Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2017-001362-25
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:RAM-MS
    National Competent Authority:Denmark - DHMA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2018-03-21
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedDenmark - DHMA
    A.2EudraCT number2017-001362-25
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Randomized autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab for patients with relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Randomized study with stem cell transplantation versus standard treatment with alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    RAM-MS
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberRAM-MS
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorHelse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital
    B.1.3.4CountryNorway
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportHelse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital
    B.4.2CountryNorway
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationHelse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointLars Bø
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressHaukelandsveien 22
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityBergen
    B.5.3.3Post code5021
    B.5.3.4CountryNorway
    B.5.6E-maillars.bo@helse-bergen.no
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Sendoxane
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderBaxter
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameCyclophosphamide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solvent for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Thymoglobuline®
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderGenzyme
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameThymoglobuline®
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 3
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Lemtrada
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderGenzyme
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product namealemtuzumab
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 4
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Sendoxane
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderBaxter
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameCyclophosphamide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 5
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Mavenclad
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderMerck Europe B.V.
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameCladribine
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 6
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Ocrevus
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderRoche Registration GmbH
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameOcrelizumab
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 21.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10063399
    E.1.2Term Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10029205 - Nervous system disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and the safety of HSCT compared to alemtuzumab, cladribine and ocrelizumab in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Not applicable.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Yes
    E.2.3.1Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives
    A wide array of immunological parameters and other biomakers will be investigated on samples from the RRMS study population (ref. section 7.3.3 - 7.3.8 in the protocol). For this purpose cerebrospinal fluid, whole blood, serum, plasma and blood cells samples will be stored in the Biobank Haukeland at Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital. Some samples will only be collected from patients in Norway/at Haukeland University hospital (stool, sperm, transvaginal ultrasound, cells from graft samples and cells from apheresis procedure).

    Samples from the Biobank Haukeland can also be used for future research in MS if in agreement with the RAMMS Project Group, and any researcher will then have to submit a separate protocol for approval by relevant medicine agencies and ethic committees.
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Age between ≥18 to ≤50, both genders

    3. Diagnosis of RRMS using revised McDonald criteria of clinically definite MS

    4. An EDSS score of 0 to 5.5

    5. Significant inflammatory disease activity despite treatment with standard disease modifying therapy for at least 6 months, with one or more of the following medications; interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, natalizumab

    a. Significant inflammatory disease activity is defined as:
    i. Having one or more clinically reported multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse(s),
    ii. AND 1 or more T1 Gd-enhanced lesion(s),
    iii. OR three or more new or enlarging T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over the last year while being treated with
    immunomodulatory treatment by standard national guidelines .

    The relapse(s) must have occurred 3 or more months after the onset of an immunomodulatory treatment, as MS immunomodulatory treatment may reach full effect after 3 months or more.

    6. The patient is a RRMS-patient referred from neurological departments in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands to an assigned study site.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Known hypersensitivity or other known serious side effects for any of the study medications, including co-medications such as high-dose glucocorticosteroids
    2. Any illness or prior treatment that in the opinion of the investigators would jeopardize the ability of the patient to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy or high-dose glucocorticosteroids
    3. Any ongoing infection, including Tbc, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, hepatitis virus, toxoplasmosis, HIV or syphilis infections, as well as heaptitis B surface antigen positivity and/or hepatitis C PCR positivity verified at Visit 1
    4. Patients without a history of chickenpox or without vaccination against varicella zoster virus (VZV), unless tested for antibodies to VZV. VZV negative patients can only be included if they receive vaccination against VZV at least 6 weeks prior to inclusion.
    5. Current or previous treatments with long-term effects that may influence the treatment effects or potential toxicities/side effects of the treatment arms. This includes, but is not restricted to previous treatment with mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribin and ocrelizumab, and treatment with rituximab within the last 9 months prior to start of study treatment.
    6. Immunocompromised patients, or patients currently reveiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive therapy
    7. Treatment with glucocorticoids or ACTH within one month prior to start of study treatment
    8. Having experienced an MS relapse within one month prior to study inclusion
    9. Prior or current major depression
    10. Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an informed consent or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol.
    11. Prior or current alcohol or drug dependencies
    12. Cardiac insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, significant cardiac dysrhytmia, unstable or advanced ischemic heart disease (NYHA III or IV)
    13. Significant hypertension: BP > 180/110
    14. Active malignancy, or prior history of malignancy except localized basal cell, squamous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    15. Known untreated or unregulated thyroid disease
    16. Failure to willingly accept or comprehend risk of irreversible sterility as a side effect of therapy
    17. WBC < 1,5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If WBC < 1,5 x 109/L is caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be > 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment.
    18. Platelet (thrombocyte) count < 100 x 109/L
    19. ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (UNL)
    20. Serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L
    21. Serum bilirubin > ULN
    22. Moderate or severely impaired kidney function (creatinine-clearance below 60 ml/min)
    23. Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams
    24. Diagnosis of primary progressive MS
    25. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS
    26. Treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod within the last 2 months, and treatment with dimetylfumurat within the last month (washout must be performed as specified in section 5.1) prior to start of study medication.
    27. Use of teriflunomide (Aubagio®) within the previous 2 years unless cleared from the body (plasma concentration < 0.02 mcg/ml following elimination from the body with cholestyramine or activated powdered charcoal) as specified in section 5.1 prior to start of study medication.
    28. Any hereditary neurological disease such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or Spinocerebellar ataxia
    29. Any disease that can influence the patient safety and compliance, or the evaluation of disability
    30. History of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit
    31. Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or who plan to become pregnant within the timeframe of this study
    32. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Patients participating in a purely observational trial will not be excluded.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The primary efficacy endpoint of this prospective, randomized study is to determine differences between patients in the 2 treatment arms according to the following criteria:
    Study Part I:
    • Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA, as defined per protocol) during a 2 year (96 week) period.

    Study Part II:
    • Proportion of patients with NEDA (as defined per protocol) during a 5 year (240 week) period.

    NEDA is the absence of a protocol defined disease activity event.

    A protocol-defined disease activity event is the occurrence of at least one of the following:
    - A new T1 Gd-enhanced lesion on MRI of the brain and spinal cord
    - A new T2 hyperintense lesion on MRI of brain and spinal cord
    - A protocol-defined MS relapse (see below)
    - 24 week confirmed disability progression based on increases in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (see below and Appendix C)

    MS relapse is defined as an occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS, which must persist for greater than (>) 24 hours and should not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, adverse reactions to medications) and immediately preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for least 30 days.

    Disability progression is defined as an increase of one point in the EDSS score (or half a point if the baseline EDSS score was equal to 5.5), confirmed after 24 weeks, with an absence of relapse at the time of assessment. MRI imaging will be performed according to the Revised Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) MRI Protocol and Guidelines.

    Disability improvement is defined as a decrease of one point in the EDSS score, confirmed after 24 weeks, with an absence of relapse at the time of assessment. MRI imaging will be performed according to the Revised Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) MRI Protocol and Guidelines
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    For Study Part I: primary enpoint evaluation after 2 years (week 96).
    For Study Part II: primary endpoint evaluation after 5 years (week 240).
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    The secondary efficacy endpoints for this study are to evaluate the efficacy of the study treatments on the basis of the following endpoints:
    Study Part I:
    • Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %) during a 2 year (96 week) period4, with re-baseline for brain athrophy at 48 weeks.
    • Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event as defined in section 2.2
    • Change in EQ-5D-5L from baseline to Week 96
    • Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline to Week 96
    • Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 from baseline to Week 96
    • Change in EDSS from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Week 96
    • The proportion of patients who, at Week 96, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) , confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline
    • Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 96 weeks
    • Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse
    • Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to Weeks 48 and 96
    • Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to Weeks 48 and 96
    • Change in brain volume from re-baseline at week 48, to week 96
    • Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion
    • Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions at weeks 24, 48, 96
    • Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions at weeks 24, 48, 96
    • Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to week 48, 96
    • Change in Timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) score from baseline to week 48, 96
    • Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to week 96
    • Overall survival rate at week 96
    • Work productivity and activity impairment at week 96

    Study Part II:
    • Proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity, including atrophy (NEDA 4), as per protocol defined disease activity events (as defined in section 2.2) plus atrophy (measured yearly atrophy above threshold of 0, 4 %) during a 5 year (240 week) period4, with re-baseline for brain athrophy at 48 weeks.
    • Time to first protocol-defined disease activity event as defined in section 2.2
    • Change in EQ-5D-5L from baseline to Week 240
    • Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline to Week 240
    • Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 from baseline to Week 240
    • Change in EDSS from baseline (Visit 4.1) to Week 240
    • The proportion of patients who, at Week 240, have protocol-defined Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI), confirmed stable EDSS or Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) compared to baseline
    • Annualized rate of protocol-defined relapses during 240 weeks from start of study treatment
    • Time to onset of first protocol-defined relapse from start of study treatment
    • Change in MRI T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volume from baseline to Week 144, 192 and 240
    • Change in MRI T1-weighted hypointense lesion volume from baseline to Week 144, 192 and 240
    • Change in brain volume from re-baseline at week 48, to Week 144, 192 and 2404
    • Time to detection of a new MRI T2 lesion
    • Total number of MRI T1-weighted Gd-enhanced lesions at Week 240
    • Proportion of patients free from T1 Gd-enhancing lesions at Week 240
    • Change in Nine-hole-peg test (9-HPT) score from baseline to Week 240
    • Change in Timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) score from baseline to Week 240
    • Change in The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) score from baseline to Week 240
    • Overall survival rate at Week 240
    • Work productivity and activity impairment at Week 144, 192 and 240
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    For Study Part I seconday endpoints will be evaluated 6 months (week 24), 1 year (week 48) and 2 years (week 96) after start of treatment.
    For Study Part II seconday endpoints will be evaluated 3 (week 144), 4 (week 192) and 5 years (week 240) after start of treatment .
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others Yes
    E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
    During the course of the study additional samples of serum, plasma, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, sperm, and stool will be collected and stored in a Biobank for future research.
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    alemtuzumab, cladribine and ocrelizumab
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned1
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA8
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last visit completed by last patient 2 years after Visit 4.1 (treatment day 0). For the planned study extension this will be 5 years after Visit 4.1 (treatment day 0).
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years10
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months0
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years10
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 100
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state15
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 100
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 100
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2018-05-01
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2018-06-27
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 07:53:23 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA