Clinical Trial Results:
PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY OF HYQVIA IN PATIENTS WITH IMMUNOGLOBULIN DEFICIENCY AND RECURRENT INFECTIONS WITH CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-002370-12 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
27 Aug 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
09 Jul 2022
|
First version publication date |
09 Jul 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
IMI2016-2
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany, 13353
|
||
Public contact |
Frau Prof. Dr. Carmen Scheibenbogen, Institut für Medizinische Immunologie, 49 030450524062 , carmen.scheibenbogen@charite.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
PD Dr. med. Patricia Grabowski, Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, patricia.grabowski@charite.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
19 May 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
27 Aug 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 Aug 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The aim of this study is to improve chronic fatigue syndrome in patients with chronic immunodeficiency and recurrent infections
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients are monitored for AE and SAE during IgG infusion as well as the periods between infusions. At home patients are requested to keep a diary where they document all infusions, complaints and problems. Side effects will be documented according to CTC criteria.
This clinical study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and the regulations of the actual Arzneimittelgesetz (AMG) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki version October 1996 (48th General Assembly of the World Medical Association, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Sep 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 17
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
17
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
17
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
16
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
1
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
ME/CFS patients were selected who were diagnosed at the outpatient clinic for immunodeficiencies at the Institute of Medical Immunology at the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Berlin, Germany) and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Start of recruitment: 01.09.2016 End of recruitment: | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
It was planned to include 15 patients in the trial and replace patients receiving less than 3 months of treatment. All 17 patients who were approached agreed to participate in the trial. Assessed for eligibility:17 Allocation: 17 | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
treatment (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
ME/CFS patients | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
HyQvia
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Infusion
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.2-0.8g/kg body weight / month
Month 1, day 0: total 0.2 g/kg body weight per month (one infusion).
Month 2: total 0.4 g/kg body weight per month (given as one or bi-weekly infusion).
Months 3–12: total 0.8 g/kg body weight per month (given as bi-weekly infusion).
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
ME/CFS patients
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
ME/CFS patients
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Completers
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
A total of 12 patients received the scheduled 12-months treatment
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
change of the Chalder fatigue scale [1] | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Univariate comparison of two independent groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney-U test, comparison of two dependent groups was done using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. A
two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to 12 months follow up
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was an investigator-initiated one arm trial |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
change of the SF-36 [2] | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Univariate comparison of two independent groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney-U test, comparison of two dependent groups was done using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. A
two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
up to 12 months fallow up
|
||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was an investigator-initiated one arm trial |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
improvement of the autonomic dysfunction | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
All patients reported moderate to severe symptoms of autonomic dysfunction assessed by the COMPASS-31 questionnaire.
The COMPASS-31 is a questionnaire validated by the Mayo Clinic to assess and quantify symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. 6 categories of organ dysfunction will be assessed with a maximum of 100 being the most severe disturbance.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
15months
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Functional Assessment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
One Patient lost the tracker device.
All responding patients at month 12 (patients 2, 11, 13 and 16) and also patients 4 and 8 with a response at
month 6 and 9 walked more steps during IgG treatment. The number of steps in the five non-responder patients (patients 5, 6, 7, 10, 17) did not
increase. There was no seasonal variation in numbers of steps. (See attachment)
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
15 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Values only from the responders |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Effectiveness to control infections | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 months before treatment and 12 mont during the treatment
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
15 months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Patients are monitored for AE and SAE during IgG infusion as well as the periods between infusions. At home patients are requested to keep a diary where they document all infusions, complaints and problems. Side effects will be documented according to CTC criteria. Grade 1 and 2 are non SAEs and Grade 3 are SAE.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
own | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
treatment completed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
treatment not completed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Taken together, our study has several limitations, including a small patient number and a lack of a control arm. | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072494 |