E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Children with chilhood absence epilepsy. |
Enfants ayant une épilepsie-absences. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Children with chilhood absence epilepsy. |
Enfants ayant une épilepsie-absences. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 19.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | HLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10000332 |
E.1.2 | Term | Absence seizures |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 19.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10034759 |
E.1.2 | Term | Petit mal epilepsy |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To assess the palatability of ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
1) To assess the acceptability of ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup.
2) To assess the treatment compliance of ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup.
3) To assess the pharmacokinetics of ethosuximide with ADV6770 and syrup formulations.
4) To assess the sustainability of the effects of ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup on the absence seizures.
5) To assess pharmacodynamic (PD) profile on gastro-intestinal (GI) tract with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup.
6) To assess the safety and tolerability of ADV6770 versus ethosuximide syrup.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1) Subjects, male or female, between 2 and 17 years old inclusive at study entry.
2) Subjects presenting a childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), diagnosed according to the International League Against Epilepsy Proposal for Revised Classification of Epileptic Seizures ILAE), confirmed by EEG.
3) Subjects who have had typical absence seizures only (seizure-free or with persisting seizures).
4) Subjects already treated and stabilised with an anti-epileptic drug: either by ethosuximide in monotherapy or ethosuximide in combination with valproic acid or lamotrigine.
5) Subjects presenting normal safety laboratory values within three months prior to inclusion or at Day 1: absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500/mm3, platelets count ≥ 120000/mm3, and transaminases ASAT and ALAT levels < 2.5 times the upper limit of normal value.
6) Sexually active female of childbearing potential must agree to use a contraceptive method judged effective by the investigator if sexually active and have a negative pregnancy test at inclusion.
7) Parent/legal guardian(s) who has (have) provided a signed written informed consent for the study.
8) Subjects for whom the assent has been collected or searched, when applicable.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1) Subjects who present other epilepsy syndromes than CAE.
2) Subjects affected by any major disease that may be negatively affected by the study product or that may affect the study product (such as renal impairment, hepatic impairment, haematological disease).
3) Subjects who present contraindications to the administration of the study treatment: known hypersensitivity to succinimides or formulation excipients, rare known hereditary problems of fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or sucrase-isomatase insufficiency.
4) Subjects treated by medications or consuming products that may interfere with ethosuximide (such as St John’s wort, chelator resins, gastro-intestinal topics, antiacids, adsorbents).
5) Subjects who are not able to evaluate the palatability of the Study treatments.
6) Subjects treated or requiring to be treated with ONLY one EVENING daily dose of ethosuximide at inclusion.
7) Subjects who don’t have coverage by social security.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary outcome is the palatability score (taste rating) measured on a 100-mm visual analogical scale VAS (0 mm indicates a really bad taste, 100 mm indicates a really good taste) incorporating 5 facial hedonic features. The outcome is evaluated by the child himself (with the support of the parents or caregiver if needed), at SP I Day 28 (V2) and SP II Day 28 (V3). The score is determined, for all children, in mm from the left end (mean +/- SD) for each investigational medicinal product (IMP) and represents the opinion of the subject for the treatment period. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
- Day 28 (V2)
- Day 56 (V3) |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
1)Acceptability endpoints
Tests to be done by the children themselves:
- evolution of the score of palatability/”taste”
- number of subjects who rate the palatability of the IMP ≥ 50
- score of after-taste,
- score of easiness of swallowing
- score of appropriateness of the volume/quantity of study product
- score of treatment preference
- score of a spontaneous verbal judgment
- score of easiness of administration
- rate of willingness to consume again the study product
Tests to be done by the parents/caregivers are:
- score of palatability perception
- score of easiness of dose preparation to obtain the right dose
- events of spontaneous rejection or spitting out of the IMP
2) Compliance endpoint
- Rate of compliance based on the patient’s surveillance diary and study drug accountability
- The percentage of days the patient is considered as compliant within a period is also analysed
3) Pharmacokinetics endpoint
Blood PK parameters of ethosuximide, in monotherapy and in combination are calculated after repeated doses, as the average steady-state plasma concentration Cavg and the clearance (Cl)
Cavg = dose / (Tau x Cl), with Tau = time interval between 2 successive administrations
4) Sustained effects endpoints
- Proportion/number of subjects free from treatment failure
- Assessment of the clinical and electroclinical absence seizure condition
- Assessment of the correlation between EEG (30 minute recordings) and video/clinical detection of seizures
5) Pharmacodynamics endpoint
- Score of gastro-intestinal (GI) tolerability
6) Safety & tolerability endpoints4
- Proportion/number of subjects experiencing treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE)
- Changes from baseline in vital signs and laboratory parameters |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
- D14 of first and secund period of treatment : palatability only
- D28 (V2) : all except score of treament preference
- D56 (V3) : all |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | Yes |
E.6.13.1 | Other scope of the trial description |
Palatability study
Compliance |
|
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | Yes |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 18 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 12 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |