Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43845   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Efficacy, safety and impact on antimicrobial resistance of duration and dose of amoxicillin treatment for young children with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): a randomised controlled trial.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-000809-36
    Trial protocol
    GB   IE  
    Global end of trial date
    21 May 2019

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    01 May 2020
    First version publication date
    01 May 2020
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    CAP-IT
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    ISRCTN76888927
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    UCL
    Sponsor organisation address
    Gower St, London, United Kingdom,
    Public contact
    CAP-IT Trial Manager, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, 0044 02076704763, mrcctu.capit@ucl.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    CAP-IT Trial Manager, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, 0044 02076704763, mrcctu.capit@ucl.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    22 Jan 2020
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    21 May 2019
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    21 May 2019
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The principal objectives are to determine whether: 1. lower dose oral amoxicillin treatments is as effective as higher dose oral amoxicillin treatment for uncomplicated childhood pneumonia 2. shorter duration (3 days) amoxicillin treatment is as effective as longer duration (7 days) amoxicillin treatment for uncomplicated childhood pneumonia CAP-IT is a 2x2 factorial trial. Main effects for the two randomisations (1. lower dose versus higher dose; 2. shorter duration versus longer duration) are estimated by collapsing across levels of the other randomisation group.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Inclusion/exclusion criteria and follow-up visits were carefully chosen to minimise the risk to trial subjects. For example, children with severe underlying chronic disease with an increased risk of developing complicated pneumonia including sickle cell anaemia, primary or secondary immunodeficiency, chronic lung disease and cystic fibrosis were excluded from the trial. Amoxicillin is a widely used licensed drug and adverse events caused by drug toxicity were known to be rare. Furthermore, the inclusion/exclusion criteria prevented patients with penicillin allergy or any other known contra-indications to amoxicillin from entering the trial. Patients were monitored closely and a review of clinical signs and symptoms were performed at each face-to-face visit and if they were unwell or showed signs of pneumonia they wold be seen by a doctor.
    Background therapy
    N/A
    Evidence for comparator
    N/A
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Feb 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 820
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ireland: 4
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    824
    EEA total number of subjects
    824
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    307
    Children (2-11 years)
    517
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Participants were recruited from 01/02/2017 to 23/04/2019 across 29 sites, (28 in the UK and 1 in Ireland). They were enrolled by research nurses and paediatric teams from paediatric emergency departments and wards.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    -

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    2642 [1]
    Number of subjects completed
    824

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Eligible but parents did not want to participate: 665
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Language barrier: 148
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Failed additional WARD eligibility criteria: 671
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Discharged on other than amoxicillin: 334
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period relates to the number screened for eligibility. Not all patients screened have been enrolled.
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Main trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Lower + shorter
    Arm description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50 mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Amoxicillin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for oral suspension
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    35-50 mg/kg per day, according to a weight-banded dosing chart. The total daily dose was administered as two daily doses, for 3 days

    Arm title
    Lower + longer
    Arm description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Amoxicillin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for oral suspension
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    35-50 mg/kg per day, according to a weight-banded dosing chart. The total daily dose was administered as two daily doses, for 7 days.

    Arm title
    Higher + shorter
    Arm description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Amoxicillin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for oral suspension
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    70-90 mg/kg per day, according to a weight-banded dosing chart. The total daily dose was administered as two daily doses for 3 days.

    Arm title
    Higher + longer
    Arm description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Amoxicillin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for oral suspension
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    70-90 mg/kg per day, according to a weight-banded dosing chart. The total daily dose was administered as two daily doses for 7 days.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Started
    209
    203
    207
    205
    Completed
    209
    203
    207
    205

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Lower + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50 mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days

    Reporting group title
    Lower + longer
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days

    Reporting group title
    Higher + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days.

    Reporting group title
    Higher + longer
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days.

    Reporting group values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer Total
    Number of subjects
    209 203 207 205 824
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    71 73 73 90 307
        Children (2-11 years)
    138 130 134 115 517
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0 0
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    98 102 100 97 397
        Male
    111 101 107 108 427
    Stratum
    Units: Subjects
        PED
    154 150 148 147 599
        WARD
    55 53 59 58 225
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Analysis population
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Excluding all randomised participants who did not receive any trial medication.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Analysis population
    Number of subjects
    814
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    305
        Children (2-11 years)
    509
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units:
        
    ±
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    393
        Male
    421
    Stratum
    Units: Subjects
        PED
    591
        WARD
    223

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Lower + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50 mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days

    Reporting group title
    Lower + longer
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days

    Reporting group title
    Higher + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days.

    Reporting group title
    Higher + longer
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days.

    Subject analysis set title
    Analysis population
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Excluding all randomised participants who did not receive any trial medication.

    Primary: Primary endpoint: any clinically indicated systemic antibacterial treatment prescribed for respiratory tract infection (including CAP) other than trial medication.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Primary endpoint: any clinically indicated systemic antibacterial treatment prescribed for respiratory tract infection (including CAP) other than trial medication.
    End point description
    An Endpoint Review Committee (ERC), blinded to randomised allocations, will review all cases where the participant was prescribed non-trial systemic antibacterial treatment. The main role of the Committee is to adjudicate, based on all available data, whether the primary outcome was met. Clinical indication of non-trial systemic antibacterial treatment for respiratory tract infection will be classified as “definitely/probably”, or “possibly” or “unlikely” or “too little information”. Those categorised as “CAP” or “other respiratory tract infection” and the likelihood that non-trial medication was indicated is “definitely/probably” or “possibly” will be regarded as fulfilling the primary endpoint.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    up to and at final follow-up 4 weeks after randomisation
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer Analysis population
    Number of subjects analysed
    208 [1]
    202 [2]
    205 [3]
    199 [4]
    814 [5]
    Units: Subjects
        Had primary endpoint
    25
    26
    26
    23
    100
        Did not have primary endpoint
    183
    176
    179
    176
    714
    Notes
    [1] - Patients in analysis population
    [2] - Patients in analysis population
    [3] - Patients in analysis population
    [4] - Patients in analysis population
    [5] - Patients in analysis population
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint, dose randomisation, primary
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary analysis of the primary endpoint for the dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    814
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [6]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.7
         upper limit
    4
    Notes
    [6] - 8% non-inferiority margin assessed against an upper 2-sided 90% CI: Lower dose is non-inferior to Higher dose
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint, duration randomisation, primary
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    814
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [7]
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    90%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.8
         upper limit
    3.9
    Notes
    [7] - 8% non-inferiority margin assessed against an upper 2-sided 90% CI: Shorter duration is non-inferior to Longer duration

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint: adherence, early cessation of IMP

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint: adherence, early cessation of IMP
    End point description
    Early cessation of trial treatment
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry to day 8.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    208 [8]
    202 [9]
    205 [10]
    199 [11]
    Units: subjects
        Trial treatment completed
    173
    182
    185
    181
        Early cessation for clinical improvement
    4
    3
    1
    0
        Early cessation for clinical deterioration
    7
    9
    3
    8
        Early cessation for other reason
    24
    8
    16
    10
    Notes
    [8] - Participants who took at least one dose of trial medication
    [9] - Participants who took at least one dose of trial medication
    [10] - Participants who took at least one dose of trial medication
    [11] - Participants who took at least one dose of trial medication
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, cough

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, cough
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    200
    197
    198
    190
    Units: Subjects with cough resolution
        Resolved
    144
    151
    141
    148
        Not resolved
    56
    46
    57
    42
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of cough: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    785
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.807
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of cough: duration randomisati
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    785
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.04 [12]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [12] - Longer treatment was associated with a faster time to resolution than shorter treatment.

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, fever

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, fever
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    168
    159
    162
    159
    Units: Subjects with fever resolution
        Resolved
    164
    155
    157
    156
        Not resolved
    4
    4
    5
    3
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of fever: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer v Lower + shorter
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    648
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.095
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of fever: duration randomisatio
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    648
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.31
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, phlegm

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, phlegm
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    146
    143
    146
    132
    Units: Participants with phlegm resolution
        Resolved
    129
    124
    125
    114
        Not resolved
    17
    19
    21
    18
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of phlegm: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    567
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.168
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of phlegm: duration randomisati
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    567
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.806
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, wheeze

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, wheeze
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    117
    97
    102
    105
    Units: Subjects with wheeze resolution
        Resolved
    112
    93
    95
    95
        Not resolved
    5
    4
    7
    10
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of wheeze: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    421
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.22
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of wheeze: duration randomisati
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    421
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.783
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, sleep disturbed by cough

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, sleep disturbed by cough
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    178
    173
    174
    163
    Units: Subjects with resolution of sleep distur
        Resolved
    154
    162
    157
    147
        Not resolved
    24
    11
    17
    16
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of sleep disturbance: dose rand
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    688
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.127
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of sleep disturbance: duration
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    688
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.026 [13]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [13] - Longer treatment was associated with a faster time to resolution than shorter treatment.

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, vomiting

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, vomiting
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    90
    77
    93
    74
    Units: Subjects with resolution of vomiting
        Resolved
    87
    75
    88
    72
        Not resolved
    3
    2
    5
    2
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of vomiting: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer v Lower + shorter
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    334
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.477
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of vomiting: duration randomisa
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    334
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.224
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, eating/drinking less

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, eating/drinking less
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    182
    176
    188
    174
    Units: Subjects with normal eating/drinking
        Resolved
    166
    165
    170
    158
        Not resolved
    16
    11
    18
    16
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to normal eating/drinking: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    720
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.647
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to normal eating/drinking: duration randomisa
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    720
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.132
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, normal activity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, normal activity
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    177
    169
    178
    179
    Units: Subjects with normal activity
        Resolved
    161
    163
    167
    166
        Not resolved
    16
    6
    11
    13
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to normal activity: dose randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    703
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.901
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to normal activity: duration randomisation
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    703
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.07
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Secondary endpoint, fast breathing

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary endpoint, fast breathing
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From trial entry until week 4.
    End point values
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Number of subjects analysed
    167
    182
    160
    170
    Units: Subjects with fast breathing resolution
        Resolved
    165
    179
    151
    161
        Not resolved
    2
    3
    9
    9
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of fast breathing: dose r
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    679
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.058
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to resolution of fast breathing: duration r
    Comparison groups
    Lower + shorter v Lower + longer v Higher + shorter v Higher + longer
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    679
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.063
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From trial entry to week 4.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    21.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Lower + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50 mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days

    Reporting group title
    Lower + longer
    Reporting group description
    Lower dose (target dose 40mg/kg per day; range 35-50mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days

    Reporting group title
    Higher + shorter
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 3 days.

    Reporting group title
    Higher + longer
    Reporting group description
    Higher dose (target dose 80mg/kg per day; range 70-90mg/kg per day) oral amoxicillin treatment for 7 days.

    Serious adverse events
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 208 (6.73%)
    9 / 202 (4.46%)
    11 / 205 (5.37%)
    9 / 199 (4.52%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebellar Tumour
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 202 (0.50%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile seizure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Coffee ground vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Epiploic appendagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Salmonella Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    2 / 199 (1.01%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchiolitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 208 (0.96%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection viral
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 208 (0.48%)
    2 / 202 (0.99%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    5 / 199 (2.51%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 5
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 208 (0.96%)
    3 / 202 (1.49%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory Distress
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 208 (2.40%)
    2 / 202 (0.99%)
    7 / 205 (3.41%)
    2 / 199 (1.01%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 2
    0 / 7
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Cyanosis peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    1 / 202 (0.50%)
    0 / 205 (0.00%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Herpes simplex oral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 208 (0.00%)
    0 / 202 (0.00%)
    1 / 205 (0.49%)
    0 / 199 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Lower + shorter Lower + longer Higher + shorter Higher + longer
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    75 / 208 (36.06%)
    61 / 202 (30.20%)
    70 / 205 (34.15%)
    71 / 199 (35.68%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
    Additional description: New Diarrhoea after baseline or worse than at baseline
    alternative dictionary used: Parent reported n/a
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    56 / 208 (26.92%)
    42 / 202 (20.79%)
    52 / 205 (25.37%)
    50 / 199 (25.13%)
         occurrences all number
    56
    42
    52
    50
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin rash
    Additional description: New Skin rash after baseline or worse than at baseline
    alternative dictionary used: Parent reported n/a
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    25 / 208 (12.02%)
    28 / 202 (13.86%)
    25 / 205 (12.20%)
    34 / 199 (17.09%)
         occurrences all number
    25
    28
    25
    34
    Infections and infestations
    Thrush
    Additional description: New Oral thrush after baseline or worse than at baseline
    alternative dictionary used: Parent reported n/a
    alternative assessment type: Systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 208 (3.37%)
    9 / 202 (4.46%)
    7 / 205 (3.41%)
    9 / 199 (4.52%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    9
    7
    9

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    12 Aug 2016
    •Correction to the higher amoxicillin dose from 70-120mg/kg to 70-90mg/kg • Trial Assessment Schedule: o Inclusion of an additional phone call at day 4. o Clarification regarding the physical exam at the final visit o Change to duration of the symptom diary • Section 3 - clarifications and changes to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. • Section 6.1.2 – clarification on procedures for face to face visits • Section 6.2.1 – additional detail regarding the collection of nasopharyngeal swabs • Section 6.3.1 – additional detail regarding the collection of EDTA blood sample • Section 6.7.1 – additional information regarding storing parent/guardians email address and phone number and additional phone call at day 4. • Section 10.3 – addition of methodology sub-study. Amendments to all PISs and consent forms, as below: • Clarification regarding storage of contact details • Change in duration of symptom diary • Clarifications regarding sample collection and storage • Update to trial schedule • Addition of methodology sub-study • Clarification regarding storage of participant data GP Letter, version 3.0 12Aug16 • Corrected higher dose of amoxicillin CAP-IT Symptom Diary, version 2.0 12Aug16 • Change in duration of symptom diary • Updated schedule • Change to severity categories for symptoms • Change to wellbeing scale CAP-IT Wellbeing Questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y), version 2.0 12Aug16 • Correction of typo on visit label CAP-IT Study Medicine Information Sheet for Parents, version 2.0 12Aug16 • Change ‘syrup’ to ‘medicine’ throughout Addition of 15 new sites and change of PI to one site. Updated IMP details
    20 Dec 2016
    Updated child trial diary - Minor formatting changes. New Trial Patient-parent card - To be given to parents/guardians of the CAP-IT participants at the time of study enrolment
    01 Sep 2017
    New wording: Previous PED and WARD specific patient information sheet, summary information sheet and consent forms have been merged together into CAP-IT patient information sheet, summary information sheet and consent form. These will replace the PED and WARD specific documents. Patients from both groups will be now consented using the same CAP-IT information sheets. CAP-IT Protocol, Version 3.0 30Aug2017: • Throughout - minor typographical corrections and amendments for consistency and clarity. • Throughout - version and date updated to v3.0, 30-Aug-2017. • Throughout – addition of CTA number “17141803” • Page iii-iv – trial contact details updated • Trial assessment schedule updated: - Addition of blood sample sub-study in PED group. - Addition of optional medical history, physical examination, symptom review, nasopharyngeal swab, saliva sample, haematology, biochemistry, virology, chest x-ray and stool sample taken at pre-randomisation n WARD group. - Nasopharyngeal and saliva samples added to randomisation (d1) for WARD group • Section 1 - background re-ordered and partially re-worded in parts for clarity and reference to recent literature added. In addition, previously unavailable results from CAP-IT feasibility work (service evaluation) have been included. • Section 3 – clarifications and changes to the inclusion and exclusion criteria • Section 3/9.6 – change of pilot timeframe from initial 6 months of the study to 3 months during the first winter of recruitment • Section 5.6.1 – additional instruction added for cases of tolerability issues. Section 6.2.1 - The nasopharyngeal sample for WARD patients will be collected at randomisation to ensure availability of a baseline sample for comparison with the final sample. An optional additional sample may be taken prior to antibiotic treatment at admission. Appendices updated Updated IMP details
    01 Sep 2017
    Addition of CAP-IT information poster to be displayed in A&E departments targeted towards parents of potential CAP-IT participants to give a brief overview of the research.
    02 Mar 2018
    The IMP dossier for the placebo used in the CAP-IT study has been updated with i) a broader release specification for viscosity, ii) up to date stability data. In the IMPD placebo version 1, the release specification for viscosity is 150-400mPA. In version 3.0, this has been widened to 150-550mPA. The broadening of the release specification is supported by a declaration from the manufacturer of the placebo, which contains data confirming that the difference in viscosity in the range of 239 to 556mPa*s are not visibly distinguishable and therefore should not affect IMP blinding. Based on our overall assessment, the broadening of the viscosity specification will allow shelf life extension of the placebo according to ICH guideline (i.e. maximum of 12 months extrapolation from last analysed time-point) without comprising the safety or integrity of the clinical trial.
    21 Jun 2018
    As part of the written informed consent for the CAP-IT study, parents/ guardians give consent for their child’s GP to provide information on any antibiotic prescriptions given during the planned 29 day duration of the study for that patient. Where a participant is lost to follow up, information on antibiotic prescriptions during this period will be elicited through contact with the participant’s GP. In the case of a parent/guardian decision to withdraw from the study, parent/guardians will be asked whether they consent to further data collection through hospital notes and NHS records. If consent is given, information on antibiotic prescriptions during the planned 29 day duration of the study for that patient will be elicited through contact with the participant’s GP. A template GP letter and form has been designed for use by sites to collect this data and approval is requested for this. In addition, several new investigator sites are being added to the protocol and a change of PI at a current site has occurred.
    07 Dec 2018
    Summary of changes to protocol: •Statistical changes: Joint analysis of the PED & WARD groups, change to the primary endpoint definition, change to the non-inferiority margin (4-8%) and a consequent reduction in sample size from 2400 to 800 children. •Addition of an Endpoint Review Committee (ERC). •Addition of a procedure for collecting primary endpoint data from primary care for patients who are lost to follow-up or withdrawn. •Modification of the WARD criteria to allow outpatient systemic antibacterial treatment prior to presentation as long as total treatment is <48 hours before randomisation. •Removal of saliva sample collection information as this has been stopped. Summary of changes to the PIS and summary PIS: •Removal of reference to the saliva samples, which are no longer being collected •Additional information about the stool sub-study •Additional and modified wording of section relating to patient data Summary of changes to the symptom diary: •Removal of reference to the Wellbeing Questionnaire as this is performed as part of telephone follow-up calls

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Final results on phenotypic resistance to penicillin not available yet
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri Apr 19 06:53:40 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA