Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43843   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Addition to Comprehensive Standard of Care for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Adult Subjects Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-003990-17
    Trial protocol
    SK   DE   HU   ES   BG  
    Global end of trial date
    18 Dec 2018

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    14 Oct 2020
    First version publication date
    03 Jan 2020
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    54135419SUI3001
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03039192
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Janssen Research & Development, LLC
    Sponsor organisation address
    920 US Route 202, Raritan,, United States, NJ 08869-0602
    Public contact
    Clinical Registry Group, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, ClinicalTrialsEU@its.jnj.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Registry Group, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, ClinicalTrialsEU@its.jnj.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    18 Dec 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    18 Dec 2018
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo in addition to comprehensive standard of care in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD), including suicidal ideation, in subjects who are assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide, as measured by the change from baseline on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at 24 hours post first dose.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with Good Clinical Practices and applicable regulatory requirements. Safety was evaluated based on the following variables: Adverse events, Clinical laboratory tests (hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis), Vital sign measurements, Physical examinations, electrocardiogram (ECG), Nasal examinations, Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT), Dosing day assessments (pulse oximetry, MOAA/S, CADSS).
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    29 Jun 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 19
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 18
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 45
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Estonia: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Korea, Republic of: 20
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Malaysia: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Taiwan: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 57
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 15
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    226
    EEA total number of subjects
    101
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    226
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 226 subjects were enrolled and treated. Of the 226 subjects, 114 enrolled in the esketamine nasal spray 84 mg + standard of care (SOC) antidepressant treatment group and 112 enrolled in the placebo nasal spray + SOC antidepressant treatment group.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment
    Arm description
    Subjects self-administered placebo matched to esketamine intranasally (1 spray of placebo to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received standard of care (SOC) antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Nasal spray, solution
    Routes of administration
    Nasal use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects self-administered placebo intranasally (1 spray of placebo to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25).

    Arm title
    Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Arm description
    Subjects self-administered esketamine 84 milligram (mg) intranasally (1 spray of esketamine 14 mg to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received SOC antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Esketamine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    JNJ-54135419
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Nasal spray, solution
    Routes of administration
    Nasal use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects self-administered esketamine 84 milligram (mg) intranasally (1 spray of esketamine 14 mg to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25)

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Started
    112
    114
    Treated
    112
    113
    Completed
    80
    84
    Not completed
    32
    30
         Subject discontinued from treatment phase
    19
    11
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    -
    1
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    -
    2
         Other
    3
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    4
    4
         Randomized, not treated
    -
    1
         Withdrawal by subject
    6
    9

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered placebo matched to esketamine intranasally (1 spray of placebo to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received standard of care (SOC) antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.

    Reporting group title
    Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered esketamine 84 milligram (mg) intranasally (1 spray of esketamine 14 mg to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received SOC antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.

    Reporting group values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment Total
    Number of subjects
    112 114 226
    Title for AgeCategorical
    Units: subjects
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    112 114 226
        From 65 to 84 years
    0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Title for AgeContinuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    37.9 ± 12.54 40.8 ± 13.11 -
    Title for Gender
    Units: subjects
        Female
    73 66 139
        Male
    39 48 87

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered placebo matched to esketamine intranasally (1 spray of placebo to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received standard of care (SOC) antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.

    Reporting group title
    Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered esketamine 84 milligram (mg) intranasally (1 spray of esketamine 14 mg to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus received SOC antidepressant treatment which was initiated or optimized on Day 1.

    Primary: Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at 24 hours after the first dose (Day 2) During Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at 24 hours after the first dose (Day 2) During Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition. A negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a postbaseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or Clinical Global Impression –Severity of Suicidality - Revised (CGI-SS-R). Here, N (number of subjects analyzed) signifies number of subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1, predose) and 24 hours first post dose (Day 2)
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    111
    Units: Unit on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.8 ± 10.73
    -16.4 ± 11.95
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment v Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    223
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.006
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Difference of Least Square Means
    Point estimate
    -3.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6.56
         upper limit
    -1.09
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    1.39

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality- Revised (CGI-SS-R) Score at 24 hours after the first dose (Day 2) During Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality- Revised (CGI-SS-R) Score at 24 hours after the first dose (Day 2) During Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    CGI-SS-R was derived from the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), a global rating scale that gives an overall measure of the severity of a subjects illness. The CGI-SS-R rating is scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) to 6 (among the most extremely suicidal subjects) a higher score indicates a more severe condition and a reduction in score indicates improvement (that is, lower severity of suicidality). Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a postbaseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, N (number of subjects analyzed) signifies number of subjects evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Day 1, predose) and 24 hours first post dose (Day 2)
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    111
    Units: Unit on a scale
        median (full range (min-max))
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
    -1.0 (-6 to 2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects Who Achieved Remission (MADRS Total Score Less Than or Equal to [<=] 12) Through the Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects Who Achieved Remission (MADRS Total Score Less Than or Equal to [<=] 12) Through the Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    Subjects who had a MADRS total score of <=12 were considered remitters. MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and Day 25 (predose and 4 hours postdose)
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Subjects
        Day 1:(4 Hours)
    9
    12
        Day 2:
    10
    21
        Day 4
    13
    28
        Day 8
    23
    30
        Day 11
    26
    33
        Day 15
    29
    38
        Day 18
    30
    42
        Day 22
    25
    41
        Day 25 (Predose)
    38
    46
        Day 25 (4 hours postdose)
    42
    60
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score During Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score During Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition and a negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25 (predose and 4 hours postdose)
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Unit on a Scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 1 (n=112,110)
    -10.9 ± 9.69
    -13.5 ± 10.89
        Day 2 (n=111, 111)
    -12.9 ± 10.72
    -16.4 ± 11.95
        Day 4 (n=110, 109)
    -14.5 ± 11.39
    -19.1 ± 12.29
        Day 8 (n=108, 104)
    -17.4 ± 12.59
    -19.7 ± 12.91
        Day 11(n=103, 100)
    -19.0 ± 12.08
    -21.8 ± 12.20
        Day 15 (n=99, 104)
    -20.4 ± 12.19
    -22.3 ± 11.70
        Day 18 (n=94, 102)
    -21.4 ± 12.00
    -23.9 ± 11.77
        Day 22 (n=92, 103)
    -21.6 ± 12.32
    -24.0 ± 12.38
        Day 25: predose (n=92, 96)
    -23.0 ± 12.41
    -24.8 ± 13.63
        Day 25: 4 hours postdose (n=88, 94)
    -25.8 ± 10.94
    -29.5 ± 10.89
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Severity of Suicidality-Revised (CGI-SS-R) Through the Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Severity of Suicidality-Revised (CGI-SS-R) Through the Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    CGI-SS-R was derived from the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), a global rating scale that gives an overall measure of the severity of a subjects illness. The CGI-SS-R rating is scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) to 6 (among the most extremely suicidal subjects). A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Unit on a scale
    median (full range (min-max))
        Day 1 (n=112,110)
    0.0 (-5 to 1)
    -1.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 2 (n=112, 112)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
    -1.0 (-6 to 2)
        Day 4 (n=110, 110)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
    -2.0 (-6 to 2)
        Day 8 (n=108, 105)
    -2.0 (-5 to 0)
    -2.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 11 (n=102,101)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 15 (n=99, 105)
    -2.0 (-5 to 0)
    -3.0 (-5 to 0)
        Day 18 (n=94, 103)
    -2.5 (-5 to 0)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 22 (n=91, 105)
    -3.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 25 (n=93, 96)
    -3.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects Who Achieved Resolution of Suicidality (CGI-SS-R Score of 0 or 1) Total score Through Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects Who Achieved Resolution of Suicidality (CGI-SS-R Score of 0 or 1) Total score Through Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    CGI-SS-R was derived from the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), a global rating scale that gives an overall measure of the severity of a subjects illness. The CGI-SS-R rating is scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) to 6 (among the most extremely suicidal subjects). A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. A subject was considered to achieve resolution of suicidality at a given time point if the CGI-SS-R score was 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) or 1 (questionably suicidal). Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Subjects
        Day 1
    25
    37
        Day 2
    39
    42
        Day 4
    45
    49
        Day 8
    48
    53
        Day 11
    46
    60
        Day 15
    52
    68
        Day 18
    55
    68
        Day 22
    62
    70
        Day 25
    57
    71
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Imminent Suicide Risk (CGI-SR-I) Scale Total Score Through Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Imminent Suicide Risk (CGI-SR-I) Scale Total Score Through Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    The CGI-SR-I is a scale summarizing the clinician’s best assessment of the likelihood that the subject will attempt suicide in the next 7 days. The CGI-SR-I rating is scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (no imminent suicide risk) to 6 (extreme imminent suicide risk). Score ranges from 0-6. A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    median (full range (min-max))
        Day 1 (n=112,110)
    0.0 (-4 to 2)
    -1.0 (-5 to 3)
        Day 2 (n= 112, 112)
    -1.0 (-5 to 2)
    -1.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 4 (n=110, 110)
    -1.0 (-5 to 2)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 8 (n=108, 105)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
    -2.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 11 (n=102,101)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
    -2.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 15 (n=99, 105)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
    -3.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 18 (n=94, 103)
    -3.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 22 (n=91,105)
    -3.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
        Day 25 (n=93, 96)
    -3.0 (-5 to 2)
    -3.0 (-6 to 1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score at Day 8 and 25 During Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score at Day 8 and 25 During Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    BHS is a self-reported measure consists of 20 true-false items. 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. These items fall within 3 domains: feelings about the future; loss of motivation; future expectations. For every statement, each response was assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total score is a sum of item responses. Ranges from 0-20. Total scores 0-3 are normal range, 4-8 identify mild hopelessness, 9-14 identify moderate hopelessness, greater than 14 identify severe hopelessness. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Day 8 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Unit on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 8 (n=108, 111)
    -4.4 ± 6.03
    -5.3 ± 6.06
        Day 25 (n=98, 105)
    -6.6 ± 6.63
    -6.9 ± 6.92
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: Health Status Index

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: Health Status Index
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-5D-5L system comprises following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (Level 1-no problem, Level 2-slight problems, Level 3-moderate problems, Level 4-severe problems, Level 5-extreme problems). Health Status Index ranges from 0.148 - 0.949, anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health), a lower score indicates worse health. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during double-blind phase, have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 2, 11 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Unit on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 2 (n=110, 111)
    0.096 ± 0.1785
    0.156 ± 0.1944
        Day 11 (n=107, 106)
    0.169 ± 0.2139
    0.206 ± 0.2043
        Day 25 (n=97, 104)
    0.189 ± 0.2336
    0.227 ± 0.2078
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: EQ-VAS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: EQ-VAS
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-5D-5L system comprises following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (Level 1-no problem, Level 2-slight problems, Level 3-moderate problems, Level 4-severe problems, and Level 5-extreme problems). EQ-VAS score from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health), positive change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during double-blind phase, have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Days 2, 11 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 2 (n=110, 111)
    7.8 ± 17.32
    13.5 ± 20.78
        Day 11 (n=107, 106)
    16.3 ± 22.27
    17.9 ± 24.55
        Day 25 (n=97, 104)
    20.0 ± 23.49
    21.4 ± 26.71
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: Sum Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Through Double-blind Phase: Sum Score
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome. It consists of EQ-5D-5L system and EQ-VAS. EQ-5D-5L system comprises following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (Level 1-no problem, Level 2-slight problems, Level 3-moderate problems, Level 4-severe problems, and Level 5-extreme problems). Sum score=(sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5)*5”. Higher score indicates a more severe problem. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during double-blind phase, have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Days 2, 11 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 2 (n= 110, 111)
    -6.1 ± 12.28
    -11.2 ± 14.87
        Day 11 (n= 107, 106)
    -12.3 ± 16.23
    -15.2 ± 15.75
        Day 25 (n= 97, 104)
    -13.4 ± 18.05
    -16.8 ± 16.30
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    The QLDS is a disease specific patient-reported outcome designed to assess health related quality of life in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD). The instrument has a recall period of "at the moment", contains 34-items with "yes"/"no" or “true”/“not true” response options and takes approximately 5-10 minutes to complete. The score range is from 0 (good quality of life) to 34 (very poor quality of life). A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 2, 11 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Unit on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Day 2 (n=110, 112)
    -2.5 ± 4.55
    -3.1 ± 5.14
        Day 11 (n=107, 106)
    -4.4 ± 5.93
    -5.6 ± 5.92
        Day 25 (n= 97, 104)
    -5.6 ± 5.99
    -6.8 ± 5.97
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    The TSQM-9 is a 9-item generic patient-reported outcome instrument to assess subject’s satisfaction with medication. It covers three domains (effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction) were each scored from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction and a lower score indicates lower satisfaction. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days 15 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Effectiveness: Day 15 (n=105, 108)
    51.7 ± 25.74
    63.5 ± 23.72
        Effectiveness: Day 25 (n=96, 102)
    57.6 ± 24.66
    65.8 ± 25.23
        Convenience: Day 15 (n=105, 108)
    70.9 ± 19.57
    70.5 ± 20.75
        Convenience: Day 25 (n=96, 102)
    74.0 ± 19.38
    71.3 ± 19.69
        Global Satisfaction: Day 15 (n=105, 108)
    52.2 ± 28.57
    64.5 ± 24.62
        Global Satisfaction: Day 25 (n=96, 102)
    55.7 ± 27.44
    68.5 ± 25.51
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) Module 5 (My Risk) Question 3 (Patient-reported FoST) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) Module 5 (My Risk) Question 3 (Patient-reported FoST) Total Score Through Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    SIBAT Module 5 (My Risk) Question 3, Assessment of Frequency of Suicidal Thinking (FoST), asks patients to describe their thinking about suicide right now. There are 5 response options ranging from “I have no suicidal thoughts” to “I have suicidal thoughts all of the time” and ranges from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    median (full range (min-max))
        Day 1 (n=111, 110)
    0.0 (-4 to 2)
    0.0 (-3 to 1)
        Day 2 (n=111, 110)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
    -1.0 (-4 to 2)
        Day 4 (n=110, 108)
    -1.0 (-4 to 2)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
        Day 8 (n=108, 104)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
        Day 11 (n=103, 100)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
    -1.5 (-4 to 1)
        Day 15 (n=100, 104)
    -1.0 (-4 to 1)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
        Day 18 (n=94, 101)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
        Day 22 (n= 92, 104)
    -2.0 (-4 to 2)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
        Day 25 (n=93, 96)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
    -2.0 (-4 to 1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) Module 7 – Clinician-rated FoST Total Score During Double-blind Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) Module 7 – Clinician-rated FoST Total Score During Double-blind Phase
    End point description
    SIBAT Module 7 Assessment of frequency of suicidal thinking (FoST) is a clinician-reported global impression with response options of “Never”, “Rarely”, “Sometimes”, “Often”, “Most of the time”, and “All of the time.” The score ranges from 0 to 5. A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Negative change in score indicates improvement. Full efficacy analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of intranasal study agent during the double-blind phase and have had both a baseline and a post-baseline evaluation for the MADRS total score or CGI-SS-R. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects who were evaluable at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    112
    Units: Units on a scale
    median (full range (min-max))
        Day 1 (n=112, 109)
    -1.0 (-5 to 2)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 2 (n=112, 111)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 4 (n=110, 109)
    -1.0 (-5 to 1)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 8 (n=108, 104)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 11 (n=102, 100)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
    -2.0 (-5 to 2)
        Day 15 (n=99, 104)
    -2.0 (-5 to 0)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 18 (n=94, 102)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 22 (n=91, 104
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
        Day 25 (n=93, 95)
    -2.0 (-5 to 1)
    -3.0 (-5 to 1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects with Treatment Emergent Adverse events (TEAEs): DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects with Treatment Emergent Adverse events (TEAEs): DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study subject administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, whether or not related to that medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. A TEAE is categorized as related if assessed by the investigator as possibly, probably, or very likely related to study agent. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
    83
    100
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Abnormal Laboratory Values: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Abnormal Laboratory Values: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    Low and high abnormal values are as follows: ALT-high=200 Units per liter(U/L); ALP-high=250U/L; aspartate aminotransferase(AST)-high=250U/L; gamma glutamyl transferase(GGT)=300U/L; Albumin(24-60 g/L); Bicarbonate(15.1-34.9 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]); Bilirubin(high=51.3micromol/L[mcm/L]); calcium(1.5-3mmol/L);Chloride(94-112mmol/L); CK(high=990U/L); Creatinine(high=265.2 mcm/L); Eosinophils(high=10%); Erythrocytes(3.0*10^12/L-6.4*10^12/L); Glucose(2.2-16.7mmol/L); Hemoglobin(80-190g/L);Hematocrit(0.28-0.55 fraction); LD(high=500U/L); Leukocytes(2.5*10^9/L-15.5*10^9/L); Lymphocytes(10-60%); Monocytes(high=20%); Neutrophils(low-high: 30-90%); Phosphate(0.7-2.6mmol/L); Platelet count(100*10^9/L-600*10^9/L]; Potassium(3.0-5.8 mmol/L]; Protein(low=50 g/L); Sodium(125-155 mmol/L); Urate(89.2-594.8 mcm/L); Urine(high=8.0 pH). Analysis was done on safety analysis set. ‘n’ (number analyzed)= subjects evaluable for each category.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3*ULN (n=100, 109)
    1
    1
        ALT: Abnormal High (n=100, 109)
    1
    1
        Albumin: Abnormal High (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Albumin: Abnormal Low (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Alkaline phosphatase(ALP)Abnormal High(n=102,110)
    0
    0
        AST: AST>3*ULN (n=100, 108)
    0
    0
        AST:Abnormal High (n=100,108)
    0
    0
        Bicarbonate: Abnormal High (n=99, 109)
    0
    0
        Bicarbonate: Abnormal Low (n=99, 109
    0
    0
        Bilirubin: Abnormal High (n=100, 109)
    0
    0
        Calcium: Abnormal High (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Calcium: Abnormal Low (n-102, 110)
    0
    0
        Chloride: Abnormal High (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Chloride: Abnormal Low (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Creatine Kinase (CK): Abnormal High (n=100, 109)
    0
    1
        Creatinine: Abnormal High (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        GGT: Abnormal High (n=102,110)
    0
    0
        Glucose: Abnormal High (n=100,109)
    0
    0
        Glucose: Abnormal Low (n=100, 109)
    0
    0
        ALT>3*ULN or AST>3*ULN and BILI>2*ULN (n=100,109)
    0
    0
        Lactate Dehydrogenase: Abnormal High(n=94, 101)
    0
    0
        Phosphate: Abnormal High(n=102,110)
    0
    0
        Phosphate: Abnormal Low(n=102, 110)
    1
    2
        Potassium: Abnormal High(n=102,110)
    0
    0
        Potassium: Abnormal Low(n=102,110)
    0
    0
        Protein: Abnormal Low(n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Sodium: Abnormal High(n=102,110)
    0
    0
        Sodium: Abnormal Low(n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Urate: Abnormal High (n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Urate: Abnormal Low(n=102, 110)
    0
    0
        Basophils: Abnormal High
    0
    0
        Eosinophils: Abnormal High (n=97,105)
    0
    0
        Erythrocytes: Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    1
    1
        Erythrocytes: Abnormal Low(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Hematocrit: Abnormal High(n=96,103)
    0
    0
        Hematocrit: Abnormal Low(n=96, 103)
    0
    0
        Hemoglobin(Hb): Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Hemoglobin: Abnormal Low (n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Leukocytes: Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Leukocytes: Abnormal Low(n=97, 105)
    1
    0
        Lymphocytes: Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Lymphocytes: Abnormal Low(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Monocytes: Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Neutrophils: Abnormal High(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Neutrophils: Abnormal Low(n=97, 105)
    0
    0
        Platelets: Abnormal High(n=97, 104)
    0
    0
        Platelets: Abnormal Low(n=97,104)
    0
    2
        Urine pH: Abnormal High(n=102,109)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Abnormal Nasal Examinations at Day 25: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Abnormal Nasal Examinations at Day 25: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    Number of subjects with abnormal nasal examination were reported. Nasal examination of visual inspection of the epistaxis, nasal crusts, nasal discharge, and nasal erythema was performed. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase. Here, ‘n’ (number analyzed) signifies number of subjects analyzed for each specified category.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Epistaxis: Mild (n=104, 109)
    0
    1
        Epistaxis: Moderate (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Epistaxis: Severe (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Crusts: Mild (n=104, 109)
    1
    0
        Nasal Crusts: Moderate (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Crusts: Severe (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Discharge: Mild (n=104, 109)
    0
    3
        Nasal Discharge: Moderate (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Discharge: Severe (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Erythema: Mild (n=104, 109)
    4
    3
        Nasal Erythema: Moderate (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
        Nasal Erythema: Severe (n=104, 109)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at Any Time: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at Any Time: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    Number of subjects with treatment emergent abnormal ECG values for variables including heart rate (abnormally low refers to less than or equal to [<=] 50 beats per minute [bpm] , abnormally high refers greater than or equal to [>=] 100 bpm), pulse rate (PR) interval (abnormally high refers to >= 210 milliseconds [msec]), QRS interval (abnormally Low refers to <= 50, abnormally high refers to >= 120 msec) and QT interval (abnormally low refers to <= 200, abnormally high >= 500 msec) were reported. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Heart Rate <= 50 bpm
    8
    2
        Heart Rate >= 100 bpm
    4
    5
        PR Duration >= 210 msec
    3
    5
        QRS Duration <= 50 msec
    0
    0
        QRS Duration >= 120 msec
    0
    0
        QT Duration <= 200 msec
    0
    0
        QT Duration >= 500 msec
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects with Abnormal Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Levels (less than [<] 93%) as Assessed by Pulse Oximetry at Any Time: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects with Abnormal Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Levels (less than [<] 93%) as Assessed by Pulse Oximetry at Any Time: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    Pulse oximetry was used to measure arterial SpO2 levels. On each dosing day, the device was attached to the finger, toe, or ear, and SpO2 was monitored and documented. If oxygen saturation levels were less than (<) 93% at any time during the 1.5 hours postdose interval, pulse oximetry was recorded every 5 minutes until levels return to >= 93% or until the participant is referred for appropriate medical care, if clinically indicated. Participants with at least 2 consecutive postdose oxygen saturation below 93% during the DB treatment phase were reported. Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
    2
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Vital Signs Abnormalities: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Vital Signs Abnormalities: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    Number of participants with treatment emergent vital signs abnormalities (pulse rate in bpm [abnormally low = a decrease from baseline of >= 15 to a value <= 50; abnormally high = an increase from baseline of >=15 to a value >=100] , systolic blood pressure [SBP] in mmHg [abnormally low = a decrease from baseline of >= 20 to a value <= 90; abnormally high = an increase from baseline of >= 20 to a value >= 180], and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] in mmHg [abnormally low= a decrease from baseline of >=15 to a value <= 50; abnormally high = an increase from baseline of >= 15 to a value >= 105) were reported. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Pulse rate (bpm): Decrease of >=15 to <=50
    2
    3
        Pulse rate (bpm): Increase of >=15 to >=100
    6
    13
        SBP (mmHg): Decrease of >=20 to <=90
    4
    0
        SBP (mmHg): Increase of >=20 to >=180
    0
    2
        DBP (mmHg): Decrease of >=15 to <=50
    4
    0
        DBP (mmHg): Increase of >=15 to >=105
    1
    11
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Sedated Subjects as Assessed by Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) Score at any Time: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Sedated Subjects as Assessed by Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) Score at any Time: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    MOAA/S was used to measure treatment-emergent sedation with correlation to levels of sedation defined by the American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) continuum. The MOAA/S scores range from 0 to 5 where,0 = no response to painful stimulus; ASA continuum = general anesthesia, 1 = responds to trapezius squeeze; ASA continuum = deep sedation, 2 = purposeful response to mild prodding or mild shaking; ASA continuum = moderate sedation, 3 = responds after name called loudly or repeatedly; ASA continuum = moderate sedation, 4 = lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone; ASA continuum = moderate sedation and 5 = readily responds to name spoken in normal tone (awake); ASA continuum = minimal sedation. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Up to Day 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Score <=2: Yes
    0
    3
        Score <=3: Yes
    1
    13
        Score <=4: Yes
    20
    43
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With an Increase in Clinician-administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) Total Score: DB Treatment Phase

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With an Increase in Clinician-administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) Total Score: DB Treatment Phase
    End point description
    The CADSS used to measure present-state dissociative symptoms, and to assess treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms. It comprises 23 subjective items divided into 3 components: depersonalization (with score range from 0 to 28), derealization (with score range from 0 to 52), and amnesia (with score range from 0 to 8). Subjects responses are coded on a 5-point scale (0 = "Not at all", 1 = "Mild", 2 = "Moderate", 3 = 'Severe" and 4 = "Extreme"). The total score is sum of the 23 items and range from 0 to 92, where 0 (best) and 92 (worst). A higher score indicates a more severe condition. Number of subjects with an increase in CADSS total score (increase based on maximum CADSS total score change from predose of > 0) was reported. Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the DB treatment phase. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of subjects analyzed for each specified time point.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22 and 25
    End point values
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Number of subjects analysed
    112
    113
    Units: Subjects
        Day 1 (n=111, 113)
    34
    95
        Day 4 (n=107, 106)
    23
    84
        Day 8 (n=108, 108)
    29
    81
        Day 11 (n=101, 100)
    19
    77
        Day 15 (n=97, 105)
    17
    69
        Day 18 (n=92, 102)
    19
    70
        Day 22 (n=93, 102)
    16
    70
        Day 25 (n=91, 98)
    14
    72
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Up to Day 25
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Safety analysis set included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study agent in the double-blind treatment phase.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    21.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment (Placebo)
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered placebo intranasally (1 spray of placebo to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus standard of care (SOC) antidepressant treatment which was initiated on Day 1.

    Reporting group title
    Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Reporting group description
    Subjects self-administered esketamine 84 milligram (mg) intranasally (1 spray of esketamine 14 mg to each nostril at 0, 5 and 10 minutes) twice per week for 4 weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25) plus SOC antidepressant treatment which was initiated on Day 1.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment (Placebo) Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 112 (5.36%)
    4 / 113 (3.54%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    1
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hypertransaminasaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Aggression
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression Suicidal
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    2 / 113 (1.77%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicidal Ideation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 112 (1.79%)
    0 / 113 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicide Attempt
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetic Ketoacidosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 112 (0.00%)
    1 / 113 (0.88%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo Plus SOC Antidepressant treatment (Placebo) Esketamine 84 mg Plus SOC Antidepressant Treatment
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    66 / 112 (58.93%)
    91 / 113 (80.53%)
    Investigations
    Blood Pressure Increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 112 (5.36%)
    19 / 113 (16.81%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    47
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 112 (8.93%)
    40 / 113 (35.40%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    187
    Dizziness Postural
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 112 (1.79%)
    6 / 113 (5.31%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    24
    Dysgeusia
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 112 (9.82%)
    16 / 113 (14.16%)
         occurrences all number
    46
    89
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 112 (17.86%)
    21 / 113 (18.58%)
         occurrences all number
    33
    29
    Hypoaesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 112 (1.79%)
    8 / 113 (7.08%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    42
    Sedation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 112 (1.79%)
    7 / 113 (6.19%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    16
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 112 (9.82%)
    21 / 113 (18.58%)
         occurrences all number
    32
    79
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 112 (0.89%)
    7 / 113 (6.19%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    18
    Eye disorders
    Vision Blurred
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 112 (4.46%)
    10 / 113 (8.85%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    18
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 112 (4.46%)
    15 / 113 (13.27%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    15
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 112 (13.39%)
    23 / 113 (20.35%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    38
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 112 (6.25%)
    8 / 113 (7.08%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    9
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 112 (8.93%)
    6 / 113 (5.31%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    6
    Dissociation
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 112 (3.57%)
    33 / 113 (29.20%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    166
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 112 (6.25%)
    7 / 113 (6.19%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    9

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    07 Apr 2017
    The overall reason for the amendment was to revise based on comments received during an initial Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) assessment; the following changes are included: Duration of hospitalization without the need for discussion with the Sponsor updated, A remote contact at Day 35 was added to the Time and Events Schedule, Exclusion criteria were revised to explicitly specify a detailed list of important medical conditions which are exclusionary, Text was added to emphasize that subjects may participate in the study only if they have adequate capacity to give consent and after fully understanding the potential risks, benefits, and potential adverse events of the study.
    20 Apr 2017
    The overall reason for the amendment was to update and/or clarify protocol content based on feedback received during study initiation activities. Exclusion criterion was revised to clarify which potential subjects are excluded from participation in the study due to substance or alcohol use disorder, a positive urine test result; to clarify that subjects who were previously enrolled in this study or the Sponsor’s other studies in this population (54135419SUI3002 and ESKETINSUI2001) are excluded from participation in this study.
    08 Feb 2018
    The overall reason for the amendment was to remove the interim analysis from the 54135419SUI3001 protocol; to clarify that Module 3 Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) was an exploratory objective; to modify the timing of screening procedures to be consistent with the Time and Events Schedule; to clarify which potential subjects were not excluded from participation in the 54135419SUI3001 study due to having a positive screening test for prescribed psychostimulants that are permitted during the study; and updated text regarding the presentation of nasal examination data.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Esketamine has known effects that may impact blinding, these treatment-emergent events potentially could have biased research staff. To minimize this bias, protocol specified that different raters perform efficacy, safety assessments.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 18 03:34:20 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA