E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Wrinkles, fine lines |
Rimpels, fijne lijnen |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Wrinkles, fine lines |
Rimpels, fijne lijnen |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Not possible to specify |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the subjects’ satisfaction over time for the treatment of glabellar frown lines (GFL), horizontal forehead lines (HFL) and lateral periorbital wrinkles, with half the stand-ard dose of NT201 administered at more frequent intervals (intervention group; 2 months interval) and the standard dose (control group; 4 months interval) measured with an elec-tronic visual analogue scale (eVAS). |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
· To evaluate the client’s satisfaction 4 and 8 months after baseline compared with baseline for each of the treatment areas. · To compared the differences in client satisfaction of the intervention group com-pared with the control group during each visit for each of the different treatment ar-eas. · To evaluate improvement of the appearance at every study visit, using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). · To evaluate the wrinkle reduction using the Miravex Antera 3D imager, the Canfield Vectra H2 3D camera, and the respective Merz Aesthetics Scales. · To evaluate the changes in hydration, elasticity, transepidermal water loss and se-bum production in the treated areas. · To evaluate the impact on quality of life of clients in the intervention group and con-trol group.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
· Males or females, 18 to 65 years of age, inclusive; · General good health status · Symmetrical rhytids on both sides of the face, expressed by a Merz Aesthetics Scales score in dynamic ≥ 2 in all treatment areas; · Client overall satisfaction score 2 and ≤ 8 based on the eVAS Satisfaction Scale (0-10); · Able to participate and willing to give informed consent and comply with the study re-strictions.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
· Clients with known allergies or sensitivity to the drug or any components of the study medication; · Use of any agent that impedes the neuromuscular transmission, or other neuromus-cular diseases that could amplify the effects of botulinum toxin type A treatment (e.g. myasthenia gravis, excessive weakness, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or atrophy of target muscles); · Previous exposure to botulinum toxin < 6 months before the first treatment; · Has ever received a permanent filler in the upper face, or has received a temporary filler in the upper face in the last two years; · Presence of an infection, or any type of skin disease, in the treatment area; · Presence or history of a malignancy like melanoma in the treated area; · Grade 4 lines in one re more of the treatment areas expressed by the Merz Aesthetic Scales; · Marked asymmetry of the crow’s feet by 1 point on the Merz Aesthetic Scales; · Females who are pregnant, planning to get pregnant during the full duration of the study, or breastfeeding. · Clients with body dysmorphic disorder or related diagnosis in the DSM-V.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
- Satisfaction Scale - score of treatment satisfaction over time compared with baseline. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Before every treatment visit, and with the follow-up consult. 5 times in total. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
- Satisfaction Scale – score of treatment satisfaction before Treatment 3 (after 4 months), and at the Follow-up visit (after 8 months); - Satisfaction Scale – difference in satisfaction score between the IG and CG for each time point; - Merz Aesthetics Scales in dynamic - at least one-point improvement on the Merz Aesthetic Scales in each of the treatment areas; - GAIS - score of at least “improved”; - Antera 3D camera - Wrinkle depth quantification (mm); - Canfield Vectra H2 – Wrinkle depth quantification (mm); - MoistureMeter SC Compact - quantification of increase in hydration compared to baseline in the stratum corneum of the dermis (arbitrary units) compared with baseline; - ElastiMeter - quantification of increase in elasticity (instant skin elasticity [N/m]) compared with baseline; - VapoMeter - quantification of decrease in TEWL (evaporation rate value [g/m²h]) compared with baseline; - SebumScale - quantification of decrease in sebum production (amount of sebum [mg/cm²]) compared with baseline; - BeautyQoL - change in score on QoL.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Before every treatment visit, and with the follow-up consult. 5 times in total. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | Yes |
E.6.13.1 | Other scope of the trial description |
|
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Last client last visit |
Last client last visit |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |