Clinical Trial Results:
An interventional, single arm, multicenter, phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of allo-APZ2-CVU on wound healing of chronic venous ulcer (CVU).
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2017-000233-31 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
30 Jun 2020
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
20 Jun 2021
|
First version publication date |
20 Jun 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
allo-APZ2-CVU-II-01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03257098 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
|
||
Public contact |
Information Office, RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG, 49 6221718330, office@rheacell.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Information Office, RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG, 49 6221718330, office@rheacell.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Jun 2020
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Jun 2020
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Jun 2020
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy (by monitoring the wound size reduction of chronic venous ulcers [CVUs]) and safety (by monitoring adverse events [AEs]) of two doses of allo-APZ2-CVU topically administered on wounds of patients with CVU.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The clinical trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki in its current revision and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP, CPMP/ICH/135/95). All national and local regulatory requirements were followed.
The investigator ensured that the patient was fully informed about the objectives, procedures, potential risks, any discomforts, and expected benefits of the trial.
The COVID-19 pandemic did impact the conduct of the trial (e.g. delay of follow-up visits and examinations, delay of data entry/cleaning activities, change/delay of monitoring activities).
The situation in this clinical trial was continuously monitored to ensure the safety of patients and to reduce the delays in collection and verification of data. The sponsor was informed and updated with short interval reports on critical issues in the trial, and on measures taken to control them. Investigators received a sponsor statement on handling patient visits and were informed about recruitment stop.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
16 Nov 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 31
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
31
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
31
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
6
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
25
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Of the 58 patients enrolled and screened at 9 centers, 27 patients were screening failures, and 31 patients were treated. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patients who met each of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were eligible to participate in the trial. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment and follow-up (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
allo-APZ2-CVU | ||||||
Arm description |
Patients treated with the investigational medicinal product (IMP), allo-APZ2-II-CVU. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
allo-APZ2-CVU
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cutaneous suspension
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
One (for patients enrolled under protocol Version 2.0) or 2 (for patients enrolled under protocol Version 3.0 or higher) topical applications of 1x10^6 cells/cm² of allo-APZ2-CVU cells were applied on the surface of the target ulcer with a syringe. Non-target wounds were treated as per standard of care.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment and follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients were treated with 1x10^6 skin-derived ABCB5-positive mesenchymal stem cells/cm², which were topically applied under local anesthesia on the wound surface of a target CVU. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients who signed the informed consent form and who received allo-APZ2-CVU at least once.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Full analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients included in the safety analysis set who had a wound size assessment at Baseline (Visit 3, Day 0) and on at least one post-baseline visit.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Modified full analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients of the full analysis set except for patients with major protocol deviations affecting efficacy assessments. The modified full analysis set was used as sensitivity analysis
set for efficacy analyses concerning wound assessments and contained all except 4 patients belonging to the full analysis set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
allo-APZ2-CVU
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients treated with the investigational medicinal product (IMP), allo-APZ2-II-CVU. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients who signed the informed consent form and who received allo-APZ2-CVU at least once.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Full analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients included in the safety analysis set who had a wound size assessment at Baseline (Visit 3, Day 0) and on at least one post-baseline visit.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Modified full analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients of the full analysis set except for patients with major protocol deviations affecting efficacy assessments. The modified full analysis set was used as sensitivity analysis
set for efficacy analyses concerning wound assessments and contained all except 4 patients belonging to the full analysis set.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of wound size reduction at Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement was missing (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of wound size reduction in comparison to the size at the day of allo-APZ2-CVU application was assessed by standardized photography.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement was missing (LOCF)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical analyses were done in this phase I/II trial. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [3] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of wound size reduction at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10 and 12 (without LOCF) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10 and 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [5] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Absolute wound size reduction at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [7] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients achieving complete wound closure at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, 12, and at any time point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Complete wound closure was defined as 95% to 100% epithelialization of the wound.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, 12, and at any time point
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [8] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [9] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to first complete wound closure | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Complete wound closure was defined as 95% to 100% epithelialization of the wound. Not all patients had a complete wound closure during the trial, thus, it was not possible to calculate the median time to wound closure. Instead, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to calculate product-limit survival estimates for the time to wound closure.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [10] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were analyzed. [11] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients achieving an at least 30% wound size reduction at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, 12, and at any time point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, 12, and at any time point
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [12] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [13] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to first 30% wound size reduction | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The time (days) from Baseline until a probabilty of at least 50% for a wound size reduction of at least 30% was calculated.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients whose wound reopened after wound closure within the 12-week efficacy follow-up | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Epithelialization at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [14] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [15] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Formation of granulation tissue before IMP applications (Visit 3, Visit 10) and at each follow-up visit (Days 1-3 and 8, Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Day 0 (before allo-APZ2-CVU application) to Week 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [16] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. [17] - At some visits, less than 27 patients were investigated. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Further wound healing parameters: formation of wound exudation before IMP applications (Visit 3, Visit 10) and at each follow-up visit (Days 1-3 and 8, Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The number (%) of patients with low, moderate, and high wound exudation was reported.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Day 0 (before allo-APZ2-CVU application) to Week 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [18] - At Weekt 6.1, 22 patients and at Week 12, 30 patients (including 1 with missing data) were analyzed. [19] - At Weekt 6.1, 19 patients were analyzed; Week 12 includes 1 patient with missing data. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS) at Days 1-3 and 8, Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 8, 10, and 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The pain perceived was rated on an NRS ranging from score 0 (no pain) to score 10 (strongest pain perceivable).
The median (full range) pain score at Baseline was 3.0 (0 - 9).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [20] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in assessment of Quality of Life (QoL) using the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire at Week 12/end of treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Quality of life was assessed using the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Changes from Baseline at Week 12/end of treatment in the scores of 9 subscales were measured. A higher score corresponds to a more positive health status.
Median (full range) values at Baseline were:
Limitations in physical functioning: 45.00 (0.0 - 100.0)
Limitations in role activities due to problems in physical health: 25.00 (0.0 - 100.0)
Bodily pain: 51.00 (0.0 - 100.0)
General health: 52.0 (25.0 - 95.0)
Vitality (fatigue and energy): 45.00 (15.0 - 100.0)
Limitations in social functioning due to physical or emotional problems: 75.00 (25.0; 100.0)
Limitations in usual role due to emotional problems: 100.00 (0.0; 100.0)
Mental health (depressed or happy): 64.0 (36.0; 100.0)
Health transition: 3.00 (1.0 - 5.0)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0 to Week 12/end of treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [21] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were investigated. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in dermatology-specific quality of life based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (summary score) | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
At Baseline, the median (full range) dermatology-specific quality of life summary score was 9.5 (0 - 23).
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Day 0 (Baseline) to Week 12
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [22] - At some visits, less than 31 patients were analyzed. |
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Treatment-emergent AEs were reported from the first allo-APZ2-CVU application (Day 0) until the end of the safety follow-up (Month 12).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treated patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All patients who were treated with allo-APZ2-CVU at least once. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
21 Mar 2018 |
Main changes from protocol version 1.0 (03-Feb-2017) to 2.0 (21-Mar-2018) included:
- Inclusion criterion #1 was changed from "Male or female patients aged 45 to 85 years" to "Male or female patients aged 35 to 85 years"
- Inclusion criterion #6 was changed from "Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 40 kg/m²" to "Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 45 kg/m²"
- Wound dressing treatment changed from "For further wound dressing Mepilex® or Biatain® plaster must be used until Week 12" to "For further wound dressing Mepilex® or Biatain® or Cutimed® Sorbact® plaster must be used until Week 12". |
||
18 May 2018 |
Main changes from protocol version 2.0 (21-Mar-2018) to 3.0 (18-May-2018) included:
- A second IMP application after 6 weeks, at Visit (V)10
- Section 9.4: Due to the inclusion of two new visits (Visit 10 and Visit 11) that were required for the second IMP application, Week 6.1 and Week 6.2 were supplemented as secondary efficacy endpoints for determining:
o Percentage and absolute wound size reduction,
o Proportion of patients achieving 30% wound closure,
o Epithelialization, formation of granulation tissue and wound exudation,
o Pain assessment,
o Secondary safety endpoints for determining physical examination and vital signs at Week 6.1 and Week 12. |
||
27 Apr 2020 |
Main changes from protocol version 3.0 (18-May-2018) to 4.0 (27-Apr-2020) included:
- Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the already reached target of responders (at least 14 of 18 patients with 30% wound size reduction), the trial was completed on 30-Jun-2020
- The possibility to treat non-target wounds was removed (Section 13.1). |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |