Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase 2 Multiple Dose, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-8E12 in Subjects with Early Alzheimer's Disease

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-001634-10
    Trial protocol
    SE   FI   ES   BE   DK   NL   IT  
    Global end of trial date
    28 Jul 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    17 Sep 2022
    First version publication date
    21 Jul 2022
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason
    • Correction of full data set
    Update is to add clarifying text specific to two PK intensive endpoints/outcome measures only.

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    M15-566
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02880956
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
    Sponsor organisation address
    AbbVie House, Vanwall Business Park, Vanwall Road,, Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, SL6 4UB
    Public contact
    Global Medical Services, AbbVie, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, 001 8006339110, abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com
    Scientific contact
    Global Medical Services, AbbVie, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG , 001 8006339110, abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    28 Jul 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    28 Jul 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objectives of this study are: ● To assess the efficacy of ABBV-8E12 in slowing disease progression (cognitive and functional impairment) in subjects with Early AD as measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). ● To assess the long-term safety of ABBV-8E12 for up to 96 weeks in subjects with Early AD.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Subject and/or legal guardian read and understood the information provided about the study and gave written permission.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    26 Jan 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 31
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 26
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 34
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    New Zealand: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 28
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 268
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    453
    EEA total number of subjects
    116
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    85
    From 65 to 84 years
    360
    85 years and over
    8

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants underwent screening procedures within 12 weeks prior to initial study drug administration. Participants who signed informed consent and did not randomize because they did not complete the study-specific procedures during the Screening Period or did not meet all entry criteria were considered Screen Failures.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Placebo for ABBV-8E12 every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo was given by IV infusion, preferably in the morning. Participant weight was obtained prior to study drug administration to determine the appropriate infusion rate.

    Arm title
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Arm description
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABBV-8E12
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    tilavonemab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABBV-8E12 was given by IV infusion, preferably in the morning. Participant weight was obtained prior to study drug administration to determine the appropriate infusion rate.

    Arm title
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg
    Arm description
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABBV-8E12
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    tilavonemab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABBV-8E12 was given by IV infusion, preferably in the morning. Participant weight was obtained prior to study drug administration to determine the appropriate infusion rate.

    Arm title
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Arm description
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABBV-8E12
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    tilavonemab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABBV-8E12 was given by IV infusion, preferably in the morning. Participant weight was obtained prior to study drug administration to determine the appropriate infusion rate.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Started
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Completed
    99
    93
    105
    95
    Not completed
    17
    15
    11
    18
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    9
    4
    6
    11
         Other, not specified
    4
    2
    -
    3
         Adverse event
    3
    6
    5
    4
         COVID-19 logistical restrictions
    1
    2
    -
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1
    -
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo for ABBV-8E12 every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg Total
    Number of subjects
    116 108 116 113 453
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        < 65 years
    15 24 17 29 85
        >= 65 years
    101 84 99 84 368
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    70 45 60 59 234
        Male
    46 63 56 54 219
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Asian
    2 3 0 0 5
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 1 0 1
        Black or African American
    2 3 1 1 7
        White
    111 102 113 111 437
        More than one race
    1 0 1 1 3
    Ethnicity
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    4 6 4 3 17
        None
    112 102 112 110 436
    Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score
    The CDR-SB is a numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia. A qualified health professional assesses a participant's cognitive and functional performance in 6 areas: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The CDR scale gives a score from 0 to 3 for each of the 6 areas, with a lower value being desirable. The sum of these 6 areas, the CDR-SB score, can range from 0 to 18, with a lower value being desirable.
    Units: score on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    3.0 ± 1.22 3.0 ± 1.12 3.1 ± 1.24 2.9 ± 1.14 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo for ABBV-8E12 every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Primary: Change From Baseline Over Time in CDR-SB Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in CDR-SB Score [1]
    End point description
    The CDR-SB is a numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia. A qualified health professional assesses a participant's cognitive and functional performance in 6 areas: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The CDR scale gives a score from 0 to 3 for each of the 6 areas, with a lower value being desirable. The sum of these 6 areas, the CDR-SB score, can range from 0 to 18, with a lower value being desirable. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Statistical analyses for this endpoint are in the attached document; the EudraCT system could not accommodate the data correctly.
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=110, 108, 116, 113
    0.60 ± 0.125
    0.66 ± 0.129
    0.44 ± 0.125
    0.63 ± 0.130
        Change to Week 48; n=105, 97, 105, 98
    1.06 ± 0.155
    1.15 ± 0.161
    1.05 ± 0.154
    0.99 ± 0.161
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 93, 101, 95
    1.90 ± 0.213
    1.88 ± 0.220
    1.85 ± 0.212
    1.81 ± 0.219
        Change to Week 96; n=85, 85, 91, 81
    2.54 ± 0.271
    2.47 ± 0.277
    2.48 ± 0.267
    2.70 ± 0.279
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [2]
    End point description
    A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that began on or after the first study drug dose date and no more than 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug. An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as an event that results in death, is life-threatening, results in hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, is a congenital abnormality, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is an important medical event. Events were rated in severity as mild, moderate, or severe, and were categorized as having a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug. Safety Dataset: participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug plus 20 weeks (up to Week 112)
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented per protocol.
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: participants
        Any TEAE
    108
    94
    108
    104
        Severe TEAE
    12
    13
    14
    11
        TEAE With a Reasonable Possibility to Study Drug
    28
    32
    31
    33
        SAE
    26
    19
    22
    17
        TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug
    4
    6
    6
    4
        Fatal TEAE
    1
    2
    2
    1
        All Deaths
    1
    2
    2
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [3]
    End point description
    Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
    Notes
    [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: μg/mL
    geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    108 ± 28
    284 ± 21
    528 ± 27
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    168 ± 23
    426 ± 20
    806 ± 37
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Time to Cmax (Tmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Cmax (Tmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [4]
    End point description
    Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
    Notes
    [4] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: hours
    median (full range (min-max))
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    3 (1.8 to 4.2)
    2.5 (1.3 to 4.2)
    2.7 (1.7 to 3.6)
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    2.4 (1.1 to 4.1)
    2.5 (1.7 to 4.3)
    2.3 (1.7 to 3.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Serum Concentration at the End of a Dose Interval (Ctrough) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Serum Concentration at the End of a Dose Interval (Ctrough) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [5]
    End point description
    Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
    Notes
    [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: μg/mL
    geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    28.6 ± 22
    75.1 ± 33
    163 ± 26
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    56.4 ± 25
    182 ± 29
    320 ± 36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Half-Life (T1/2) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Half-Life (T1/2) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [6]
    End point description
    Harmonic mean is presented in the data table. Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
    Notes
    [6] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: days
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    22.0 ± 17.2
    19.4 ± 8.87
    33.2 ± 10.5
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    19.6 ± 6.09
    24.0 ± 16.6
    37.5 ± 13.5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Dosing (Time 0) to Day 28 (AUC0-28) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Dosing (Time 0) to Day 28 (AUC0-28) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [7]
    End point description
    The AUC0-28 for Dose 1 included the following timepoints: pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 5, Day 15 and Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). The AUC0-28 for Dose 4 included the following timepoints: Day 85 pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 89, Day 99 and Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Endpoint description above for complete time point details.
    Notes
    [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: μg.day/mL
    geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    2520 ± 28
    6090 ± 37
    14800 ± 25
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    4230 ± 33
    13100 ± 36
    30200 ± 36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Cmax/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Cmax/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [8]
    End point description
    Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
    Notes
    [8] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: μg/mL/mg
    geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    0.359 ± 28
    0.284 ± 21
    0.264 ± 27
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    0.561 ± 23
    0.426 ± 20
    0.403 ± 37
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: AUC0-28/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    AUC0-28/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses [9]
    End point description
    The AUC0-28/dose for Dose 1 included the following timepoints: pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 5, Day 15 and Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). The AUC0-28/dose for Dose 4 included the following timepoints: Day 85 pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 89, Day 99 and Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). Intensive Pharmacokinetic Cohort: Among the first 48 participants enrolled in the study, those who received ABBV-8E12 and had an evaluable PK assessment at given time point. n=Participants with an evaluable sample at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Endpoint description above for complete time point details.
    Notes
    [9] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: PK analysis was only done for participants receiving active study drug.
    End point values
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    12
    17
    9
    Units: μg.day/mL/mg
    geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation)
        First Dosing Interval; n=12, 17, 9
    8.40 ± 28
    6.09 ± 37
    7.41 ± 25
        Fourth Dosing Interval; n=11, 17, 8
    14.1 ± 33
    13.1 ± 36
    15.1 ± 36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (14-Item) Cognition Portion (ADASCog- 14) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (14-Item) Cognition Portion (ADASCog- 14) Total Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. The Total Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 90, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=104, 103, 110, 99
    1.82 ± 0.492
    1.42 ± 0.498
    0.56 ± 0.480
    1.86 ± 0.503
        Change at Week 48; n=98, 89, 102, 87
    4.50 ± 0.621
    3.51 ± 0.642
    3.42 ± 0.605
    4.03 ± 0.647
        Change at Week 72; n=91, 88, 92, 85
    5.26 ± 0.718
    4.78 ± 0.730
    5.00 ± 0.706
    6.37 ± 0.738
        Change at Week 96; n=72, 78, 77, 64
    8.43 ± 0.898
    7.99 ± 0.891
    7.84 ± 0.872
    9.46 ± 0.935
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Comprehension of Spoken Language Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Comprehension of Spoken Language Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Comprehension of Spoken Language score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n= Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.01 ± 0.038
    0.03 ± 0.038
    0.04 ± 0.037
    0.08 ± 0.039
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.03 ± 0.044
    0.09 ± 0.046
    0.07 ± 0.044
    0.12 ± 0.046
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.17 ± 0.064
    0.11 ± 0.066
    0.14 ± 0.064
    0.31 ± 0.066
        Change at Week 96; n=81, 81, 87, 76
    0.30 ± 0.083
    0.26 ± 0.083
    0.19 ± 0.080
    0.29 ± 0.085
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Constructional Praxis Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Constructional Praxis Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Constructional Praxis Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.11 ± 0.057
    0.05 ± 0.058
    -0.02 ± 0.056
    0.09 ± 0.059
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.07 ± 0.073
    0.23 ± 0.077
    0.17 ± 0.072
    0.20 ± 0.077
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 94
    0.25 ± 0.069
    0.22 ± 0.072
    0.16 ± 0.070
    0.16 ± 0.071
        Change at Week 96; n=80, 81, 86, 75
    0.41 ± 0.089
    0.25 ± 0.089
    0.026 ± 0.086
    0.33 ± 0.092
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Commands Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Commands Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Commands Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.09 ± 0.066
    0.10 ± 0.067
    0.09 ± 0.065
    0.09 ± 0.068
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.17 ± 00.72
    0.12 ± 0.076
    0.09 ± 0.071
    0.22 ± 0.075
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.09 ± 0.078
    0.11 ± 0.081
    0.36 ± 0.079
    0.21 ± 0.080
        Change at Week 96; n=81, 81, 86, 76
    0.30 ± 0.102
    0.36 ± 0.103
    0.40 ± 0.100
    0.40 ± 0.106
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Delayed Word Recall Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Delayed Word Recall Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Delayed Word Recall Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    115
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=109, 106, 113, 102
    0.11 ± 0.133
    0.17 ± 0.135
    -0.04 ± 0.131
    -0.09 ± 0.137
        Change at Week 48; n=101, 92, 105, 93
    0.41 ± 0.133
    0.30 ± 0.138
    0.32 ± 0.131
    0.27 ± 0.138
        Change at Week 72; n=99, 92, 96, 95
    0.39 ± 0.132
    0.61 ± 0.136
    0.52 ± 0.133
    0.67 ± 0.135
        Change at Week 96; n=79, 81, 86, 76
    0.86 ± 0.135
    0.80 ± 0.135
    0.60 ± 0.131
    0.66 ± 0.138
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Ideational Praxis Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Ideational Praxis Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Ideational Praxis Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 112, 102
    0.05 ± 0.057
    0.13 ± 0.058
    0.02 ± 0.056
    0.18 ± 0.059
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.21 ± 0.075
    0.12 ± 0.078
    0.09 ± 0.073
    0.16 ± 0.078
        Change at Week 72; n=99, 92, 96, 94
    0.18 ± 0.083
    0.25 ± 0.086
    0.21 ± 0.083
    0.35 ± 0.085
        Change at Week 96; 80, 81, 86, 75
    0.35 ± 0.111
    0.26 ± 0.112
    0.41 ± 0.108
    0.42 ± 0.114
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Maze Task Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Maze Task Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Maze Task Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    114
    107
    116
    112
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=107, 104, 111, 101
    0.15 ± 0.130
    -0.04 ± 0.132
    -0.20 ± 0.129
    0.17 ± 0.134
        Change at Week 48; n=100, 89, 104, 88
    0.37 ± 0.147
    0.07 ± 0.154
    0.21 ± 0.145
    0.28 ± 0.155
        Change at Week 72; n=97, 89, 93, 88
    0.32 ± 0.160
    0.14 ± 0.166
    0.04 ± 0.162
    0.40 ± 0.167
        Change at Week 96; n=74, 80, 80, 70
    0.52 ± 0.184
    0.29 ± 0.181
    0.60 ± 0.179
    0.52 ± 0.190
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Number Cancellation Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Number Cancellation Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Number Cancellation Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    113
    108
    115
    112
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=107, 106, 112, 100
    0.33 ± 0.099
    0.33 ± 0.100
    0.35 ± 0.097
    0.32 ± 0.102
        Change at Week 48; n=99, 92, 103, 92
    0.43 ± 0.114
    0.42 ± 0.118
    0.42 ± 0.112
    0.22 ± 0.118
        Change at Week 72; n=95, 92, 93, 91
    0.75 ± 0.115
    0.68 ± 0.117
    0.44 ± 0.115
    0.68 ± 0.118
        Change at Week 96; n=76, 80, 83, 70
    0.87 ± 0.138
    0.84 ± 0.137
    0.74 ± 0.133
    0.77 ± 0.143
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Naming Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Naming Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Naming Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    114
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=108, 106, 113, 102
    0.02 ± 0.048
    0.08 ± 0.049
    -0.03 ± 0.047
    0.05 ± 0.050
        Change at Week 48; n=101, 92, 105, 93
    0.11 ± 0.049
    0.09 ± 0.051
    0.08 ± 0.048
    0.03 ± 0.050
        Change at Week 72; n=97, 92, 96, 95
    0.21 ± 0.063
    0.14 ± 0.065
    0.08 ± 0.063
    0.07 ± 0.064
        Change at Week 96; n=79,80, 86, 75
    0.34 ± 0.085
    0.34 ± 0.086
    0.28 ± 0.082
    0.20 ± 0.087
    Attachments
    Untitled (Filename: ADAS-Cog-14 Naming Score_SA.docx)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Orientation Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Orientation Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Orientation Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.08 ± 0.127
    0.42 ± 0.130
    0.08 ± 0.125
    0.49 ± 0.132
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.63 ± 0.147
    0.77 ± 0.154
    0.45 ± 0.145
    0.61 ± 0.153
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    1.01 ± 0.166
    0.84 ± 0.172
    1.02 ± 0.167
    1.05 ± 0.171
        Change at Week 96; n=80, 81, 86, 76
    1.26 ± 0.196
    1.46 ± 0.197
    1.28 ± 0.191
    2.00 ± 0.202
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recall - Number of Words Not Recalled Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recall - Number of Words Not Recalled Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Recall - Number of Words Not Recalled Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.16 ± 0.098
    0.03 ± 0.100
    0.16 ± 0.097
    0.11 ± 0.101
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.39 ± 0.101
    0.32 ± 0.105
    0.41 ± 0.100
    0.38 ± 0.105
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 94
    0.58 ± 0.113
    0.64 ± 0.117
    0.60 ± 0.114
    0.70 ± 0.116
        Change at Week 96; n=81, 81, 88, 76
    1.04 ± 0.131
    0.97 ± 0.132
    0.89 ± 0.127
    0.91 ± 0.135
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Remember Word Recognition Instructions Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Remember Word Recognition Instructions Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Remember Word Recognition Instructions Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.03 ± 0.050
    0.03 ± 0.051
    0.15 ± 0.049
    -0.02 ± 0.052
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.27 ± 0.071
    0.10 ± 0.074
    0.19 ± 0.070
    0.06 ± 0.074
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.24 ± 0.091
    0.19 ± 0.094
    0.29 ± 0.091
    0.26 ± 0.093
        Change at Week 96; n=80, 81, 82, 72
    0.40 ± 0.112
    0.45 ± 0.113
    0.27 ± 0.111
    0.46 ± 0.117
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Spoken Language Ability Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Spoken Language Ability Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Spoken Language Ability Score of the ADASCog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.07 ± 0.045
    0.08 ± 0.046
    0.06 ± 0.045
    0.11 ± 0.047
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.14 ± 0.051
    0.04 ± 0.054
    0.03 ± 0.051
    0.11 ± 0.053
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.23 ± 0.066
    0.11 ± 0.069
    0.19 ± 0.066
    0.24 ± 0.068
        Change at Week 96; n=81, 81, 87, 76
    0.29 ± 0.089
    0.23 ± 0.090
    0.25 ± 0.087
    0.43 ± 0.092
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Find Difficulty Spontaneous Speech Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Find Difficulty Spontaneous Speech Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Find Difficulty Spontaneous Speech Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.21 ± 0.071
    0.14 ± 0.073
    0.11 ± 0.070
    0.23 ± 0.074
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    0.25 ± 0.077
    0.19 ± 0.081
    0.21 ± 0.077
    0.31 ± 0.081
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.47 ± 0.093
    0.28 ± 0.096
    0.44 ± 0.094
    0.42 ± 0.096
        Change at Week 96; n= 81, 81, 87, 76
    0.58 ± 0.117
    0.35 ± 0.119
    0.47 ± 0.114
    0.60 ± 0.121
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recognition Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recognition Score
    End point description
    The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Recognition Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score representing greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=110, 106, 113, 102
    0.53 ± 0.248
    0.25 ± 0.253
    -0.20 ± 0.245
    -0.02 ± 0.257
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 93
    1.35 ± 0.257
    0.92 ± 0.270
    0.73 ± 0.254
    0.80 ± 0.268
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    0.65 ± 0.245
    1.05 ± 0.255
    0.78 ± 0.249
    0.88 ± 0.252
        Change at Week 96; n=80, 81, 82, 72
    1.98 ± 0.287
    1.97 ± 0.287
    1.53 ± 0.283
    2.09 ± 0.301
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) Score
    End point description
    FAQ measures level of assistance (functional disability) needed for carrying out instrumental activities in daily living (iADLs). FAQ score ranges from 0-30 and consists of 10 items (each scored from 0-3), which measure a specific iADL in the past 4 weeks: [1) writing checks, paying bills, keeping financial records; 2) assembling tax or business records; 3) shopping alone; 4) playing a game of skill; 5) making coffee or tea; 6) preparing a balanced meal; 7) keeping track of current events; 8) attending to and understanding a television program, book, or magazine; 9) remembering appointments, family occasions, medications; 10) traveling out of the neighborhood]. Performance in each category is rated from 0-3: 0=normal; 1=has difficulty, but does by self; 2=requires assistance; or 3=dependent. The FAQ was administered by a trained interviewer. Higher scores indicate a greater requirement of assistance. Intent-to-Treat Data Set. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=112, 105, 111, 103
    1.63 ± 0.422
    1.84 ± 0.435
    1.19 ± 0.423
    2.06 ± 0.439
        Change at Week 48; n=105, 96, 106, 98
    3.37 ± 0.480
    3.53 ± 0.498
    2.83 ± 0.477
    3.58 ± 0.496
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 95, 101, 96
    5.62 ± 0.571
    5.09 ± 0.588
    4.57 ± 0.568
    6.31 ± 0.586
        Change at Week 96; n=86, 85, 92, 82
    6.14 ± 0.650
    7.11 ± 0.663
    5.80 ± 0.638
    7.94 ± 0.667
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-CGIC-MCI) General Condition Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-CGIC-MCI) General Condition Score
    End point description
    The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 48; n=99, 95, 104, 95
    4.91 ± 0.078
    4.86 ± 0.080
    4.80 ± 0.076
    4.87 ± 0.079
        Change at Week 96; n=83, 83, 89, 80
    5.29 ± 0.087
    5.28 ± 0.087
    5.22 ± 0.083
    5.34 ± 0.088
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Cognition Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Cognition Score
    End point description
    The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 48; n=99, 95, 104, 95
    4.85 ± 0.080
    4.81 ± 0.081
    4.83 ± 0.077
    4.92 ± 0.081
        Change at Week 96; n=83, 83, 89, 80
    5.30 ± 0.092
    5.29 ± 0.092
    5.22 ± 0.088
    5.34 ± 0.093
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Behavior Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Behavior Score
    End point description
    The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 48; n=99, 95, 104, 95
    4.30 ± 0.061
    4.31 ± 0.062
    4.28 ± 0.059
    4.33 ± 0.062
        Change at Week 96; n=83, 83, 89, 80
    4.61 ± 0.079
    4.49 ± 0.078
    4.57 ± 0.076
    4.55 ± 0.080
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Functional Abilities Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Functional Abilities Score
    End point description
    The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning (functional abilities). Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 48; n=99, 95, 104, 95
    4.59 ± 0.071
    4.58 ± 0.072
    4.46 ± 0.068
    4.59 ± 0.072
        Change at Week 96; n=83, 83, 89, 80
    4.97 ± 0.088
    4.95 ± 0.088
    4.98 ± 0.085
    5.03 ± 0.090
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in University of California's Performance Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-Brief) - Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in University of California's Performance Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-Brief) - Total Score
    End point description
    The UPSA-Brief is a performance-based instrument which uses a series of tasks and roleplay scenarios to evaluate a person's functional capacity in two areas of basic living skills (i.e., financial skills and communication skills). Scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score of the UPSA-Brief is desirable. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    114
    112
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 48; n=98, 93, 102, 88
    -4.47 ± 1.533
    -6.04 ± 1.567
    -4.10 ± 1.500
    -8.96 ± 1.601
        Change to Week 96; n=77, 79, 81, 73
    -13.36 ± 2.047
    -12.74 ± 2.037
    -11.55 ± 1.994
    -14.85 ± 2.104
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living Scale Adapted for Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL-24) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living Scale Adapted for Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL-24) Total Score
    End point description
    The ADCS-MCI-ADL-24 is a 24-item, study partner-based assessment of activities of daily living designed specifically for AD patients and is completed by a trained rater. The scale assesses functional activities such as cooking, household chores, shopping, keeping appointments, social interactions and hobbies. Items are assessed according to whether they were performed in the past 4 weeks and, if so, some items are further assessed as to whether they were performed independently, with supervision, or with physical help. Scores on the ADCS-ADL-MCI range from 0 to 69, where higher score indicates greater capability to carry out activities of daily living. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    114
    108
    114
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 48; n=103, 98, 105, 98
    -3.72 ± 0.723
    -4.51 ± 0.738
    -2.91 ± 0.712
    -3.65 ± 0.740
        Change to Week 98; n=83, 85, 87, 79
    -9.21 ± 1.134
    -10.25 ± 1.135
    -9.16 ± 1.112
    -10.60 ± 1.163
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) - Total Scale Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) - Total Scale Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. Total score can range from 40 to 160 with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    115
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=108, 105, 107, 100
    -3.52 ± 0.640
    -4.83 ± 0.649
    -5.04 ± 0.637
    -5.17 ± 0.664
        Change to Week 48; n=98, 90, 101, 88
    -1.85 ± 0.757
    -1.37 ± 0.782
    -1.86 ± 0.746
    -2.67 ± 0.792
        Change to Week 72; n=94, 87, 90, 86
    -5.27 ± 0.861
    -5.95 ± 0.885
    -6.86 ± 0.862
    -6.38 ± 0.897
        Change to Week 96; n=74, 75, 79, 64
    -6.79 ± 0.923
    -7.78 ± 0.928
    -6.59 ± 0.901
    -7.03 ± 0.977
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Coding Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Coding Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Coding Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 89, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=109, 105, 110, 100
    -0.39 ± 0.600
    -1.29 ± 0.611
    -1.40 ± 0.595
    -1.40 ± 0.623
        Change to Week 48; n=98, 90, 103, 90
    -1.98 ± 0.673
    -1.17 ± 0.694
    -2.38 ± 0.660
    -3.14 ± 0.698
        Change to Week 72; n=95, 89, 91, 88
    -5.26 ± 0.799
    -2.80 ± 0.819
    -4.58 ± 0.799
    -4.53 ± 0.828
        Change to Week 96; n=77, 76, 80, 65
    -6.12 ± 0.957
    -6.95 ± 0.970
    -6.70 ± 0.940
    -7.30 ± 1.016
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Digit Span Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Digit Span Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Digit Span Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    -0.48 ± 0.185
    -0.50 ± 0.189
    -0.78 ± 0.184
    -0.64 ± 0.193
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 93
    -0.75 ± 0.207
    -0.65 ± 0.217
    -0.41 ± 0.204
    -0.65 ± 0.216
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 96, 95
    -0.94 ± 0.194
    -0.89 ± 0.201
    -1.10 ± 2.105
    -0.79 ± 0.199
        Change to Week 96; n=81, 79, 85, 73
    -1.07 ± 0.229
    -0.81 ± 0.232
    -0.83 ± 0.224
    -0.90 ± 0.239
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Copy Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Copy Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Figure Copy Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    0.29 ± 0.287
    0.03 ± 0.293
    -0.12 ± 0.284
    -0.20 ± 0.299
        Change to Week 48; n=102, 91, 105, 93
    0.07 ± 0.363
    -0.60 ± 0.380
    -0.01 ± 0.359
    -0.38 ± 0.379
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 93
    -0.57 ± 0.410
    -0.77 ± 0.426
    -1.04 ± 0.412
    -1.25 ± 0.425
        Change to Week 96; n=81, 79, 84, 74
    -1.63 ± 0.470
    -1.48 ± 0.480
    -1.29 ± 0.462
    -1.95 ± 0.490
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Recall Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Recall Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Figure Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 18, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=110, 106, 112, 102
    -0.23 ± 0.259
    -0.65 ± 0.264
    0.06 ± 0.256
    -0.60 ± 0.268
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 92
    -0.97 ± 0.276
    -0.70 ± 0.288
    -0.22 ± 0.272
    -1.18 ± 0.288
        Change to Week 72; n=99, 90, 97, 92
    -1.21 ± 0.262
    -1.16 ± 0.272
    -0.68 ± 0.263
    -1.45 ± 0.272
        Change to Week 96; n=79, 77, 84, 73
    -1.16 ± 0.299
    -1.43 ± 0.305
    -0.86 ± 0.293
    -1.49 ± 0.310
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recognition Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recognition Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Recognition Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    0.09 ± 0.233
    -0.64 ± 0.238
    -0.38 ± 0.232
    -0.79 ± 0.242
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 93
    0.31 ± 0.231
    0.29 ± 0.242
    0.41 ± 0.227
    -0.23 ± 0.239
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 94
    0.13 ± 0.253
    -0.55 ± 0.262
    -0.48 ± 0.256
    -0.43 ± 0.260
        Change to Week 96; n=80, 79, 85, 74
    -1.11 ± 0.279
    -1.42 ± 0.281
    -0.90 ± 0.271
    -1.04 ± 0.289
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Learning Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Learning Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Learning Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    -0.57 ± 0.350
    -0.67 ± 0.359
    -0.98 ± 0.348
    -1.14 ± 0.364
        Change to Week 48; n=102, 91, 105, 93
    -1.27 ± 0.397
    -0.36 ± 0.416
    -1.89 ± 0.392
    -1.17 ± 0.413
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 95
    -3.18 ± 0.413
    -3.32 ± 0.428
    -3.02 ± 0.415
    -3.11 ± 0.424
        Change to Week 96; n=82, 79, 87, 75
    -3.57 ± 0.484
    -2.93 ± 0.496
    -3.23 ± 0.474
    -3.07 ± 0.503
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Line Orientation Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Line Orientation Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Line Orientation Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 110, 102
    0.20 ± 0.301
    0.24 ± 0.308
    -0.05 ± 0.301
    0.03 ± 0.313
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 104, 92
    -0.84 ± 0.348
    0.05 ± 0.363
    -0.53 ± 0.344
    -0.47 ± 0.363
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 95, 94
    -0.64 ± 0.365
    -0.07 ± 0.378
    -0.60 ± 0.369
    -0.60 ± 0.377
        Change to Week 96; n=77, 79, 84, 69
    -1.33 ± 0.404
    -1.01 ± 0.405
    -0.99 ± 0.392
    -1.88 ± 0.424
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recall Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recall Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    0.04 ± 0.102
    -0.15 ± 0.105
    -0.01 ± 0.102
    -0.08 ± 0.106
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 93
    0.07 ± 0.120
    0.05 ± 0.125
    0.10 ± 0.118
    -0.10 ± 0.124
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 95
    0.01 ± 0.081
    -0.29 ± 0.084
    -0.24 ± 0.082
    -0.27 ± 0.083
        Change to Week 96; n=80, 79, 86, 75
    -0.14 ± 0.095
    -0.39 ± 0.096
    -0.35 ± 0.092
    -0.31 ± 0.098
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Picture Naming Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Picture Naming Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Picture Naming Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    -0.68 ± 0.132
    -0.87 ± 0.136
    -0.85 ± 0.132
    -0.86 ± 0.138
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 93
    -0.21 ± 0.112
    -0.10 ± 0.117
    -0.09 ± 0.110
    -0.14 ± 0.116
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 95
    -0.91 ± 0.162
    -0.81 ± 0.168
    -0.63 ± 0.163
    -0.75 ± 0.167
        Change to Week 96; n=81, 79, 87, 75
    -0.68 ± 0.152
    -0.94 ± 0.155
    -0.65 ± 0.148
    -0.77 ± 0.157
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Semantic Fluency Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Semantic Fluency Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Semantic Fluency Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 111, 102
    -1.47 ± 0.289
    -1.90 ± 0.296
    -1.48 ± 0.288
    -1.65 ± 0.300
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 92
    -1.03 ± 0.441
    -1.00 ± 0.462
    -0.90 ± 0.434
    -0.79 ± 0.460
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 95
    -4.07 ± 0.462
    -4.50 ± 0.480
    -4.38 ± 0.465
    -4.26 ± 0.475
        Change to Week 96; n=81, 79, 87, 74
    -2.29 ± 0.408
    -2.87 ± 0.415
    -2.83 ± 0.397
    -2.78 ± 0.425
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Memory Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Memory Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Story Memory Total Score of the RBANS ranges from __ to __, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    -3.06 ± 0.282
    -3.13 ± 0.289
    -2.93 ± 0.280
    -2.99 ± 0.293
        Change to Week 48; n=102, 91, 105, 93
    -1.62 ± 0.324
    -1.07 ± 0.341
    -0.70 ± 0.320
    -1.01 ± 0.338
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 94
    -2.15 ± 0.381
    -2.00 ± 0.396
    -1.84 ± 0.384
    -2.10 ± 0.393
        Change to Week 96; n=82, 79, 86, 74
    -3.31 ± 0.380
    -2.67 ± 0.388
    -2.46 ± 0.372
    -2.45 ± 0.397
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Recall Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Recall Total Score
    End point description
    The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory – List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional – Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language – Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention – Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory – List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Story Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score representing a better outcome. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change to Week 24; n=111, 106, 112, 102
    -0.93 ± 0.132
    -1.01 ± 0.135
    -0.93 ± 0.131
    -0.95 ± 0.137
        Change to Week 48; n=101, 91, 105, 93
    -0.70 ± 0.178
    -0.95 ± 0.186
    -0.60 ± 0.175
    -0.69 ± 0.137
        Change to Week 72; n=100, 92, 97, 94
    -0.90 ± 0.179
    -1.12 ± 0.186
    -0.90 ± 1.81
    -1.38 ± 0.185
        Change to Week 96; n=81, 79, 86, 74
    -1.28 ± 0.197
    -1.10 ± 0.201
    -0.96 ± 0.192
    -1.35 ± 0.205
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
    End point description
    The MMSE is a brief, 30-point questionnaire, administered by a trained rater, which provides a quantitative measure of cognitive status in adults and is widely used to screen for cognitive impairment and to estimate the severity of cognitive impairment at a given point in time in AD participants. The MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater impairment. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=111, 106, 113, 103
    -0.60 ± 0.255
    -0.83 ± 0.260
    -0.48 ± 0.252
    -1.56 ± 0.263
        Change at Week 48; n=102, 92, 105, 92
    -1.78 ± 0.294
    -1.81 ± 0.305
    -1.60 ± 0.290
    -2.17 ± 0.305
        Change at Week 72; n=100, 91, 97, 94
    -2.83 ± 0.376
    -2.92 ± 0.388
    -2.43 ± 0.375
    -3.34 ± 0.386
        Change at Week 96; n=83, 81, 88, 76
    -3.95 ± 0.478
    -4.06 ± 0.488
    -3.70 ± 0.469
    -4.71 ± 0.494
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI) Total Score
    End point description
    The NPI is used to assess changes in the participant's behavior that occurred in a defined period of time (4 weeks). The NPI assesses 12 behavioral domains on the dimensions of frequency and severity. Frequency is rated on a scale where 0 = absent, 1 = occasionally, 2 = often, 3 = frequently, 4 = very frequently. Severity is rated on a scale where 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. For each of the domains, 3 scores are obtained: frequency, severity, and total (product of frequency and severity; ranges from 0 to 12, with a lower score desirable). A total NPI score can be calculated by summing the domain total scores. Total Score ranges from 0 to 144 with a lower score desirable. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=111, 105, 111, 101
    0.93 ± 0.551
    0.96 ± 0.567
    0.80 ± 0.551
    1.92 ± 0.576
        Change at Week 48; n=104, 96, 107, 98
    -0.03 ± 0.487
    0.84 ± 0.505
    0.99 ± 0.481
    1.32 ± 0.502
        Change at Week 72; n=102, 95, 100, 96
    1.34 ± 0.742
    1.52 ± 0.767
    1.80 ± 0.745
    3.25 ± 0.765
        Change at Week 96; n=86, 86, 91, 82
    2.38 ± 0.784
    2.03 ± 0.794
    2.53 ± 0.769
    2.94 ± 0.804
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Score
    End point description
    ADCOMS score is a composite score which is a weighted linear combination of the selected individual scale items from ADAS-Cog-14 (see description in Endpoint 10) , MMSE (see description in Endpoint 45), and CDR-SB (see description in Endpoint 1) scales. The ADCOMS score ranges from 0 to 1.97, with a lower score desirable. Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=Participants with an assessment at given time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
    End point values
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 300 mg ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    116
    108
    116
    113
    Units: score on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Change at Week 24; n=100, 98, 107, 95
    0.05 ± 0.013
    0.08 ± 0.013
    0.05 ± 0.013
    0.08 ± 0.014
        Change at Week 48; n=89, 82, 99, 83
    0.13 ± 0.018
    0.15 ± 0.018
    0.13 ± 0.017
    0.13 ± 0.018
        Change at Week 72; n=85, 79, 85, 84
    0.22 ± 0.023
    0.22 ± 0.024
    0.22 ± 0.023
    0.22 ± 0.024
        Change at Week 96; n=72, 74, 79, 65
    0.29 ± 0.029
    0.29 ± 0.030
    0.28 ± 0.029
    0.35 ± 0.031
    Attachments
    Statistical Analyses
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From the time of study drug administration until 20 weeks following discontinuation of study drug administration. Overall median time on study was 680.0 days.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    24.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo for ABBV-8E12 every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 1000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 2000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Reporting group title
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    ABBV-8E12 300 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    26 / 116 (22.41%)
    22 / 116 (18.97%)
    17 / 113 (15.04%)
    19 / 108 (17.59%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    1
    2
    1
    2
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    1
    2
    1
    2
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    BREAST CANCER
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    BREAST CANCER METASTATIC
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOUR
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PROSTATIC ADENOMA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    HYPERTENSIVE CRISIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    HYPOTENSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    ASTHENIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CHEST PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PYREXIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    PNEUMOTHORAX
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PULMONARY EMBOLISM
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    RESPIRATORY TRACT CONGESTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    AGGRESSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    AGITATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    DELIRIUM
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    MENTAL STATUS CHANGES
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PSYCHOTIC DISORDER DUE TO A GENERAL MEDICAL CONDITION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SUICIDAL IDEATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Investigations
    WEIGHT DECREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    CHEST INJURY
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CLAVICLE FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    FALL
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    FEMUR FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    HIP FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    MULTIPLE INJURIES
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PELVIC FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PNEUMOTHORAX TRAUMATIC
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    RIB FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SKIN LACERATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SOFT TISSUE INJURY
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SPINAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SPINAL FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SUBDURAL HAEMATOMA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    TRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    UPPER LIMB FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS CORONARY ARTERY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ATRIAL FLUTTER
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    BRADYCARDIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    MYOCARDITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    RIGHT VENTRICULAR FAILURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CEREBRAL MASS EFFECT
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    DEMENTIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    DEMENTIA ALZHEIMER'S TYPE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ENCEPHALOPATHY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    HEADACHE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    NORMAL PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PRESYNCOPE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SCIATICA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SEIZURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SYNCOPE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    3 / 113 (2.65%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 3
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    THALAMUS HAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    ABDOMINAL PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CONSTIPATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    DYSPHAGIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    GASTRIC ULCER HAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    NAUSEA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PANCREATITIS ACUTE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    STOMACH MASS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    VOMITING
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    CHOLECYSTITIS ACUTE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    URTICARIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    NEPHROLITHIASIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    POLYURIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    RENAL FAILURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    ARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ATLANTOAXIAL SUBLUXATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    NECK PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    OSTEOARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SPINAL OSTEOARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    COVID-19
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    COVID-19 PNEUMONIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    DIVERTICULITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ENDOCARDITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    EPIGLOTTITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    ERYSIPELAS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    GASTROENTERITIS VIRAL
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    PNEUMONIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    PYELONEPHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    SINUSITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    URINARY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    DEHYDRATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    FAILURE TO THRIVE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    1 / 108 (0.93%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    HYPONATRAEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo ABBV-8E12 1000 mg ABBV-8E12 2000 mg ABBV-8E12 300 mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    83 / 116 (71.55%)
    86 / 116 (74.14%)
    91 / 113 (80.53%)
    68 / 108 (62.96%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    CONTUSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 116 (6.90%)
    8 / 116 (6.90%)
    5 / 113 (4.42%)
    6 / 108 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    8
    6
    7
    FALL
         subjects affected / exposed
    22 / 116 (18.97%)
    17 / 116 (14.66%)
    25 / 113 (22.12%)
    21 / 108 (19.44%)
         occurrences all number
    39
    23
    37
    33
    SKIN ABRASION
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
    7 / 108 (6.48%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    2
    2
    8
    SKIN LACERATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    7 / 113 (6.19%)
    4 / 108 (3.70%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    6
    7
    4
    Vascular disorders
    HYPERTENSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    5 / 113 (4.42%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    6
    6
    2
    Nervous system disorders
    HEADACHE
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    20 / 113 (17.70%)
    9 / 108 (8.33%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    15
    29
    11
    DIZZINESS
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 116 (8.62%)
    9 / 116 (7.76%)
    14 / 113 (12.39%)
    14 / 108 (12.96%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    11
    14
    20
    CEREBRAL MICROHAEMORRHAGE
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 116 (3.45%)
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    3 / 113 (2.65%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    3
    2
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    FATIGUE
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    7 / 116 (6.03%)
    8 / 113 (7.08%)
    6 / 108 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    7
    31
    6
    Immune system disorders
    SEASONAL ALLERGY
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
    3 / 108 (2.78%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    3
    2
    3
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    NAUSEA
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    4 / 116 (3.45%)
    10 / 113 (8.85%)
    5 / 108 (4.63%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    5
    12
    9
    DIARRHOEA
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 116 (7.76%)
    10 / 116 (8.62%)
    12 / 113 (10.62%)
    12 / 108 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    11
    12
    15
    VOMITING
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    11 / 113 (9.73%)
    5 / 108 (4.63%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    14
    5
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    COUGH
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 116 (6.03%)
    7 / 116 (6.03%)
    9 / 113 (7.96%)
    3 / 108 (2.78%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    7
    11
    3
    Psychiatric disorders
    ANXIETY
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    9 / 116 (7.76%)
    16 / 113 (14.16%)
    3 / 108 (2.78%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    11
    17
    4
    DEPRESSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    8 / 116 (6.90%)
    12 / 113 (10.62%)
    10 / 108 (9.26%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    10
    13
    10
    INSOMNIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    2 / 116 (1.72%)
    3 / 113 (2.65%)
    7 / 108 (6.48%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    2
    3
    7
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CHEST PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    9
    2
    0
    BACK PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 116 (6.03%)
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    11 / 113 (9.73%)
    9 / 108 (8.33%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    11
    11
    12
    ARTHRALGIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 116 (7.76%)
    12 / 116 (10.34%)
    10 / 113 (8.85%)
    7 / 108 (6.48%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    14
    12
    7
    Infections and infestations
    INFLUENZA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 116 (0.00%)
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    6 / 113 (5.31%)
    2 / 108 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    6
    2
    NASOPHARYNGITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 116 (9.48%)
    12 / 116 (10.34%)
    12 / 113 (10.62%)
    11 / 108 (10.19%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    16
    14
    12
    BRONCHITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 116 (5.17%)
    1 / 116 (0.86%)
    3 / 113 (2.65%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    3
    0
    SINUSITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 116 (6.90%)
    3 / 116 (2.59%)
    3 / 113 (2.65%)
    0 / 108 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    3
    4
    0
    URINARY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 116 (10.34%)
    13 / 116 (11.21%)
    11 / 113 (9.73%)
    11 / 108 (10.19%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    16
    11
    12
    UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 116 (7.76%)
    12 / 116 (10.34%)
    18 / 113 (15.93%)
    7 / 108 (6.48%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    14
    19
    11

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    19 Mar 2018
    The purpose of this amendment is to include the new ABBV-8E12 formulation, addition of tau positron emission tomography (PET) and retinal imaging assessments and update the treatments administered section. Other revisions were made to ensure consistency within the protocol and to provide further clarifications of study design and processes.
    15 Nov 2018
    The purpose of this amendment is to: ● Update Section 4.0, Study Objectives, to add an exploratory objective for a digital clock drawing test. ● Update Section 5.1, Overall Study Design and Plan, to add Japan in the study. ● Update Section 5.3.1.1, Study Procedures, and Appendix C, Study Activities, to clarify the current diagnostic tools and scale order and duration (Table 4) and include additional study activities. ● Update Section 5.5.1, Treatment Administered, to define the study drug infusion rate during the study. ● Update Section 8.1.3, Efficacy Analyses, to revise multiplicity control method to incorporate the development goals. ● Update Section 8.1.10, Interim Analysis, to include target engagement interim analysis for the first 48 Cohort 1 subjects.
    02 Oct 2020
    The purpose of this amendment is to: ● Update Section 3.2 Benefits and Risks to include language for the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. ● Update Section 5.1 Overall Study Design and Plan: Description to remove sites in Japan from the study. ● Update Section 5.3.1.1 Study Procedures [Physical Examination, Neurological Examination, Vital Signs, 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG), Abnormal Findings, Lumbar Puncture (LP), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Tau Imaging, Retinal Imaging for Amyloid, and Digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT)] to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 5.3.1.2 Collection and Handling of Biomarker and Pharmacogenetic Research Samples [Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Pharmacogenetic Sample; Optional Pharmacogenetic Research Samples] to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 5.4.1 Discontinuation of Individual Subjects to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 5.5.1 Treatments Administered to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 6.1.5 Adverse Event Reporting to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 8.1.7.1 Tabulations and Summary Statistics to include summary of data for all subjects ● Update Section 9.2 Ethical Conduct of the Study to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 9.3 Subject Information and Consent to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update Section 11.0 Data Quality Assurance to include language for the COVID-19 pandemic. ● Update footnote at Appendix C Study Activities to accommodate tau PET due to scheduling conflicts.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 07:02:32 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA