.5 ( 126.1 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Between group adjusted mean difference
    Statistical analysis description
    Between group mean difference adjusted for baseline fatigue severity
    Comparison groups
    Active treatment v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    15
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [66]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -139.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -341.4
         upper limit
    63
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Notes
    [66] - 1Mean difference is equivalent to the methylphenidate group value minus the placebo group value. Positive values indicate the methylphenidate group value was higher than the placebo group, negative values indicate the methylphenidate group value was lower than the placebo group.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    AEs assessed at week 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Weeks 2,4,6,12,18 and 24 were face-to-face visits with assessment of patients in person. This included blood tests, ECGs, physical observations. Weeks 1,3,5,8,10,14,16,20 and 22 were telephone calls to record any AEs. Participants could also contact the trial team if any problems occurred between visits.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    CTCAE
    Dictionary version
    4.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Methylphenidate
    Reporting group description
    Fifteen participants receiving methylphenidate

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Seven participants receiving placebo

    Serious adverse events
    Methylphenidate Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Syncope
    Additional description: Bradycardia with syncope thought to be unrelated to the medication (occurred after afternoon in the pub and then suddenly standing up), brief hospital admission meant that it was classified as an SAE.
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0.1%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Methylphenidate Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 15 (93.33%)
    7 / 7 (100.00%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
    Additional description: 1x grade 1 and 1x grade 2 AE in methylphenidate group
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Unknown
    Additional description: Multiple non-specific disorders 2x grade 1, 2x grade 2 in methylphenidate 1x grade 1, 1x grade 2 in placebo
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 15 (26.67%)
    2 / 7 (28.57%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Testicular pain
    Additional description: 2x grade 1 AEs in methylphenidate group only
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea exertionalasia
    Additional description: 9x grade 1 and 4x grade 2 AEs in methylphenidate group 6x grade 1 and 1x grade 2 AEs in placebo group
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 15 (86.67%)
    7 / 7 (100.00%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    7
    Psychiatric disorders
    Mood altered
    Additional description: 2x grade 1 and 3x grade 2 AE in methylphenidate group 2x grade 1 and 2x grade 2 AE in placebo group
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 15 (33.33%)
    4 / 7 (57.14%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    4
    Investigations
    Liver function test abnormal
    Additional description: One patient with deranged LFTs in methylphenidate group who had an intercurrent viral illness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
    Additional description: 14x grade 1 AEs in methylphenidate group 1x grade 2 AE in methylphenidate group 3x grade AE in placebo group
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 15 (93.33%)
    3 / 7 (42.86%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    3
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Dizziness
    Additional description: Grade 1 severity only
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Eye disorders
    Vision blurred
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    3 / 7 (42.86%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
    Additional description: Diarrhoea, also abdominal pains; reported AEs were reported by class in final results
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 15 (93.33%)
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash
    Additional description: 2x grade 1 and 2x grade 2 AEs in methylphenidate group 1x grade 2 AE in placebo group
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 15 (26.67%)
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle discomfort
    Additional description: 3x grade 1 and 2x grade 2 AE in methylphenidate group 1x grade 2 AE in placebo group All AEs myopathy/muscle pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 15 (33.33%)
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Respiratory tract infectionratory
    Additional description: 1x grade 1 infection in methylphenidate group 1x grade 2 infection in placebo group
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Appetite disorderite
    Additional description: 1x grade 1 AE in methylphenidate group only.
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    17 Apr 2017
    After four months of recruitment it became apparent that the recruitment rate was below that expected. In order to increase the recruitment period, two amendments were made. Firstly, the ability to recruit participants from PIC sites in the eastern region was added, with Royal Papworth Hospital and Addenbrooke’s hospital operating in this capacity. Secondly, in order to increase the recruitment phase (and maximise the time participants could enter the study without reducing the overall study duration), follow-up for participants recruited between December 2017 and March 2018 was truncated. Participants randomised between 01/12/2017 and 01/02/2018 received study medication for 18 weeks, plus an additional two weeks if a down-titration period at the end of the study was required; participants randomised between 02/02/2018 and 02/03/2018 received study medication for 12 weeks, plus an additional two weeks if down-titration was required. The last date of follow-up was fixed at 06/07/2018. As part of this substantial amendment, two additional outcome measures were added. The PSQI and Exit questionnaires were administered to patients entering the study after 23/05/2017 according to the questionnaire schedule in table 1; participants who had already commenced the study were administered the additional questionnaires if they consented to completing these additional measurements.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    The individual AEs are archived and not immediately available, the overall data results are presented and entered here.

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29208618
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34020962
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun Apr 28 23:02:52 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA