Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomised, Open, Parallel-group Phase III Biosimilarity Study to Assess the Long-term Safety, Focusing on Immunogenicity, of Rechon Insulin Human Soluble in Type 1 Diabetic Patients.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2016-004691-22 |
Trial protocol |
DE PL |
Global end of trial date |
17 Dec 2019
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Nov 2020
|
First version publication date |
27 Nov 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
RCT-004
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Rechon Life Science AB
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Soldattorpsvägen 5, Limhamn, Sweden, SE-216 10
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Development, Rechon Life Science AB, info@rechon.se
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Development, Rechon Life Science AB, info@rechon.se
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
17 Dec 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
17 Dec 2019
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
17 Dec 2019
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To asses the long-term safety of Rechon Human Insulin Soluble as compared to Humulin® Regular in terms of immunogenicity and insulin tolerance.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All patients received written and verbal information regarding the study. The given information emphasised that participation in the study was voluntary and that the patient could withdraw from the study at any time and for any reason. All patients were given the opportunity to ask questions about the study and were given sufficient time to decide whether they would participate in the study.
Before any study-related procedures, the informed consent form (ICF) was signed and personally dated by the patient and by the person who conducted the informed consent discussion.
Participation in the study was not judged to pose any risk for the patients. The individual
patients participating in the study gained benefit from regular health checkups during the
study. Additionally, by their participation they supported the development of new insulins to
be put on the market. Rechon Insulin Human Soluble has been developed to compete with
the innovator product on the market, thereby increasing the availability of insulin products for
diabetic patients. Europe’s healthcare systems will benefit from the cost relief and the
increased patient access to the life enhancing treatments that biosimilar products will bring.
|
||
Background therapy |
N/A | ||
Evidence for comparator |
The insulin substance used in Humulin® Regular, the reference product, is a recombinant human insulin with a molecular weight of 5,808 kDa. The molecule consists of two chains interconnected by two disulfide bonds. The insulin substance is synthesised in a non-disease producing strain of E.coli that has been genetically altered by the addition of the human gene for insulin production. The insulin is produced by Eli Lilly and Company. Humulin® Regular is a fast acting solution. The IMP was manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company. Humulin® Regular was provided in 3 mL cartridges to be used in the insulin pen Humapen Savvio. The pen was intended for use with the Humulin® products. The Sponsor (Rechon Life Science AB) is developing the fast-acting insulin Rechon Insulin Human Soluble as a biosimilar to the fast-acting insulin Humulin® Regular and the intermediate-acting insulin Rechon Insulin Human Isophane as a biosimilar to Humulin® NPH. At the initiation of this clinical study, RCT-004, both pre-clinical studies and three clinical trials had been performed on the Rechon drug substance and on these two formulations of Rechon insulin, which were compared to their respective Humulin® reference products. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
20 Dec 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 323
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 8
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
331
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
331
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
303
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
28
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
In this study, 370 patients were screened for participation, and as 39 patients (10.5%) were screening failures, 331 patients (89.5%) were randomized to treatment with either Rechon Insulin (164 patients) or Humulin Regular (167 patients). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Male or female patients 18-75 years, with BMI 18.0-32.0 kg/m2 and diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) for at least two years. They should have ongoing daily treatment with insulin for at least 12 months, below or equal to 1.2 U/kg/day and HbA1c below or equal to 94 mmol/mol. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Patients and Investigators were not blinded to study treatment in this study. It was not possible to completely blind the study since the cartridges differed in colour of the plunger, lined-seal and metal cap of the cartridges. The primary variable in the study was anti-insulin antibody, which was analysed by Wieslab AB, Malmö, Sweden. Laboratory staff doing the laboratory analyses were blinded to treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMPs were administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient.
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble was provided in 3 mL cartridges to be used in the insulin pen (YpsoPen Twist) manufactured by Ypsomed AG, Switzerland. The pen is documented for use with Rechon insulin products and is CE marked.
Before a meal, fast acting insulins (e.g. Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or) are taken to be able to utilise the carbohydrates in the food and prevent blood glucose levels to rise. The more carbohydrates the food contains, the more insulin is needed. Many fast acting insulins reach the blood after approximately 15 minutes and are effective for 3-4 hours.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Humulin® Regular | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Reference product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMPs were administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient.
Before a meal, fast acting insulins (e.g. Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or) are taken to be able to utilise the carbohydrates in the food and prevent blood glucose levels to rise. The more carbohydrates the food contains, the more insulin is needed. Many fast acting insulins reach the blood after approximately 15 minutes and are effective for 3-4 hours. Humulin® Regular has a somewhat slower onset of the effect and is effective for a longer time. Humulin® Regular is taken around 30 minutes before each meal.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All randomised patients who took at least 1 dose of the study drug.
In total, 0.9% of the patients (n=3), all randomised to treatment with Humulin Regular, were excluded from the safety set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Per protocol set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The PPS was defined for each study visit to consist of all randomised patients who completed the study up to the specific visit and were deemed to have no major protocol deviations that could interfere with the objectives of this study. The visit-specific PPS are sub-sets of the safety set.
3.3% of the patients (n=11) had at least some data that was excluded from the PPS on a per-visit basis.
For the primary endpoint, PPS was the primary analysis population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||
Reporting group title |
Humulin® Regular
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All randomised patients who took at least 1 dose of the study drug.
In total, 0.9% of the patients (n=3), all randomised to treatment with Humulin Regular, were excluded from the safety set.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Per protocol set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The PPS was defined for each study visit to consist of all randomised patients who completed the study up to the specific visit and were deemed to have no major protocol deviations that could interfere with the objectives of this study. The visit-specific PPS are sub-sets of the safety set.
3.3% of the patients (n=11) had at least some data that was excluded from the PPS on a per-visit basis.
For the primary endpoint, PPS was the primary analysis population.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Anti-Insulin Binding Antibodies (PPS) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients having binding antibodies against human insulin. Since it was expected that a large proportion of patients would have anti-insulin antibodies already at baseline, the primary analysis assessed shift from negative at baseline to positive at subsequent visits. For the primary endpoint, PPS was the primary analysis population.
In the PPS, fewer patients were positive for anti-insulin antibodies at baseline in the Rechon Insulin group (4.3% of the patients [n=7]) as compared to the Humulin Regular group (7.4% of the patients [n=12]) with only small changes over time. At Visit 5, the difference between the groups was 8.0 percent units more positive patients in the Humulin Regular group than in the Rechon Insulin group (95% CI: -13.3, -2.7).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 2, Day 1 to Visit 5, Day 180.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Visit 2, n=163 Visit 3, n=158 Visit 4, n=154 Visit 5, n=150 [2] - Visit 2, n=163 Visit 3, n=158 Visit 4, n=154 Visit 5, n=150 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Odds Ratio for Testing Positive for Anti-Insulin A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
A sensitivity analysis using logistic regression in the safety set shows a trend for patients in the Humulin Regular group to have a higher probability of being positive for anti-insulin binding antibodies at Visit 3 and Visit 4, compared to patients treated with Rechon Insulin. At Visit 5, the difference in probability of being positive for anti-insulin antibodies was statistically significant (p-value 0.0152) in favour of the Rechon Insulin treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.6434 [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Visit 3, P=0.6434 Visit 4, P=0.4903 Visit 5, P=0.0152 |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Testing Positive for Anti-Insulin Antibodies (Safety Set) [4] | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
A sensitivity analysis using logistic regression in the safety set shows a trend for patients in the Humulin Regular group to have a higher probability of being positive for anti-insulin binding antibodies at Visit 3 and Visit 4, compared to patients treated with Rechon Insulin. At Visit 5, the difference in probability of being positive for anti-insulin antibodies was statistically significant (p-value 0.0152) in favour of the Rechon Insulin treatment.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 3 - Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Presented under the primary end point Anti-Insulin Binding Antibodies. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Total Daily Insulin dose (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
In the safety set, the median total daily insulin dose at baseline was 0.645 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.665 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group. The median total daily dose changed from baseline by 0.026 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and by 0.027 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group at Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Visit 2, n=148 Visit 3, n=143 Visit 4, n=137 Visit 5, n=134 [6] - Visit 2, n=156 Visit 3, n=152 Visit 4, n=144 Visit 5, n=139 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Daily Basal Insulin Dose (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
In the safety set, the median basal insulin dose at baseline was 0.260 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.246 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group. The change from
baseline at Visit 5 was -0.002 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.001 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Visit 2, n=153 Visit 5, n=140 [8] - Visit 2, n=158 Visit 5, n=143 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Daily Bolus Insulin Dose (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
In the safety set, the median bolus insulin dose at baseline was 0.396 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.386 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group and the change from baseline at Visit 5 was 0.032 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.023 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Visit 2, n=157 Visit 5, n=141 [10] - Visit 2, n=160 Visit 5, n=143 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Total Daily Insulin Dose at Baseline - Intermediate-acting insulin (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
In the safety set, there were approximately 10-times more patients that had long/ultralong-acting basal insulin at baseline compared to patients that had intermediate-acting insulin. For patients with intermediate-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median total daily insulin dose was 0.652 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.606 IU/kg in the humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.027 IU/kg and 0.029 IU/kg, respectively. For patients with long/ultralong-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median total daily insulin dose was 0.641 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.665 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.023 IU/kg and 0.027 IU/kg, respectively.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [11] - Visit 2, n=14 Visit 5, n=12 [12] - Visit 2, n=10 Visit 5, n=10 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Total Daily Insulin Dose at Baseline - Long/ultralong-acting insulin (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
In the safety set, there were approximately 10-times more patients that had long/ultralongacting basal insulin at baseline compared to patients that had intermediate-acting insulin. For patients with intermediate-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median total daily insulin dose was 0.652 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.606 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.027 IU/kg and 0.029 IU/kg, respectively. For patients with long/ultralong-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median total daily insulin dose was 0.641 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.665 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.023 IU/kg and 0.027 IU/kg, respectively.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Visit 2, n=131 Visit 5, n=119 [14] - Visit 2, n=142 Visit 5, n=126 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Daily Bolus Insulin Dose at Baseline - Intermediate-acting insulin (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For patients in the safety set with intermediate-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median daily bolus dose was 0.432 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.422 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.031 IU/kg and 0.019 IU/kg, respectively. For patients with long/ultralong-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median daily bolus dose was 0.391 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.383 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.032 IU/kg and 0.025 IU/kg, respectively.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Visit 2, n=14 Visit 5, n=12 [16] - Visit 2, n=10 Visit 5, n=10 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Daily Bolus Insulin Dose at Baseline - Long/ultralong-acting insulin (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For patients in the safety set with intermediate-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median daily bolus dose was 0.432 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.422 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.031 IU/kg and 0.019 IU/kg, respectively. For patients with long/ultralong-acting basal insulin at baseline, the median daily bolus dose was 0.391 IU/kg in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.383 IU/kg in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.032 IU/kg and 0.025 IU/kg, respectively.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [17] - Visit 2, n=131 Visit 5, n=119 [18] - Visit 2, n=142 Visit 5, n=126 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Clinical Chemistry Assessments at Baseline and Absolute Change at Visit 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For clinical chemistry and haematology parameters, there were no apparent trends for the assessed values to change over time from Visit 2 to Visit 5. The assessed values and absolute change from baseline were similar between the treatment groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Clinical Chemistry Assessments at Baseline and Absolute Change at Visit 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For clinical chemistry and haematology parameters, there were no apparent trends for the assessed values to change over time from Visit 2 to Visit 5. The assessed values and absolute change from baseline were similar between the treatment groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [20] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Clinical Chemistry Assessments at Baseline and Absolute Change at Visit 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For clinical chemistry and haematology parameters, there were no apparent trends for the assessed values to change over time from Visit 2 to Visit 5. The assessed values and absolute change from baseline were similar between the treatment groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [21] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Haematology Assessments at Baseline and Absolute Change at Visit 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
For clinical chemistry and haematology parameters, there were no apparent trends for the assessed values to change over time from Visit 2 to Visit 5. The assessed values and absolute change from baseline were similar between the treatment groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From visit 2 to Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [22] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Level of circulating Antibodies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood samples for analysing levels of total circulating immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies were taken at Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5. The analysis was performed by Synlab, Munich.
At baseline, the IgE levels were 35.0 kU/I in the Rechon Insulin group and 37.8 kU/I in the Humulin Regular group, with a change of 0.1 kU/I and 0.8 kU/I compared to the IgE levels at Visit 5 for the treatment groups, respectively.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [23] - Visit 2, n=164 Visit 3, n=159 Visit 4, n=154 Visit 5, n=152 [24] - Safety set Visit 2, n=164 Visit 3, n=160 Visit 4, n=155 Visit 5, n=152 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Circulating IgE Antibodies (ANCOVA) (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
An ANCOVA assessment did not detect a statistically significant difference between the treatment groups in change from baseline (p-value 0.745 at Visit 5).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.492 [25] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [25] - Visit 3, P= 0.492 Visit 4, P= 0.394 Visit 5, P= 0.745 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Partial Correlation Analysis of Circulating IgE Antibodies (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Partial Spearman correlations were performed where the change in anti-insulin
antibody levels was compared to:
- change from baseline in HbA1c;
- change from baseline in body weight;
- level of fasting glucose; and
- total insulin dose.
At Visit 3, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation in change from baseline in HbA1c in the Humulin Regular group (0.3630, p-value <0.0001) and a weak positive correlation in total insulin dose in the Rechon Insulin group (0.1980, p-value 0.0186). In addition, there was a statistically significant weak negative correlation in change from baseline in body weight at Visit 5 in the Rechon Insulin group (-0.1970, p-value 0.0220).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [26] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Partial Correlation Analysis - HbA1c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
At Visit 3, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation in change from baseline in HbA1c in the Humulin Regular group (0.3630, p-value <0.0001) and a weak positive correlation in total insulin dose in the Rechon Insulin group (0.1980, p-value 0.0186).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [27] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3125 [28] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Spearman correlation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [27] - Correlation [28] - Rechon insulin, Visit 3, P=0.3125 Humulin Regular, Visit 3, P=0.3630 Rechon insulin, Visit 4, P=0.4239 Humulin Regular, Visit 4, P=0.3118 Rechon insulin, Visit 5, P=0.2548 Humulin Regular, Visit 5, P=0.5040 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Partial Correlation Analysis - Body weight | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
At Visit 3, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation in change from baseline in HbA1c in the Humulin Regular group (0.3630, p-value <0.0001) and a weak positive correlation in total insulin dose in the Rechon Insulin group (0.1980, p-value 0.0186).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [29] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.8033 [30] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Spearman correlation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [29] - Correlation [30] - Rechon insulin, Visit 3, P=0.8033 Humulin Regular, Visit 3, P=0.6925 Rechon insulin, Visit 4, P=0.1987 Humulin Regular, Visit 4, P=0.1124 Rechon insulin, Visit 5, P=0.0220 Humulin Regular, Visit 5, P=0.9690 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Partial Correlation Analysis - Fasting glucose | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
At Visit 3, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation in change from baseline in HbA1c in the Humulin Regular group (0.3630, p-value <0.0001) and a weak positive correlation in total insulin dose in the Rechon Insulin group (0.1980, p-value 0.0186).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [31] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.5201 [32] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Spearman correlation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [31] - Correlation [32] - Rechon insulin, Visit 3, P=0.5201 Humulin Regular, Visit 3, P=0.6279 Rechon insulin, Visit 4, P=0.7043 Humulin Regular, Visit 4, P=0.4483 Rechon insulin, Visit 5, P=0.5303 Humulin Regular, Visit 5, P=0.2483 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Partial Correlation Analysis - Total insulin dose | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
At Visit 3, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation in change from baseline in HbA1c in the Humulin Regular group (0.3630, p-value <0.0001) and a weak positive correlation in total insulin dose in the Rechon Insulin group (0.1980, p-value 0.0186).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [33] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0186 [34] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Spearman correlation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [33] - Correlation [34] - Rechon insulin, Visit 3, P=0.0186 Humulin Regular, Visit 3, P=0.9147 Rechon insulin, Visit 4, P=0.0631 Humulin Regular, Visit 4, P=0.8832 Rechon insulin, Visit 5, P=0.1776 Humulin Regular, Visit 5, P=0.4461 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Spearman Correlation of Circulating IgE Antibodies versus Body Weight, Fasting Blood Glucose, HbA1c, and Insulin Dose at Visit 5 (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The clinical relevance of antibody formation was evaluated using Spearman correlations between change from baseline in anti-insulin antibody levels and change from baseline in glucose response as HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin dose and weight change.
Based on the results from the Spearman correlation analyses, it is not possible to conclude if there is any specific relationship between antibody formation and change from baseline in HbA1c, change from baseline in body weight, fasting glucose or total insulin dose.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [35] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Assessment of Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Criteria (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
All hypoglycaemic episodes were summarised by severity according to ADA-defined categories 1-5 and in total.
All hypoglycaemic episodes were presented, including number of and percent of patients with at least one episode, number of episodes and rate (as number of events per patient year of exposure).
Hypoglycaemic episodes occurred overall at a significantly higher rate (1.20 [1.14-1.27], p-value <0.0001) in the Rechon Insulin group (2700 episodes) than in the Humulin Regular group (2217 episodes).
With the exception of the overall rate ratio for hypoglycaemic episodes, that was slightly higher in the Rechon Insulin group, no clinically meaningful changes were detected compared to treatment with Humulin Regular.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After first exposure of randomised treatment and no later than 1 day after last exposure to randomised treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [36] - Safety set |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Hypoglycaemic Episodes: Gen. Linear Regression | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
A generalised linear regression model with number of episodes as response (using a log-link function in accordance with a Poisson regression) and including treatment group and country as factors and exposure time as offset was applied to estimate the treatment rate ratio with a 95% CI.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble v Humulin® Regular
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
328
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.27 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Assessment of Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Criteria (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
All hypoglycaemic episodes were summarised by severity according to ADA-defined categories 1-5 and in total.
All hypoglycaemic episodes were presented, including number of and percent of patients with at least one episode, number of episodes and rate (as number of events per patient year of exposure).
Hypoglycaemic episodes occurred overall at a significantly higher rate (1.20 [1.14-1.27], p-value <0.0001) in the Rechon Insulin group (2700 episodes) than in the Humulin Regular group (2217 episodes).
With the exception of the overall rate ratio for hypoglycaemic episodes, that was slightly higher in the Rechon Insulin group, no clinically meaningful changes were detected compared to treatment with Humulin Regular.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
After first exposure of randomised treatment and no later than 1 day after last exposure to randomised treatment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Hypersensitivity (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The patients were asked to complete a paper diary with doses of administered insulin during one week after Visit 2 and during one week before Visit 3, 4 and 5 and to register local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions and hypoglycaemic episodes daily.
Local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions were reported by 3.7% of patients (n=6) in each of the treatment groups.
The 13 incidents in the Rechon Insulin and the 6 incidents in the Humulin Regular group that were recorded by the patients in the diary and judged by the Investigators either as not an AESI, an AESI not related to treatment or an AESI related to treatment
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [37] - Safety set |
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Systolic Blood Pressure | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) were taken after 5 minutes lying down.
Assessments of blood pressure and pulse showed similar results in both treatment groups and over time.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 to Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [38] - Visit 1, n=164 Visit 5, n=152 [39] - Visit 1, n=164 (Safety set) Visit 5, n=152 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Diastolic Blood Pressure | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) were taken after 5 minutes lying down.
Assessments of blood pressure and pulse showed similar results in both treatment groups and over time.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 to Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [40] - Visit 1, n=164 Visit 5, n=152 [41] - Visit 1, n=164 (Safety set) Visit 5, n=152 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pulse | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) were taken after 5 minutes lying down.
Assessments of blood pressure and pulse showed similar results in both treatment groups and over time.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 1 to Visit 5
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [42] - Visit 1, n=164 Visit 5, n=152 [43] - Visit 1, n=164 (Safety set) Visit 5, n=152 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Physical examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Standard physical examinations included assessments of the general condition, heart, lungs and abdomen.
The physical examinations showed similar results between groups, with only 3 cases of CS abnormal findings that were noted at baseline, which all were due to the patients’ general condition and not related to the study treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 1 to Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [44] - Visit 1, n=164 Visit 2, n=164 Visit 3, n=161 Visit 4, n=155 Visit 5, n=152 [45] - Visit 1, n=164 (Safety set) Visit 2, n=164 Visit 3, n=160 Visit 4, n=155 Visit 5, n=152 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Injection site reactions (Safety Set) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
There were only a few cases of AESI of injection site reactions and thus no trends were seen for a different distribution between treatment groups for injection site erythema, injection site pain, injection site pruritus and injection site rash.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose of IMP to completion of Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [46] - Safety set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Creatinine Assessments (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Overall, the laboratory assessments showed similar results between the treatment groups without clear tendencies to change over time, including creatinine, indicating a stable diabetic condition over time irrespective of treatment.
The creatinine level at baseline was 0.859 mg/dL in the Rechon Insulin group and 0.910 mg/dL in the Humulin Regular group, which at Visit 5 had changed by 0.0168 mg/dL and -0.0001 mg/dL, respectively.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Visit 2 to Visit 5.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [47] - Visit 2, n=163 Visit 3, n=159 Visit 4, n=154 Visit 5, n=152 [48] - Visit 2, n=164 (Safety set) Visit 3, n=158 Visit 4, n=153 Visit 5, n=152 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Clinically Significant Laboratory Values: Urinalysis (Safety Set) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
As expected from the patient population, the urinalysis parameter most commonly assessed as CS abnormal was glucose in urine. This was reported for slightly more patients in the Rechon Insulin group than in the Humulin Regular group; for 7 patients on 10 occasions in the Rechon Insulin group and by 3 patients on 5 occasions in the Humulin Regular group. Out of these in total 15 cases of CS abnormal glucose in urine, 1 case was reported as an AE which was unrelated to treatment with Humulin Regular. All other cases were reported as medical history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Visit 1 to Visit 5.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [49] - Safety set |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From first dose of IMP until the completion of Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Detailed information on each AE was recorded in the eCRF. Any AE that was ongoing at the time when the patient left the study was to be followed up until the AE was resolved or the Investigator decided that the AE was stable and did not need further follow-up.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Rechon Insulin Human Soluble
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. In total, 0.9% of the patients (n=3), all randomised to treatment with Humulin Regular, were excluded from the safety set. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Humulin® Regular
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received either Rechon Insulin Human Soluble or Humulin® Regular in a randomised way. The IMP was administered at home by the patients themselves. Dosing was individualised and adjusted based on blood glucose levels for each patient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
05 Dec 2017 |
Prior to this amendment, there were two local versions of the CSP; version 3.0 that was approved only in Poland and version 4.0 that was approved only in Germany. This substantial amendment was made to combine information in the two local CSP versions into a single global version of the CSP. This substantial amendment included:
- Addition of a withdrawal criterion regarding pregnancy
- Updated information on origin of source data and medical records
- Correction to the list of references
This substantial amendment rendered the global CSP version 5.0. |
||
25 Jun 2018 |
The analysis method for the primary variable was changed to a 3-tiered approach with a new method of analysis and procedure for the detection of antibodies against insulin. A clarification was made for the re-check of eligibility criteria, where laboratory safety assessments were to be performed. Exclusion criteria regarding definition of hypoglycaemic episodes and patient life expectancy were updated.
Definition and reporting procedure for suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs), as well as clarification of follow-up of patients with ongoing AEs at database lock was added. In addition, clarification of when hypoglycaemic events should be reported as an AE was made.
A sample size adjustment was added to avoid a decrease in sample size due to dropout and the planned study start and end dates were updated. Information regarding data protection was updated in light of new GDPR legislation. Minor administrative and editorial changes were made.
This substantial amendment rendered the CSP version 6.0. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
N/A |