Clinical Trial Results:
Qualification of 82Rb PET for measurement of tumor perfusion. Uptake in primary prostate cancer vs healthy prostate
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-003185-26 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
11 Sep 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
14 Oct 2017
|
First version publication date |
14 Oct 2017
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2016-NUK-01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Nuclearmedicine & PET
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Århus N, Denmark, 8200
|
||
Public contact |
Dept. of Nuclearmedicine & PET, Aarhus University Hospital, 0045 78456210, madsjoch@rm.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Dept. of Nuclearmedicine & PET, Aarhus University Hospital, 0045 78456210, madsjoch@rm.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
11 Sep 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
11 Sep 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
11 Sep 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
It is well known that blood flow in tumors are higher than in healthy tissue. The main objective of the trial is to prove that the increased blood flow in tumors can be detected by the PET flow tracer 82Rb. In this project we examine the prostate.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
None (None needed)
|
||
Background therapy |
None | ||
Evidence for comparator |
The healthy controls have normal PSA values and no known disease of the prostate. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Oct 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
30
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
12
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
18
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The 15 patients with prostate cancer were recruited in relation to a clinical 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. The 15 controls were recruited in relation to a clinical 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion scan. The controls had a PSA blood sample taken and were asked about symptoms from lower urinary tract and known prostate disease. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
The patients had high risk prostate cancer and no other known malignancies. The controls had a PSA blood sample taken and were asked about symptoms from lower urinary tract and no known prostate disease and no other known malignancies. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Patients with prostate cancer | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
High risk prostate cancer patients | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Patients with prostate cancer - scanned | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cardiogen-82
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Radiopharmaceutical diagnostics. The Cardiogen-82 generator can eluate a new dosage of Rubidium-82 every 10 minutes for directly infusion in the patient. The dosage of radioactivity is approximately 1110 MBq.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Healthy controls | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Men without known disease in the prostate gland | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Patients with prostate cancer
|
||
Reporting group description |
High risk prostate cancer patients | ||
Reporting group title |
Healthy controls
|
||
Reporting group description |
Men without known disease in the prostate gland |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
SUVmean(Tumor, PSMA guided) vs SUVmean(controls) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
3/2-2017 - 20/7-2017
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - One of the patients had low or none PSMA expression in the prostata. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
T-test for difference in means | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
T-test for analysis of the difference between mean SUV in the tumors of the patients (PSMA guided) and mean SUV in the total prostate in the healthy controls.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Patients with prostate cancer v Healthy controls
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
26
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [2] | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [3] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - T-test for analysis of the difference between mean SUV in the tumors of the patients (PSMA guided) and mean SUV in the total prostate in the healthy controls. [3] - A very low p-value that proves significantly higher mean SUV in the tumors of the patients (PSMA guided) than mean SUV in the total prostate in the healthy controls. |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
SUVmean(Tumor, 60% threshold) vs SUVmean(controls) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
3/2-2017 - 30/7-2017
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
T-test for difference in means | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
T-test for the difference in SUVmean in the tumors of the patients (60% threshold method) and the SUVmean of the total prostate of the healthy controls.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Patients with prostate cancer v Healthy controls
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
27
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [4] | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [5] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - T-test for the difference in SUVmean in the tumors of the patients (60% threshold method) and the SUVmean of the total prostate of the healthy controls. [5] - A very low p-value proves that SUVmean in the tumors of the patients (60% threshold method) are significantly higher than the SUVmean of the total prostate of the healthy controls. |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
3/2-2017 - 11/9-2017
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No adverse events were reported, (this was as expected, as 82Rb has no known adverse effects) |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |