Clinical Trial Results:
Intravenous regional anesthesia versus axillar block for hand surgery in day-care hospitall: A prospective, randomised, comparative trial
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-002325-11 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
07 Nov 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
30 Dec 2019
|
First version publication date |
30 Dec 2019
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AT052016
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University Hospitals Leuven
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium,
|
||
Public contact |
Anesthesie Research, University Hospital Leuven, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
Anesthesie Research, University Hospital Leuven, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
08 Nov 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
07 Nov 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
No difference in patient satisfaction scores for both groups
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All patients received prophylactic pain medication (paracetamol, ketorolac) according to the protocol.
Pain scores (intra-operative and post-operative) were monitored frequently.
Other adverse events (e.g. postoperative nausea and vomiting, neurological symptoms) were evaluated until dicharge and one day after surgery (by telephone).
All measures to prevent discomfort and pain were described in detail in the protocol.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Sep 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 120
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
120
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
120
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
95
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
24
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled 120 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release, resection of a wrist cyst or Dupuytren release (with a maximum of 2 strands) under RA in an ambulatory setting. We included only patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I - III, ≥ 18 years of age, scheduled f | |||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
120 | |||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
120 | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Intravenous regional anaesthesia | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lidocain
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
IVRA
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection/infusion
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
300 mg
total volume of 40 mL
In patients allocated to the IVRA-group, all anesthetic measures were performed in the operation room (OR). A cannula (22G, BD Insyte-W; Becton,Dickinson Benelux N.V., Erembodegem, Belgium) was inserted into a vein on the back of the hand at the operative side. A tourniquet with a double cuff was attached around the upper arm. Then, an Esmarch was wrapped tightly while lifting the arm, thereby exsanguinating the arm.16 Subsequently, the proximal cuff of the tourniquet was insufflated to 250 mmHg, and the Esmarch was removed. 300 mg of lidocaine in a total volume of 40 mL was injected slowly through the intravenous catheter, which was removed afterwards.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Axillary block | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
mepivacaine
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Infiltration
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
280 mg (mepivacain 1%)
total volume 28 ml
In patients allocated to receive an axillary block, regional anesthesia was performed in the preoperative preparation and block room. The arm to be operated was abducted at 90° and the forearm flexed to a 90° angle. With the use of ultrasound, the following 4 nerves were identified as hyperechoic structures: the median, ulnar and radial nerve surrounding the axillary artery and the musculocutaneous nerve in the fascial layers between the biceps and coracobrachialis muscles. Local anesthesia of the puncture site was achieved with a subcutaneous injection of 2 mL lidocaine 1%. The needle (Stimuplex® Ultra 360 0.71x 50mm; G 22; B. Braun® Medical Inc., Melsungen, Hessen, Germany) was inserted in the axilla under ultrasound guidance with the probe in plane.14 Both ultrasound and neuro-stimulation were used to detect the nerves and to decrease the risk of intra-neural puncture/injection. After the initial motor response of the median nerve was obta
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Intravenous regional anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Axillary block
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Intravenous regional anaesthesia
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Axillary block
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Patient satisfaction | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the “Evaluation du Vécu de l’ Anesthésie LocoRegional” (EVAN-LR) questionnaire which was specially developed for the evaluation of patient satisfaction after RA.18 (Addendum 1) In addition, patients were asked if they would choose the same anesthesia technique in the future. All questions were completed just before discharge, except for those items, which are home related (question 12-13-14). These questions were asked during a postoperative phone call interview at day 1 during which patients were also asked for the occurrence of adverse events and postoperative pain.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day of surgery and day after surgery (see description).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
patient satisfaction | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Intravenous regional anaesthesia v Axillary block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
NRS for pain | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Intra-oparative (day of surgery)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
NRS for pain intra-operatively | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Intravenous regional anaesthesia v Axillary block
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
VAS pain score postopartively | ||||||||||||
End point description |
VAS score for pain post-operatively
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day of surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
VAS score postoperatively | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Axillary block v Intravenous regional anaesthesia
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
120
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
PONV medication | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Need for treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting (day of surgery)
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Until discharge
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
During surgery
Postoperatively (day of surgery until discharge DSU)
Day 1 after surgery (by telephone conversation)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
21.1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Intravenous regional anaesthesia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Axillary block
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035357 |