E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
We wish to study the drug Kineret in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Traumatic brain injury is defined as blunt trauma to the brain causing injuries and hemorrhages, which in turn lead to a harmful environment for surviving brain cells. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10060690 |
E.1.2 | Term | Traumatic brain injury |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004863 |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10051288 |
E.1.2 | Term | Central nervous system inflammation |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Our primary research aim is to detect a dose-response decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines (components of the immune system called tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma) in the brain parenchyma during the first 48 hours after first dose of the IMP following traumatic brain injury. The cytokine-extraction will be done using the microdialysis which will extract these cytokines from the extracellular fluid of the brain.
Our main hypothesis is that following administration of Kineret, there will be a dose-response modification of the inflammatory response, possible to measure using microdialysis probes in brain parenchyma. With escalating dose, and versus placebo, the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma, will decrease in the brain parenchyma. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in cytokine concentration between an escalating dose of Kineret and placebo.
Placebo group (A) will be compared with the intermediate dose of the |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To determine a dose-response effect of Kineret following traumatic brain injury on: - Patient outcome after 6 and 12 months. - Brain immune system activation ("Microglial" activation) and assessment of special kind of brain injury ("diffuse axonal injury"). - Release of brain enriched proteins to the blood and spinal fluid. - Pressure and amount of oxygen in the injured brain. - Drug delivery to the brain. - Drug safety for the patient (amount of side-effects). |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
• Have given written informed consent to participate provided by the patient's legal representative or by agreement with an independent health provider (as the patient will initially lack capacity). • Aged 18-64 years. • Head injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-13), requiring ventilation, sedation and a cranial access device for their clinical management for at least 72 hours. • Head injury should be compatible with survival. • Possible to deliver the first dose of IMP within 12 hours after trauma.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
• Head injury unlikely to survive 5 days (CT evidence of above as judged by clinical team, bilateral fixed and dilated pupils). • Not able to provide the initial dose of IMP within 12 hour after trauma. • Follow up not possible • Not suitable for insertion of Cranial Access Device (bleeding diathesis) • Participation in other CTIMP
- As per the SmPC
• Immunosuppression (evidence of neutropenia (ANC <1.5 x 109/l), immunosuppression secondary to immunomodulatory medications, chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the 3 months preceding study entry) • Severe Renal Insufficiency or End Stage Renal Disease (defined as a creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) • Pregnancy/Nursing mothers • Known hypersensitivity to E. coli derived products • Administration of live vaccine • Known presence or suspicion of active bacterial, fungal or viral infections, including tuberculosis, or HIV infection or hepatitis B or C infection. • Uncontrolled clinically significant hematologic, pulmonary, endocrine, metabolic, gastrointestinal, or hepatic disease as judged by the investigator. • Concurrent treatment with TNF-alpha antagonists (Etanercept®). |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary endpoint is a dose-dependent difference in cerebral cytokine concentrations following 48 hours of IMP administration, primarily for tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
The cytokine concentration will be sampled and analyzed the first 48-72 hours following injury. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
To determine a dose-response effect of recombinant human Interlekukin-1 receptor antagonist (Kineret) following traumatic brain injury on several outcome metrics, including: - Clinical outcome by assessing neurological function and recovery using standardized scales (e.g. extended Glasgow Outcome Score, and neuropsychiatric assessment) at 6 months and 1 year. This will provide an estimate of the variability in outcome metrics which will allow a definitive power calculation to be estimated for a phase III study. - Imaging outcome by magnetic resonance imaging, including a technique called diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at repeated time points to determine degree of brain injury on the connectivity between the brain’s axons (connections) globally as well as in the locality of the microdialysis catheter (a semipermeable membrane inserted into affected brain tissue) to monitor brain metabolism and inflammation. - Biochemical outcome by concentrations of protein biomarkers of tissue fate, including S100B, Neurofilament Light (NF-L), microtubule associated protein tau (tau) and amyloid-beta which all have been shown to increase in patients with different brain diseases including traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer’s and multiple sclerosis. - Monitoring outcome by assessing intracranial pressure, cerebral metabolism, brain tissue oxygen as well as alterations in cerebral blood flow. - Pharmacokinetic outcome by measuring how much drug that reaches the affected brain using the microdialysis technique. - Inflammatory outcome by analysing microglial activation, the inflammatory cells of the brain, using positron emission tomography, a radiological technique, during hospital stay. We also wish to see how the body’s immune system reacts by measuring the adaptive immune system’s reactivity toward brain specific proteins as a surrogate marker of injury severity |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
- Clinical outcome will be assessed at 6 months and 1 year. - Radiological outcome using DTI will be analyzed during hospital stay - Monitoring outcome, consisting of intracranial pressure, cerebral metabolism and brain tissue oxygen pressure will be assessed the first week, or longer depending on the clinical course of the patient, following trauma. - Pharmacokinetic outcome will be assessed the first 5 days following injury during drug administration. - Inflammatory outcome using positron emission tomography will be done during hospital stay |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | Yes |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
Different dose of the Kineret in the two treatment groups. |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 3 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 1 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 4 |