Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43883   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7296   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Double blind placebo controlled randomized intervention study to validate the beneficial effect of hydrocortisone on dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral side effects in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2017-002738-22
    Trial protocol
    NL  
    Global end of trial date
    27 Mar 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    07 Sep 2022
    First version publication date
    07 Sep 2022
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Reason for late posting of results

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    62388
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    Netherlands Trial Register: NL6507 (NTR6695)
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
    Sponsor organisation address
    Heidelberglaan 25, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CS
    Public contact
    M.M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 31 08809727007, m.m.vandenheuvel-eibrink@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl
    Scientific contact
    M.M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 31 08809727007, m.m.vandenheuvel-eibrink@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    09 Apr 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    25 Nov 2020
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    27 Mar 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To validate that addition of physiological doses of hydrocortisone to standard dexamethasone treatment reduces side effects in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients who suffer from clinically relevant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The risk-benefit analysis for this study showed a favorable risk profile. The IMP that was studied is hydrocortisone, given in a physiological dose, NOT in a pharmacological dose. No side effects were expected in this physiological dose. In addition, we previously performed preclinical in vitro and ex vivo studies to prove that adding hydrocortisone to treatment will not have any negative effects on the efficacy of dexamethasone and prednisone regarding cytotoxicity on leukemic cells. Since we did not expect major risks, we did not install a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) for this study. Safety assessments consisted of collecting all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), with their severity and relationship to study drug. This included the regular assessment of the patient's physical condition and performance status.
    Background therapy
    This study is a double blind placebo controlled randomized trial with cross-over design. Patients are included if they experience clinically significant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems. These patients received the IMP (hydrocortisone) or placebo during 4 periods of a 5-day dexamethasone treatment during maintenance therapy. All children were randomized to either start with dexamethasone + IMP or dexamethasone + placebo. After two courses (with a washout period of 2 weeks and 2 days between each period) cross over took place. The IMP was hydrocortisone suspension, given orally in a physiological dose of 10 mg/m2/day. Patients used the hydrocortisone solution (1mg/ml) or placebo (equal in appearance and taste) 3 times per day in a 5:3:2 ratio (circadian rhythm). Timing of intake: first dose after awakening. Second dose between 12am and 1pm, the third dose between 6pm and 8 pm. 52 patients were randomized to answer our primary objective. However, in total 105 patients were included in our trial to be able answer our secondary objectives as well.
    Evidence for comparator
    NA
    Actual start date of recruitment
    17 May 2018
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 105
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    105
    EEA total number of subjects
    105
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    90
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    15
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Recruitment took place between 17 May 2018 (first inclusion) and 27 March 2021 (last patient last visit) in the Princess Máxima Center in Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    164 out of 278 ALL patients were eligible. 106 gave informed consent, 1 patient entered twice. 58 refused for these reasons: - Burden/effort n=17 - No time n=10 - Few side effects: n=10 - Child refuses: n=5 - Too many studies n=3 - Not interested n=5 - Other n=5 - Unknown n=3 Of the 105 unique patients, 52 were included in our RCT.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Baseline measurement
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Blinding was only used in the RCT (the period after baseline measurement)

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Start hydrocortisone
    Arm description
    Patients who started with hydrocortisone during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of hydrocortisone, cross over to placebo took place.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Hydrocortisone
    Investigational medicinal product code
    H02AB09 (CAS 50-23-7)
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/m2/day. Patients used hydrocortisone (1mg/ml) 3 times per day in a circadian rhythm: 5 mg/m2 in the morning, 3 mg/m2 in the afternoon and 2 mg/m2 in the evening.

    Arm title
    Start placebo
    Arm description
    Patients who started with placebo during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of placebo, cross over to hydrocortisone took place.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    NA
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/m2/day. Patients used the placebo in exactly the same way as the IMP: 5 mg/m2 in de morning, 3 mg/m2 in the afternoon and 2 mg/m2 in the evening.

    Arm title
    No intervention
    Arm description
    Patients who did not have clinically significant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems (defined as a rise of 5 or more point on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Score after 5 days of dexamethasone treatment) did not enter the randomized controlled trial. Also patients who only completed the baseline (dexamethasone-only) measurements after our RCT closed.
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Start hydrocortisone Start placebo No intervention
    Started
    26
    26
    53
    Completed
    26
    26
    53
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Randomized Controlled Trial (n=52)
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients were allocated to start with hydrocortisone or placebo using the method of a prefixed randomization list. This randomization list was prepared by the Princess Maxima Center pharmacy, independent of the clinical investigators. Both the IMP (hydrocortisone) and placebo were produced by the A15 pharmacy and distributed through the Princess Maxima Center pharmacy.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Hydrocortisone
    Arm description
    All patients in the RCT received two courses of hydrocortisone (cross-over design).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Hydrocortisone
    Investigational medicinal product code
    H02AB09 (CAS 50-23-7)
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/m2/day. Patients used hydrocortisone (1mg/ml) 3 times per day in a circadian rhythm: 5 mg/m2 in the morning, 3 mg/m2 in the afternoon and 2 mg/m2 in the evening.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    All patients in the RCT received two courses of placebo (cross-over design)
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    NA
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral solution in bottle
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    10 mg/m2/day. Patients used the placebo in exactly the same way as the IMP: 5 mg/m2 in de morning, 3 mg/m2 in the afternoon and 2 mg/m2 in the evening.

    Number of subjects in period 2 [1]
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Started
    52
    52
    Completed
    51
    52
    Not completed
    1
    0
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    1
    -
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period.
    Justification: After the baseline (first) period, only patients with clinically relevant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems were included in the subsequent period. Patients under the category 'no intervention' did not enter the RCT, therefore the number of subjects starting the RCT is not consistent with the total number completing the preceding period.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Start hydrocortisone
    Reporting group description
    Patients who started with hydrocortisone during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of hydrocortisone, cross over to placebo took place.

    Reporting group title
    Start placebo
    Reporting group description
    Patients who started with placebo during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of placebo, cross over to hydrocortisone took place.

    Reporting group title
    No intervention
    Reporting group description
    Patients who did not have clinically significant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems (defined as a rise of 5 or more point on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Score after 5 days of dexamethasone treatment) did not enter the randomized controlled trial. Also patients who only completed the baseline (dexamethasone-only) measurements after our RCT closed.

    Reporting group values
    Start hydrocortisone Start placebo No intervention Total
    Number of subjects
    26 26 53 105
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age continuous
    Age at start of the study
    Units: years
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    5.8 (4.1 to 9.1) 5.4 (4.1 to 8.0) 5.2 (4.0 to 10.5) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    7 13 21 41
        Male
    19 13 32 64
    ALL subtype
    Type of ALL
    Units: Subjects
        B-ALL
    25 21 48 94
        T-ALL
    1 5 5 11
    CNS-status
    Central nervous system involvement at diagnosis
    Units: Subjects
        CNS-1
    10 11 25 46
        CNS-2
    12 6 17 35
        CNS-3
    1 1 4 6
        TLP+
    2 6 5 13
        TLP-
    0 0 1 1
        Undetermined
    1 2 1 4
    Week maintenance
    Week of maintenance at start of the RCT
    Units: week
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    34 (25 to 44) 42 (27 to 53) 37 (23.5 to 47.5) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Start hydrocortisone
    Reporting group description
    Patients who started with hydrocortisone during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of hydrocortisone, cross over to placebo took place.

    Reporting group title
    Start placebo
    Reporting group description
    Patients who started with placebo during the RCT with cross-over design. After two courses of placebo, cross over to hydrocortisone took place.

    Reporting group title
    No intervention
    Reporting group description
    Patients who did not have clinically significant dexamethasone-induced neurobehavioral problems (defined as a rise of 5 or more point on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Score after 5 days of dexamethasone treatment) did not enter the randomized controlled trial. Also patients who only completed the baseline (dexamethasone-only) measurements after our RCT closed.
    Reporting group title
    Hydrocortisone
    Reporting group description
    All patients in the RCT received two courses of hydrocortisone (cross-over design).

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    All patients in the RCT received two courses of placebo (cross-over design)

    Primary: Neurobehavioral problems

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Neurobehavioral problems
    End point description
    To answer our primary aim, we used the Dutch version of the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This 25-item questionnaire assesses psychological adjustment of children and youths and provides five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity and inattention, peer relationship problems and prosocial behavior. The Total difficulties score is the sum of the first four subscale scores (i.e. without prosocial behavior). A higher SDQ Total difficulties score reflects more problems. Like in our previous and current study a change of ≥5 points was considered clinically relevant. The effect of hydrocortisone was assessed by comparing the difference in SDQ scores of intervention day one and day five (delta score) of two consecutive hydrocortisone periods with two consecutive placebo periods.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    51
    51
    Units: Points
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    5.0 (2.0 to 9.0)
    5.8 (3.0 to 9.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    102
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [1]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    -2.05
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -6
         upper limit
    1.9
    Notes
    [1] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 51 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 102 measurements.

    Secondary: Objective sleep problems

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Objective sleep problems
    End point description
    Children wore a wrist-worn actigraph (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, Pensacola, FL, USA) for seven consecutive days twice: once during hydrocortisone and once during placebo. The parent kept an additional sleep-diary to document bedtimes, time of awakening and removal periods. The Sadeh algorithm was used to generate sleep outcomes. Total sleep time is reported.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    39
    Units: min
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    512.0 ± 41.4
    504.2 ± 42.1
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    78
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [2]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    6.88
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -7.26
         upper limit
    21.01
    Notes
    [2] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 39 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 78 measurements.

    Secondary: Subjective sleep

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Subjective sleep
    End point description
    To assess subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbances, we used the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). This questionnaire contains 26 items and yields six subscales and a Total sleep score: a higher score reflects more problems. The effect of hydrocortisone was assessed by comparing the difference in SDSC scores of intervention day one and day five (delta score) of one hydrocortisone period with one placebo period.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    42
    Units: Points
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    3.5 (0.8 to 10.0)
    3.0 (1.0 to 8.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    84
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [3]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    -1.96
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -9.27
         upper limit
    5.35
    Notes
    [3] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 42 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 84 measurements.

    Secondary: Eating and hunger satiety

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Eating and hunger satiety
    End point description
    To measure dexamethasone induced eating and hunger satiety we used an Eating Thermometer (ET): a visual analogue scale to indicate hunger. The scale ranged from 0 (no hunger at all) to 10 (terrible hunger). The effect of hydrocortisone was assessed by comparing the difference in thermometer score of intervention day one and day five (delta score) of one hydrocortisone period with one placebo period.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    38
    38
    Units: Points
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    2 (1 to 4)
    2 (0.75 to 3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    76
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [4]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    1.25
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.1
         upper limit
    3.6
    Notes
    [4] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 38 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 76 measurements.

    Secondary: Quality of Life

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Quality of Life
    End point description
    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), a 21- (for toddlers) or 23-item questionnaire, was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A higher score reflects a better HRQoL in the child. The effect of hydrocortisone was assessed by comparing the difference in PedsQL scores of intervention day one and day five (delta score) of one hydrocortisone period with one placebo period.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    41
    Units: Points
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    -14.1 (-23.8 to -4.2)
    -15.2 (-25.6 to -7.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    82
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [5]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    3.25
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -13.69
         upper limit
    20.2
    Notes
    [5] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 41 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 82 measurements.

    Secondary: Parental distress

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Parental distress
    End point description
    We used the Distress Thermometer for parents (DT-P) to assess parental distress.21 Parents were asked to rate their overall distress from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). The effect of hydrocortisone was assessed by comparing the difference in DT-P scores of intervention day one and day five (delta score) of one hydrocortisone period with one placebo period.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Measurement for the RCT (n=52) took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    End point values
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    40
    Units: Points
        median (inter-quartile range (Q1-Q3))
    2 (1 to 4)
    2 (1 to 4)
    Statistical analysis title
    Repeated measurement analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Due to the presence of repeated measures in our study design, a generalized mixed model was estimated to study the effect of therapy on all outcomes. Age, sex, start group (hydrocortisone/placebo), week of maintenance treatment, concomitant asparaginase treatment (yes/no), whether mother or father completed the questionnaire and an interaction term between intervention and time (maintenance week) were included in the models.
    Comparison groups
    Hydrocortisone v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    80
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [6]
    Method
    Parameter type
    estimated effect
    Point estimate
    0.62
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.23
         upper limit
    3.46
    Notes
    [6] - Due to the cross-over design, hydrocortisone and placebo could be compared within patients in a repeated measurement model. We only included 40 patients in our analyses, but these patients had 80 measurements.

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse event reporting took place between May 17, 2018 and August 5, 2020.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    5
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Hydrocortisone
    Reporting group description
    Adverse events of 51 patients during hydrocortisone treatment

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Adverse events of 52 patients during placebo treatment

    Serious adverse events
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 51 (3.92%)
    1 / 52 (1.92%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fever
    Additional description: Fever and (prolongation of) hospitalization. Once during placebo course and two times between treatment courses, not related to study medication.
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 51 (0.00%)
    1 / 52 (1.92%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Febrile neutropenia
    Additional description: (Prolongation of) hospitalization between treatment courses, not related to study medication.
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 51 (1.96%)
    1 / 52 (1.92%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Psychosis
    Additional description: Other medically important condition in one patient during hydrocortisone treatment
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 51 (1.96%)
    0 / 52 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthritis
    Additional description: (Prolongation of) hospitalization. During hydrocortisone course but unlikely related to study medication.
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 51 (1.96%)
    0 / 52 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Device related infection
    Additional description: (Prolongation of) hospitalization. SAE between courses, not related to study medication.
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 51 (1.96%)
    0 / 52 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Hydrocortisone Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    22 / 51 (43.14%)
    22 / 52 (42.31%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 51 (7.84%)
    5 / 52 (9.62%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 51 (41.18%)
    19 / 52 (36.54%)
         occurrences all number
    21
    19
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 51 (39.22%)
    20 / 52 (38.46%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    20
    Fever
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 51 (3.92%)
    3 / 52 (5.77%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    3
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 51 (21.57%)
    10 / 52 (19.23%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    10
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 51 (17.65%)
    9 / 52 (17.31%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    9
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 51 (7.84%)
    6 / 52 (11.54%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 51 (0.00%)
    3 / 52 (5.77%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 51 (11.76%)
    7 / 52 (13.46%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    7
    Psychiatric disorders
    Agitation
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 51 (13.73%)
    6 / 52 (11.54%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    6
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 51 (5.88%)
    0 / 52 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    16 Apr 2018
    Addition of several laboratory measurements in blood. Modification of number and timing of blood sampling. Addition of the 'time to rise from the floor' test. Addition of an alternative bioelectrical impedance analysis device.
    18 Feb 2019
    Addition of two exclusion criteria. Addition of muscle strength measurement. Possibility to start during concomittant asparaginase treatment. Possibility to visit patients at home.
    28 Sep 2020
    Continuation of the study after closure of the RCT to answer secondary research questions. Addition of short sarcopenia questionnaire. Addition of measurement from residual blood.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue May 21 09:11:39 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA