Clinical Trial Results:
Clinical Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Wilate in Previously Treated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-003681-34 |
Trial protocol |
HU BG PL |
Global end of trial date |
29 Mar 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
02 May 2019
|
First version publication date |
02 May 2019
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
WIL-27
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02954575 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Octapharma AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Seidenstrasse 2, Lachen, Switzerland, CH-8853
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Manager, Octapharma AG, +41 554512180, Cristina.Solomon@octapharma.ch
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Manager, Octapharma AG, +41 554512180, Cristina.Solomon@octapharma.ch
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
22 Aug 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
29 Mar 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of Wilate in the prophylactic treatment of previously treated patients (PTP) with severe hemophilia A.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This trial was conducted in accordance to the principles of ICH- GCP, ensuring that the rights, safety and well-being of patients are protected and in consistency with the Declaration of Helsinki and national regulatory requirements.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined in order to protect subjects from contraindications, interactions with other medication and risk factors associated with the investigational medicinal product. Throughout the study safety was assessed, such as occurrence of AEs and concomitant medications.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
21 Dec 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Russian Federation: 7
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 17
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bulgaria: 27
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Hungary: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
55
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
48
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
5
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
50
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients with documented severe hemophilia A, who had previous treatment with a FVIII concentrate for at least 150 exposure days (EDs) were screened according to predefined in- and exclusion criteria. | ||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
Wilate | ||||||||||
Arm description |
All patients will received Wilate for prophylactic treatment according to the guidelines given in the clinical study protocol and the patient’s clinical condition. | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Wilate
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for solution for injection
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dose and frequency of Wilate was determined according to detailed guidelines given in the clinical study protocol and to the patient’s clinical condition.
The dose used for PK assessment, i.e., 50 ± 5 IU/kg, was in line with the current recommendations of the EMA ,which recommends a dose of 25–50 IU/kg.
The doses for prophylaxis (20–40 IU/kg Wilate/kg BW given at intervals of 2 to 3 days), the treatment of bleeding episodes and perioperative prophylaxis, were given as indicated in the European Summary of Product Characteristics. The body weight measurement obtained at the visit prior to the prophylactic treatments was used in the calculations of dose.
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Wilate
|
||
Reporting group description |
All patients will received Wilate for prophylactic treatment according to the guidelines given in the clinical study protocol and the patient’s clinical condition. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Per-protocol population (PP)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The per-protocol (PP) set, i.e. a subset of the full analysis set excludes subjects with major protocol deviations which may have an impact on the evaluation of the primary study outcome parameter (major protocol deviations as defined during the data review meeting.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety population (SAF)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The safety (SAF) set includes all subjects who received at least one infusion of IMP
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Full analysis set (FAS)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The full analysis set (FAS) defined according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle will include all enrolled subjects who received at least one infusion of IMP after the initial PK or at Non-PK Visit.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Pharmacokinetic population (PK)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The pharmacokinetic (PK) set will include all subjects for which at least one valid Wilate PK profile has been obtained.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
N (BE)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Number of bleeding events (PP -data set )
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
% (BE)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Percentage of bleeding events (PP -data set )
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Initial PK
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Initial PK Assessment of FVIII:C
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
PK completion 6 months
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
PK Assessment of FVIII:C at 6 months
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Number of patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Number of patients
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
% of patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
percentage of patients
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Overall efficacy assessment (n)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Result of overall efficacy assessment (n)
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Overall efficacy assessment (%)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Overall efficacy assessment (%)
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
ABRs during Wilate Prophylaxis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
ABRs during Wilate Prophylyxis
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Incremental IVR (kg/dL) over time
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
IVR from FVIII:C plasma levels from all patients at each visit
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
ANOVA assessed association between blood group &IMP half-life
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
ANOVA assessed association between blood group and Wilate half-life
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
ANOVA assessed association between VWF:Ag and IMP half-life
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
ANOVA assessed association between VWF:Ag and Wilate half-life
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Number of patients Pearson Clopper CI (2-sided) 95%
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
95% Pearson Clopper interval
|
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Reduction of total annualized bleeding rate (TABR) under Prophylaxis [1] | ||||||||||
End point description |
The efficacy of prophylactic treatment with Wilate was statistically evaluated by comparing the primary endpoint, i.e., TABR under prophylaxis, with a predefined threshold of 29 BEs per patient per year. This threshold corresponds to 50% of the TABR reported in GENA-01 study which had a TABR of 58.1 per patient per year. A confirmative one-sided, one-sample Poisson test was used to test whether the mean annualised bleeding rate (ABR) in patients treated prophylactically with Wilate was below the threshold of 29 BEs per patient year (alpha = 2.5%). A corresponding two-sided 95% CI for the TABR was also provided.
In the per-protocol population (N=52) the one-sample Poisson test estimate was 2.13 (95% CI 1.64, 2.76) p<0.0001 vs mean TABR >29
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Trial includes one arm only. For specifying statistical analysis in the system at least 2 arms are required, so no statistical analysis can be entered. Therefore only results for this endpoint are provided. 84.2% of all BEs were treated successfully (95% CI 72.13%, 92.52%; p=0.0096 for proportion of success ≤70%) |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (SABR) | ||||||||||
End point description |
SABR was analysed in the same way as TABR, the only exception being that, for the comparison of mean SABRs, a predefined threshold of 19.1 per patient per year was chosen; this threshold corresponds to 50% of the SABR in GENA-01.
For the spontaneous BEs in the PP population, the one-sample Poisson test estimate was 1.53 (95% CI 1.13, 2.08; p<0.0001 vs mean SABR >19.1).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Efficacy of Wilate in the treatment of breakthrough bleeding events | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The proportion of bleeding events (BEs) successfully treated with Wilate were documented by the patient (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments) in the patient diary for all BEs according to a 4 point hemostatic efficacy scales including the four items: 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none'.
All efficacy ratings assessed as either ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ were considered ‘successfully treated.’
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Number of patients with BEs [3] - Number of patients with BEs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Wilate consumption for prophylaxis | ||||||||||
End point description |
The total consumption of Wilate for all patients receiving prophylaxis (IU/kg)
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment area under the curve [AUCnorm] of FVIII:C | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The value of the area under the curve [AUC]) of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at baseline and 6 months
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
PK OS assay assessment (in vivo half-life) of FVIII:C | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the OS assay. The in vivo half-life of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at baseline and 6 months
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
PK assessment (Maximum plasma concentration [Cmax]) of FVIII:C | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The Maximum plasma concentration of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at baseline and 6 months
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) of Wilate over time | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
IVR was determined from FVIII:C plasma levels from all patients at each visit using OS assay
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of treatment
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Association between ABO blood type and the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate | ||||||||||
End point description |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between AB0 blood type and the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Association between VWF:Ag concentration and the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate | ||||||||||
End point description |
ANOVA was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between VWF:Ag with the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Immunogenicity of Wilate by testing for FVIII inhibitors | ||||||||||
End point description |
FVIII inhibitor activity was determined at each study visit before the injection of Wilate using the modified Bethesda assay (Nijmegen modification).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Virus safety to be measured by the incidence of parvovirus B19 seroconversions between baseline (BL) and end of study | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Virus safety was evaluated by taking a plasma sample for parvovirus B19 antibody testing before the first injection of Wilate. All patients negative at screening were tested again at the study completion visit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - refers to percentage from the total 55 subjects in SAF [5] - refers to percentage from the total 55 subjects in SAF |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Efficacy of Wilate in surgical prophylaxis assessed by surgeon and hematologist using predefined assessment criteria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Hemostatic efficacy was assessed at the end of surgery by the surgeon and at end of the postoperative period by the haematologist, using 4 point hemostatic efficacy scales including the four items: 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none'. Overall efficacy was assessed by the investigator, taking both the intra and postoperative assessments into account, and using the ‘excellent,’ ‘good,’ moderate,’ and ‘none’ scale.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Throughout the observation period until study completion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
SAF Population
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
16 Jan 2017 |
Protocol amendment has been prepared in response to the FDA information request:
- a second PK Assessment Phase after 6 months of prophylactic treatment which is included in the PK Study Completion Visit has been added
- study duration for patients undergoing PK assessment has been corrected from 1 week to 2 days per PK Assessment Phase.
- thromboembolic events have been defined as events subject to expedited reporting throughout the duration of the study. Also, to actively monitor patients for signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events after the end of study treatment, a Follow-up Contact 30 days after the end of study treatment has been included.
- specification that, of the 20 patients undergoing PK assessment, 4 patients should be between ≥12 and <17 years of age has been added
- the time period for recording bleeding events that will count towards the primary and relevant secondary endpoint has been more clearly defined.
- determination of VWF:Ag and VWF:Ac has been dropped from the Screening Visit
- further instruction whow to proceed in case the interval between screening and treatment initiation is longer than 30 days have been added
- information on how to deal with patients who develop FVIII inhibitors have been specified
- details which bleeding frequency during prophylactic treatment should be considered ‘unacceptable’ for a dose adjustment to be triggered have been added
- a retention sample being taken for possible virus marker testing in addition to parvovirus B19 antibody testing
- the use of Wilate in surgical prophylaxis has been defined as additional (i.e., exploratory) rather than a secondary endpoint.
- continuous infusion of Wilate during surgical prophylaxis has been disallowed
- The possibility of ‘severe hemorrhage’ during surgery was deleted as a defining criterion for major surgeries |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |