Clinical Trial Results:
Pharmacodynamic interactions between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine (PIRAD)
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2017-000945-37 |
Trial protocol |
NL |
Global end of trial date |
23 Feb 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
23 Mar 2022
|
First version publication date |
23 Mar 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
PIRAD-001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03143972 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University Medical Center Groningen
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, Netherlands,
|
||
Public contact |
spanjersberg, umcg, r.spanjersberg@umcg.nl
|
||
Scientific contact |
spanjersberg, umcg, r.spanjersberg@umcg.nl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
24 Jan 2022
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
23 Feb 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Feb 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Our objective is to map the pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic interaction between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil by observing changes in anesthetic depth, measured by hypnotic and analgesic endpoints such as modified observer’s assessment of alertness and sedation scale (MOAA/S), response to electrical stimuli, response to laryngoscopy and electroencephalogram (EEG) derived indices. These effects will be related to drug concentrations using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
A complete anaesthesia work station including a ventilator, were present in the study room. The study team included a board certified anaesthetist and nurse anaesthetist ensured the safety of our volunteers. Volunteers were well informed in advance, local anesthesia was given before inserting the arterial canula. We ensured someone was present in the room at all times so volunteers could indicate problems at all times.
|
||
Background therapy |
NA | ||
Evidence for comparator |
NA | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
28 Jun 2017
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
30
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
27
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
3
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
We recruited healthy volunteers through an online advertisement on www.medians.nl, approved by the ethical committee. We recruited between 25-5-2017 and 31-1-2018 in the Netherlands. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Screened: 48 Included: 35 (including replacement of 5 drop-outs before second session) Reasons for drop-out: failure of arterial cannula placement (n=3), withdrawal after 1st session by participant (n=1), withdrawal after 1st session by physician due to too much anxiety of volunteer during 1st session (n=1) | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Dexmedetomidine
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Dexmedetomidine | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dexmedetomidine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Volunteers received dexmedetomidine via target-controlled infusion (Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C13). This target-controlled infusion was based on the pharmacokinetic model developed by Hannivoort (Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Proost JH et al.: Development of an optimized pharmacokinetic model of dexmedetomidine using target-controlled infusion in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2015; 123:357–67) expanded with an equilibration rate constant (ke0) for the effect site of the MOAA/S estimated in the pharmacodynamic model by Colin (Colin PJ, Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, et al: Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:200–10). To avoid hypertensive
reactions, the infusion of dexmedetomidine was limited to 6 μg · kg−1 · h−1 for the first three infusion steps and was increased to 10 μg · kg−1 · h−1 for the two highest targets of 5 and 8 ng/ml.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Remifentanil
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Remifentanil | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
remifentanil
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A computer-controlled infusion, based on the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model developed by Eleveld et al. (Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Vereecke H, Absalom AR, Olofsen E, Vuyk J, Struys MMRF: An allometric model of remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Anesthesiology 2017; 126:1005–18) was used to target remifentanil effect-site concentrations.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 3
|
|||||||
Period 3 title |
Interaction
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Interaction | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dexmedetomidine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Volunteers received dexmedetomidine via target-controlled infusion (Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C13). This target-controlled infusion was based on the pharmacokinetic model developed by Hannivoort (Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Proost JH et al.: Development of an optimized pharmacokinetic model of dexmedetomidine using target-controlled infusion in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2015; 123:357–67) expanded with an equilibration rate constant (ke0) for the effect site of the MOAA/S estimated in the pharmacodynamic model by Colin (Colin PJ, Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, et al: Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:200–10). To avoid hypertensive
reactions, the infusion of dexmedetomidine was limited to 6 μg · kg−1 · h−1 for the first three infusion steps and was increased to 10 μg · kg−1 · h−1 for the two highest targets of 5 and 8 ng/ml.
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
remifentanil
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A computer-controlled infusion, based on the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model developed by Eleveld et al. (Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Vereecke H, Absalom AR, Olofsen E, Vuyk J, Struys MMRF: An allometric model of remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Anesthesiology 2017; 126:1005–18) was used to target remifentanil effect-site concentrations.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period. Justification: During the remifentanil period, one participant experienced thorax rigidity (known side effect of remifentanil). This person completed the remifentanil period, but did not enter the interaction period. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Dexmedetomidine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Dexmedetomidine
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Remifentanil
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Interaction
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
All subjects (18-70 years)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects within the study
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Tolerance of laryngoscopy | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At the end of each infusion step
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Response surface - Tolerance of laryngoscopy |
|||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - One person experienced thoraxi rigidity in period two, and did not enter period 3. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
non-linear mixed effects modeling | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
non-linear mixed effects modeling was used to describe exposure-response relationships of either drug alone (dexmedetomidine / remifentanil) and in combination (interaction).
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Interaction v All subjects (18-70 years)
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
58
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [2] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
nonlinear mixed effects modeling | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
EC50 | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
35
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
90% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
25 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
54 | |||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - nonlinear mixed-effects modeling |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
As per protocol, all adverse events reported spontaneously by the subject or observed by the investigator or his staff will be recorded. Serious adverse events will be reported to ethical comittee by PI through webportal ToetsingOnline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
Not applicable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
NA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All subjects-all periods
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Results are not interpretable in this online format. Please read article for results. | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31425170 |