Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Vasculopathic Injury and Plasma as Endothelial Rescue in septic shock (SHOCK) trial

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2017-000427-27
    Trial protocol
    DK  
    Global end of trial date
    17 Apr 2019

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    09 Feb 2022
    First version publication date
    09 Feb 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    VIPER-SHOCK
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT03092245
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Rigshospitalet, Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capitol Region Blood Bank
    Sponsor organisation address
    Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100
    Public contact
    Jakob Stensballe, Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capitol Region Blood Bank, 45 35458587, jakob.stensballe@regionh.dk
    Scientific contact
    Jakob Stensballe, Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capitol Region Blood Bank, +45 35458587, jakob.stensballe@regionh.dk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    03 Nov 2019
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    17 Apr 2019
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    17 Apr 2019
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Efficacy of OctaplasLG® administration as compared to crystalloids (standard of care) in patients with septic shock
    Protection of trial subjects
    All patients are admitted to the ICU and therefore in a hospital setting. Special safety markeres specially related to organfailure are observed during the study such as TACO and TRALI
    Background therapy
    All patients receive normal standard of care treatment at the ICU
    Evidence for comparator
    Comparator i standard of care
    Actual start date of recruitment
    18 Apr 2017
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 55
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    55
    EEA total number of subjects
    55
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    16
    From 65 to 84 years
    38
    85 years and over
    1

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Patients were screened for inclusion upon admission to the ICU with septic shock

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Screenings criteria were: 18 years old or above, admitted to the ICU at Bispebjerg Hospital, fulfilling the cirteria for septic shock (defined as need for vasopressor and lactate above 2 mmol/l), need for mechanical ventilation, need for naradrenalin at 0,1 mcg/kg/min or above

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Open label trail

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Intervention arm
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    OctaplasLG
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Dosage according to trial algorithm

    Arm title
    Standard of care
    Arm description
    The standard of care group will receive crystalloids as volumen support according to trail algorithm
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ringer acetate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    all types of crystalloids can be used. the most common type i ringer acetate.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Intervention arm Standard of care
    Started
    28
    27
    Completed
    20
    24
    Not completed
    8
    3
         Transferred to other hospital
    1
    -
         Error in microscan
    1
    1
         Died before 24 hours
    -
    2
         Died
    3
    -
         Protocol deviation
    3
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Overall trial
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Overall trial Total
    Number of subjects
    55 55
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    16 16
        From 65-84 years
    38 38
        85 years and over
    1 1
    Gender categorical
    Both male and female patients at 18 years old or above could be included
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    25 25
        Male
    30 30

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Intervention arm
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Standard of care
    Reporting group description
    The standard of care group will receive crystalloids as volumen support according to trail algorithm

    Primary: Change in micorvascular perfusion

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in micorvascular perfusion
    End point description
    The data describe mean change/diffrence i microvascular perfusion from baseline to 24 hours between the 2 groups
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From baseline to 24 hours
    End point values
    Intervention arm Standard of care
    Number of subjects analysed
    28
    27
    Units: mm/mm2
    log mean (standard error)
        PPV
    -1.528 ( 1.101 )
    0 ( 0 )
        PVD
    -2.2931 ( 0.2479 )
    0 ( 0 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint
    Comparison groups
    Intervention arm v Standard of care
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    55
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Mortality at 24h

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mortality at 24h
    End point description
    Number of death at 24 hours
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    mortality at 24 hours
    End point values
    Intervention arm Standard of care
    Number of subjects analysed
    28 [1]
    27 [2]
    Units: number
        Death
    3
    2
    Notes
    [1] - ITT analysis
    [2] - ITT analysis
    Statistical analysis title
    ITT mortality at 24h
    Comparison groups
    Intervention arm v Standard of care
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    55
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.747
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Mortality at day 30

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Mortality at day 30
    End point description
    number of deaths at day 30
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Mortality at day 30
    End point values
    Intervention arm Standard of care
    Number of subjects analysed
    28 [3]
    27 [4]
    Units: number
        Death
    12
    7
    Notes
    [3] - ITT analysis
    [4] - ITT analysis
    Statistical analysis title
    ITT mortality at dag 30
    Comparison groups
    Intervention arm v Standard of care
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    55
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.25
    Method
    Fisher exact
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Until day 30
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Only SAR and some SAE of special interests will be recorded at these patients are admitted to an ICU and therefore critical ill and will experience AE all the time without any benefit for safety issues. SAE/SAR are recorded based on the patients medical record.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    none
    Dictionary version
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: Only SAR and some SAE are recorded for these patients as these are admitted to the ICU. NO SAE or SAR are observed

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 02:53:01 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA