Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Proof-of-concept study of BI 655130 add-on treatment in patients with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis during TNF inhibitor therapy

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-004572-21
    Trial protocol
    DK   NO   DE   NL   ES   GB  
    Global end of trial date
    16 Sep 2020

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    01 Oct 2021
    First version publication date
    01 Oct 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    1368-0010
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03123120
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Boehringer Ingelheim
    Sponsor organisation address
    Binger Strasse 173, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 55216
    Public contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, +1 8002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Scientific contact
    Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center, Boehringer Ingelheim, +1 8002430127, clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    26 Oct 2020
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    26 Mar 2020
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    16 Sep 2020
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The objectives of this trial were safety and efficacy (proof-of-concept) of induction of mucosal healing by spesolimab (BI 655130) add-on therapy in patients with mild or moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and persisting endoscopic activity despite pre-existing tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Only subjects that met all the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were to be entered in the study. All subjects were free to withdraw from the clinical trial at any time for any reason given. Close monitoring of all subjects was adhered to throughout the trial conduct. Rescue medication was allowed for all patients as required.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    06 Jul 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Norway: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 13
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 5
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    39
    EEA total number of subjects
    32
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    39
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial over 36 weeks with 24-week follow-up evaluated safety and efficacy of induction of mucosal healing by Spesolimab add-on therapy in patients with mild or moderate ulcerative colitis and persisting endoscopic activity despite pre-existing tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo - randomized
    Arm description
    Matching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who were randomized into the Placebo treatment were included in this arm.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Matching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment.

    Arm title
    Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Arm description
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively). Participants who were randomized into the Spesolimab 1200 mg treatment were included in this arm.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BI 655130
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively).

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Started
    8
    14
    Completed
    8
    12
    Not completed
    0
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Baseline characteristics are based on patients who were randomised after successfully completing the screening period and received at least one dose of the trial medication.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo - randomized
    Reporting group description
    Matching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who were randomized into the Placebo treatment were included in this arm.

    Reporting group title
    Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Reporting group description
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively). Participants who were randomized into the Spesolimab 1200 mg treatment were included in this arm.

    Reporting group values
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized Total
    Number of subjects
    8 14 22
    Age categorical
    Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    8 14 22
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Age Continuous
    Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    45.5 ( 12.1 ) 43.1 ( 9.9 ) -
    Sex: Female, Male
    Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Participants
        Female
    1 4 5
        Male
    7 10 17
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
    Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    0 0 0
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    8 14 22
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0
    Race (NIH/OMB)
    Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    0 0 0
        Asian
    0 0 0
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0
        Black or African American
    0 0 0
        White
    8 13 21
        More than one race
    0 1 1
        Unknown or Not Reported
    0 0 0
    Number of participants per Mayo clinical score modified endoscopic subscore value group
    The number of participants per Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic subscore (mESS) value group was reported. The MCS mESS ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The MCS mESS was assessed by a central reader who was independent from the investigator. Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Subjects
        MCS mESS = 0
    0 0 0
        MCS mESS = 1
    0 0 0
        MCS mESS = 2
    2 3 5
        MCS mESS = 3
    6 11 17
    Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic subscore (mESS)
    The Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic subscore (mESS) at baseline was reported. The MCS mESS ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The MCS mESS was assessed by a central reader who was independent from the investigator. Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    Units: Score on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.8 ( 0.5 ) 2.8 ( 0.4 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo - randomized
    Reporting group description
    Matching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who were randomized into the Placebo treatment were included in this arm.

    Reporting group title
    Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Reporting group description
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively). Participants who were randomized into the Spesolimab 1200 mg treatment were included in this arm.

    Subject analysis set title
    Placebo - actual
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Matching placebo were administered via intravenous over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who actually administered placebo during the study were included in this group. 1 patient who was assigned to placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Spesolimab 1200 mg - actual
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who actually administered Spesolimab during the study were included in this group. 1 patient who was assigned to Placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group.

    Primary: Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12
    End point description
    Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement (Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤1) at Week 12 was reported. The endoscopic improvement (mucosal healing) was defined as the Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1 point. The MCS mESS ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The mESS was assessed by a central reader who was independent from the investigator. The 95% confidence intervals of the proportion were calculated using the method of Wilson. Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    14
    Units: Proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.375 (0.137 to 0.694)
    0.143 (0.040 to 0.399)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference was calculated as the observed proportion of response from Spesolimab minus the one from Placebo. Newcombe method was used in the calculation of the 95% confidence interval around the risk difference.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo - randomized v Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.232
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.568
         upper limit
    0.118

    Secondary: Proportion of participants with histological remission at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of participants with histological remission at Week 12
    End point description
    Proportion of participants with histological remission at Week 12 was reported. The histological remission was defined as the Robarts histology index (RHI) score ≤ 6. The RHI was a histologic activity score, consists of chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium and erosion or ulceration on a scale of 0 to 3. The 4 components were weighted to calculate the RHI, with RHI = 1 × chronic inflammatory infiltrate + 2 × lamina propria neutrophils + 3 × neutrophils in epithelium + 5 × erosion or ulceration. The resulting RHI score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity). The 95% confidence intervals of the proportion were calculated using the method of Wilson. Full analysis set (FAS): This set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    14
    Units: Proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.500 (0.215 to 0.785)
    0.214 (0.076 to 0.476)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference was calculated as the observed proportion of response from Spesolimab minus the one from Placebo. Newcombe method was used in the calculation of the 95% confidence interval around the risk difference.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo - randomized v Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.286
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.602
         upper limit
    0.101

    Secondary: Proportion of participants with total clinical remission (tCR) based on total Mayo clinical score at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of participants with total clinical remission (tCR) based on total Mayo clinical score at Week 12
    End point description
    Proportion of participants with total clinical remission based on total Mayo clinical score (MCS) at Week 12 was reported. The total clinical remission based on total MCS was defined as the total MCS ≤ 2 points and all sub-scores ≤ 1 point. The total MCS was a composite disease activity score consisting of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician’s global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total MCS was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease. The 95% confidence intervals of the proportion were calculated using the method of Wilson. Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded from the FAS.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    14
    Units: Proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.125 (0.022 to 0.471)
    0.071 (0.013 to 0.315)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference was calculated as the observed proportion of response from Spesolimab minus the one from Placebo. Newcombe method was used in the calculation of the 95% confidence interval around the risk difference.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo - randomized v Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    -0.054
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.404
         upper limit
    0.21

    Secondary: Proportion of participants with clinical remission (CR) based on Mayo clinical score at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of participants with clinical remission (CR) based on Mayo clinical score at Week 12
    End point description
    Proportion of participants with clinical remission (CR) based on Mayo clinical score (MCS) at Week 12 was reported. The CR based on MCS was defined as the total MCS ≤ 2 and Rectal Bleeding Subscore = 0, Stool Frequency Score =0 or 1 and drop ≥ 1 from baseline, and Modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1. The total MCS consisted of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician’s global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total MCS was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease. The 95% confidence intervals of the proportion were calculated using the method of Wilson. Full analysis set (FAS): This set includes all patients in the safety analysis set who had a baseline measurement available for the primary endpoint. Treatment assignment will be as randomized. Patients who were randomized but not treated were excluded.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo - randomized Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects analysed
    8
    14
    Units: Proportion of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.324)
    0.143 (0.040 to 0.399)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    Risk difference was calculated as the observed proportion of response from Spesolimab minus the one from Placebo. Newcombe method was used in the calculation of the 95% confidence interval around the risk difference.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo - randomized v Spesolimab 1200 mg - randomized
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    Method
    Parameter type
    Risk difference (RD)
    Point estimate
    0.143
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.197
         upper limit
    0.399

    Secondary: Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
    End point description
    Number of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported. Safety Analysis Set (SAF): this patient set included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of trial drug. Treatment assignment was analyzed according to the actual treatment. 1 patient who was assigned to placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group in the SAF.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first does of study medication until end of the follow-up period, up to 36 weeks.
    End point values
    Placebo - actual Spesolimab 1200 mg - actual
    Number of subjects analysed
    7
    15
    Units: Participants
    6
    15
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From first does of study medication until end of the follow-up period, up to 36 weeks.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Safety Analysis Set (SAF): this patient set included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of trial drug. Treatment assignment was analyzed according to the actual treatment. 1 patient who was assigned to placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group in the SAF.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    23.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo - actual
    Reporting group description
    Matching placebo were administered via intravenous over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who actually administered placebo during the study were included in this group. 1 patient who was assigned to placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group.

    Reporting group title
    Spesolimab 1200 mg - actual
    Reporting group description
    1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment. Participants who actually administered Spesolimab during the study were included in this group. 1 patient who was assigned to Placebo accidentally received one dose of Spesolimab and was analyzed in the Spesolimab group.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo - actual Spesolimab 1200 mg - actual
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Adenocarcinoma of colon
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Gastrointestinal stoma complication
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Colitis ulcerative
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Rectal abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo - actual Spesolimab 1200 mg - actual
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 7 (85.71%)
    15 / 15 (100.00%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Influenza like illness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Malaise
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Sputum increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Adjustment disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    4 / 15 (26.67%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    6
    Migraine
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Presyncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Lymphadenopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Eye disorders
    Episcleritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Ocular discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Colitis ulcerative
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 7 (28.57%)
    3 / 15 (20.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Dyspepsia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Haemorrhoids
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Acne
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Eczema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Stasis dermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 7 (14.29%)
    0 / 15 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Foot deformity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Joint swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Muscle spasms
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Cystitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    2 / 15 (13.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Helicobacter gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 7 (28.57%)
    5 / 15 (33.33%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    5
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Viral upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Iron deficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 7 (0.00%)
    1 / 15 (6.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    13 Jun 2017
    The following main changes were implemented: - Addition of safety as a trial objective and of TEAEs as secondary endpoint, as safety is a central component of Phase IIa studies. - Change of time point for UC diagnosis to ≥5 months prior to screening in the inclusion criteria to allow stable TNFi treatment for ≥4 months prior to randomization.
    13 Dec 2017
    The following main changes were implemented: - Deletion of the lower body weight limit of 60 kg in Inclusion Criterion 2 and corresponding update of the section on dose selection, as a lower weight limit was no longer considered to be needed. - Modification of in Inclusion Criterion 4 to clarify that ‘unchanged dose’ includes unchanged dose and dosing interval.
    04 Mar 2019
    The following main changes were implemented: - Increase of the upper age limit in Inclusion Criterion 1 from 60 to 75 years to facilitate recruitment. - Increase of the upper body weight limit in Inclusion Criterion 2 from 100 to 120 kg to facilitate recruitment; corresponding update of the benefit-risk assessment to justify that this is not expected to affect PK of the trial drug. - Modification of Inclusion Criterion 4 to facilitate recruitment by adding the possibility of TNFi treatment with adalimumab and golimumab with unchanged doses for ≥2 months and specification that patients may or may not have received up to 2 different prior TNFi treatments; corresponding modification of the benefit-risk assessment and discussion of trial design. - Modification of Exclusion Criterion 3 to state that prior use of more than 2 different TNFis was not allowed, to facilitate recruitment. - Change of the timing of the primary endpoint from Week 8 to Week 12, and corresponding update of the wording for the primary objective and all other affected sections. Week 12 was defined as a project standard time point for primary efficacy measurement as initial data indicated a potential for slower onset of action for the spesolimab mechanism of action: The primary endpoint was changed to ‘mucosal healing (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12’ instead of ‘at Week 8’; The secondary endpoint ‘mucosal healing (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12’ was deleted; A further endpoint ‘mucosal healing (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 8’ was added. - Deletion of the following endpoints at Week 8 from the list of secondary endpoints and moving of these endpoints to the list of further endpoints: ‘Modified clinical remission based on MCS (total modified MCS ≤2 and: RBS =0, Stool Frequency Score =0 or 1 and drop ≥1 from baseline, AND mESS ≤1) at Week 8’; ‘Clinical remission based on MCS (total MCS ≤2 points, and all subscores ≤1 point) at Week 8’; ‘Histological remission (RHI score ≤6) at Week 8’.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun May 05 13:07:40 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA