E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
The goal is to acquire knowledge about the impact of the withdrawal of PPI’s, so as to minimize disturbance of the stomach wall in myocardial perfusion imaging. The associated main question is therefore: What is the impact of the withdrawal of PPI use in the stomach wall uptake of 99m Tc-Sestamibi in myocardial perfusion imaging? Myocardial perfusion imaging consists of stress and rest study.
|
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
It has previously been shown that the use of stomach protective drugs also called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the uptake of the radiopharmaceutical Tc99m Sestamibi increases in the stomach wall. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Diagnosis [E01] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The goal is to acquire knowledge about the impact of the withdrawal of PPIs, so as to minimize disturbance of uptake in the stomach wall in myocardial perfusion imaging. The associated main question here came about: What is the effect of the withdrawal of PPI in the stomach wall uptake with 99m Tc-Sestamibi in myocardial perfusion imaging? Myocardial perfusion imaging consists of stress and rest study.
Main question: What is the effect of the withdrawal of PPI in the stomach wall uptake with 99m Tc-Sestamibi in myocardial perfusion imaging?
Sub-questions: - What is the relative stomach wall uptake within myocardial perfusion imaging Tc 99m Sestamibi in the stress an rest studies? - How can withdrawal of PPI’s gain effect on the image quality and the ability to assess a myocardial perfusion imaging?
Hypothesis It is expected that reducing and eventually stopping PPIs for myocardial perfusion imaging shows an equivalent image in patients not taking PPIs. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
- Patients who have a referral from a cardiologist to a myocardial perfusion imaging. - Patients older than 18 years. - Patients wherein for the myocardial perfusion during exercise use is made of the administration of adenosine or regadenoson. - Patients taking preventive use of PPIs. - Patients who have signed an informed consent. - Patients taking PPIs for longer than two weeks. - the scan is accomplished on the BrightView 1 in Nucleare department Rijnstate Arnhem. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
- myocardial perfusion stress test performed with a bycycle ergometry. - Patients with dyspepsia. - Patients with only uptake in the stomach cavity. - Patients who are not prepared and tested in accordance with the protocols in the hospital Rijnstate. - Patients with the following well-known diseases, Zollinger Ellison Syndrome, a barrettoesofagus or a esophagitis with endoscopic grade C or D. - Patients who are(partially) paravasal injected. - Possible complications with concomitant medications.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
It has previously been shown that the use of stomach protective drugs also called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the uptake of the radiopharmaceutical Tc99m Sestamibi increases in the stomach wall in a cardiac function (myocardial perfusion) examination. The higher the uptake in the stomach wall, the more negative this contributes to the evaluation of the heart. It can lead to the poor judging of the perfusion (blood flow) of the heart. By reducing the use of PPI’s for a myocardial perfusion examination this issue would maybe be reduced and the quality of care improved. Previously, no research has been conducted into the impact of the withdrawal of PPIs with a myocardial perfusion imaging. It has previously been shown that patients who used PPI’s have much uptake in the stomach and patients not taking PPI’s have virtually no uptake in the stomach wall.
The goal is to acquire knowledge about the impact of the withdrawal of PPI’s, so as to minimize disturbance of the stomach wall in myocardial perfusion imaging. The associated main question is therefore: What is the impact of the withdrawal of PPI use in the stomach wall uptake of 99m Tc-Sestamibi in myocardial perfusion imaging? Myocardial perfusion imaging consists of stress and rest study.
The study is a prospective controlled trial study. During the study men and women are divided into four intervention groups. Men are divided into two intervention groups, women as well. For men shall be in one of the two intervention groups, PPI’s will be stopped for the stress examination and continued for the rest examination. The other intervention is the continuation of PPI’s in the stress examination and PPI’s are stopped in the rest examination. For woman held similar intervention groups. For each treatment group, 20 healthy participants are required. In and exclusion criteria are specified later.
With this study, the care of the patient may be improved. Any other additional repeat examination can be reduced. In addition, costs can be reduced regarded to the use of medication. Better images are provided to professionals to be reviewed which leads to a better treatment for the patient. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | Yes |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | No |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | Yes |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 80 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Wenn all data is analysed and processed. A rapport has been written. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |