E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 20.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10011401 |
E.1.2 | Term | Crohn's disease |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10017947 - Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the long-term safety and explore long-term efficacy of ozanimod for the treatment of subjects with moderately to severely active CD. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. Subjects who are not in clinical response and/or clinical remission after completing 12 weeks in the Induction Studies RPC01-3201 or RPC01-3202, subjects who experience relapse in the Maintenance Study RPC01-3203, subjects who complete the Maintenance Study RPC01- 3203, subjects who complete at least 1 year of RPC01 2201. 2. Subject should not have any constraints under local regulations, must provide written informed consent prior to any studyrelated procedures, and must have the ability to comply with the Table of Events. 3. Female subjects of childbearing potential (FCBP): Note: For the purposes of this study, a female subject is considered to be of childbearing potential if she 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy (the surgical removal of the uterus) or bilateral oophorectomy (the surgical removal of both ovaries) or 2) has not been postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (that is, has had menses at any time during the preceding 24 consecutive months). Must agree to practice a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study until completion of the 90-day Safety Follow-up Visit. Highly effective methods of contraception are those that alone or in combination result in a failure rate of a Pearl Index of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Examples of acceptable methods of birth control in the study are the following: • combined hormonal (containing oestrogen and progestogen) contraception, which may be oral, intravaginal, or transdermal • progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, which may be oral, injectable, or implantable • placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) • placement of an intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) • bilateral tubal occlusion • vasectomized partner • complete sexual abstinence Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), spermicides only, and lactational amenorrhoea method are not acceptable methods of contraception. Female condom and male condom should not be used together. Counseling about pregnancy precautions and the potential risks of fetal exposure must be conducted for FCBP. The Investigator will educate all FCBP about the different options of contraceptive methods or abstinence at Day 1, as appropriate. The subject will be re-educated every time her contraceptive measures/methods or ability to become pregnant changes. The female subject's chosen form of contraception must be effective by the time the female subject starts the study (for example, hormonal contraception should be initiated at least 28 days before Day 1). |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment: 4.3.1. Exclusions Related to General Health: 1. Subject has any clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, pulmonary [severe respiratory disease (pulmonary fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)], ophthalmological, endocrine, psychiatric, or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study difficult or that would put the subject at risk by participating in the study. 2. Subject is pregnant, lactating, or has a positive urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test. 3. Subject has suspected or diagnosed intra-abdominal or perianal abscess that has not been appropriately treated. 4.3.2. Exclusions Related to Medications: 4. Hypersensitivity to active ingredients or excipients of ozanimod 5. Subject has received any of the following therapies since the first dose of IP in the prior ozanimod study: • treatment with a biologic agent as well as other treatments for CD such as etrasimod, filgotinib, upadacitinib • treatment with an investigational agent other than ozanimod • treatment with D-penicillamine, leflunomide, thalidomide, natalizumab, fingolimod or other S1P modulators • treatment with lymphocyte-depleting therapies (eg, Campath®, anti- CD4, cladribine, rituximab, ocrelizumab, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, total body irradiation, bone marrow transplantation, alemtuzumab, daclizumab) 6. Subject is currently receiving or requires initiation of any of the following therapies: • treatment with corticosteroids at a dose that exceeds the prednisone equivalent of >40 mg • treatment with immunomodulatory agents (eg, AZA, 6-MP, or MTX) • chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (note: occasional use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen [eg, headache, arthritis, myalgias, or menstrual cramps] and aspirin up to 325 mg/day is permitted) • treatment with Class Ia or Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs, treatment with 2 or more agents in combination known to prolong PR interval, or treatment with additional prohibited systemic cardiac medication • treatment with breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine, eltrombopag) 7. Subject is receiving treatment with any of the following drugs or interventions within the corresponding timeframe: • CYP2C8 inducers (eg, rifampicin) • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (eg, selegiline, phenelzine) 4.3.3. Exclusions Related to Laboratory Resultsand Other Assessments: 8. Subject has any clinically significant abnormal results (eg, labs or ECG) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the subject at risk. 9. Subjects has a pre-dose resting HR < 55 bpm. One recheck is allowed at the Day 1 visit. If HR remains < 55 bpm at Day 1, one additional recheck is allowed at a later date within the available window for rollover from the previous study. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Key Efficacy Endpoints: • Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score of < 150 • Proportion of subjects with a SES-CD decrease from baseline of ≥ 50% • Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 points with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline • Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of ≥ 100 points or CDAI score of < 150 • Proportion of subjects with absence of ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm with no segment with any ulcerated surface ≥ 10% • Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of ≥ 70 points • Change from baseline in CDAI • Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of ≥ 100 points or CDAI score of < 150 and SES-CD decrease from baseline of ≥ 50% • Proportion of subjects with CDAI score of < 150 and SES-CD ≤ 4 points and a SES CD decrease ≥ 2 points • Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 points and a stool frequency no worse than baseline and SES-CD ≤ 4 points and a SES-CD decrease ≥ 2 points • Proportion of subjects with SES-CD ≤ 4 points and a SES-CD decrease ≥ 2 points • Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score < 150 in subjects off corticosteroids • Proportion of subjects with a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) decrease from baseline of ≥ 50% Exploratory Endpoints: • Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 points with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline, and SES-CD decrease from baseline ≥ 50% • Efficacy in subjects (clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement) as a function of baseline and change-frombaseline in biomarkers (eg, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, highdensity lipoprotein, IgA, IL-7) • To assess impact of SARS-CoV-2 serologic status on subjects receiving ozanimod and CD. - Exploratory measurements of SARS-CoV-2 serology (anti-SARS-CoV-2 total or IgG), from serum samples collected every 48 weeks. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Due to the open-label nature of the study and the lack of a control group, all data will be summarized and no hypothesis testing will be performed. Each efficacy endpoint will be summarized and 95% confidence intervals around the estimates may also be presented. All efficacy data will be listed. For all proportion-based efficacy endpoints, subjects with missing efficacy data will be considered non-responders. For continuous efficacy endpoints, subjects with missing data will have their last post baseline value carried forward. Observed-cases analyses will also be presented for all efficacy endpoints.
|
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | No |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | No |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 1 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 6 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 213 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Argentina |
New Zealand |
Singapore |
Switzerland |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Moldova, Republic of |
Ukraine |
Ireland |
Hong Kong |
Puerto Rico |
Taiwan |
Australia |
Austria |
Belarus |
Belgium |
Brazil |
Bulgaria |
Canada |
China |
Croatia |
Czechia |
Denmark |
Finland |
France |
Georgia |
Germany |
Greece |
Hungary |
Israel |
Italy |
Japan |
Korea, Republic of |
Latvia |
Lithuania |
Mexico |
Netherlands |
Norway |
Poland |
Portugal |
Romania |
Russian Federation |
Saudi Arabia |
Serbia |
Slovakia |
Slovenia |
South Africa |
Spain |
Sweden |
Turkey |
United Kingdom |
United States |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of study is defined as either the date of the last visit of the last subject to complete the safety follow-up, or the date of receipt of the last datapoint from the last subject that is required for primary or secondary analysis, as pre-specified in the protocol, whichever is the later date. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 9 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 7 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |