Clinical Trial Results:
Clinical Evaluation of 0.1% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Pediatric Patients
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2017-003841-39 |
Trial protocol |
Outside EU/EEA |
Global end of trial date |
04 Jul 2011
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
24 Jan 2018
|
First version publication date |
24 Jan 2018
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
JPN-P-2010-1
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01109485 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Alcon Research, Japan
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
6201 S. Freeway, Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76134
|
||
Public contact |
Ophthalmology Unit, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, +44 01276 6673 3391, dennis.wong@novartis.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Ophthalmology Unit, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, +44 01276 6673 3391, dennis.wong@novartis.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Jul 2011
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Jul 2011
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Jul 2011
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of Olopatadine Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% in Japanese children with allergic conjunctivitis.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Prior to the start of the study, the study protocol, the informed consent and assent documents, patient instruction sheets, the Investigator’s Brochure, as well as any advertising materials used to recruit patients were submitted to institutional review boards (IRBs) and independent ethics committees (IECs). The IRB/IECs reviewed all documents and approved required documents; copies of the approval letters were provided to Alcon. Consistent with both the IRB/IEC’s requirements and all applicable regulations, the Investigators periodically provided study updates to the IRB/IEC. A patient or parent/legal guardian (if necessary, a legally authorized representative) provided informed consent, and children signed an approved assent form when appropriate. This study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practices (GCP) and the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
27 Feb 2010
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Japan: 70
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
70
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
51
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
19
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Subjects were recruited from 2 study centers located in Japan. | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
This reporting group includes all enrolled and randomized subjects (70). | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Olopatadine | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1-2 drops q.i.d. (4 times per day:, morning, afternoon, evening, and at bedtime) for 4 weeks | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
Patanol
|
||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Eye drops, solution
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Ophthalmic use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1-2 drops QID (morning, afternoon, evening, and at bedtime) for 4 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Olopatadine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1-2 drops q.i.d. (4 times per day:, morning, afternoon, evening, and at bedtime) for 4 weeks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Olopatadine
|
||
Reporting group description |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1-2 drops q.i.d. (4 times per day:, morning, afternoon, evening, and at bedtime) for 4 weeks | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Efficacy Analysis Set at Baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Week 1
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Efficacy Analysis Set at Week 1
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Week 2
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Efficacy Analysis Set at Week 2
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Week 4
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Efficacy Analysis Set at Week 4
|
|
|||||||
End point title |
Number of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) [1] | ||||||
End point description |
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product (IP), whether or not considered related to the investigational product. Of the AEs reported, all cases judged as having a possible causal relationship to the investigational product (IP) qualified as ADRs. This analysis population includes all subjects exposed to IP (Safety Analysis Set).
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Up through Week 4
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No formal statistical analysis was planned or conducted for this primary endpoint. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Severity Score of Subjective Symptoms by Visit [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The severity score of subjective symptoms (eye pruritus, foreign body sensation in eyes, eye pain, lacrimation, photophobia, and eye discharge) was assessed by interviewing subjects at scheduled visits. Each symptom was rated on a scale of 0-3, where 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe. This analysis population includes all treated subjects with a follow-up period of four weeks (Efficacy Analysis Set).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was a one-arm descriptive study; no hypothesis testing was performed. Descriptive statistics were provided. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Efficacy Analysis Set, n=42, 42, 42, 41, 42, 41 [4] - Efficacy Analysis Set, n=38, 38, 38, 37, 38, 37 [5] - Efficacy Analysis Set [6] - Efficacy Analysis Set, n=41, 41, 41, 42, 41, 41 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Severity Score of Objective Symptoms by Visit [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The severity score of objective symptoms (conjunctival hyperaemia, conjunctival swelling, conjunctival follicles, conjunctival papillae, conjunctival oedema and corneal complications) was assessed by interviewing subjects at scheduled visits. Each symptom was rated on a scale of 0-3, where 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe. Efficacy Analysis Set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was a one-arm descriptive study; no hypothesis testing was performed. Descriptive statistics were provided. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Efficacy Analysis Set [9] - Efficacy Analysis Set, n=38, 38, 38, 38, 38, 38, 38, 38, 38, 36 [10] - Efficacy Analysis Set [11] - Efficacy Analysis Set |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All adverse events reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit.
|
||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||
Dictionary version |
13.0
|
||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Olopatadine
|
||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1-2 drops q.i.d. (4 times per day:, morning, afternoon, evening, and at bedtime) for 4 weeks | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No non-serious adverse events were reported in this study. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |