Clinical Trial Results:
Novel strategies of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) at high risk of cardiovascular events: comparison of different dosing regimens of administration of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. ARES
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-002885-30 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
31 Dec 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
20 Oct 2022
|
First version publication date |
20 Oct 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Report EMA Appendix 1 Appendix 4 Appendix 8 |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
FARM12Y8HH_ARES
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
FARM12Y8HH: ARES, EudraCT: 2016-002885-30 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Largo A. Gemelli 1, Rome, Italy,
|
||
Public contact |
Area di ematologia, FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO GEMELLI, 0039 0630154968, valerio.destefano@policlinicogemelli.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
Area di ematologia, FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO GEMELLI, 0039 0630154968, valerio.destefano@policlinicogemelli.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
23 Feb 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
22 Feb 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 Dec 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
1- To investigate whether low-dose (100 mg) aspirin regimens twice or three times daily are superior to the standard once-daily regimen in inhibiting platelet-derived thromboxane (TX)A2, as assessed by the measurement of serum TXB2, without significantly affecting in vivo PGI2 biosynthesis, as assessed by its urinary metabolite (PGIM). The comparison between aspirin 100 mg twice or 3 times daily vs. 100 mg od was hypothesized and tested as a superiority hypothesis. PGIM comparisons was hypothesized and assess based on a non-inferiority hypothesis of any multiple daily dosing vs standard od regimen.
2- To evaluate the long-term persistence of superior biochemical efficacy of an optimized, multiple daily dosing regimen of aspirin, as compared to the standard 100 mg od regimen and its safety.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The Investigators conducted the study in compliance with the 2004 revision of the 1964 declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice requirements described in the ICH guidelines included in the protocol. Prior to undergoing any study-specific procedure, all subjects gave their consent in writing to participate. The process of obtaining the informed consent was conducted in compliance with the Italian regulations. The ICF incorporated privacy working that complied with relevant data protection and privacy legislation.
All possible measures to minimize pain and distress were adopted along the trial timeframe, although the IMP is a well-known drug with a known safety profile.
Patients were prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) according to current regulatory indications approved in Italy, when deemed necessary to reduce upper gastrointestinal symptoms. In case of occasional need of anti-inflammatory, antipyretic or analgesic drugs, patients were instructed to take paracetamol (up to 2000 mg daily) and avoid ibuprofen or naproxen of NSAIDs in general which have a known pharmacodynamic interaction with aspirin and may also potentiate its bleeding risk at the gastrointestinal level.
|
||
Background therapy |
During the study all cytoreductive drugs were allowed as background therapy (i.e. hydroxyurea, pipobroman, busulphan, interferon, anagrelide) to control platelet count, according to the judgement of the referring Hematologist. and current international guidelines Patients were also prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) according to current regulatory indications approved in Italy. In case of occasional need of anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drugs, patients were instructed to take paracetamol (up to 2000 mg daily) and avoid ibuprofen or naproxen and NSAIDs in general. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Part A: all patients were treated with the current standard of care for cardiovascular prevention in ET, i.e. aspirin 100 mg once-daily. In part A placebo was used as comparator on top of aspirin once daily so that all patients took study medication 3 times daily, i.e. 1 aspirin plus 2 placebo pills or 2 aspirin plus one placebo pills or 3 aspirin pills daily. Part B: the comparator was the standard of care for the disease, eg aspirin 100 mg once-daily and no placebo was used. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
27 Jul 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 268
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
268
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
268
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
164
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
104
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
ET patients were recuited from up to 11 Italian hematological Centers: 3 General (Bergamo, Pescara, Vicenza) and 8 Academic (Bari, Bologna, Firenze, Milano Bicocca, Milano Ospedale Maggiore, Padova, Roma, Torino) Hospitals. Recruitment was competitive. Randomization was centralized. FPFV of part A to LPLV of part B dates: 12/12/2017 to 24/10/2020 | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
Following a 6-week screening period, all patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria and giving their informed consent underwent a run-in phase, where patients were instructed to take their aspirin tablet at breakfast (7-9 am) for 7-10 consecutive days to allow synchronizing of aspirin intake. After runin patients entered the trial. | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Run in
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
single arm | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
standard of care | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
acetylsalycilic acid
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
100 mg once daily
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms |
|||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
part A
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst | ||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
All patients had a 5-digit ID code which was sequential and not associated with the randomized arm, thus the laboratories measurements of the primary and secondary biomarker endpoints were performed by personnel who was blinded with regards of the randomized assignement.
Patients were randomized to 3 arms in a 1:1:1 fashion: 100 mg of aspirin once, twice or three times daily with matching placebo tablets to achieve 3 tablet's intake per day.
|
||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
standard of care | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
acetylsalycilic acid
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
100 mg once daily
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
twice daily | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
acetylsalycilic acid
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
100 mg twice daily
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
third daily | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
acetylsalycilic acid
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
100 mg three times daily
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period. Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms |
|||||||||||||
Period 3
|
|||||||||||||
Period 3 title |
Part B
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Part B was open-label. However the laboratory measurements were performed by personnel who was blinded regarding the assigned randomized arm, since patients were sequentially identified with a 5-digit code.
|
||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
two arm protocol | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
acetylsalycilic acid
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
100 mg once daily
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period. Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Run in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
single arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
standard of care
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
twice daily
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
third daily
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
two arm protocol
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Part A
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
251 eligible, aspirin-treated, consenting ET patients started the run-in phase, 6 patients withdrew their consent for personal reasons, 245 patients underwent randomization. There were no statistically significant differences of patient's characteristics across the 3 treatment arms. One patient assigned to aspirin 100 mg od exited the study for abdominal pain, and 1 patient had no serum sample available; 243 patients were evaluable and included in the analyses. Compliance: 218 out of 243 patients (90%) took all nine pills in the three days preceding visit 3 and were considered fully compliant. After two weeks of randomized aspirin treatment, serum TXB2 values of patients assigned to either the 100 mg bid or tid regimen were reduced by 80 to 90% versus their baseline values and were significantly lower than serum TXB2 values of patients assigned to 100 mg od.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Part B
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
242 aspirin-treated patients with essential thrombocythemia, were randomized to 100 mg aspirin twice- versus once-daily in addition to standard care. The primary endpoint was serum thromboxane B2, a biomarker of antithrombotic efficacy.
On 10 visits during 20-month follow-up, serum thromboxane B2 was consistently lower in the twice-daily versus once-daily arm (median 3.9 ng/mL versus 19.2 ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001; median relative reduction 80%, 95% confidence interval, 74 to 85%).
No major bleeding occurred. No statistically significant difference was found between the twice- and once-daily treatment groups regarding clinically relevant, non-major bleedings (6.6% versus 1.7%, p=ns), and major thromboses (0.8% versus 2.5%, p=ns ). Severe hand and foot microvascular pain was consistently less frequent in the twice-daily arm, while upper gastrointestinal pain scores were comparable in the two arms.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Serum thromboxane-TX B2 | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Part A and B: platelet thromboxane (TX)A2 production ex vivo, as reflected by serum TXB2 measured in samples collected in a fasting state, in the morning, before the next aspirin intake
Part A: vascular PGI2 biosynthesis in vivo, as reflected by urinary 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alfa (PGIM) excretion in a urine sample collected in the morning before the next aspirin intake.
Both biomarkers will be measured at baseline and after 14±2 days of randomized treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Applicable for both Part A and part B .
Values were measured over 2 visits in part A and over 11 visits in part B
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
major outcome | ||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Part A. Based on previous findings (3, 7) we assumed a mean±SD serum TXB2 in ET patients on aspirin 100 mg od and 100 mg bid of 22±33 and 5.0±6.0 ng/ml respectively.Anticipating a 30% dropout over the entire study duration (i.e. between part A and part B, and during part B), 100 patients were planned to be enrolled in each study arm to ensure adequate statistical power.Statistical hypothesis and sample size for Part B. The same ET patients were planned to be randomized in part B of the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Part B v Part A
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
493
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | ||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
15
|
||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||
level |
85% | ||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
5 | ||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
20 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From FPFV of part A to LPLV of part B: 12/12/2017-24/10/2020
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Part A: no serior adverse events recorded
Part B: tthrombotic complications: 1 and 3, in the twice- and once-daily aspirin regimen, respectively; No major bleeding; clinically relevant non-major bleedings were 8 and 2 in the twice- and once-daily aspirin regimen, respectively (p=ns). Other NSAE: 97 and 84 in the od and bid arms in 20 months.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
adverse events
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
13 Jul 2017 |
#1: included one new trial site (Unit 13) and a prolongation of the study overall from 36 to 40 months to accommodate possible delays of the Centers in recruiting patients, importantly the time on treatment for the patients in part A and B was not changed and remained as in the protocol |
||
02 Jul 2020 |
# 2: the Amendment included the change of PIs in Units 8 and 9 as well as a better definition of the time frame for ‘breakfast’ and ‘after dinner’ on the basis of part A experience to increase feasibility for the patients and ensure a 12 h interval intake for the bid regimen. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
NA | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880847 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266380 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743317 |