Clinical Trial Results:
Reduction of post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response by Phlogenzym® using total hip replacement as a model.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-003078-41 |
Trial protocol |
CZ |
Global end of trial date |
15 Oct 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Aug 2022
|
First version publication date |
28 Aug 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
MUC-2/16
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
MUCOS Pharma CZ
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Uhříněveská 448, Průhonice, Czechia, 25243
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical department, MUCOS Pharma CZ, +420 267 750 003, akocar@mucos.cz
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical department, MUCOS Pharma CZ, +420 267 750 003, akocar@mucos.cz
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
23 Sep 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
15 Oct 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
15 Oct 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The objective of the study is to explore the validity and clinical feasibility of methods for assessment of perioperative efficacy of Phlogenzym in terms of symptoms of systemic (CRP, hemocoagulation) and local inflammation and short- and mid-term course of rehabilitation.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The subjects were closely monitored during hospitalization and rehabilitation period via physical and laboratory examinations.
Occurrence of adverse events was monitored and evaluated at each study visit.
The subjects were provided with contact details for emergent situations.
|
||
Background therapy |
Planned concomitant medication per protocol involves: • rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) as prevention of thromboembolism • standard analgesics medication • antibiotics i.v. or s.c. to cover the postoperative inflammatory complications per local standard. • Rescue analgesic medication (its consumption evaluated as an efficacy variable) | ||
Evidence for comparator |
An identically appearing placebo was used as comparator | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
19 Mar 2019
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czechia: 34
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
34
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
34
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
12
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
22
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The study subjects were recruited on orthopedics department in Czech republic from patients considered for planned total hip replacement. The recruitment started on 19MAR2019 and was finished prematurely due to the COVID-19 epidemic on 15OCT2020. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
40 patients with primary diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease, candidates for total hip replacement, 20 in each treatment group and stratified by gender in 1:1 ratio, were planned to be enrolled to the study | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Pre-operation phase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The random numbers were generated using SAS in constant block size of 4 subjects; Verum/placebo 1:1.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Phlogenzym | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
registered drug | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Phlogenzym
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
marketing authorization No. 87/084/95-C
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Composition: Trypsinum 48 mg (corresponds to 24 μkat), Bromelaina 90 mg (corresponds to 450 F.I.P.-u.), and Rutosidum trihydricum 100 mg and additional compound
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dosing of Phlogenzym® or Placebo was fixed-changing according to the following schedule:
• preoperative day -4 to -2: 3 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 18 tbl);
• preoperative Day - 1: 3 tbl in the morning (Σ = 3 tbl);
• operation day: no dosing;
• postoperative Day 1 - 7: 6 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 84 tbl);
• postoperative Day 8 - 42: 5 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 350 tbl).
A total dose of Phlogenzym® / placebo per study is 455 tablets provided all visits take place exactly as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects treated with placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dosing of Phlogenzym® or Placebo was fixed-changing according to the following schedule:
• preoperative day -4 to -2: 3 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 18 tbl);
• preoperative Day - 1: 3 tbl in the morning (Σ = 3 tbl);
• operation day: no dosing;
• postoperative Day 1 - 7: 6 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 84 tbl);
• postoperative Day 8 - 42: 5 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 350 tbl).
A total dose of Phlogenzym® / placebo per study is 455 tablets provided all visits take place exactly as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Post-operation phase
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The random numbers were generated using SAS in constant block size of 4 subjects; Verum/placebo 1:1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Phlogenzym | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
registered drug | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Phlogenzym
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
marketing authorization No. 87/084/95-C
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dosing of Phlogenzym® or Placebo was fixed-changing according to the following schedule:
• preoperative day -4 to -2: 3 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 18 tbl);
• preoperative Day - 1: 3 tbl in the morning (Σ = 3 tbl);
• operation day: no dosing;
• postoperative Day 1 - 7: 6 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 84 tbl);
• postoperative Day 8 - 42: 5 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 350 tbl).
A total dose of Phlogenzym® / placebo per study is 455 tablets provided all visits take place exactly as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Subjects using placebo in a double-blind manner | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dosing of Phlogenzym® or Placebo was fixed-changing according to the following schedule:
• preoperative day -4 to -2: 3 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 18 tbl);
• preoperative Day - 1: 3 tbl in the morning (Σ = 3 tbl);
• operation day: no dosing;
• postoperative Day 1 - 7: 6 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 84 tbl);
• postoperative Day 8 - 42: 5 tbl b.i.d. (Σ = 350 tbl).
