Clinical Trial Results:
Post-marketing, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of
Concomitant Administration of V260 and Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis and Inactivated Poliovirus
Vaccine (DTP-IPV) in Japanese Healthy Infants
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2017-000277-37 |
Trial protocol |
Outside EU/EEA |
Global end of trial date |
06 Jun 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 May 2017
|
First version publication date |
26 May 2017
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
V260-060
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01926015 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, United States, 07033
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trials Disclosure, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trials Disclosure, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
09 Sep 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Jun 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The study evaluated the immunogenicity of DTP-IPV (TetrabikTM) with concomitant administration of RotaTeqTM (V260) in healthy Japanese infants. The hypothesis to be tested was that the antibody response rates to DTP-IPV with concomitant administration of RotaTeqTM were non-inferior to those with staggered administration of RotaTeqTM.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in conformance with Good Clinical Practice standards and applicable country and/or local statutes and regulations regarding ethical committee review, informed consent, and the protection of human subjects participating in biomedical research.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
19 Sep 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Japan: 192
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
192
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
192
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 193 participants’ parents/legal guardians agreed to participate by giving written informed consent for study participation. Of these, a total of 192 participants were randomised and 190 participants received study vaccinations; 2 participants were randomised but did not receive study vaccination. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Randomisation and Overall Treatment (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
RotaTeqTM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
V260
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Oral solution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Live, oral, pentavalent vaccine containing 5 human-bovine reassortant rotavirus strains. 2 mL oral administration at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
TetrabikTM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, inactivated polio vaccine used as part of the Japanese vaccination schedule. 0.5 mL subcutaneous injection at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
RotaTeqTM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
V260
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Oral solution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Live, oral, pentavalent vaccine containing 5 human-bovine reassortant rotavirus strains. 2 mL oral administration at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
TetrabikTM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, inactivated polio vaccine used as part of the Japanese vaccination schedule. 0.5 mL subcutaneous injection at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | ||
Reporting group title |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Serologic Response for Diphtheria Toxin, Tetanus Toxin, Pertussis Toxin, Pertussis Filamentous Hemagglutinin (FHA) and Poliovirus (PV) Type 1/2/3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses. Threshold levels for serologic response were the following: Diphtheria Toxin, >=0.1 International Units (IU)/mL; Tetanus Toxin, >=0.01 IU/mL; Pertussis Toxin and Pertussis FHA, >=10 Enzyme Units (EU)/mL; Poliovirus Types 1, 2, and 3, neutralising antibody (NA) titer >=8.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against Diphtheria Toxin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against Diphtheria Toxin is >=0.1 IU/mL. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against Diphtheria Toxin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [2] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against Tetanus Toxin is >=0.01 IU/mL. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against Pertussis Toxin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against Pertussis Toxin is >=10 EU/mL. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against Pertussis FHA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [4] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against Pertussis FHA is >=10 EU/mL. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against PV Type 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [5] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against PV Type 1 is neutralising antibody titer (NA) >=8. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against PV Type 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against PV Type 2 is NA >=8. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Compared Seroprotection Against PV Type 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV v Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Miettinen and Nurminen | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Difference in Serologic Response Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - The infection control threshhold level for seroprotection against PV Type 3 is NA >=8. Non-inferiority of concomitant versus staggered administration requires that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the percentage difference, excluding a difference >=10%, is >=-0.10. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event With Incidence >=1% | ||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse event. Adverse events with an incidence >=1% in either treatment group were recorded. Each participant was counted only once within a study Period and only once Overall.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to 14 days after any of the 6 study visits
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest: Fever | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse event. Adverse events of special interest included fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, and injection-site adverse events. The safety population included randomised participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine and had safety follow-up. Each participant was counted only once within a study Period and only once Overall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Period 1 (up to 14 days after Visit 1 [V1] or V2), Period 2 (up to 14 days after V3 or V4), Period 3 (up to 14 days after V5 or V6), and Overall (up to 14 days after any visit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest: Diarrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse event. Adverse events of special interest included fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and injection-site adverse events. The safety population included randomized participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine and had safety follow-up. Each participant was counted only once within a study Period and only once Overall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Period 1 (up to 14 days after Visit 1 [V1] or V2), Period 2 (up to 14 days after V3 or V4), Period 3 (up to 14 days after V5 or V6), and Overall (up to 14 days after any visit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest: Vomiting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse event. Adverse events of special interest included fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, and injection-site adverse events. The safety population included randomized participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine and had safety follow-up. Each participant was counted only once within a study Period and only once Overall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Period 1 (up to 14 days after Visit 1 [V1] or V2), Period 2 (up to 14 days after V3 or V4), Period 3 (up to 14 days after V5 or V6), and Overall (up to 14 days after any visit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest: Injection-site Adverse Events | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse event. Adverse events of special interest included fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, and injection-site adverse events. The safety population included randomized participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine and had safety follow-up. Each participant was counted only once within a study Period and only once Overall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Period 1 (up to 14 days after Visit 1 [V1] or V2), Period 2 (up to 14 days after V3 or V4), Period 3 (up to 14 days after V5 or V6), and Overall (up to 14 days after any visit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Diphtheria Toxin Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Tetanus Toxin Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Pertussis Toxin Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Pertussis FHA Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [8] - 6.951 |
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Poliovirus Type 1 Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. Poliovirus antibodies are expressed as neutralising antibody (NA) titers. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Poliovirus Type 2 Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. Poliovirus antibodies are expressed as neutralising antibody (NA) titers. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Geometric Mean Titers for Poliovirus Type 3 Antibody | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses before the first dose of study vaccine (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV. Poliovirus antibodies are expressed as neutralising (NA) titers. The per-protocol population included participants who received the 3 scheduled doses of DTP-IPV according to guidelines and did not have an important protocol deviation that may substantially affect the results of the endpoint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Predose (Baseline) and 4 to 6 weeks after the third dose of DTP-IPV
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
All adverse events: up to 14 days after any study visit; all deaths, vaccine-related serious adverse events, overdoses, and intussusception: up to 26 weeks after Visit 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
The safety population included randomised participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine and had safety follow-up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Staggered RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) administered at Visit 1 (Day 1), Visit 3 (6-8 weeks after Visit 1), and Visit 5 (6-8 weeks after Visit 3) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Concomitant RotaTeqTM + DTP-IPV
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
RotaTeqTM (2 mL oral dose) and DTP-IPV (0.5 mL subcutaneous injection) administered concomitantly at Visit 2 (>=4 weeks after Visit 1), Visit 4 (6-8 weeks after Visit 2), and Visit 6 (6-8 weeks after Visit 4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |