Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy with LYC-30937-EC in Subjects with Active Ulcerative Colitis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-000518-31 |
Trial protocol |
NL HU PL CZ |
Global end of trial date |
26 Mar 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
01 Apr 2020
|
First version publication date |
01 Apr 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
LYC-30937-2001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02762500 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Lycera Corp.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
620 West Germantown Pike, Suite 400, Plymouth Meeting, United States, PA 19462
|
||
Public contact |
Lycera Clinical Department, Lycera Corp., 001 6104575095, 30937_Clinical_Operations@Lycera.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Lycera Clinical Department, Lycera Corp., 001 6104575095, 30937_Clinical_Operations@Lycera.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
29 Oct 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
26 Mar 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of LYC-30937-EC in inducing remission compared with placebo in subjects with active ulcerative colitis over a treatment duration of 8 weeks.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was performed in accordance with the protocol, International Council for Harmonisation good clinical practice guidelines, and applicable local regulatory requirements and laws.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
30 Jun 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 81
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czech Republic: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Hungary: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 28
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Serbia: 5
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
124
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
91
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
117
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
7
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were enrolled at 42 study centers within the United States, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Serbia and Netherlands. Study centers included academic medical centers and non-academic medical clinics. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
The screening visit took place up to 28 days (4 weeks) prior to randomization and the participant's first dose of study drug. Screening occurred over multiple days to complete and obtain results for all assessments. Participants who meet all eligibility requirements returned for the next phase of the study. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
LYC-30937-EC was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
LYC-30937-EC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Modified-release capsule, soft
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg was administered once daily as a single delayed release, enteric coated hydroxyl-propyl-methyl-cellulose (HPMC) capsule. Administration occurred in the morning upon awaking after fasting overnight. Participants should not have eaten for approximately 1 hour (or more) after taking study drug, except for the randomisation visit where participants were dosed in the clinic at least 2 hours after their morning meal.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Modified-release capsule, soft
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Matching placebo for LYC-30937-EC was administered once daily as a single, delayed release, enteric coated HPMC capsule. Administration occurred in the morning upon awaking after fasting overnight. Participants should not have eaten for approximately 1 hour (or more) after taking study drug, except for the randomisation visit where participants were dosed in the clinic at least 2 hours after their morning meal.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
LYC-30937-EC was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg
|
||
Reporting group description |
LYC-30937-EC was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 8 Using the MMS | |||||||||
End point description |
The MMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. Scoring ranges from 0 to 9 points and consists of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy findings), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopy findings scoring was performed centrally. Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of less than or equal to (≤ 1), Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 and a Mayo endoscopy findings subscore of ≤ 1.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Response Rate Difference | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The difference in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinical remission at Week 8 of treatment (LYC-30937-EC minus placebo) and corresponding 90% confidence interval were estimated. Participants who were missing the Week 8 MMS assessment were assumed to have not achieved clinical remission.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
124
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.106 | |||||||||
Method |
1-sided Pearson chi-squared | |||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||
Point estimate |
-8.1
|
|||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||
lower limit |
-18.6 | |||||||||
upper limit |
2.5 | |||||||||
Notes [1] - Statistical comparisons between the LYC-30937-EC treatment arm and placebo were done using a 1-sided Pearson chi-square test at the 5% level of significance (α = 0.05). |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 8 Using the TMS | |||||||||
End point description |
The TMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physicians global assessment), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopy findings scoring was performed centrally. Clinical remission was defined as a TMS of ≤ 2, with no individual subscore greater than (>) 1 and rectal bleeding score of 0.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Response Rate Difference | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The difference in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinical remission at Week 8 of treatment (LYC-30937-EC minus placebo) and corresponding 90% confidence interval were estimated. Participants who were missing the Week 8 TMS assessment were assumed to have not achieved clinical remission.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
124
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.106 | |||||||||
Method |
1-sided Pearson chi-squared | |||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||
Point estimate |
-8.1
|
|||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||
lower limit |
-18.6 | |||||||||
upper limit |
2.5 | |||||||||
Notes [2] - Statistical comparisons between the LYC-30937-EC treatment arm and placebo were done using a 1-sided Pearson chi-square test at the 5% level of significance (α = 0.05). |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a Clinical Response at Week 8 Using the MMS | |||||||||
End point description |
The MMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. Scoring ranges from 0 to 9 points and consists of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy findings), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopy findings scoring was performed centrally. Clinical response was defined as a reduction from the baseline MMS of greater than or equal to (≥) 2 points and ≥ 25%, and a decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding score of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding score of ≤ 1 point.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Response Rate Difference | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The difference in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinical response at Week 8 of treatment (LYC-30937-EC minus placebo) and corresponding 90% confidence interval were estimated. Participants who were missing the Week 8 MMS assessment were assumed to have not achieved clinical response.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
124
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [3] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.235 | |||||||||
Method |
1-sided Pearson chi-squared | |||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||
Point estimate |
-6.5
|
|||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||
lower limit |
-21.1 | |||||||||
upper limit |
8.2 | |||||||||
Notes [3] - Statistical comparisons between the LYC-30937-EC treatment arm and placebo were done using a 1-sided Pearson chi-square test at the 5% level of significance(α = 0.05). |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a Clinical Response at Week 8 Using the TMS | |||||||||
End point description |
The TMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physicians global assessment), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopy findings scoring was performed centrally. Clinical response was defined as a reduction from baseline TMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, and a decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding score of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding score of ≤ 1 point.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Response Rate Difference | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The difference in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinical response at Week 8 of treatment (LYC-30937-EC minus placebo) and corresponding 90% confidence interval were estimated. Participants who were missing the Week 8 TMS assessment were assumed to have not achieved clinical response.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
124
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [4] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.14 | |||||||||
Method |
1-sided Pearson chi-squared | |||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk difference (RD) | |||||||||
Point estimate |
-9.7
|
|||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||
lower limit |
-24.3 | |||||||||
upper limit |
5 | |||||||||
Notes [4] - Statistical comparisons between the LYC-30937-EC treatment arm and placebo were done using a 1-sided Pearson chi-square test at the 5% level of significance(α = 0.05). |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute Change From Baseline in TMS at Week 8 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The TMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. Scoring ranges from 0 to 12 points and consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physicians global assessment), each graded 0 to 3 with higher score indicating more severe disease activity. Endoscopy findings scoring was performed centrally. A decrease from baseline to Week 8 in the TMS indicates a reduction in disease activity.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 8
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Number of participants with non-missing change from baseline in TMS [6] - Number of participants with non-missing change from baseline in TMS |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical Analysis of Change from Baseline TMS | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Participants who were missing the baseline or Week 8 TMS were excluded from the analysis.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
117
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [7] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.708 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.18
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.6 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.95 | ||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The mean change from baseline at Week 8 was evaluated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with a factor for treatment and a covariate for baseline TMS. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fecal Calprotectin in Participants with Baseline Fecal Calprotectin ≥ 250 micrograms per gram (μg/g) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Fecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. A decrease from baseline to Week 8 in fecal calprotectin indicates a reduction in inflammation. Only participants with a baseline fecal calprotectin value ≥ 250 μg/g were included.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 8
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Participants with non-missing percent change from baseline in fecal calprotectin [9] - Participants with non-missing percent change from baseline in fecal calprotectin |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical Analysis of Fecal Calprotectin | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Participants who were missing the baseline or Week 8 fecal calprotectin were excluded from the analysis.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
81
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.032 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-44.59
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-78.66 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-10.53 | ||||||||||||
Notes [10] - The mean change from baseline at Week 8 was evaluated using an ANCOVA with a factor for treatment and a covariate for baseline fecal calprotectin. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation from the Study | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Adverse events (AEs) were collected from the time a participant signed the informed consent. TEAEs were AEs occurring or worsening after the first dose of study drug (LYC-30937-EC 25 mg or placebo). Severity of AEs was assessed by the Investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03, with grading as follows: Grade 1 = mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms), Grade 2 = moderate (minimal, local intervention, or noninvasive intervention indicated); Grade 3 = severe (or medically significant but not life-threatening); Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
10 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
AEs and serious AEs were collected from the time the participant signed informed consent through last participant visit (up to 14 weeks in total).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
All directly observed and spontaneously reported AEs were recorded. Participants were also questioned about AEs. Severity of AEs was graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03. AEs not included in the NCI CTCAE lists were graded according to the NCI CTCAE general guidelines.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
19.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
LYC-30937-EC 25 mg
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
LYC-30937-EC was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. 'Subjects affected by non-serious adverse events' is the number of participants affected by non-serious AEs occurring at >5%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo was administered orally, once daily from Day 1 through the end of the double-blind treatment phase (Visit 6/Week 8) for a total of 57 days of treatment. 'Subjects affected by non-serious adverse events' is the number of participants affected by non-serious AEs occurring at >5%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
09 May 2016 |
The following changes were made:
• Section 6.5.7 (Monitoring Subjects for AEs of Special Interest) and Section 7.12 (Stopping Rules) were revised, and Section 7.12.1 (Suspension of Study) was added to be consistent with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) industry guidance on drug-induced liver injury.
• The liver function test exclusion was reduced to 1.5 x the upper limit of normal.
• The new Lycera facsimile number was added to the cover page.
• Minor revisions/clarifications were made throughout. |
||
22 Jun 2016 |
The following changes were made:
• Exploratory efficacy endpoint referencing “mucosal healing” changed throughout to “endoscopic improvement” as histologic evaluation of mucosa to validate healing was not performed.
• Secondary efficacy endpoint Week 8 TMS clinical remission definition revised to include rectal bleeding score of 0.
• Section 4.4.1: Inclusion criteria 4 revised to require women of childbearing potential to use 2 highly effective forms of birth control.
• Section 4.4.2: Elevated serum creatinine added to Exclusion criteria 6 to exclude patients with renal impairment.
• Section 6.4.1 definition of left-sided disease added to clarify which subjects could have flexible sigmoidoscopy at week 8 based on demarcation of inflammation observed in Screening colonoscopy.
• Section 6.4.1 clarified that endoscopy video recording was to be provided for central reading and central readers had study specific training, including that a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 or 1 could not include any degree of “friability” as this was inconsistent with remission.
• Section 6.4.1 clarified that stool frequency and rectal bleeding data for Mayo scoring was obtained from the diary completed by the subjects. Also clarified that average stool frequency and rectal bleeding score calculated from the individual 3 consecutive days was used for the Mayo score.
• Section 6.5.7 revised to state that study drug was to be withheld in subjects who exhibited any of the listed laboratory elevations in liver biochemical parameters and lactate.
• Section 7.5 revised to add SAE reporting information including time frame for reporting SAEs to US FDA.
• Section 6.6.1.2 clarified serial pharmacokinetic sub-study blood sample collection.
• Section 7.10: sponsor medical monitor name and contact information added.
• Section 7.12: individual stopping criteria added based on abnormal ECG findings of prolonged QT/QTc interval.
• Section 11.1 removed statement that subjects were identified |
||
07 Dec 2016 |
The following changes were made:
• Throughout protocol: revised all references to “anti-tumour necrosis factor” therapy to state “biologic” therapy
• Section 1.0 revised to add countries participating in study and the estimated last subject last visit;
• Sections 1.0 - 2.5 updated and reorganized
• Section 4.1 revised language related to open-label extension protocol
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #2 revised to add clarity to histological evaluation if done at Screening
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #4 revised to add clarity to effective birth control
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #5 revised to add clarity
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #6 revised to add clarity
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #3 revised for clarity regarding bleeding disorders
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #10 revised to define history of uveitis
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #12 revised to define type of colon polyp being referenced
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #19 revised to remove reference to use of “topical” 5-ASA and steroids
• Section 5.5.2-5.5.3 revised to add clarity related to IWRS and compliance
• Section 5.6 revised to be consistent with other sections of protocol and to specify that corticosteroid taper was not allowed during the study
• Section 6.2.1 revised wording related to timing for Screening procedures when a subject was already scheduled for a colonoscopy
• Section 6.5.4 revised to clarify calculation of QTcF will not be done by sites
• Section 6.5.7 revised to specify that Baseline abdominal pain and vomiting was to be carefully assessed
• Section 7.4 revised to include the CTCAE criteria for assessment of AE severity
• Section 7.12.1 study suspension criteria revised to state that if 50% of subjects experienced clinically important drug-related AEs (instead of TESAEs) with severity of CTCAE Grade 2
• Appendix B revised: hepatitis blood sample removed. |
||
05 Jun 2017 |
The following changes were made:
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #5 revised to allow inclusion of subjects on concomitant thiopurine UC treatment and to allow subjects on no UC treatment.
• Section 4.4.1 Inclusion criteria #6 revised to include thiopurine.
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #7 revised to remove reference to thiopurines and to reduce the washout of other immunomodulatory medications to 4 weeks prior to the Screening endoscopy.
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #10 removed (history of uveitis).
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #12 revised to allow subjects with a history of cancer that was in remission for ≥ 5 years and exclude subjects with cancer diagnosed within the past 5 years unless approved by the study medical monitor.
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #17 biologic washout period determination revised and Appendix D added.
• Section 4.4.2 Exclusion criteria #19 revised to allow use of rectal 5-ASA medications.
• Section 5.6 revised to allow concomitant use of a stable dose of thiopurines.
• Section 6.2.6 revised to specify that the Visit 6 date was the date of study completion.
• Section 6.6.1.1, Table 3 footnote and Appendix B revised to specify that up to 20 subjects were planned to participate in the safety PK sub-study.
• Section 6.6.1.2, Table 3 footnote and Appendix B revised to specify that up to 12 subjects were planned to participate in the serial PK sub-study.
• Section 7.12 revised to specify that a repeat ECG was to be performed if QT/QTc prolongation stopping criteria were noted for confirmation. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |