Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43857   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Long Term Extension Study of E2080 in Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2016-004953-34
    Trial protocol
    Outside EU/EEA  
    Global end of trial date
    09 Aug 2013

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    15 Apr 2018
    First version publication date
    15 Mar 2018
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason
    • Correction of full data set
    Aligned the results with ClinicalTrials.gov and corrected typo error.

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    E2080-J081-305
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01151540
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Eisai Medical Research Inc.
    Sponsor organisation address
    4-6-10 Koishikawa, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan,
    Public contact
    Customer Joy Department. EJ, Eisai Co., Ltd., 81 33817-3700,
    Scientific contact
    Customer Joy Department. EJ, Eisai Co., Ltd., 81 33817-3700,
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    25 Oct 2013
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    09 Aug 2013
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To investigate the safety of long term administration of E2080 in the participants with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LSG) who completed the E2080-J081-304 study.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in accordance with standard operating procedures (SOPs) of the sponsor (or designee), which are designed to ensure adherence to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines as required by the following: - Principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2008) - International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 Guideline for GCP (CPMP/ICH/135/95) of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Title 21 of the United States (US) Code of Federal Regulations (US 21 CFR) regarding clinical studies, including Part 50 and Part 56 concerning informed subject consent and Institutional Review Board (IRB) regulations and applicable sections of US 21 CFR Part 312 - European Good Clinical Practice Directive 2005/28/EC and Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC for studies conducted within any European Union (EU) country. All suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions were reported, as required, to the Competent Authorities of all involved EU member states. - Article 14, Paragraph 3, and Article 80-2 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (Law No. 145, 1960) for studies conducted in Japan, in addition to Japan’s GCP Subject Information and Informed Consent.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    19 Nov 2010
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Japan: 54
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    54
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    22
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    11
    Adults (18-64 years)
    21
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants who successfully completed Study 304 were enrolled into this study.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Initially participants were blinded, then changed over to open-label for the remainder of the study as follows; 1) Pre-conversion Period - designed to avoid breaking the blindness in the preceding Study 304 and to prevent any data obtained in the open-label treatment in Study 305 from affecting the evaluation in the Study 304, and 2) Conversion Period - participants on placebo were titrated to the appropriate dose of rufinamide (the Study Drug B) within 2 weeks under double-blind conditions.

    Arms
    Arm title
    Rufinamide
    Arm description
    Ralfinamide was administered orally twice daily after breakfast and dinner. Participants on placebo in Study 304 were titrated over to rufinamide within 2 weeks during the Conversion Period. As a general rule, the dose of rufinamide at the end of the Conversion Period was maintained throughout the Maintenance Period.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rufinamide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    E2080
    Other name
    BANZEL
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Ralfinamide was administered orally twice daily after breakfast and dinner.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Rufinamide
    Started
    54
    Completed
    41
    Not completed
    13
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    7
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    4
         Not specified
    2

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Rufinamide
    Reporting group description
    Ralfinamide was administered orally twice daily after breakfast and dinner. Participants on placebo in Study 304 were titrated over to rufinamide within 2 weeks during the Conversion Period. As a general rule, the dose of rufinamide at the end of the Conversion Period was maintained throughout the Maintenance Period.

    Reporting group values
    Rufinamide Total
    Number of subjects
    54 54
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        ≥4 to <12 years
    22 22
        ≥12 to <17 years
    11 11
        ≥17 years
    21 21
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    15.0 ± 6.8 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    21 21
        Male
    33 33
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The Efficacy Analysis Set included 46 participants. 8 participants who had no evaluable efficacy data were excluded.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects
    46
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        ≥4 to <12 years
    18
        ≥12 to <17 years
    11
        ≥17 years
    17
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    15.2 ± 6.9
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    16
        Male
    30

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Rufinamide
    Reporting group description
    Ralfinamide was administered orally twice daily after breakfast and dinner. Participants on placebo in Study 304 were titrated over to rufinamide within 2 weeks during the Conversion Period. As a general rule, the dose of rufinamide at the end of the Conversion Period was maintained throughout the Maintenance Period.

    Subject analysis set title
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The Efficacy Analysis Set included 46 participants. 8 participants who had no evaluable efficacy data were excluded.

    Primary: Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Rufinamide

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Rufinamide [1]
    End point description
    Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), clinical laboratory tests, blood pressure, pulse rate, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that started on or after the date and time of administration of first dose of test drug, but not later than 30 days after discontinuation from the study, or if the AE was present prior to the administration of the first dose of test drug and increased in National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC version 3.0) grade during the study or 30 days after discontinuation from the study. AEs were considered serious if it resulted in; death, was life-threatening, hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Safety analysis set included all treated participants.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From date of first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, up to approximately 2 years 10 months
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed on this data set.
    End point values
    Rufinamide
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    Units: Participants
    number (not applicable)
        TEAEs
    54
        Treatment-related TEAEs
    38
        SAEs
    9
        Treatment-related SAEs
    2
        AEs leading to study drug withdrawal
    3
        AEs leading to study drug dose reduction
    12
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percent Change in Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency From Baseline (Per 28 Days)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent Change in Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency From Baseline (Per 28 Days)
    End point description
    The sum of the frequencies of tonic seizures and atonic seizures was defined as the “tonic-atonic seizure frequency”. The percent change in tonic-atonic seizure frequency was calculated using the tonic-atonic seizure frequency per 28 days of the Observation Period in Study 304 as the baseline and the tonic-atonic seizure frequency at Weeks 12, 24, 32, 40, 52 and Week 52 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) as the post-treatment value. Percentage change in tonic - atonic seizure frequency was calculated as follows: [100 x (post-treatment value - baseline)/ baseline]. The frequency of epileptic seizures was recorded in the seizure diary by the recorder. Seizure frequency was counted based on the classification established by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). The diary recorder monitored the participant and recorded the seizure diary in a consistent manner, and continued these practices throughout the study period. The Efficacy Analysis Set was used.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Observation period in Study 304), Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 52 and Week 52 LOCF
    End point values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects analysed
    46
    Units: Percent Change in Seizure Frequency
    median (full range (min-max))
        Baseline (n=46)
    220.85 (8.3 to 22469.5)
        Percent Change in Week 12 (n=46)
    -39.3 (-100 to 125.2)
        Percent Change in Week 24 (n=43)
    -40.6 (-100 to 85.7)
        Percent Change in Week 32 (n=42)
    -46.8 (-100 to 75)
        Percent Change in Week 40 (n=41)
    -47.6 (-100 to 833.2)
        Percent Change in Week 52 (n=40)
    -36.05 (-100 to 101.7)
        Percent Change in Week 52 LOCF (n=46)
    -39.25 (-100 to 101.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percent Change in the Total Seizure Frequency From Baseline (Per 28 Days)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent Change in the Total Seizure Frequency From Baseline (Per 28 Days)
    End point description
    Percent change in the total seizure frequency (per 28 days) was calculated using the total seizure frequency per 28 days of the Observation Period of Study 304 as the baseline and the total seizure frequency per 28 days at Weeks 12, 24, 32, 40, 52 and Week 52 LOCF as the post-treatment value. Percentage change in total seizure frequency was calculated as follows: [100 x (post-treatment value - baseline)/ baseline].
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Observation period in Study 304), Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 52 and Week 52 LOCF
    End point values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects analysed
    46
    Units: Percent Change in Seizure Frequency
    median (full range (min-max))
        Baseline (n=46)
    268.2 (79.9 to 22499.4)
        Percent Change in Week 12 (n=45)
    -47.7 (-100 to 101.5)
        Percent Change in Week 24 (n= 43)
    -48.9 (-97 to 116.6)
        Percent Change in Week 32 (n= 42)
    -50.6 (-90.8 to 209.2)
        Percent Change in Week 40 (n= 41)
    -52 (-95.5 to 833.2)
        Percent Change in Week 52 (n= 40)
    -47.35 (-94.3 to 340.8)
        Percent Change in Week 52 LOCF (n= 46)
    -46.3 (-100 to 340.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percent change in the Frequency of Seizures Other than Tonic-Atonic Seizures

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent change in the Frequency of Seizures Other than Tonic-Atonic Seizures
    End point description
    Percent change in the frequency of seizures other than tonic-atonic seizures (per 28 days) was calculated using the total seizure frequency per 28 days of the Observation Period as the baseline and the total seizure frequency per 28 days of the Weeks, 12, 24, 32, 40, 52 and 52 LOCF as the post-treatment value. Percentage change in total seizure frequency was calculated as follows: [100 x (post-treatment value - baseline)/ baseline]. Seizures analyzed other than tonic-atonic seizures included: Partial seizure frequency, Absence seizure, Atypical absence seizure, Myoclonic seizure, Tonic seizure, Tonic-clonic seizure, Atonic seizure, and Unclassified epileptic seizure. This data was based on the diary data collected for 7 days after each visit. Seizure frequency was counted based on the classification established by the ILAE. The diary recorder monitored the participant and recorded the seizure diary in a consistent manner. The Efficacy Analysis Set was used.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Observation period in Study 304), Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 52 and Week 52 LOCF
    End point values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects analysed
    45
    Units: Percent change in seizure frequency
    median (full range (min-max))
        Partial Seizure Week 12 (n=7)
    -95 (-100 to 255.6)
        Partial Seizure Week 24 (n=5)
    -80.9 (-100 to 303.2)
        Partial Seizure Week 32 (n=5)
    -70.5 (-100 to 30.2)
        Partial Seizure Week 40 (n=5)
    -85.7 (-100 to -42.4)
        Partial Seizure Week 52 (n=5)
    -77.3 (-100 to -61.8)
        Partial Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=7)
    -77.3 (-100 to 189.2)
        Absence Seizure Week 12 (n=1)
    -87.7 (-87.7 to -87.7)
        Absence Seizure Week 24 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Absence Seizure Week 32 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Absence Seizure Week 40 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Absence Seizure Week 52 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Absence Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 12 (n=24)
    -86.7 (-100 to 54.7)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 24 (n=22)
    -92.85 (-100 to 185.7)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 32 (n=22)
    -92.3 (-100 to 209.2)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 40 (n=21)
    -100 (-100 to 219.3)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 52 (n=21)
    -100 (-100 to 737.2)
        Atypical Absence Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=24)
    -100 (-100 to 737.2)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 12 (n=13)
    -100 (-100 to 228.8)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 24 (n=13)
    -100 (-100 to 64.4)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 32 (n=13)
    -100 (-100 to 435.6)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 40 (n=13)
    -100 (-100 to 117.6)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 52 (n=13)
    -100 (-100 to 368.2)
        Myoclonic Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=14)
    -100 (-100 to 368.2)
        Tonic Seizure Week 12 (n=45)
    -35.4 (-100 to 175.2)
        Tonic Seizure Week 24 (n=42)
    -37.85 (-100 to 138.5)
        Tonic Seizure Week 32 (n=41)
    -49.4 (-100 to 83.5)
        Tonic Seizure Week 40 (n=40)
    -47.05 (-100 to 833.2)
        Tonic Seizure Week 52 (n=39)
    -36.4 (-100 to 110.2)
        Tonic Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=45)
    -46.2 (-100 to 110.2)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 12 (n=8)
    -61.55 (-100 to 300)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 24 (n=7)
    -44.1 (-100 to 300)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 32 (n=7)
    -22.6 (-100 to 700)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 40 (n=7)
    -46.7 (-100 to 1100)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 52 (n=7)
    -35.5 (-100 to 700)
        Tonic-clonic Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=8)
    -38.1 (-100 to 700)
        Atonic Seizure Week 12 (n=16)
    -60.35 (-100 to 29)
        Atonic Seizure Week 24 (n=15)
    -84.3 (-100 to 189.2)
        Atonic Seizure Week 32 (n=14)
    -100 (-100 to 20.5)
        Atonic Seizure Week 40 (n=14)
    -67.2 (-100 to 261.4)
        Atonic Seizure Week 52 (n=14)
    -67.55 (-100 to 526.5)
        Atonic Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=16)
    -67.55 (-100 to 526.5)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 12 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 24 (n=1)
    6932.3 (6932.3 to 6932.3)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 32 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 40 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 52 (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
        Unclassified Seizure Week 52 LOCF (n=1)
    -100 (-100 to -100)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants who Achieved 100%, 75%, 50% or 25% reduction in Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency (Responders)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants who Achieved 100%, 75%, 50% or 25% reduction in Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency (Responders)
    End point description
    Categorized percent change in Tonic-atonic seizure frequency per 28 Days by visit relative to the baseline (Observation Phase in Study 304) was determined based on the diary data collected for 7 days after each visit. The Efficacy Analysis Set was used.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 52 and Week 52 LOCF
    End point values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects analysed
    46
    Units: Percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 12 100% Reduction - Yes
    6.5
        Week 12 100% Reduction - No
    93.5
        Week 12 75% Reduction - Yes
    17.4
        Week 12 75% Reduction - No
    82.6
        Week 12 50% Reduction - Yes
    43.5
        Week 12 50% Reduction - No
    56.5
        Week 12 25% Reduction - Yes
    71.7
        Week 12 25% Reduction - No
    28.3
        Week 24 100% Reduction - Yes
    2.3
        Week 24 100% Reduction - No
    97.7
        Week 24 75% Reduction - Yes
    11.6
        Week 24 75% Reduction - No
    88.4
        Week 24 50% Reduction - Yes
    39.5
        Week 24 50% Reduction -No
    60.5
        Week 24 25% Reduction - Yes
    65.1
        Week 24 25% Reduction - No
    34.9
        Week 32 100% Reduction - Yes
    2.4
        Week 32 100% Reduction - No
    97.6
        Week 32 75% Reduction - Yes
    19
        Week 32 75% Reduction - No
    81
        Week 32 50% Reduction - Yes
    47.6
        Week 32 50% Reduction - No
    52.4
        Week 32 25% Reduction - Yes
    66.7
        Week 32 25% Reduction - No
    33.3
        Week 40 100% Reduction - Yes
    4.9
        Week 40 100% Reduction - No
    95.1
        Week 40 75% Reduction - Yes
    17.1
        Week 40 75% Reduction - No
    82.9
        Week 40 50% Reduction - Yes
    48.8
        Week 40 50% Reduction - No
    51.2
        Week 40 25% Reduction - Yes
    61
        Week 40 25% Reduction - No
    39
        Week 52 100% Reduction - Yes
    5
        Week 52 100% Reduction - No
    95
        Week 52 75% Reduction - Yes
    20
        Week 52 75% Reduction -No
    80
        Week 52 50% Reduction - Yes
    37.5
        Week 52 50% Reduction - No
    62.5
        Week 52 25% Reduction - Yes
    60
        Week 52 25% Reduction - No
    40
        Week 52 (LOCF) 100% Reduction - Yes
    8.7
        Week 52 (LOCF) 100% Reduction - No
    91.3
        Week 52 (LOCF) 75% Reduction - Yes
    21.7
        Week 52 (LOCF) 75% Reduction -No
    78.3
        Week 52 (LOCF) 50% Reduction - Yes
    39.1
        Week 52 (LOCF) 50% Reduction - No
    60.9
        Week 52 (LOCF) 25% Reduction - Yes
    63
        Week 52 (LOCF) 25% Reduction - No
    37
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With An Increase In Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With An Increase In Tonic-Atonic Seizure Frequency
    End point description
    Number of participants with an increase in Tonic-atonic seizure frequency per 28 Days by visit relative to the baseline (Observation Phase in Study 304) was determined based on the diary data collected for 7 days after each visit. The Efficacy Analysis Set was used.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, Week 52 and Week 52 LOCF
    End point values
    Efficacy Analysis Set
    Number of subjects analysed
    46
    Units: Percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 12 Increase - Yes
    21.7
        Week 12 Increase - No
    78.3
        Week 24 Increase - Yes
    23.3
        Week 24 Increase - No
    76.7
        Week 32 Increase - Yes
    16.7
        Week 32 Increase - No
    83.3
        Week 40 Increase - Yes
    9.8
        Week 40 Increase - No
    90.2
        Week 52 Increase - Yes
    22.5
        Week 52 Increase -No
    77.5
        Week 52 LOCF Increase - Yes
    19.6
        Week 52 LOCF Increase - No
    80.4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From date of first dose up to 15 days after the last dose of study treatment, up to approximately 2 year and 10 months
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    13.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Rufinamide
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    Rufinamide
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 54 (16.67%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Status epilepticus
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 54 (3.70%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    4 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Dental caries
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis viral
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Rufinamide
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    54 / 54 (100.00%)
    Investigations
    Platelet count decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 54 (22.22%)
         occurrences all number
    22
    Skin laceration
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 54 (9.26%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    Eyelid injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Mouth injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Nervous system disorders
    Status epilepticus
         subjects affected / exposed
    22 / 54 (40.74%)
         occurrences all number
    158
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 54 (25.93%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 54 (9.26%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    Eye disorders
    Conjunctivitis allergic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 54 (24.07%)
         occurrences all number
    27
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 54 (16.67%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    Dental caries
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 54 (12.96%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    Stomatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 54 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Epistaxis
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 54 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dry skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Dermatitis contact
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 54 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    Agitation
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    26 / 54 (48.15%)
         occurrences all number
    61
    Influenza
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 54 (20.37%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 54 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 54 (9.26%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 54 (9.26%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    Pharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 54 (12.96%)
         occurrences all number
    7

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    12 May 2010
    • Description of the method for examining concomitant drugs was modified.
    05 Jul 2010
    • Clarified the administrations of study treatment during the Conversion Period. • Clarified the dose reduction procedure during the Conversion Period. • Changes made to the clinical trial plan on how blood pressure is taken.
    13 Oct 2010
    • Phenobarbital (suppository) was added to rescue drugs for status epilepticus.
    11 Apr 2011
    • Newly approved levetiracetam was added to the concomitant antiepileptic drugs which can be used in this study. • Levetiracetam was added to the prohibited antiepileptic drugs for participants under 15 years old, since the drug had not been allowed for patients with <15 years old.
    31 Oct 2011
    • Gabapentin was deleted from the prohibited antiepileptic drugs for participants under 15 years old, since the drug was approved for children.
    03 Apr 2012
    • Emergency treatment for epilepticus status was revised to include intravenous hyphenytoin as a rescue medication.
    24 Oct 2012
    • Revisions made to the Study Design etc. in response to future approval and marketing of the study drug. • Clinical trial was to be considered a post-marketing trial after approval and marketing of the study drug. • End date of the study was defined as the date at which the study drug is on the market and can be prescribed • Assessments at the end of the study are clarified. • Clarified the tapering and end-of-study-assessments those not required for the participants who can continuously use rufinamide after completion of this study. • Instructions were given on how marketed study drug should be handled and delivered to medical institutions for the participants. • Clarification was given on the follow-up of adverse events and serious adverse events. • List of surveys and evaluations the investigators should conduct as the end of the trial. • Clarified the report of pregnancy after use of marketed study drug. • Compliance with Good Post-marketing Study Practice (GPSP) was included.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 03:38:44 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA