Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44237   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7338   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Novel strategies of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) at high risk of cardiovascular events: comparison of different dosing regimens of administration of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. ARES

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-002885-30
    Trial protocol
    IT  
    Global end of trial date
    31 Dec 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    20 Oct 2022
    First version publication date
    20 Oct 2022
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Report EMA
    Appendix 1
    Appendix 4
    Appendix 8

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    FARM12Y8HH_ARES
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    FARM12Y8HH: ARES, EudraCT: 2016-002885-30
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
    Sponsor organisation address
    Largo A. Gemelli 1, Rome, Italy,
    Public contact
    Area di ematologia, FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO GEMELLI, 0039 0630154968, valerio.destefano@policlinicogemelli.it
    Scientific contact
    Area di ematologia, FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO GEMELLI, 0039 0630154968, valerio.destefano@policlinicogemelli.it
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    23 Feb 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    22 Feb 2021
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    31 Dec 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    1- To investigate whether low-dose (100 mg) aspirin regimens twice or three times daily are superior to the standard once-daily regimen in inhibiting platelet-derived thromboxane (TX)A2, as assessed by the measurement of serum TXB2, without significantly affecting in vivo PGI2 biosynthesis, as assessed by its urinary metabolite (PGIM). The comparison between aspirin 100 mg twice or 3 times daily vs. 100 mg od was hypothesized and tested as a superiority hypothesis. PGIM comparisons was hypothesized and assess based on a non-inferiority hypothesis of any multiple daily dosing vs standard od regimen. 2- To evaluate the long-term persistence of superior biochemical efficacy of an optimized, multiple daily dosing regimen of aspirin, as compared to the standard 100 mg od regimen and its safety.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The Investigators conducted the study in compliance with the 2004 revision of the 1964 declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice requirements described in the ICH guidelines included in the protocol. Prior to undergoing any study-specific procedure, all subjects gave their consent in writing to participate. The process of obtaining the informed consent was conducted in compliance with the Italian regulations. The ICF incorporated privacy working that complied with relevant data protection and privacy legislation. All possible measures to minimize pain and distress were adopted along the trial timeframe, although the IMP is a well-known drug with a known safety profile. Patients were prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) according to current regulatory indications approved in Italy, when deemed necessary to reduce upper gastrointestinal symptoms. In case of occasional need of anti-inflammatory, antipyretic or analgesic drugs, patients were instructed to take paracetamol (up to 2000 mg daily) and avoid ibuprofen or naproxen of NSAIDs in general which have a known pharmacodynamic interaction with aspirin and may also potentiate its bleeding risk at the gastrointestinal level.
    Background therapy
    During the study all cytoreductive drugs were allowed as background therapy (i.e. hydroxyurea, pipobroman, busulphan, interferon, anagrelide) to control platelet count, according to the judgement of the referring Hematologist. and current international guidelines Patients were also prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) according to current regulatory indications approved in Italy. In case of occasional need of anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drugs, patients were instructed to take paracetamol (up to 2000 mg daily) and avoid ibuprofen or naproxen and NSAIDs in general.
    Evidence for comparator
    Part A: all patients were treated with the current standard of care for cardiovascular prevention in ET, i.e. aspirin 100 mg once-daily. In part A placebo was used as comparator on top of aspirin once daily so that all patients took study medication 3 times daily, i.e. 1 aspirin plus 2 placebo pills or 2 aspirin plus one placebo pills or 3 aspirin pills daily. Part B: the comparator was the standard of care for the disease, eg aspirin 100 mg once-daily and no placebo was used.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    27 Jul 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 268
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    268
    EEA total number of subjects
    268
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    164
    From 65 to 84 years
    104
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    ET patients were recuited from up to 11 Italian hematological Centers: 3 General (Bergamo, Pescara, Vicenza) and 8 Academic (Bari, Bologna, Firenze, Milano Bicocca, Milano Ospedale Maggiore, Padova, Roma, Torino) Hospitals. Recruitment was competitive. Randomization was centralized. FPFV of part A to LPLV of part B dates: 12/12/2017 to 24/10/2020

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Following a 6-week screening period, all patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria and giving their informed consent underwent a run-in phase, where patients were instructed to take their aspirin tablet at breakfast (7-9 am) for 7-10 consecutive days to allow synchronizing of aspirin intake. After runin patients entered the trial.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Run in
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Non-randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Arm title
    single arm
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    standard of care

    Investigational medicinal product name
    acetylsalycilic acid
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg once daily

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    single arm
    Started
    245
    Completed
    245
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    part A
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst
    Blinding implementation details
    All patients had a 5-digit ID code which was sequential and not associated with the randomized arm, thus the laboratories measurements of the primary and secondary biomarker endpoints were performed by personnel who was blinded with regards of the randomized assignement. Patients were randomized to 3 arms in a 1:1:1 fashion: 100 mg of aspirin once, twice or three times daily with matching placebo tablets to achieve 3 tablet's intake per day.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    standard of care
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    acetylsalycilic acid
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg once daily

    Arm title
    twice daily
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    acetylsalycilic acid
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg twice daily

    Arm title
    third daily
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    acetylsalycilic acid
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg three times daily

    Number of subjects in period 2 [2]
    standard of care twice daily third daily
    Started
    85
    79
    79
    Completed
    85
    79
    79
    Notes
    [2] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period.
    Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms
    Period 3
    Period 3 title
    Part B
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Part B was open-label. However the laboratory measurements were performed by personnel who was blinded regarding the assigned randomized arm, since patients were sequentially identified with a 5-digit code.

    Arms
    Arm title
    two arm protocol
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    acetylsalycilic acid
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100 mg once daily

    Number of subjects in period 3 [3]
    two arm protocol
    Started
    242
    Completed
    242
    Notes
    [3] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period.
    Justification: the trial consisted in two parts with different number of arms

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Run in
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Run in Total
    Number of subjects
    245 245
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    158 158
        From 65-84 years
    87 87
    Gender categorical
    Male, n (%) 112 (45.7) Female, n (%) 133 (54.3)
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    133 133
        Male
    112 112

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    single arm
    Reporting group description
    -
    Reporting group title
    standard of care
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    twice daily
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    third daily
    Reporting group description
    -
    Reporting group title
    two arm protocol
    Reporting group description
    -

    Subject analysis set title
    Part A
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    251 eligible, aspirin-treated, consenting ET patients started the run-in phase, 6 patients withdrew their consent for personal reasons, 245 patients underwent randomization. There were no statistically significant differences of patient's characteristics across the 3 treatment arms. One patient assigned to aspirin 100 mg od exited the study for abdominal pain, and 1 patient had no serum sample available; 243 patients were evaluable and included in the analyses. Compliance: 218 out of 243 patients (90%) took all nine pills in the three days preceding visit 3 and were considered fully compliant. After two weeks of randomized aspirin treatment, serum TXB2 values of patients assigned to either the 100 mg bid or tid regimen were reduced by 80 to 90% versus their baseline values and were significantly lower than serum TXB2 values of patients assigned to 100 mg od.

    Subject analysis set title
    Part B
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    242 aspirin-treated patients with essential thrombocythemia, were randomized to 100 mg aspirin twice- versus once-daily in addition to standard care. The primary endpoint was serum thromboxane B2, a biomarker of antithrombotic efficacy. On 10 visits during 20-month follow-up, serum thromboxane B2 was consistently lower in the twice-daily versus once-daily arm (median 3.9 ng/mL versus 19.2 ng/mL, respectively; P<0.001; median relative reduction 80%, 95% confidence interval, 74 to 85%). No major bleeding occurred. No statistically significant difference was found between the twice- and once-daily treatment groups regarding clinically relevant, non-major bleedings (6.6% versus 1.7%, p=ns), and major thromboses (0.8% versus 2.5%, p=ns ). Severe hand and foot microvascular pain was consistently less frequent in the twice-daily arm, while upper gastrointestinal pain scores were comparable in the two arms.

    Primary: Serum thromboxane-TX B2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Serum thromboxane-TX B2
    End point description
    Part A and B: platelet thromboxane (TX)A2 production ex vivo, as reflected by serum TXB2 measured in samples collected in a fasting state, in the morning, before the next aspirin intake Part A: vascular PGI2 biosynthesis in vivo, as reflected by urinary 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1alfa (PGIM) excretion in a urine sample collected in the morning before the next aspirin intake. Both biomarkers will be measured at baseline and after 14±2 days of randomized treatment
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Applicable for both Part A and part B . Values were measured over 2 visits in part A and over 11 visits in part B
    End point values
    Part A Part B
    Number of subjects analysed
    251
    242
    Units: ng/ml
    number (not applicable)
        Urinary prostacyclin metabolite PGIM
    245
    242
        Urinary thromboxane metabolite
    245
    242
    Statistical analysis title
    major outcome
    Statistical analysis description
    Part A. Based on previous findings (3, 7) we assumed a mean±SD serum TXB2 in ET patients on aspirin 100 mg od and 100 mg bid of 22±33 and 5.0±6.0 ng/ml respectively.Anticipating a 30% dropout over the entire study duration (i.e. between part A and part B, and during part B), 100 patients were planned to be enrolled in each study arm to ensure adequate statistical power.Statistical hypothesis and sample size for Part B. The same ET patients were planned to be randomized in part B of the study.
    Comparison groups
    Part B v Part A
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    493
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    15
    Confidence interval
         level
    85%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    5
         upper limit
    20

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From FPFV of part A to LPLV of part B: 12/12/2017-24/10/2020
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Part A: no serior adverse events recorded Part B: tthrombotic complications: 1 and 3, in the twice- and once-daily aspirin regimen, respectively; No major bleeding; clinically relevant non-major bleedings were 8 and 2 in the twice- and once-daily aspirin regimen, respectively (p=ns). Other NSAE: 97 and 84 in the od and bid arms in 20 months.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    25.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    adverse events
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    adverse events
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 268 (5.60%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    pulmonary cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    major arterial thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 268 (2.99%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 8
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION FOR ANGINA AND WORSENING OF CHRONIC CORONARY SYNDROME
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Acute myeloid leukaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    ACUTE PANCREATITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastric cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Endocrine disorders
    tyroid cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 268 (0.37%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 3%
    Non-serious adverse events
    adverse events
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    98 / 268 (36.57%)
    Vascular disorders
    Erythromelalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    47 / 268 (17.54%)
         occurrences all number
    47
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    gastric pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    30 / 268 (11.19%)
         occurrences all number
    30
    Infections and infestations
    flu
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 268 (8.58%)
         occurrences all number
    23

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    13 Jul 2017
    #1: included one new trial site (Unit 13) and a prolongation of the study overall from 36 to 40 months to accommodate possible delays of the Centers in recruiting patients, importantly the time on treatment for the patients in part A and B was not changed and remained as in the protocol
    02 Jul 2020
    # 2: the Amendment included the change of PIs in Units 8 and 9 as well as a better definition of the time frame for ‘breakfast’ and ‘after dinner’ on the basis of part A experience to increase feasibility for the patients and ensure a 12 h interval intake for the bid regimen.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    NA

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880847
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266380
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743317
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA