Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44156   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7326   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2017-002527-21
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:AMYPAD-01
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2018-06-11
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2017-002527-21
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Multicentre, Open-label, Randomised Study to Assess the Diagnostic Value of Amyloid PET Imaging in Patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or Dementia Where Alzheimer’s Disease is in the Differential Diagnosis
    Estudio multicéntrico, abierto, aleatorizado para determinar el valor diagnóstico de la imagen PET de amiloide en pacientes con declive cognitivo subjetivo plus, deterioro cognitivo leve, o demencia donde la enfermedad de Alzheimer está en el diagnóstico diferencial
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Diagnostic and Patient Management Study
    Estudio de diagnóstico y tratamiento del paciente
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    DPMS
    DPMS
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberAMYPAD-01
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorUniversity of Geneva
    B.1.3.4CountrySwitzerland
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportInnovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking
    B.4.2CountryBelgium
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportEFPIA (Janssen Pharmaceutical)
    B.4.2CountryBelgium
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportEFPIA (Piramal Imaging)
    B.4.2CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportEFPIA (GE Healthcare)
    B.4.2CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportSECRETARIAT D'ETAT A LA FORMATION A LA RECHERCHE ET A L'INNOVATION (SEFRI)
    B.4.2CountrySwitzerland
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationUniversity of Geneva
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointLANVIE
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressChemin du Petit-Bel-Air 2
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityChêne Bourg
    B.5.3.3Post code1225
    B.5.3.4CountrySwitzerland
    B.5.4Telephone number00412230 54758
    B.5.6E-mailgiovanni.frisoni@gmail.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name VIZAMYL
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderGE Healthcare Limited
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameVizamyl
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Neuraceq
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderPiramal Imaging Limited
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameNeuraceq
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Alzheimer's disease
    Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus
    Enfermedad de Alzheimer
    Deterioro Cognitivo Leve
    Declive Cognitivo Subjetivo Plus
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive disorder and it is the most common cause of cognitive impairment and dementia.
    La Enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) es un trastorno progresivo y es la causa más común de deterioro cognitivo y demencia.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Diagnosis [E01]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To test the hypothesis that the proportion of subjects for whom the managing physician reaches an aetiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%) at 12 weeks after baseline is higher for subjects who underwent amyloid PET imaging shortly after baseline than for subjects who have not yet undergone amyloid PET imaging (ie, subjects scheduled to undergo amyloid PET imaging at 8 months [±8 weeks] after baseline).
    Evaluar la hipótesis de que la proporción de participantes a los que el médico encargado asigna un diagnóstico etiológico con una confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %) a las 12 semanas después de la visita basal es mayor en los participantes que se sometieron a imágenes PET de amiloide poco después de la visita basal que para los participantes que aún no se han sometido a imágenes PET de amiloide (es decir, los participantes que tienen programado someterse a la prueba de imágenes PET de amiloide a los 8 meses [± 8 semanas] después de la visita basal).
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    1) To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on Diagnosis and confidence (Time to communicate to the patient an aetiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%); Changes in the managing physician’s aetiologic diagnosis and diagnostic confidence over time; and the managing physician’s estimate of the likelihood that the patient’s symptoms are due to AD.
    2) To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on diagnostic and patient management, including: change or early adoption of programs and pharmacologic treatments aimed to delay the onset or progression of cognitive impairment; and Use of medical resources.
    3) To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on:
    • Patient-related outcomes (cognition, anxiety, depression, coping skills, and quality of life)
    • Cost of diagnostic workup to the aetiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%)
    • Number of patients who are discharged from the memory centre and the reason for discharge
    4) Imaging results assessment
    1) Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en el diagnóstico y confianza diagnóstica (Tiempo para comunicar al paciente un diagnóstico etiológico con una confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %); Cambios en el manejo del diagnóstico etiológico y en la confianza diagnóstica a lo largo del tiempo; y estimación de la probabilidad de que los síntomas del paciente se deban a la EA.
    2) Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en el manejo de los pacientes, incluyendo: cambio o adopción temprana de programas y tratamientos farmacológicos con el objetivo de retrasar la aparición o la progresión del deterioro cognitivo; y uso de recursos médicos.
    3) Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en:
    • Resultados relacionados con los pacientes
    • Coste de las pruebas diagnósticas para el diagnóstico etiológico con confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %).
    • Número de pacientes a los que se ha dado el alta en el centro de memoria y motivo del alta.
    4) Evaluación de los resultados de las imágenes
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    • The patient can be male or female and of any race or ethnicity.
    • The patient must be 60 to 85 years of age (for patients with SCD-Plus) or 50 to 85 years of age (for patients with MCI or with dementia where AD is in the differential diagnosis).
    • The patient must have a complaint (reported by the patient or by a caregiver) of cognitive problems that are considered by the managing physician to be possibly due to AD.
    o The patient must be entering a diagnostic assessment for the cognitive complaint.
    o The patient’s managing physician at the memory clinic must feel that knowledge of the patient’s brain amyloid status may increase diagnostic confidence and alter diagnosis and management.
    o In some centres, the patient may receive diagnostic workup before being screened for this study. These patients can be enrolled in the study; however, if they are assigned to the Early Amyloid PET Imaging arm, the results of that workup must not be made available to the managing physician before the managing physician reviews the results of the amyloid PET scan.
    • The patient must satisfy the diagnostic criteria for one of the following:
    o SCD-Plus
    o MCI
    o Dementia, where AD is in the differential diagnosis
    • The patient has an MRI and/or CT scan that excludes an intracranial mass or other lesion(s) that could explain cognitive impairment.
    • The patient can complete all clinical visits according to the protocol.
    • The patient can tolerate a 20-minute amyloid PET scan.
    • The patient (or a legally acceptable representative, for patients with dementia) provides informed consent for study participation and data source verification.
    • If the patient has dementia, he or she has a study partner willing and able to accompany him or her to all visits for the duration of the protocol
    • El paciente puede ser de cualquier sexo, raza u origen étnico.
    • Los pacientes deben tener entre 60 y 85 años de edad (para paciente con DCS Plus) o entre 50 y 85 años de edad (para pacientes con DCL o demencia).
    • El paciente debe tener una queja (notificada por el paciente o por un cuidador) de problemas cognitivos que hayan sido considerados por el médico encargado como posiblemente debidos a la EA.
    o El paciente debe entrar en una evaluación diagnóstica de la queja cognitiva.
    o El médico encargado debe comprender que el conocimiento del estado de amiloide puede aumentar la confianza diagnóstica o alterar el diagnóstico y la gestión.
    o En algunos centros, el paciente puede recibir una prueba diagnóstica antes de ser seleccionado para este estudio. Estos pacientes se pueden incluir en el estudio; no obstante, si se les asigna al grupo de PET de amiloide temprano, los resultados del estudio de diagnóstico no se deben poner a disponibilidad del médico encargado antes de que el mismo revise los resultados de la prueba de PET de amiloide.
    • El paciente debe satisfacer los criterios diagnósticos de uno de los siguientes:
    o DCS plus
    o DCL
    o Demencia donde EA está en el diagnóstico diferencial
    • El paciente presenta una RM o una TC (siempre con una antigüedad inferior a 12 meses) o se someterá a una antes de la PET de amiloide.
    • El paciente puede completar todas las visitas clínicas de acuerdo con el protocolo.
    • El paciente puede tolerar una PET de amiloide de 20 minutos.
    • El paciente (o representante legal para pacientes con demencia) proporciona su consentimiento informado para la participación en el estudio y verificación de la fuente de datos.
    • Si el paciente padece demencia, un compañero de estudio estará disponible durante todo el protocolo.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Subjects must be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any of the following criteria:
    • The patient has another confirmed condition that can fully account for the cognitive impairment (neuroinflammatory, neuroinfective, or neurodegenerative disease; multiple sclerosis; genetic disorders; HIV; brain injuries; neurosurgery aftereffects; major depressive episode; schizoaffective disorder; delusional disorder; delirium)
    • The patient came to observation of the memory clinic for reasons other than diagnosis (disability assessment for social aids, cognitive assessment for driving license, etc.)
    • The patient had a previous beta-amyloid imaging scan and/or has had other diagnostic workup (fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET and/or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] analysis) for a cognitive complaint prior to the screening. (In some centres, the patient may receive a diagnostic workup before the screening for this study. These patients can be enrolled in the study only if the investigator is blinded to the results of those tests until after randomization. For subjects assigned to the Early Amyloid PET Imaging arm, the managing physician will be blinded to the results of those tests until he or she has reviewed the results of the amyloid PET imaging.
