Clinical Trial Results:
Phase II trial: uPAR PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI for preoperative staging of bladder cancer
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-001026-33 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
04 Dec 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
03 Jan 2021
|
First version publication date |
03 Jan 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AK2016-1
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02805608 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Rigshospitalet
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
|
||
Public contact |
Professor Andreas Kjaer, Rigshospitalet, Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, akjaer@sund.ku.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Professor Andreas Kjaer, Rigshospitalet, Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, akjaer@sund.ku.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
18 Dec 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Dec 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Dec 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-NOTA-AE105 PET/CT and FDG PET/MR for detection of regional lymph node metastases will be tested by observer-blinded readings (two separate teams) and compared to diagnostic performance of conventional preoperative procedure. The reference test will be histopathology of lymph nodes obtained by operative lymph node dissection based on 6 regions. The suspected lymph nodes will be assigned to 6 regions based on the images. During the following operation the lymph nodes will be removed and analysed in each of these regions.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
An experienced medical doctor will be present in the department during the entire duration of the PET/CT and PET/MR scans. Emergency equipment is available in accordance with the current procedures of the department, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and oxygen supply/suction. It is emphasized, that handling of emergency situations is part of the department's routine procedures, and the staff is trained
to handle e.g. unexpected allergic reactions associated with administration of CT contrast agents.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jun 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 18
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
18
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
18
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
6
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
12
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients were recruited from 10 DEC 2016 to 04 DEC 2017. All patients were recruited from Rigshospitalet, Denmark. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Screening performed by a medical doctor according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
No
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Experimental: uPAR PET/CT | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects injected with [68Ga]-NOTA-AE105 and subsequently scanned with PET/CT (uPAR PET/CT) | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
[68Ga]-NOTA-AE105
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dose of approximately 200 MBq (40 µg) administered intra-venously approximately 20 minutes prior to the PET/CT
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Experimental: FDG PET/MR | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects injected with [18F]-FDG and subsequently scanned with PET/MR (FDG PET/MR) | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
[18F]-FDG
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoroglucose
|
|||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous bolus use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dose of approximately 200 MBq administered intra-venously approximately 1 hour prior PET/MR
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Experimental: uPAR PET/CT
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects injected with [68Ga]-NOTA-AE105 and subsequently scanned with PET/CT (uPAR PET/CT) | ||
Reporting group title |
Experimental: FDG PET/MR
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects injected with [18F]-FDG and subsequently scanned with PET/MR (FDG PET/MR) |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Sensitivity in detection of regional lymph node metastases [1] [2] | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sensitivity of uPAR-PET/CT detection of regional lymph node metastases by 68Ga-NOTA-AE105 PET/CT
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluated on the uPAR PET/CT 20 minutes after injection of [68Ga]-NOTA-AE105
|
||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: uPAR-PET Image technical check following 18 patients, demonstrated that bladder cancer/lymph node metastases could not be discriminated from spillover caused by high bladder activity. Accordingly, the study was terminated prematurely. [2] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: The sensitivity for detection of regional lymph node metastases was also not performed for FDG PET/MR because the main purpose of the trial was to study the sensitivity of uPAR PET/CT. For technical reasons, this was not possible and the study was terminated prematurely. The number of included subjects at termination was too low for any meaningful analysis of FDG PET/MR sensitivity. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Analysis not possible due to bladder spillover |
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse event are recorded from injection of IMP up to 24 hours after injection.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Experimental: uPAR PET/CT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects injected with [68Ga]-NOTA-AE105 and subsequently scanned with PET/CT (uPAR PET/CT) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
FDG PET/MR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects injected with [18F]-FDG and subsequently scanned with PET/MR (FDG PET/MR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
01 Sep 2016 |
Change in production method of [68Ga]-NOTA-AE105 |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
uPAR-PET Image technical check following 18 patients, demonstrated that bladder cancer/lymph node metastases could not be discriminated from spillover caused by high bladder activity. Accordingly, the study was terminated prematurely. |