Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2018-000269-36
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:HIPAIN
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2018-04-09
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2018-000269-36
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of two techniques against chronic hip pain: cooled radiofrequency over sensitive nerves of the hip, compared to intraarticular injection of steroids and local anestethic under fluoroscopic guidance on the hip.

    Estudio piloto, prospectivo, aleatorizado para comparar la eficacia de dos técnicas contra el dolor crónico de cadera: radiofrecuencia cooled sobre la inervación sensitiva de la cadera y la infiltración intra-articular de anestésico local y corticoide.
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of two techniques against chronic hip pain: radiofrequency over sensitive nerves of the hip, compared injection of steroids and local anestethic into the hip.
    Estudio para comparar la eficacia de dos técnicas contra el dolor crónico de cadera: radiofrecuencia cooled sobre la inervación sensitiva de la cadera y infiltración en la cadera de anestésico local y corticoide.
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    Randomized trial: radiofrequency versus intraarticular local anesthestic and steroids.
    Estudio piloto, prospectivo, aleatorizado para comparar la eficacia de dos técnicas contra el dolor
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberHIPAIN
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorJORGE ORDUÑA VALLS
    B.1.3.4CountrySpain
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportHospital Clinico Universitario
    B.4.2CountrySpain
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationINCLIVA
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointJORGE ORDUNA
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressMENENDEZ Y PELAYO 4
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityVALENCIA
    B.5.3.3Post code46010
    B.5.3.4CountrySpain
    B.5.4Telephone number0034961973514
    B.5.6E-maildr.orduna.dolor@gmail.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name TRIGON DEPOT
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderBristol-Myers Squibb, S.A
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationSpain
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nametriamcinolone acetonide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection/infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntraarticular use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNTRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE
    D.3.9.1CAS number 76-25-5
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB04936MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number4
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Chronic Hip Pain by Osteoarthrosis
    Dolor crónico de cadera por Artrosis
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Chronic hip pain secondary a arthoris
    Dolor de cadera por artrosis
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of two techniques against chronic hip pain: cooled radiofrequency over sensitive nerves of the hip, compared to intraarticular injection of steroids and local anestethic under fluoroscopic guidance on the hip.
    Comparar la eficacia de dos técnicas contra el dolor crónico de cadera: radiofrecuencia cooled sobre la inervación sensitiva de la cadera y la infiltración intra-articular de anestésico local y corticoide.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial


    638/5000
    - To compare the improvement of the functional capacity of patients subjected to radiofrequency cooled compared to those treated by intra-articular injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid measured by the WOMAC and Oxford Hip score scales.
    -Compare the duration of the clinical improvement in terms of pain reduction quantified by the VAS scale (visual analog scale) a year after the application of both techniques.
    - To compare the improvement of the quality of life of patients subjected to cooled radiofrequency compared to those treated by intra-articular injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid as measured by the SF 36 scale.
    -Comparar la mejoría de la capacidad funcional de los pacientes sometidos a radiofrecuencia cooled respecto a los tratados mediante inyección intra articular de anestésico local y corticoide medida por las escalas WOMAC y Oxford Hip score.
    -Comparar la duración de la mejoría clínica en términos de reducción de dolor cuantificada por la escala VAS (escala visual analógica) al año tras la aplicación de ambas técnicas.
    - Comparar la mejoría de la calidad de vida de los pacientes sometidos a radiofrecuencia cooled respecto a los tratados mediante inyección intra articular de anestésico local y corticoide medida por la escala SF 36.

    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1- Patient over 18 years old.
    2- Chronic hip pain (more than 3 months) that has not responded to conservative treatment, pharmacological therapy, physiotherapy or TENS).
    3- Mechanical pain in the affected limb with a VAS of at least 50 mm during ambulation.
    4- Patients for whom it is possible to carry out all the scheduled visits of the study, with the capacity to attend within the established deadlines for the control visits.
    5- Greater than 50% improvement in the VAS scale after the two anesthetic blocks performed with local anesthetics of different duration (levobupivacaine 0.25% and mepivacaine 2%)
    6- Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis determined with degrees Kellgren-Lawrence II, III, IV.
    7- Stable doses of analgesics at least 30 days before starting the study.
    8- Patients who have performed the Oxford Hip Score and WOMAC test 3 months or less before the study.
    9- Absence of allergy or adverse events known to any of the medications administered: local anesthetics of amide group and iodinated contrasts.
    10-Negative pregnancy test (women of childbearing age) and commitment to guarantee contraception during the study
    1- Paciente mayor a 18 años.
    2- Dolor de cadera crónico (más de 3 meses) que no ha respondido a tratamiento conservador, terapia farmacológica, fisioterapia o TENS).
    3- Dolor de tipo mecánico en el miembro afectado con un VAS de al menos 50 mm durante la deambulación.
    4- Pacientes para los que es posible realizar todas las visitas programadas del estudio, con capacidad para acudir en los plazos establecidos a las visitas de control.
    5- Mejoría mayor al 50% en la escala VAS tras los dos bloqueos anestésicos realizados con anestésicos locales de diferente duración (levobupivacaina 0,25% y mepivacaina 2%)
    6- Osteoartrosis moderada a severa determinada con grados Kellgren-Lawrence II, III, IV.
    7- Dosis estables de analgésicos al menos durante 30 días antes de iniciar el estudio.
    8- Pacientes que han realizado el test Oxford Hip Score y WOMAC 3 meses o menos antes del estudio.
    9- Ausencia de alergia o eventos adversos conocidos a alguno de los medicamentos administrados: anestésicos locales de grupo amida y contrastes iodados.
    10-Test de embarazo negativo (mujeres en edad fértil) y compromiso de garantizar la anticoncepción durante el estudio
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1- Signs of alarm or infection in the joint affects.
    2- Signs of active infection, immunosuppression or active HIV.
    3- Severe psychiatric illnesses.
    4-Patient carrier of hip prosthesis.
    5- Pain added to an unexplained weight loss of more than 5% 90 days or less before the start of the study.
    6- Pain of root origin established in the affected limb, or neurodegenerative diseases of the peripheral nervous system.
    7- Patients with basic tumor pathology or who have had cancer in the five years prior to inclusion.
    8- Alterations of the coagulation or taking of anticoagulants / antiaggregants (except aspirin 150 or 300 mg / day) at the beginning of the study, which can not be suspended for basic pathology during a prudent interval for the realization of the technique.
    9- Patient who has participated in a clinical study for the previous 30 days in which interventions are performed that may affect the results of the study.
    10- Patient with a diagnosis of disorder due to substance abuse or alcoholism.
    11- Patient who is in process for the award of a disability or degree of disability.
    12- Pregnant or lactating patient.
    13- Patient under treatment with opioids with doses greater than the equivalent to 90 milligrams of oral morphine / day.
    1- Signos de alarma o infección en la articulación afecta.
    2- Signos de infección activa, inmunosupresión o VIH activo.
    3- Enfermedades psiquiátricas severas.
    4-Paciente portador de prótesis de cadera.
    5- Dolor sumado a una pérdida no explicada de peso de más del 5% 90 días o menos antes del inicio del estudio.
    6- Dolor de origen radicular establecido en la extremidad afectada, o enfermedades neurodegenerativas del Sistema nervioso periférico.
    7- Pacientes con patología tumoral de base o que hayan tenido cáncer en los cinco años previos a la inclusión.
    8- Alteraciones de la coagulación o toma de anticoagulantes/antiagregantes (salvo aspirina 150 o 300 mg/día) al inicio del estudio, que no puedan ser suspendidos por patología de base durante un intervalo prudente para la realización de la técnica.
    9- Paciente que haya participado en un estudio clínico los 30 días previos en los que se realizan intervenciones que pueden afectar a los resultados del estudio.
    10- Paciente con diagnóstico de trastorno por abuso de sustancias o alcoholismo.
    11- Paciente que se encuentre en trámites para la adjudicación de una baja o grado de incapacidad.
    12- Paciente embarazada o en periodo de lactancia.
    13- Paciente bajo tratamiento con opioides con dosis mayores que la equivalente a 90 miligramos de morfina oral/día.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    a)-Improvement more than 50% in VAS score in patients under treatment with Intraarticular injection or cooled radiofrequency
    b)-Duration of the clinical effect in terms of pain reduction (quantified by a 50% reduction in the VAS scale with respect to the baseline level)
    - Porcentaje de sujetos con mejoría en los dos grupos definido como reducción del VAS mayor al 50 % respecto al basal a los tres meses desde la aplicación de la técnica.
    -Comparar la persistencia del efecto clínico en términos de reducción de dolor (cuantificada por una reducción del 50% en la escala VAS respecto al nivel basal) a los seis meses tras la aplicación de la radiofrecuencia cooled sobre ramas nerviosas sensitivas de la cadera respecto a la inyección intra articular
    de anestésico local y corticoide.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    a)-3 months
    b)-6 months
    a)3 meses
    b) 6 meses
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    - Compare the improvement of the functional capacity of patients subjected to radiofrequency cooled compared to those treated by intra-articular injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid measured by the WOMAC and Oxford Hip score scales.
    -Compare the duration of the clinical improvement in terms of pain reduction quantified by the VAS scale (visual analog scale) a year after the application of both techniques.
    - To compare the improvement of the quality of life of patients subjected to cooled radiofrequency compared to those treated by intra-articular injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid as measured by the SF 36 scale.
    -Comparar la mejoría de la capacidad funcional de los pacientes sometidos a radiofrecuencia cooled respecto a los tratados mediante inyección intra articular de anestésico local y corticoide medida por las escalas WOMAC y Oxford Hip score.
    -Comparar la duración de la mejoría clínica en términos de reducción de dolor cuantificada por la escala VAS (escala visual analógica) al año tras la aplicación de ambas técnicas.
    - Comparar la mejoría de la calidad de vida de los pacientes sometidos a radiofrecuencia cooled respecto a los tratados mediante inyección intra articular de anestésico local y corticoide medida por la escala SF 36.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    -One month from treatments day.
    -Thee months from treatments day.
    -Six Months from treatments day.
    -12 Months from treatments day.
    -24 Months from treatments day.
    - Un mes tras el tratamiento
    - Tres meses tras el tratamiento
    - Seis meses tras el tratamiento
    - 12 meses tras el tratamiento
    - 24 meses tras el tratamiento
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety No
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind Yes
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    cooled radiofrequency
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 20
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 20
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state20
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    None
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2018-05-23
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2018-04-26
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat May 03 01:20:47 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA