Clinical Trial Results:
Modeling of the impact of a PCSK9 inhibition on lipoproteins in patients with dyslipidemia
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-003551-30 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
16 Jan 2019
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
18 Feb 2021
|
First version publication date |
16 Sep 2020
|
Other versions |
v1 |
Version creation reason |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
August2016
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
U1111-1192-0601 | ||
Other trial identifiers |
DRKS: DRKS00011663 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Institut für klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Hugstetter Str 55, Freiburg, Germany, 79106
|
||
Public contact |
Karl Winkler, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Institut für klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin , 49 76127033160, karl.winkler@uniklinik-freiburg.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Karl Winkler, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Institut für klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin , 49 76127033160, karl.winkler@uniklinik-freiburg.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
16 Jan 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
16 Jan 2019
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
16 Jan 2019
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The objective is to study the impact of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with dyslipidemia using a mathematical model describing the lipoproteins of low density (LDL)based on clinical data
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Study was part of regular patient treatment. Hence Protection=regular protection in patient treatment
|
||
Background therapy |
the protocol doesn't prescripe a background therapy | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Mar 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
30
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
16
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
14
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Time-span of recruitment: 23.03.17 -01.12.18 All patients were recruited in the lipid ambulance of the university hospital Freiburg, Germany | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
no screening, patients of the lipid ambulance of the university hospital Freiburg, Germany, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included (given written consent) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Praluent arm | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
no PCSK9-inhibitor at baseline, start of PCSK9 inhibition thearpy directly after baseline-visit. visite 1 (~2 weeks after baseline-visit), visit 2 (~12 weeks after baseline visit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Praluent
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
EMA/504805/2015
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
75 mg every two weeks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Repatha arm | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
12 weeks Repatha | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Repatha
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
EMEA/H/C/003766
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
140mg total every two weeks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Praluent arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
no PCSK9-inhibitor at baseline, start of PCSK9 inhibition thearpy directly after baseline-visit. visite 1 (~2 weeks after baseline-visit), visit 2 (~12 weeks after baseline visit) | ||
Reporting group title |
Repatha arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
12 weeks Repatha |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Estimation of the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of Apolipoprotein B in LDL | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
This FCR is estimated using a mathematical model based on lipid-compositions of in the lipoproteinfractions VLDL, IDL, LDL and HDL. It results from the expected TG loss and the observed TG number per ApoB in LDL.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
FCR | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Change in FCR before (baseline) and after (12 weeks) treatment with PCSK9-inhibitor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Repatha arm v Praluent arm
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
26
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.000378 [2] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Change in FCR before (baseline) and after (12 weeks) treatment with PCSK9-inhibitor Wilcoxon signed rank test [2] - The fractional catabolic rate (derived using a mathematical model) increases significantly due to therapy with PCSK9-inhibitors. This is in accordance with intuition |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Cholesterol ester in HDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
TG in HDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Cholesterol ester in LDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Triglycerides in LDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Cholesterol ester in VLDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Triglycerides in VLDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
ApoB in LDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
ApoB in VLDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
ApoA1 in HDL | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
12 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
no PCSK9-inhibitor at baseline, start of PCSK9 inhibition thearpy directly after baseline-visit. visite 1 (~2 weeks after baseline-visit), visit 2 (~12 weeks after baseline visit) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects exposed to this adverse event is less than the total number of subjects exposed for the reporting group. These numbers are expected to be equal. Justification: I have to admit, that I do not unterstand the warning (neither do I understand the difference between 'exposed' and 'affected'). However, there was only one case of that specific non-SAE in our study. [2] - The number of subjects exposed to this adverse event is less than the total number of subjects exposed for the reporting group. These numbers are expected to be equal. Justification: I have to admit, that I do not unterstand the warning (neither do I understand the difference between 'exposed' and 'affected'). However, there was only one case of that specific non-SAE in our study. [3] - The number of subjects exposed to this adverse event is less than the total number of subjects exposed for the reporting group. These numbers are expected to be equal. Justification: I have to admit, that I do not unterstand the warning (neither do I understand the difference between 'exposed' and 'affected'). However, there was only one case of that specific non-SAE in our study. [4] - The number of subjects exposed to this adverse event is less than the total number of subjects exposed for the reporting group. These numbers are expected to be equal. Justification: I have to admit, that I do not unterstand the warning (neither do I understand the difference between 'exposed' and 'affected'). However, there was only one case of that specific non-SAE in our study. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30670016 |