Clinical Trial Results:
Efficacy and Safety of Bilateral Intravitreal Injection of GS010: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Subjects Affected with G11778A ND4 Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy for Up to One Year
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2017-002187-40 |
Trial protocol |
BE FR GB ES NL IT |
Global end of trial date |
23 Jul 2024
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
05 Mar 2026
|
First version publication date |
05 Mar 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
GS-LHON-CLIN-05
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT03293524 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
GenSight Biologics
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
74 Rue de Faubourg Saint Antoine, Paris, France, 75012
|
||
Public contact |
VP Regulatory Affairs , GenSight Biologics, 33 176217233, schekroun@gensight-biologics.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Chief Medical Officer, GenSight Biologics, 33 176217233, mtaiel@gensight-biologics.com
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
06 Nov 2025
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
23 Jul 2024
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Jul 2024
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the efficacy of intravitreal GS010 compared to placebo intravitreal injection in second affected/not yet affected eyes, at 1.5-Year post-treatment, utilizing the change from baseline of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) reported with the Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR), in ND4 LHON subjects with vision loss up to one year.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki (7th revision, 2013) with the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) according to the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guideline (ICH E6 [R2]), as well as with applicable regulatory requirements.
|
||
Background therapy |
There were restrictions on the use of concomitant medications during the trial. The following medications were not permitted: IVT drug delivery to any eye within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit, and use of idebenone that was not completely discontinued at least 7 days prior to Visit 2 (Inclusion Visit). | ||
Evidence for comparator |
No gene therapy product had been approved for the treatment of LHON at the time of the study conduct. This study included a treatment arm (Treatment Arm 2) in which each subject received IVT lenadogene nolparvovec in their first-affected eye and a placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Mar 2018
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety, Efficacy | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
5 Years | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Taiwan: 15
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 56
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
98
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
19
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
10
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
86
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
2
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
108 patients (>=15 years old) were screened for eligibility in 13 sites (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom: 1 site each, and the United States: 7 sites). Of these, 98 were randomized: 48 to treatment arm 1 (GS010-GS010) and 50 to treatment arm 2 (GS010-placebo). The remaining 10 subjects were screen failures. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
108 patients with the G11778A mitochondrial point mutation in the ND4 gene and vision loss of up to 1 year in one or both eyes were screened. Screening failures (10) including patients who did not meet inclusion criteria or met exclusion criteria | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Study treatments were masked and the allocation to treatment groups was not known to the investigator or other persons involved in the conduct of the study, except the site pharmacies personnel to allow for preparation of investigational products before administration, in cases of emergencies and the data safety monitoring board (DSMB). To ensure that the double-masking design of the study was maintained, GS010 and placebo were identical in appearance and storage conditions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
GS010-GS010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
GS010/GS010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GS010/GS010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Lenadogene nolparvovec
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravitreal use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received IVT lenadogene nolparvovec in both eyes at a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in 90 microL for each eye. Treatment could be performed either on a single day (1 IVT injection in each eye on Day 0) or on 2 consecutive days (1st IVT injection on Day -1 and 2nd IVT injection on Day 0)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
GS010-Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravitreal use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received IVT lenadogene nolparvovec in their first-affected eye (ddPCR dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in a volume of 90 microL) and placebo IVT injection (volume of 90 microL) in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
GS010-GS010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
GS010-GS010
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | ||
Reporting group title |
GS010-Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Intent-to-treat population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The intent-to-treat analysis (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects. The analyses were based on the planned treatment (as randomized).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The safety population was defined as those patients who received study drug (GS010 or Placebo) in at least one eye. Patients were classified according to treatment actually received.
|
||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) reported with LogMAR at 1.5 years post-treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 1.5 year post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) reported with LogMAR at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-GS010 v GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
98
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.608 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.05
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.25 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.15 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.101
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline of the BCVA reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-GS010 v GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
98
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.5086 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.07
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.3 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.15 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.112
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Proportion of patients who switched from off-chart eyes to on-chart eyes at 5 years post-treatment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Proportion of patients with both eyes off-chart, defined as those patients unable to read letter on the ETDRS chart, who had at least one eye on-chart, defined as those patients able to read letters on the ETDRS chart (at either 4 meters or 1 meter) at 5 years
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From baseline to 5 years post-treatment
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Responder analyses - Improvements from nadir (gainer eyes) at 5 years | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Proportion of patients with an improvement of at least -0.3 LogMAR (>= +15 ETDRS letters) from nadir to year 5 in at least one eye. Nadir was defined for each eye of each subject as the worst value observed from baseline to year 5
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From nadir to 5 years post-treatment
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-GS010 v GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
98
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.7605 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.1
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.5 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Responder analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery from nadir at 5 years | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Proportion of patients with clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir that was defined as patient with a CRR in at least one eye - Patient with at least one eye which was on chart at nadir, and which had an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMAR from nadir, or which was off-chart at nadir but became on-chart
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From nadir to 5 years post-treatment
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-Placebo v GS010-GS010
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
98
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1352 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.9
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.8 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Responder analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 years | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Proportion of patients who had clinically relevant stabilization (CRS), defined as eyes with LogMAR BCVA <1 at baseline and at 5 years post-treatment or had a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From baseline to 5 years post-treatment
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-GS010 v GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
98
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1995 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.7 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Quality of life questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Change from baseline to 5 years follow up in the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Treatment contrast | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
GS010-GS010 v GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
75
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3605 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From the time of the ICF was signed throughout the completion of the study follow-up (Year 5)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Patients were expected to volunteer information about adverse events that they experienced. In addition, the investigator or designee questioned the patient at each visit about adverse events and recorded these as well as other adverse events at the visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
GS010-GS010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye. This population took into account the study treatment actually received by the patients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
GS010-Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet affected-eye. Patients in this group took into account the study treatment actually received by the patients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
07 Aug 2017 |
Amendment number 2, dated 25 September 2017 reiterates the changes made in amendment 1. Main change included the modification of the population used for the primary efficacy analysis from the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) to the ITT population requested by the FDA |
||
16 Jul 2019 |
Main changes included the updated of the primary efficacy timepoint which was extended from Year 1 (Week 52) to Year 1.5 (Week 78) based on preliminary results of the study, and addition of quality of life assessments (VFQ-25 and SF-36v2) at Visit 12 (Year 1.5) |
||
23 Dec 2019 |
Main change included the extension of the follow-up period from 2 years to 5 years |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
| None reported | |||