A total dose of Phlogenzym® / placebo per study is 455 tablets provided all visits take place exactly as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Phlogenzym
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects treated with placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Per Protocol
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Subjects without major protocol deviation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Phlogenzym
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects treated with placebo | ||
Reporting group title |
Phlogenzym
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Subjects using placebo in a double-blind manner | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Per Protocol
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subjects without major protocol deviation
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
2- Local pain at rest (VAS) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Self-assessment of pain on 100 mm scale; The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation, average of the morning + evening assessment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
EP2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.005 [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Interaction ofd treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
9- Local pain at rest (VAS), weekly morning+evening average assessments, Day 7 to Day 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The a\verage of the morning and evening assessment of pain on the 100 mm visual analogue scale, performer by patient
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Endpoint 9_Local pain at rest |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Local pain at rest (VAS) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
1- CRP postoperative | ||||||||||||
End point description |
CRP in serum
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
CRP in serum, Day 1 to Day 7 following operation |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CRP 7 days after operation | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Analysis of non-monotonous change
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.034 [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
3- Redon Drain Discharge | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Discharge of drain in the operation wound
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Redon Drain Discharge | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.723 [4] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
4- Thigh circumference on Day 1 to Day 7 following operation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Thigh circumference measured by a flexible ruler
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
EP4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Thigh circumference on Day 1 to Day 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.448 [5] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - No interaction od treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
5- Calf circumference on Day 1 to Day 7 following operation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Calf circumference measured by a flexible ruler.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
EP5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Calf circumference on Day 1 to Day 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.776 [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - No interaction odf treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
6- Temperature in axilla | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Body temperature measured in axilla in the morning.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 7 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
EP6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Temperature in axilla on Day 1 to Day 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.167 [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit; No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
7- Knee extension strength, Day 5 and Day 7 after operation | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Maximal isometric knee-extension force measured by means of a hand-held dynamometer
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 5 to and Day 7 following operation
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Endpoint 7 Knee extension strenght |
||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Knee extension strength, D5 and D7 after operation | ||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
31
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [8] | ||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.074 | ||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [8] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
8- Harris Hip Score, performance from Day 7 to Day 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Hip function questionnaire which includes items reflecting a patient's ability to perform normal daily activities and the goniometric assessments
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Endpoint 8_Harris Hip Score |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Harris Hip Score, performance from Day 7 to Day 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
33
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [9] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.297 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [9] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
10- Knee Extension Strength of operated leg, weekly assessments, Day 7 to Day 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Maximal isometric knee-extension force measured by means of a hand-held dynamometer
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Endpoint 10_Knee extension strengh |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Knee Extension Strength of operated leg, weekly as | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.074 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [10] - No interaction od of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
11- Performance in timed Up&Go Test (TUG) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The time (in seconds) it takes the patients to rise from a chair as quickly and safely as possible, walk 3 m to a line drawn on the floor, and return to the chair.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Endpoint 11_Performance in timed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Performance in timed Up&Go Test (TUG) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [11] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.772 [12] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [11] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity [12] - No interaction od of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
12- Thigh circumference, weekly assessments, Day 7 to Day 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Thigh circumference measured by a flexible ruler.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: Endpoint 12_Thigh circumference-weekly assessment.docx) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Thigh circumference, weekly assessments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [13] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.074 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [13] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
13- Calf circumference, weekly assessments, Day 7 to Day 42. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Calf circumference measured by a flexible ruler.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: Endpoint 13_Calf circumference-weekly assessment.docx) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Calf circumference, weekly assessments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [14] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.074 [15] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [14] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity [15] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
14- CGI Change Score by subject, weekly assessments, Day 7 to Day 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Self-assessment of global change of the subject´s general condition during the observation period.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CGI Change Score by subject, weekly assesment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [16] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [16] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
15- CGI Change Score by investigator, weekly assessments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Assessment by the investigator of the global change of the subject´s general condition during the observation period.
The endpoint was evaluated by ANOVA for statistical significance of the interaction of the effect of treatment (grouping variable) and visit (repeating variable), see the attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: Endpoint 15_CGI Change Score by Investigator.docx) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CGI Change Score by investigator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
ANOVA with treatment as grouping variable and visit as repeating variable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [17] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [17] - No interaction of treatment vs. visit No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
16- Cumulative number of the DDDs of rescue analgesics medication, Day 7 to Day 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Count of DDDs of rescue analgesic medication doses between the study visits.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 7 to Day 42 following operation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Cumulative number of the DDDs of rescue analgesics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Mann-Whitney U-test for cumulative number of the DDDs of rescue analgesics, Day 7 to Day 42
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Phlogenzym v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
29
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
> 0.05 [18] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Mann-Whitney U-test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [18] - No adjustment for multiplicity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Screening till final visit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
AEs were reported at study visits for all subjects.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
19.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Phlogenzym
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects using active IMP Phlogenzym in a double-blind manner | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Subjects treated with placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
The planned number of subjects was not enrolled because of preliminary recruitment termination due to the COVID situation. |