    • The patient has any life-threatening unstable medical disease or psychiatric condition that could lead to difficulty in complying with the protocol.
    • The patient is currently receiving an investigational pharmaceutical product or has participated in a clinical trial with an investigational pharmaceutical product within 30 days prior to screening, and/or was administered a radiopharmaceutical within 10 radioactive half-lives prior to study drug administration in this study.
    • The patient is a woman who is pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating.
    Se debe excluir a los pacientes si cumplen alguno de los siguientes criterios:
    • El paciente tiene otra afección confirmada que puede ser la causa total del deterioro cognitivo (enfermedad neuroinflamatoria, neuroinfecciosa o neurodegenerativa; esclerosis múltiple; trastornos genéticos; VIH; lesiones cerebrales; secuelas de neurocirugía; episodio de depresión mayor; trastorno esquizoafectivo; trastorno delirante; delirio).
    • El paciente acude a la observación por motivos diferentes al diagnóstico (evaluación de incapacidad para ayudas sociales, evaluación cognitiva para el permiso de conducir, etc.).
    • El paciente se ha sometido a una prueba de imágenes beta-amiloide anterior o se ha sometido a otro estudio de diagnóstico de biomarcadores de EA (análisis de fluorodesoxiglucosa [FDG]-PET o de líquido cefalorraquídeo [LCR]) antes de la selección. En algunos centros, el paciente puede recibir un estudio de diagnóstico antes de la selección. Se puede incluir a estos pacientes si los resultados están enmascarados para el investigador hasta después de la aleatorización o hasta después de revisar los resultados de la imagen PET de amiloide.
    • El paciente tiene una enfermedad médica potencialmente mortal o inestable, o una afección psiquiátrica que podría crear dificultad para cumplir el protocolo.
    • El paciente se encuentra actualmente recibiendo un fármaco en investigación o ha participado en un ensayo clínico con un fármaco en investigación en el plazo de 30 días anteriores a la selección o se le ha administrado un radiofármaco dentro de 10 semividas radioactivas antes de la administración del fármaco del estudio en el estudio.
    • La paciente es una mujer que está embarazada, planea quedarse embarazada o está en periodo de lactancia.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The difference, at 12 weeks after baseline, between the Early Amyloid PET Imaging arm and the Late Amyloid PET Imaging arm in the proportion of patients for whom the managing physician has made an aetiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%). Diagnostic confidence, which is the managing physician’s confidence that the diagnosis is correct, will be measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (full confidence).
    La diferencia, a 12 semanas después de la visita basal, entre el grupo de PET de amiloide temprano y el grupo de PET de amiloide tardío en la proporción de pacientes para los que el médico encargado ha realizado un diagnóstico etiológico con una confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %). La confianza diagnóstica se medirá con una escala visual analógica (EVA) que oscila de 0 % (sin confianza) a 100 % (confianza completa).
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    At 12 weeks after Baseline
    A las 12 semanas desde la visita basal
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Diagnosis and Diagnostic Confidence
    To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on diagnosis-related metrics:
    • Time to communicate to the patient an etiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%)
    • Changes in the managing physician’s etiologic diagnosis over time.
    • Changes in the managing physician’s diagnostic confidence over time.
    • The managing physician’s estimate of the likelihood that the patient’s symptoms are due to AD.
    • How the placement of amyloid PET imaging in the clinical workup, when the managing physician is given free choice, changes over time.

    Diagnostic/Therapeutic Management
    To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on patient management:
    • Number of patients randomised to disease-modifying drug (DMD) or any other AD clinical trial at 6 months from baseline
    • Change or early adoption of programs and/or pharmacologic treatments aimed to delay the onset or progression of cognitive impairment
    • Use of medical resources (including but not limited to diagnostic procedures, tests, programs, visits, and hospitalisations)
    Health Economics and Patient-Centred Outcomes
    To assess the impact of amyloid PET imaging on:
    • Patient-related outcomes (cognition, anxiety, depression, coping skills, and quality of life)
    • Cost of diagnostic workup to the etiologic diagnosis with very high confidence (≥90%)
    • Number of patients who are discharged from the memory centre and the reason for discharge
    Imaging results assessment
    • To test the hypothesis that amyloid load is stable over 18 months.
    • To develop standardised methods of image quantitation across the PET tracers in order to allow pooled analysis across the AMYPAD program.
    Diagnóstico y confianza diagnóstica
    Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en las métricas relacionadas con el diagnóstico:
    • Tiempo para comunicar al paciente un diagnóstico etiológico con una confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %)
    • Cambios en el manejo del diagnóstico etiológico del médico encargado a lo largo del tiempo.
    • Cambios en la confianza diagnóstica del médico encargado a lo largo del tiempo.
    • Estimación de la probabilidad del médico encargado de que los síntomas del paciente se deban a la EA
    • Cambios a lo largo del tiempo de la asignación de la imagen PET de amiloide en el diagnóstico clínico, cuando se da al médico encargado libre elección.

    Manejo diagnóstico/terapéutico
    Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en el manejo de los pacientes:
    • Número de pacientes aleatorizados a un fármaco modificador de la enfermedad (FME) o cualquier otro ensayo clínico de EA a los 6 meses desde la visita basal.
    • Cambio o adopción temprana de programas y/o tratamientos farmacológicos con el objetivo de retrasar la aparición o la progresión del deterioro cognitivo.
    • Uso de recursos médicos (incluidos entre otros los procedimientos diagnósticos, pruebas, programas, visitas y hospitalizaciones).

    Economía sanitaria y resultados centrados en los pacientes
    Evaluar el impacto de la imagen PET de amiloide en:
    • Resultados relacionados con los pacientes (cognición, ansiedad, depresión, habilidades de afrontamiento y calidad de vida).
    • Coste de las pruebas diagnósticas para el diagnóstico etiológico con confianza muy alta (≥ 90 %).
    • Número de pacientes a los que se ha dado el alta en el centro de memoria y motivo del alta.

    Evaluación de los resultados de las imágenes
    • Evaluar la hipótesis de que la carga amiloide es estable durante 18 meses.
    • Desarrollar métodos normalizados de cuantificación de imágenes en los trazadores de PET para permitir un análisis agrupado en todo el programa AMYPAD.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    The timepoints are defined as follows: T0 = baseline, T1 = 12 weeks after T0, T2 = 6 months (±14 days) after T0, T3 = 13 months (±4 weeks) after T0; T4 = ≤28 days after the second scan, which will be approximately 18 months after T0. (All time points are calculated relative to baseline.)
    Los tiempos se definen del siguiente modo: T0 = basal, T1 = 12 semanas después del T0, T2 = 6 meses (± 14 días) después del T0, T3 = 13 meses (± 4 semanas) después del T0; T4 = ≤ 28 días después de la segunda prueba, que será de 18 meses después del T0. (Todos los momentos se calculan en comparación con la visita basal).
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis Yes
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety No
    E.6.5Efficacy No
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled No
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial3
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA7
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    European Union
    Switzerland
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months0
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 250
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 650
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally Yes
    F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
    Patients with dementia may be unable to give consent. In this case, a legally acceptable representative, for patients with dementia, has to provide informed consent
    Los pacientes con demencia pueden ser incapaces de dar su consentimiento. En este caso, un representante legalmente aceptable, para pacientes con demencia, tiene que dar su consentimiento informado
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state112
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 784
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 900
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    Ninguno
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Stichting VUmc
    G.4.3.4Network Country Netherlands
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 2
    G.4.1Name of Organisation The University of Edinburgh
    G.4.3.4Network Country United Kingdom
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 3
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Barcelonabeta Brain Research Center
    G.4.3.4Network Country Spain
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 4
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Karolinska Institutet
    G.4.3.4Network Country Sweden
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 5
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    G.4.3.4Network Country France
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 6
    G.4.1Name of Organisation University College London
    G.4.3.4Network Country United Kingdom
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 7
    G.4.1Name of Organisation University Hospital of Cologne
    G.4.3.4Network Country Germany
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 8
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Stichting Katholieke Universiteit
    G.4.3.4Network Country Netherlands
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 9
    G.4.1Name of Organisation CONSULTATION DE LA MEMOIRE
    G.4.3.4Network Country Switzerland
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2018-07-24
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2018-07-19
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA