Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43873   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7292   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A prospective, multi-center, controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a steroid/antibiotic associated treatment following cataract extraction by means of phaco-emulsification.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-002138-63
    Trial protocol
    IT  
    Global end of trial date
    31 Mar 2020

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    21 May 2021
    First version publication date
    20 Aug 2020
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason
    • Correction of full data set
    Value of Statistical parameters have been written with a typing error
    Summary report(s)
    SAP
    SYNOPSIS 044/SI

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    044-SI
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    SIFI SpA
    Sponsor organisation address
    Via Ercole Patti, 36, Lavinaio (CT), Italy, 95025
    Public contact
    Clinical Development, S.I.F.I. S.p.A., +39 +39-0957922238, claudine.civiale@sifigroup.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Development, S.I.F.I. S.p.A., +39 0957922238, claudine.civiale@sifigroup.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    31 Mar 2020
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    31 Mar 2020
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The purpose of this trial is to show that the administration of a reduced dose of NETILDEX ™ gel 2 times a day starting on the day of cataract extraction by means of phaco-emulsification and administered until 14 days after surgery is sufficient to obtain a non-inferior efficacy of the NETILDEX ™ eye drops solution administered 4 times a day for the same period.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was monitored by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB could recommend stopping the study for futility, if at least 3 patients (4.5%) in the same Group have grade +3 or more for both cells and flare at the examination with slit lamp and bio-microscopy, at any time during the study.
    Background therapy
    Cataract is an ophthalmic disease that usually affects the elderly population. Cataract surgery with phaco-emulsification is now the most frequently performed intraocular surgical procedure in the developed world. However, differences in surgical technique impact the severity of surgical trauma and post-operative recovery. The amount of post-operative ocular pain and inflammation plays a significant role in the Patient's perception of the surgical success. Several ophthalmic products have been studied in the management of post-surgery ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery. Corticosteroids are considered the gold standard for the treatment of ocular inflammation, and their most commonly used route of administration is the topical instillation as eye drops formulation. After topical administration of Dexamethasone, the concentration in the anterior chamber increases and declines within hours, necessitating frequent daily instillations of eye drops for several weeks. This might be associated with compliance issues, particularly in elderly Patients or in individuals with disabilities. A pharmaceutical formulation allowing for a less frequent administration could therefore be an attractive alternative.
    Evidence for comparator
    NETILDEX™ eye drops solution, containing Netilmicin Sulfate 4.55 mg (3mg/ml) and Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1.32 mg (1mg/ml), is already available for Patients. A new ophthalmic gel, preservative-free formulation has been developed. This new formulation has been tested in pre-clinical animal studies and in a clinical trial. The new formulation contains Xanthan gum, a high molecular mass polysaccharide approved by the FDA in 1969 for food products. It is used in the product as viscosity enhancer and to give to the product pseudo-plastic characteristics and prolonged ocular retention time.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    09 Jan 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 18
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 155
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    173
    EEA total number of subjects
    173
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    28
    From 65 to 84 years
    134
    85 years and over
    11

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The enrollement at the investigational sites was stopped at the achievement of 173 randomizzed patients versus the target of 180 randomizzed patients. The rational of this decision is due to the fact that the number of statistically evaluable patients were already reached (160 ITT population patients versus the 130 requested in the protocol ). Ana

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Male and female Patients, aged > 40 years, undergoing cataract extraction by means of phaco-emulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation according to inclusion criteria and after to be thoroughly informed about all aspects of the study, including scheduled study visits and activities, and to have signed the informed consent form.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    overall Trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator, Monitor, Subject, Data analyst
    Blinding implementation details
    All daily study products will be manufactured in indistinguishable single dose plastic vials, labeled in accordance with hour of administration. In accordance with the double-blind design of the study, daily treatment for patients randomized to group A (NETILDEX™ ophthalmic gel), will be of 2 doses of active treatment and 2 doses of indistinguishable placebo. For blinding purposes, Group B (NETILDEX™ eye drops solution) medications labels will consist in an aluminum envelope for each dose of the

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel
    Arm description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    NETILDEX™ ophthalmic gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Ear drops, solution in single-dose container
    Routes of administration
    Ophthalmic use
    Dosage and administration details
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Arm title
    NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Arm description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Ear drops, solution in single-dose container
    Routes of administration
    Ophthalmic use
    Dosage and administration details
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Started
    85
    83
    Completed
    80
    81
    Not completed
    5
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    4
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    1
    1
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: 173 patients were enrolled and randomised but 5 of them didn't received the treatment. So the total number at baseline is 168

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Reporting group title
    NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Reporting group values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution Total
    Number of subjects
    85 83 168
    Age categorical
    1.Male or female Patients 2.Patients aged ≥ 40 years old 3.Patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery through phaco-emulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation 4.Patients with grade 2 or 3 according to LOCS III system for grading age-related cataract
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    16 15 31
        From 65-84 years
    65 62 127
        85 years and over
    4 6 10
    Age continuous
    1.Male or female Patients 2.Patients aged ≥ 40 years old 3.Patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery through phaco-emulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation 4.Patients with grade 2 or 3 according to LOCS III system for grading age-related cataract
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    72.2 ± 8.8 73.2 ± 8.3 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    48 57 105
        Male
    37 26 63
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    ITT population
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The ITT Population is defined as all patients who received 7 days of study treatment and had the SLIT lamp examination at baseline visit3 (day 1) and endpoint visit 4 (day 7)

    Subject analysis set title
    The Safety Analysis Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis population is defined as all patients registered, who received at least one dose of study treatment

    Subject analysis set title
    The Per-Protocol (PP) populations
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    The Per-Protocol Population is defined as all subjects of the ITT population who completed regularly the study with no major violations of the eligibility criteria or during study conduction

    Subject analysis sets values
    ITT population The Safety Analysis Population The Per-Protocol (PP) populations
    Number of subjects
    160
    168
    158
    Age categorical
    1.Male or female Patients 2.Patients aged ≥ 40 years old 3.Patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery through phaco-emulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation 4.Patients with grade 2 or 3 according to LOCS III system for grading age-related cataract
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
    0
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
    0
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    0
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    0
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
    0
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    0
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    29
    31
    27
        From 65-84 years
    121
    127
    121
        85 years and over
    10
    10
    10
    Age continuous
    1.Male or female Patients 2.Patients aged ≥ 40 years old 3.Patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery through phaco-emulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation 4.Patients with grade 2 or 3 according to LOCS III system for grading age-related cataract
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    72.8 ± 8.3
    72.7 ± 8.6
    73 ± 7.8
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    99
    105
    98
        Male
    61
    63
    60

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Reporting group title
    NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery.

    Subject analysis set title
    ITT population
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The ITT Population is defined as all patients who received 7 days of study treatment and had the SLIT lamp examination at baseline visit3 (day 1) and endpoint visit 4 (day 7)

    Subject analysis set title
    The Safety Analysis Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety analysis population is defined as all patients registered, who received at least one dose of study treatment

    Subject analysis set title
    The Per-Protocol (PP) populations
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    The Per-Protocol Population is defined as all subjects of the ITT population who completed regularly the study with no major violations of the eligibility criteria or during study conduction

    Primary: Measurement of Inflammation Conditions in the Anterior Ocular Chamber After Cataract Extraction Through Slit Lamp and Bio-microscopy

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Measurement of Inflammation Conditions in the Anterior Ocular Chamber After Cataract Extraction Through Slit Lamp and Bio-microscopy
    End point description
    the primary efficacy variable is the measurement of inflammation (cellularity and flare) at endpoint (V4), in the anterior ocular chamber, after cataract extraction, examined with slit lamp and bio-microscopy. Based on these two measurements, a Patient is defined as: Full responder: if both cellularity and flare are of degree zero Partial responder: if at least one of the two measurements (cellularity and flare) is of degree zero The difference of Full responders after 7 days from surgery has been analysed for non-inferiority of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel using a non-inferiority margin of -0.10 and a Confidence Interval of 97.5%. No responder: if both cellularity and flare are greater than zero
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    80 [1]
    80 [2]
    Units: participants
        Full responder
    72
    76
        Partial responder
    8
    4
        No responder
    0
    0
    Notes
    [1] - ITT Population
    [2] - ITT Population
    Statistical analysis title
    Measurement of Inflammation
    Statistical analysis description
    The primary analysis compares the ITT population (Full responder) of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel (n=80 patients) and NETILDEX™ Eye Drops (n=80 patients). The difference of Full responders after 7 days from surgery has been analysed for non-inferiority of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel using a non-inferiority margin of -0.10 and a Confidence Interval of 97.5%. The primary analysis compares the ITT population of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel (n=80 patients) and NETILDEX™ Eye Drops (n=80 patients).
    Comparison groups
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel v NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    160
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [3]
    P-value
    < 0.025 [4]
    Method
    Confidence Interval
    Parameter type
    Discrete (counting) variable
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    1-sided
         lower limit
    -0.058
         upper limit
    0.158
    Notes
    [3] - The efficacy parameter utilized has been the combination of two clinical parameters, Flare and Cellularity The non inferiority test results indicate that the GEL Group is noninferior to the DROP Group since the lower linmit of the 97.5% Confidence Interval is Greater than the noninferiority limit of -0.10.
    [4] - The hypotheses for noninferiority has been stated in terms of the difference in the proportions D = ptest − pctrl where test is Netildex gel and ctrl is Netildex drops solution. The null and alternative hypotheses are the following: H0: D = ptest

    Secondary: Microbial load measurement

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Microbial load measurement
    End point description
    Microbial load measurement (for Patients with risk of ocular infections, based on Investigator's judgment) through ocular swab, evaluating the antibiotic efficacy 24 hours after surgery, based on the number of detected microbial infections (presence of positive swabs and anti-biogram results, if any). The anti-biogram should be performed according to standard procedure at investigational sites, but including at least the test with Netilmicin and Cefuroxime.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    85 [5]
    83 [6]
    Units: participants
    0
    0
    Notes
    [5] - Safety Population
    [6] - Safety population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Assessment of a Potential Variation in the Intra-ocular Pressure Related to the Use of the Gel Formulation Compared to the Eye-drops Formulation, Through Its Measurement Before and After Treatment.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Assessment of a Potential Variation in the Intra-ocular Pressure Related to the Use of the Gel Formulation Compared to the Eye-drops Formulation, Through Its Measurement Before and After Treatment.
    End point description
    IOP was measured in both eyes at Visit 1 (Screening examination), Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1), Visit 5 (Day 15±2) and Visit 6 (Day 60±3) by using a Goldman applanation tonometer (average of two measurements), recording of the time of measurement. All IOP measurements on the same patient will be performed by the same physician with the same tonometer. Intra-ocular pressure data (change from visit 1) has been tabulated with central and dispersion variables before and after treatment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    85 [7]
    83 [8]
    Units: change in IOP
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1 after surgery
    0.7 ± 2.5
    0.2 ± 2.2
        Day 7 after surgery
    -0.3 ± 1.9
    -0.6 ± 2.1
        Day 15 after surgery
    -0.6 ± 2.1
    -0.5 ± 2.2
        Follow up Day 60 after surgery
    -0.9 ± 1.9
    -0.7 ± 2.1
    Notes
    [7] - Safety population
    [8] - Safety Population
    Statistical analysis title
    Intra-ocular pressure (change from visit 1)
    Statistical analysis description
    Evaluation of intra-ocular pressure (change from Visit 1): tabulated with central and dispersion variables before and after treatment along with one-sided 97.5% confidence interval of the difference.
    Comparison groups
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel v NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    168
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    P-value
    = 0.4758 [10]
    Method
    t-test, 1-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.2238
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.3944
         upper limit
    0.8419
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Dispersion value
    0.3131
    Notes
    [9] - Student's t test for independent samples
    [10] - The p-value of the difference between The two groups is 0.4758, so we do not reject the null hypothesis TIPO DI VARIABLE ESTIMATE: CONTINUE VARIABLE

    Secondary: Evaluation of Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Inflammation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Evaluation of Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Inflammation
    End point description
    Evaluation of ocular inflammation signs/symptoms during the study (other than flare and cellularity) - Total score •Scoring System for Conjunctival hyperemia. 0 none 1.mild (some vessel injected) 2.moderate (diffuse injection, individual vessels discernible) 3.severe (intense injection, individual vessels not easily discernible) •Scoring System for Corneal edema and Lid edema. 0 none 1.mild 2.moderate 3.severe •Scoring System for Ocular discomfort (pain, photophobia, tearing). 0 none 1.mild (present but not distressing) 2.moderate (distressing but not interfering with daily life) 3.severe (very distressing and interfering with daily life) Evaluation of ocular inflammation signs/symptoms during the study - Total score Safety sample - change from Day 1 It is reported below the number of patients with none discomfort
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    85 [11]
    83 [12]
    Units: Total score
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 3
    0.7 ± 1
    0.7 ± 1.3
        Visit 4
    0.2 ± 0.5
    0.1 ± 0.4
        Visit 5
    0.1 ± 0.4
    0.1 ± 0.4
    Notes
    [11] - Safety Population Visit V3: 83 patients analysed Visit 4 82 patients analysed Visit 5: 81 patient
    [12] - Safety Population Visit 3: 83 patient analysed Visit 4 and Visit 5: 82 patients analysed
    Statistical analysis title
    Evaluation of Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Ocula
    Comparison groups
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel v NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    168
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [13]
    P-value
    = 0.9392 [14]
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.0122
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2734
         upper limit
    0.2978
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Dispersion value
    0.9261
    Notes
    [13] - It has been verified the non significative diffeence between both groups
    [14] - The p-value of the difference between the two groups is 0.9329 so we do not reject the null hypothesis Tipo di variable estimate: continue variable

    Secondary: Evaluation of Visual Acuity Through Standard Measurement Systems.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Evaluation of Visual Acuity Through Standard Measurement Systems.
    End point description
    Visual acuity with correction (best corrected visual acuity) was measured in the operated eye at Screening, Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1), Visit 5 (Day 15±2) and Visit 6 (Day 60±3). No relevant difference along the study and between treatment groups are present
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    83
    82
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        before surgery
    0.5 ± 0.2
    0.5 ± 0.2
        Day 1 after surgery
    0.6 ± 0.4
    0.6 ± 0.4
        Day 7 after surgery
    0.7 ± 0.4
    0.7 ± 0.5
        Day 15 after surgery
    0.7 ± 0.4
    0.7 ± 0.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Evaluation of Visual Acuity
    Statistical analysis description
    Visual acuity with correction (best corrected visual acuity) was measured in both eyes at Visit 1 (Screening examination), and in the operated eye only at Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1), Visit 5 (Day 15±2) and Visit 6 (Day 60±3). Dilated ophthalmoscopy was performed in the affected eye only at Screening examination (Visit 1/up to Day 0) and at Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1), Visit 5 (Day 15±2) and Visit 6 (Day 60±3).
    Comparison groups
    NETILDEX™ eye drops solution v Netildex Ophthalmic gel
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    165
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [15]
    P-value
    = 0.3823 [16]
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.0131
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.0761
         upper limit
    0.05
    Variability estimate
    Standard deviation
    Dispersion value
    0.201
    Notes
    [15] - Student's t for independent samples
    [16] - The p-value of the difference between the two groups is 0.6823, so we do not reject the null hypothesis

    Secondary: Evaluation of the Global Tolerability of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel in Treated Patients (by the Investigator), Through a Standard Questionnaire.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Evaluation of the Global Tolerability of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel in Treated Patients (by the Investigator), Through a Standard Questionnaire.
    End point description
    This outcome was assessed by interviewing the patients about their symptoms (such as burning, stinging and itching) experienced at at Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1) and Visit 5 (Day 15±2). These symptoms were individually assessed by using a 0 to 3 categorical rating scale. Changes in Burning, stinging and itching compared to Day 1 Burning/stinging/blurred vision scores: (0) none; (1) mild (present but not distressing); (2) moderate (distressing but not interfering with daily life); (3) severe (very distressing and interfering with daily life)
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Within 2 weeks after cataract surgery.Global subjective tolerability score at day 15 after surgery day.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    85 [17]
    83 [18]
    Units: participants
        None
    79
    80
        Mild
    0
    1
        Moderate
    1
    0
        Severe
    0
    0
        Missing Data
    5
    2
    Notes
    [17] - Safety population
    [18] - Safety Population
    Statistical analysis title
    Evaluation of the Global Tolerability
    Statistical analysis description
    The global subjective tolerability was assessed at Visit 3 (Day 1), Visit 4 (Day 7±1) and Visit 5 (Day 15±2) interviewing the subject on his/her global sensation and asking to rate using a 0 to 3 categorical scale, as follow: Score Evaluation Score Evaluation 0 none 1 mild (present but not distressing) 2 moderate (distressing but not interfering with daily life) 3 severe (very distressing and interfering with daily life)
    Comparison groups
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel v NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    168
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [19]
    P-value
    = 1 [20]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [19] - Comparison between groups of the frequency distributions for the categories decreased/unchanged Fisher's Exact test for the presence of cells with values <5 Categorical variable parameter estimate................: Odds Ratio NOT ESTIMABLE CI (sides, lower and upper limits): NOT ESTIMABLE variability estimate..............: NOT ESTIMABLE dispersion value..................: NOT ESTIMABLE
    [20] - The p-value of the difference between the two groups is 1.0000, so we do not reject the null hypothesis Tipo di parameter estimate: Comparison between groups of the frequency distributions for the categories decreased/unchanged

    Secondary: Evaluation of the Safety of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel Through the Collection and Evaluation of Adverse Events.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Evaluation of the Safety of NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel Through the Collection and Evaluation of Adverse Events.
    End point description
    Ten patients out of 168 experienced at least one AE: on NETILDEX™ Eye Drops. All adverse events were assessed by the investigators as mild or moderate and properly documented in source documents and eCRF. All AE were already known and all patients apart one completed the study.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Throughout study completion, approximately 9 weeks.
    End point values
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects analysed
    85 [21]
    83 [22]
    Units: participants
    4
    6
    Notes
    [21] - Safety Population
    [22] - Safety Population
    Statistical analysis title
    Evaluation of the Adverse Events
    Statistical analysis description
    Safety evaluation will include assessments of frequency and severity of adverse events, clinically-significant laboratory abnormalities and physical examination findings. Comparison between groups of the frequency distributions for the categories presence/absence AE
    Comparison groups
    Netildex Ophthalmic gel v NETILDEX™ eye drops solution
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    168
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [23]
    P-value
    = 0.5325 [24]
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.5779
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.4287
         upper limit
    5.8075
    Notes
    [23] - Fisher's Exact test for the presence of cells with values <5
    [24] - The p-value of the difference between the two groups is 0.5325, so we do not reject the null hypothesis

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Overall Trial and 2 months follow-up after day of surgery
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    MedDRA (10.0)
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    10
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery. Bromfenac 0.9 mg/ml 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) for 3 days before cataract surgery. NETILDEX™ ophthalmic gel: 1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) ophthalmic gel immediately after the surgery then 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery + 1 drop of XANTERGEL™ ophthalmic gel twice daily (b.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery. Bromfenac 0.9 mg/ml 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) for 3 days before cataract surgery.

    Reporting group title
    NETILDEX™ Eye Drops Solution
    Reporting group description
    1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery. Bromfenac 0.9 mg/ml 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) for 3 days before cataract surgery. NETILDEX™ eye drops solution: 1 drop of NETILDEX™ (Netilmicin Sulfate 3mg/ml / Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate 1mg/ml) eye drops solution immediately after the surgery then 1 drop four times a day (q.i.d.) from Day 1 until Day 14 after surgery. Bromfenac 0.9 mg/ml 1 drop twice daily (b.i.d.) for 3 days before cataract surgery

    Serious adverse events
    NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel NETILDEX™ Eye Drops Solution
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 85 (0.00%)
    2 / 83 (2.41%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Vascular disorders
    Vascular occlusion
    Additional description: Vascular occlusion not related to drug treatment
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 85 (0.00%)
    1 / 83 (1.20%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Macula edema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 85 (0.00%)
    1 / 83 (1.20%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 4.76%
    Non-serious adverse events
    NETILDEX™ Ophthalmic Gel NETILDEX™ Eye Drops Solution
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 85 (4.71%)
    4 / 83 (4.82%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Fibrin deposition on lens postoperative
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 85 (1.18%)
    0 / 83 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Investigations
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 85 (2.35%)
    0 / 83 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Immune system disorders
    Hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 85 (0.00%)
    1 / 83 (1.20%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Eye disorders
    Eye disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 85 (1.18%)
    3 / 83 (3.61%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    dyspepsia , nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 85 (2.35%)
    0 / 83 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Hordelum
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 85 (1.18%)
    0 / 83 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    16 Feb 2017
    Protocol version 2.0 (16 February 2017) has been implemented according to the requests raised by the German Competent Authority (BfArM) on the 27th December 2016.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon May 06 17:26:45 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA